2017-05-14 16:32:50 +00:00
|
|
|
===================================
|
2009-09-08 23:49:37 +00:00
|
|
|
Using flexible arrays in the kernel
|
2017-05-14 16:32:50 +00:00
|
|
|
===================================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:Updated: Last updated for 2.6.32
|
|
|
|
:Author: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
|
2009-09-08 23:49:37 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large contiguous memory allocations can be unreliable in the Linux kernel.
|
|
|
|
Kernel programmers will sometimes respond to this problem by allocating
|
|
|
|
pages with vmalloc(). This solution not ideal, though. On 32-bit systems,
|
|
|
|
memory from vmalloc() must be mapped into a relatively small address space;
|
|
|
|
it's easy to run out. On SMP systems, the page table changes required by
|
|
|
|
vmalloc() allocations can require expensive cross-processor interrupts on
|
|
|
|
all CPUs. And, on all systems, use of space in the vmalloc() range
|
|
|
|
increases pressure on the translation lookaside buffer (TLB), reducing the
|
|
|
|
performance of the system.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In many cases, the need for memory from vmalloc() can be eliminated by
|
|
|
|
piecing together an array from smaller parts; the flexible array library
|
|
|
|
exists to make this task easier.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A flexible array holds an arbitrary (within limits) number of fixed-sized
|
|
|
|
objects, accessed via an integer index. Sparse arrays are handled
|
|
|
|
reasonably well. Only single-page allocations are made, so memory
|
|
|
|
allocation failures should be relatively rare. The down sides are that the
|
|
|
|
arrays cannot be indexed directly, individual object size cannot exceed the
|
|
|
|
system page size, and putting data into a flexible array requires a copy
|
|
|
|
operation. It's also worth noting that flexible arrays do no internal
|
|
|
|
locking at all; if concurrent access to an array is possible, then the
|
|
|
|
caller must arrange for appropriate mutual exclusion.
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-14 16:32:50 +00:00
|
|
|
The creation of a flexible array is done with::
|
2009-09-08 23:49:37 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/flex_array.h>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct flex_array *flex_array_alloc(int element_size,
|
|
|
|
unsigned int total,
|
|
|
|
gfp_t flags);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The individual object size is provided by element_size, while total is the
|
|
|
|
maximum number of objects which can be stored in the array. The flags
|
|
|
|
argument is passed directly to the internal memory allocation calls. With
|
|
|
|
the current code, using flags to ask for high memory is likely to lead to
|
|
|
|
notably unpleasant side effects.
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-14 16:32:50 +00:00
|
|
|
It is also possible to define flexible arrays at compile time with::
|
2009-10-14 18:43:22 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEFINE_FLEX_ARRAY(name, element_size, total);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This macro will result in a definition of an array with the given name; the
|
|
|
|
element size and total will be checked for validity at compile time.
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-14 16:32:50 +00:00
|
|
|
Storing data into a flexible array is accomplished with a call to::
|
2009-09-08 23:49:37 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
int flex_array_put(struct flex_array *array, unsigned int element_nr,
|
|
|
|
void *src, gfp_t flags);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This call will copy the data from src into the array, in the position
|
|
|
|
indicated by element_nr (which must be less than the maximum specified when
|
|
|
|
the array was created). If any memory allocations must be performed, flags
|
|
|
|
will be used. The return value is zero on success, a negative error code
|
|
|
|
otherwise.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There might possibly be a need to store data into a flexible array while
|
|
|
|
running in some sort of atomic context; in this situation, sleeping in the
|
|
|
|
memory allocator would be a bad thing. That can be avoided by using
|
|
|
|
GFP_ATOMIC for the flags value, but, often, there is a better way. The
|
|
|
|
trick is to ensure that any needed memory allocations are done before
|
2017-05-14 16:32:50 +00:00
|
|
|
entering atomic context, using::
|
2009-09-08 23:49:37 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
int flex_array_prealloc(struct flex_array *array, unsigned int start,
|
2011-04-28 19:55:52 +00:00
|
|
|
unsigned int nr_elements, gfp_t flags);
|
2009-09-08 23:49:37 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This function will ensure that memory for the elements indexed in the range
|
2011-04-28 19:55:52 +00:00
|
|
|
defined by start and nr_elements has been allocated. Thereafter, a
|
2009-09-08 23:49:37 +00:00
|
|
|
flex_array_put() call on an element in that range is guaranteed not to
|
|
|
|
block.
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-14 16:32:50 +00:00
|
|
|
Getting data back out of the array is done with::
|
2009-09-08 23:49:37 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void *flex_array_get(struct flex_array *fa, unsigned int element_nr);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The return value is a pointer to the data element, or NULL if that
|
|
|
|
particular element has never been allocated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note that it is possible to get back a valid pointer for an element which
|
|
|
|
has never been stored in the array. Memory for array elements is allocated
|
|
|
|
one page at a time; a single allocation could provide memory for several
|
2009-10-14 18:43:22 +00:00
|
|
|
adjacent elements. Flexible array elements are normally initialized to the
|
|
|
|
value FLEX_ARRAY_FREE (defined as 0x6c in <linux/poison.h>), so errors
|
|
|
|
involving that number probably result from use of unstored array entries.
|
|
|
|
Note that, if array elements are allocated with __GFP_ZERO, they will be
|
|
|
|
initialized to zero and this poisoning will not happen.
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-14 16:32:50 +00:00
|
|
|
Individual elements in the array can be cleared with::
|
2009-10-14 18:43:22 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
int flex_array_clear(struct flex_array *array, unsigned int element_nr);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This function will set the given element to FLEX_ARRAY_FREE and return
|
|
|
|
zero. If storage for the indicated element is not allocated for the array,
|
|
|
|
flex_array_clear() will return -EINVAL instead. Note that clearing an
|
|
|
|
element does not release the storage associated with it; to reduce the
|
2017-05-14 16:32:50 +00:00
|
|
|
allocated size of an array, call::
|
2009-10-14 18:43:22 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
int flex_array_shrink(struct flex_array *array);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The return value will be the number of pages of memory actually freed.
|
|
|
|
This function works by scanning the array for pages containing nothing but
|
|
|
|
FLEX_ARRAY_FREE bytes, so (1) it can be expensive, and (2) it will not work
|
|
|
|
if the array's pages are allocated with __GFP_ZERO.
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-14 16:32:50 +00:00
|
|
|
It is possible to remove all elements of an array with a call to::
|
2009-09-08 23:49:37 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void flex_array_free_parts(struct flex_array *array);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This call frees all elements, but leaves the array itself in place.
|
2017-05-14 16:32:50 +00:00
|
|
|
Freeing the entire array is done with::
|
2009-09-08 23:49:37 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void flex_array_free(struct flex_array *array);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of this writing, there are no users of flexible arrays in the mainline
|
|
|
|
kernel. The functions described here are also not exported to modules;
|
|
|
|
that will probably be fixed when somebody comes up with a need for it.
|