devcoredump : Serialize devcd_del work

In following scenario(diagram), when one thread X running dev_coredumpm()
adds devcd device to the framework which sends uevent notification to
userspace and another thread Y reads this uevent and call to
devcd_data_write() which eventually try to delete the queued timer that
is not initialized/queued yet.

So, debug object reports some warning and in the meantime, timer is
initialized and queued from X path. and from Y path, it gets reinitialized
again and timer->entry.pprev=NULL and try_to_grab_pending() stucks.

To fix this, introduce mutex and a boolean flag to serialize the behaviour.

 	cpu0(X)			                cpu1(Y)

    dev_coredump() uevent sent to user space
    device_add()  ======================> user space process Y reads the
                                          uevents writes to devcd fd
                                          which results into writes to

                                         devcd_data_write()
                                           mod_delayed_work()
                                             try_to_grab_pending()
                                               del_timer()
                                                 debug_assert_init()
   INIT_DELAYED_WORK()
   schedule_delayed_work()
                                                   debug_object_fixup()
                                                     timer_fixup_assert_init()
                                                       timer_setup()
                                                         do_init_timer()
                                                       /*
                                                        Above call reinitializes
                                                        the timer to
                                                        timer->entry.pprev=NULL
                                                        and this will be checked
                                                        later in timer_pending() call.
                                                       */
                                                 timer_pending()
                                                  !hlist_unhashed_lockless(&timer->entry)
                                                    !h->pprev
                                                /*
                                                  del_timer() checks h->pprev and finds
                                                  it to be NULL due to which
                                                  try_to_grab_pending() stucks.
                                                */

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/2e1f81e2-428c-f11f-ce92-eb11048cb271@quicinc.com/
Signed-off-by: Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@quicinc.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1663073424-13663-1-git-send-email-quic_mojha@quicinc.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Mukesh Ojha 2022-09-13 18:20:24 +05:30 committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman
parent b8de524ce4
commit 01daccf748

View File

@ -25,6 +25,47 @@ struct devcd_entry {
struct device devcd_dev;
void *data;
size_t datalen;
/*
* Here, mutex is required to serialize the calls to del_wk work between
* user/kernel space which happens when devcd is added with device_add()
* and that sends uevent to user space. User space reads the uevents,
* and calls to devcd_data_write() which try to modify the work which is
* not even initialized/queued from devcoredump.
*
*
*
* cpu0(X) cpu1(Y)
*
* dev_coredump() uevent sent to user space
* device_add() ======================> user space process Y reads the
* uevents writes to devcd fd
* which results into writes to
*
* devcd_data_write()
* mod_delayed_work()
* try_to_grab_pending()
* del_timer()
* debug_assert_init()
* INIT_DELAYED_WORK()
* schedule_delayed_work()
*
*
* Also, mutex alone would not be enough to avoid scheduling of
* del_wk work after it get flush from a call to devcd_free()
* mentioned as below.
*
* disabled_store()
* devcd_free()
* mutex_lock() devcd_data_write()
* flush_delayed_work()
* mutex_unlock()
* mutex_lock()
* mod_delayed_work()
* mutex_unlock()
* So, delete_work flag is required.
*/
struct mutex mutex;
bool delete_work;
struct module *owner;
ssize_t (*read)(char *buffer, loff_t offset, size_t count,
void *data, size_t datalen);
@ -84,7 +125,12 @@ static ssize_t devcd_data_write(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
struct device *dev = kobj_to_dev(kobj);
struct devcd_entry *devcd = dev_to_devcd(dev);
mod_delayed_work(system_wq, &devcd->del_wk, 0);
mutex_lock(&devcd->mutex);
if (!devcd->delete_work) {
devcd->delete_work = true;
mod_delayed_work(system_wq, &devcd->del_wk, 0);
}
mutex_unlock(&devcd->mutex);
return count;
}
@ -112,7 +158,12 @@ static int devcd_free(struct device *dev, void *data)
{
struct devcd_entry *devcd = dev_to_devcd(dev);
mutex_lock(&devcd->mutex);
if (!devcd->delete_work)
devcd->delete_work = true;
flush_delayed_work(&devcd->del_wk);
mutex_unlock(&devcd->mutex);
return 0;
}
@ -122,6 +173,30 @@ static ssize_t disabled_show(struct class *class, struct class_attribute *attr,
return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", devcd_disabled);
}
/*
*
* disabled_store() worker()
* class_for_each_device(&devcd_class,
* NULL, NULL, devcd_free)
* ...
* ...
* while ((dev = class_dev_iter_next(&iter))
* devcd_del()
* device_del()
* put_device() <- last reference
* error = fn(dev, data) devcd_dev_release()
* devcd_free(dev, data) kfree(devcd)
* mutex_lock(&devcd->mutex);
*
*
* In the above diagram, It looks like disabled_store() would be racing with parallely
* running devcd_del() and result in memory abort while acquiring devcd->mutex which
* is called after kfree of devcd memory after dropping its last reference with
* put_device(). However, this will not happens as fn(dev, data) runs
* with its own reference to device via klist_node so it is not its last reference.
* so, above situation would not occur.
*/
static ssize_t disabled_store(struct class *class, struct class_attribute *attr,
const char *buf, size_t count)
{
@ -278,13 +353,16 @@ void dev_coredumpm(struct device *dev, struct module *owner,
devcd->read = read;
devcd->free = free;
devcd->failing_dev = get_device(dev);
devcd->delete_work = false;
mutex_init(&devcd->mutex);
device_initialize(&devcd->devcd_dev);
dev_set_name(&devcd->devcd_dev, "devcd%d",
atomic_inc_return(&devcd_count));
devcd->devcd_dev.class = &devcd_class;
mutex_lock(&devcd->mutex);
if (device_add(&devcd->devcd_dev))
goto put_device;
@ -301,10 +379,11 @@ void dev_coredumpm(struct device *dev, struct module *owner,
INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&devcd->del_wk, devcd_del);
schedule_delayed_work(&devcd->del_wk, DEVCD_TIMEOUT);
mutex_unlock(&devcd->mutex);
return;
put_device:
put_device(&devcd->devcd_dev);
mutex_unlock(&devcd->mutex);
put_module:
module_put(owner);
free: