linux/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c

1053 lines
23 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* pseries Memory Hotplug infrastructure.
*
* Copyright (C) 2008 Badari Pulavarty, IBM Corporation
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
* modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
* as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version
* 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
*/
powerpc/pseries: Create new device hotplug entry point The current hotplug (or dlpar) of devices (the process is generally the same for memory, cpu, and pci) on PowerVM systems is initiated from the HMC, which communicates the request to the partitions through the RSCT framework. The RSCT framework then invokes the drmgr command. The drmgr command performs the hotplug operation by doing some pieces, such as most of the rtas calls and device tree parsing, in userspace and make requests to the kernel to online/offline the device, update the device tree and add/remove the device. For PowerKVM the approach for device hotplug is to follow what is currently being done for pci hotplug. A hotplug request is initiated from the host. QEMU then generates an EPOW interrupt to the guest which causes the guest to make the rtas,check-exception call. In QEMU, the rtas,check-exception call returns a rtas hotplug event to the guest. Please note that the current pci hotplug path for PowerKVM involves the kernel receiving the rtas hotplug event, passing it to rtas_errd in userspace, and having rtas_errd invoke drmgr. The drmgr command then handles the request as described above for PowerVM systems. There is no need for this circuitous route, we should just handle the entire hotplug of devices in the kernel. What I am planning is to enable this by moving the code to handle hotplug from drmgr into the kernel to provide a single path for handling device hotplug for both PowerVM and PowerKVM systems. This patch provides the common iframework and entry point. For PowerKVM a future update to the kernel rtas code will recognize rtas hotplug events returned from rtas,check-exception calls and use the common entry point to handle hotplug of the device. For PowerVM systems, This patch creates /sys/kernel/dlpar that can be used by the drmgr command to initiate hotplug requests. In order to do this a string of the format "<resource> <action> <id_type> <id>" is written to this file. The string consists of a resource (cpu, memory, pci, phb), an action (add or remove), an id_type (count, drc index, drc name), and the corresponding id. The kernel will parse the string and create a rtas hotplug section that can be passed to the common entry point for handling hotplug requests. It should be noted that there is no chance of updating how we receive hotplug (dlpar) requests from the HMC on PowerVM systems. Signed-off-by: Nathan Fontenot <nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2015-02-10 19:47:02 +00:00
#define pr_fmt(fmt) "pseries-hotplug-mem: " fmt
#include <linux/of.h>
#include <linux/of_address.h>
#include <linux/memblock.h>
#include <linux/memory.h>
#include <linux/memory_hotplug.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <asm/firmware.h>
#include <asm/machdep.h>
#include <asm/prom.h>
#include <asm/sparsemem.h>
#include <asm/fadump.h>
#include <asm/drmem.h>
#include "pseries.h"
static bool rtas_hp_event;
unsigned long pseries_memory_block_size(void)
{
struct device_node *np;
unsigned int memblock_size = MIN_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE;
struct resource r;
np = of_find_node_by_path("/ibm,dynamic-reconfiguration-memory");
if (np) {
const __be64 *size;
size = of_get_property(np, "ibm,lmb-size", NULL);
if (size)
memblock_size = be64_to_cpup(size);
of_node_put(np);
} else if (machine_is(pseries)) {
/* This fallback really only applies to pseries */
unsigned int memzero_size = 0;
np = of_find_node_by_path("/memory@0");
if (np) {
if (!of_address_to_resource(np, 0, &r))
memzero_size = resource_size(&r);
of_node_put(np);
}
if (memzero_size) {
/* We now know the size of memory@0, use this to find
* the first memoryblock and get its size.
*/
char buf[64];
sprintf(buf, "/memory@%x", memzero_size);
np = of_find_node_by_path(buf);
if (np) {
if (!of_address_to_resource(np, 0, &r))
memblock_size = resource_size(&r);
of_node_put(np);
}
}
}
return memblock_size;
}
static void dlpar_free_property(struct property *prop)
{
kfree(prop->name);
kfree(prop->value);
kfree(prop);
}
static struct property *dlpar_clone_property(struct property *prop,
u32 prop_size)
{
struct property *new_prop;
new_prop = kzalloc(sizeof(*new_prop), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!new_prop)
return NULL;
new_prop->name = kstrdup(prop->name, GFP_KERNEL);
new_prop->value = kzalloc(prop_size, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!new_prop->name || !new_prop->value) {
dlpar_free_property(new_prop);
return NULL;
}
memcpy(new_prop->value, prop->value, prop->length);
new_prop->length = prop_size;
of_property_set_flag(new_prop, OF_DYNAMIC);
return new_prop;
}
static bool find_aa_index(struct device_node *dr_node,
struct property *ala_prop,
const u32 *lmb_assoc, u32 *aa_index)
{
u32 *assoc_arrays, new_prop_size;
struct property *new_prop;
int aa_arrays, aa_array_entries, aa_array_sz;
int i, index;
/*
* The ibm,associativity-lookup-arrays property is defined to be
* a 32-bit value specifying the number of associativity arrays
* followed by a 32-bitvalue specifying the number of entries per
* array, followed by the associativity arrays.
*/
assoc_arrays = ala_prop->value;
aa_arrays = be32_to_cpu(assoc_arrays[0]);
aa_array_entries = be32_to_cpu(assoc_arrays[1]);
aa_array_sz = aa_array_entries * sizeof(u32);
for (i = 0; i < aa_arrays; i++) {
index = (i * aa_array_entries) + 2;
if (memcmp(&assoc_arrays[index], &lmb_assoc[1], aa_array_sz))
continue;
*aa_index = i;
return true;
}
new_prop_size = ala_prop->length + aa_array_sz;
new_prop = dlpar_clone_property(ala_prop, new_prop_size);
if (!new_prop)
return false;
assoc_arrays = new_prop->value;
/* increment the number of entries in the lookup array */
assoc_arrays[0] = cpu_to_be32(aa_arrays + 1);
/* copy the new associativity into the lookup array */
index = aa_arrays * aa_array_entries + 2;
memcpy(&assoc_arrays[index], &lmb_assoc[1], aa_array_sz);
of_update_property(dr_node, new_prop);
/*
* The associativity lookup array index for this lmb is
* number of entries - 1 since we added its associativity
* to the end of the lookup array.
*/
*aa_index = be32_to_cpu(assoc_arrays[0]) - 1;
return true;
}
static int update_lmb_associativity_index(struct drmem_lmb *lmb)
{
struct device_node *parent, *lmb_node, *dr_node;
struct property *ala_prop;
const u32 *lmb_assoc;
u32 aa_index;
bool found;
parent = of_find_node_by_path("/");
if (!parent)
return -ENODEV;
lmb_node = dlpar_configure_connector(cpu_to_be32(lmb->drc_index),
parent);
of_node_put(parent);
if (!lmb_node)
return -EINVAL;
lmb_assoc = of_get_property(lmb_node, "ibm,associativity", NULL);
if (!lmb_assoc) {
dlpar_free_cc_nodes(lmb_node);
return -ENODEV;
}
dr_node = of_find_node_by_path("/ibm,dynamic-reconfiguration-memory");
if (!dr_node) {
dlpar_free_cc_nodes(lmb_node);
return -ENODEV;
}
ala_prop = of_find_property(dr_node, "ibm,associativity-lookup-arrays",
NULL);
if (!ala_prop) {
of_node_put(dr_node);
dlpar_free_cc_nodes(lmb_node);
return -ENODEV;
}
found = find_aa_index(dr_node, ala_prop, lmb_assoc, &aa_index);
of_node_put(dr_node);
dlpar_free_cc_nodes(lmb_node);
if (!found) {
pr_err("Could not find LMB associativity\n");
return -1;
}
lmb->aa_index = aa_index;
return 0;
}
static struct memory_block *lmb_to_memblock(struct drmem_lmb *lmb)
{
unsigned long section_nr;
struct mem_section *mem_sect;
struct memory_block *mem_block;
section_nr = pfn_to_section_nr(PFN_DOWN(lmb->base_addr));
mem_sect = __nr_to_section(section_nr);
mem_block = find_memory_block(mem_sect);
return mem_block;
}
static int get_lmb_range(u32 drc_index, int n_lmbs,
struct drmem_lmb **start_lmb,
struct drmem_lmb **end_lmb)
{
struct drmem_lmb *lmb, *start, *end;
struct drmem_lmb *last_lmb;
start = NULL;
for_each_drmem_lmb(lmb) {
if (lmb->drc_index == drc_index) {
start = lmb;
break;
}
}
if (!start)
return -EINVAL;
end = &start[n_lmbs - 1];
last_lmb = &drmem_info->lmbs[drmem_info->n_lmbs - 1];
if (end > last_lmb)
return -EINVAL;
*start_lmb = start;
*end_lmb = end;
return 0;
}
static int dlpar_change_lmb_state(struct drmem_lmb *lmb, bool online)
powerpc/pseries: Check memory device state before onlining/offlining When DLPAR adding or removing memory we need to check the device offline status before trying to online/offline the memory. This is needed because calls to device_online() and device_offline() will return non-zero for memory that is already online and offline respectively. This update resolves two scenarios. First, for a kernel built with auto-online memory enabled (CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG_DEFAULT_ONLINE=y), memory will be onlined as part of calls to add_memory(). After adding the memory the pseries DLPAR code tries to online it and fails since the memory is already online. The DLPAR code then tries to remove the memory which produces the oops message below because the memory is not offline. The second scenario occurs when removing memory that is already offline, i.e. marking memory offline (via sysfs) and then trying to remove that memory. This doesn't work because offlining the already offline memory does not succeed and the DLPAR code then fails the DLPAR remove operation. The fix for both scenarios is to check the device.offline status before making the calls to device_online() or device_offline(). kernel BUG at mm/memory_hotplug.c:1936! ... NIP [c0000000002ca428] .remove_memory+0xb8/0xc0 LR [c0000000002ca3cc] .remove_memory+0x5c/0xc0 Call Trace: .remove_memory+0x5c/0xc0 (unreliable) .dlpar_add_lmb+0x384/0x400 .dlpar_memory+0x5dc/0xca0 .handle_dlpar_errorlog+0x74/0xe0 .pseries_hp_work_fn+0x2c/0x90 .process_one_work+0x17c/0x460 .worker_thread+0x88/0x500 .kthread+0x15c/0x1a0 .ret_from_kernel_thread+0x58/0xc0 Fixes: 943db62c316c ("powerpc/pseries: Revert 'Auto-online hotplugged memory'") Signed-off-by: Nathan Fontenot <nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [mpe: Use bool, add explicit rc=0 case, change log typos & formatting] Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-08-02 18:03:22 +00:00
{
struct memory_block *mem_block;
int rc;
mem_block = lmb_to_memblock(lmb);
if (!mem_block)
return -EINVAL;
if (online && mem_block->dev.offline)
rc = device_online(&mem_block->dev);
else if (!online && !mem_block->dev.offline)
rc = device_offline(&mem_block->dev);
else
rc = 0;
put_device(&mem_block->dev);
return rc;
}
static int dlpar_online_lmb(struct drmem_lmb *lmb)
powerpc/pseries: Check memory device state before onlining/offlining When DLPAR adding or removing memory we need to check the device offline status before trying to online/offline the memory. This is needed because calls to device_online() and device_offline() will return non-zero for memory that is already online and offline respectively. This update resolves two scenarios. First, for a kernel built with auto-online memory enabled (CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG_DEFAULT_ONLINE=y), memory will be onlined as part of calls to add_memory(). After adding the memory the pseries DLPAR code tries to online it and fails since the memory is already online. The DLPAR code then tries to remove the memory which produces the oops message below because the memory is not offline. The second scenario occurs when removing memory that is already offline, i.e. marking memory offline (via sysfs) and then trying to remove that memory. This doesn't work because offlining the already offline memory does not succeed and the DLPAR code then fails the DLPAR remove operation. The fix for both scenarios is to check the device.offline status before making the calls to device_online() or device_offline(). kernel BUG at mm/memory_hotplug.c:1936! ... NIP [c0000000002ca428] .remove_memory+0xb8/0xc0 LR [c0000000002ca3cc] .remove_memory+0x5c/0xc0 Call Trace: .remove_memory+0x5c/0xc0 (unreliable) .dlpar_add_lmb+0x384/0x400 .dlpar_memory+0x5dc/0xca0 .handle_dlpar_errorlog+0x74/0xe0 .pseries_hp_work_fn+0x2c/0x90 .process_one_work+0x17c/0x460 .worker_thread+0x88/0x500 .kthread+0x15c/0x1a0 .ret_from_kernel_thread+0x58/0xc0 Fixes: 943db62c316c ("powerpc/pseries: Revert 'Auto-online hotplugged memory'") Signed-off-by: Nathan Fontenot <nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [mpe: Use bool, add explicit rc=0 case, change log typos & formatting] Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-08-02 18:03:22 +00:00
{
return dlpar_change_lmb_state(lmb, true);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
static int dlpar_offline_lmb(struct drmem_lmb *lmb)
powerpc/pseries: Check memory device state before onlining/offlining When DLPAR adding or removing memory we need to check the device offline status before trying to online/offline the memory. This is needed because calls to device_online() and device_offline() will return non-zero for memory that is already online and offline respectively. This update resolves two scenarios. First, for a kernel built with auto-online memory enabled (CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG_DEFAULT_ONLINE=y), memory will be onlined as part of calls to add_memory(). After adding the memory the pseries DLPAR code tries to online it and fails since the memory is already online. The DLPAR code then tries to remove the memory which produces the oops message below because the memory is not offline. The second scenario occurs when removing memory that is already offline, i.e. marking memory offline (via sysfs) and then trying to remove that memory. This doesn't work because offlining the already offline memory does not succeed and the DLPAR code then fails the DLPAR remove operation. The fix for both scenarios is to check the device.offline status before making the calls to device_online() or device_offline(). kernel BUG at mm/memory_hotplug.c:1936! ... NIP [c0000000002ca428] .remove_memory+0xb8/0xc0 LR [c0000000002ca3cc] .remove_memory+0x5c/0xc0 Call Trace: .remove_memory+0x5c/0xc0 (unreliable) .dlpar_add_lmb+0x384/0x400 .dlpar_memory+0x5dc/0xca0 .handle_dlpar_errorlog+0x74/0xe0 .pseries_hp_work_fn+0x2c/0x90 .process_one_work+0x17c/0x460 .worker_thread+0x88/0x500 .kthread+0x15c/0x1a0 .ret_from_kernel_thread+0x58/0xc0 Fixes: 943db62c316c ("powerpc/pseries: Revert 'Auto-online hotplugged memory'") Signed-off-by: Nathan Fontenot <nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [mpe: Use bool, add explicit rc=0 case, change log typos & formatting] Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-08-02 18:03:22 +00:00
{
return dlpar_change_lmb_state(lmb, false);
}
static int pseries_remove_memblock(unsigned long base, unsigned int memblock_size)
{
unsigned long block_sz, start_pfn;
int sections_per_block;
int i, nid;
start_pfn = base >> PAGE_SHIFT;
powerpc/pseries: Protect remove_memory() with device hotplug lock While testing memory hot-remove, I found following dead lock: Process #1141 is drmgr, trying to remove some memory, i.e. memory499. It holds the memory_hotplug_mutex, and blocks when trying to remove file "online" under dir memory499, in kernfs_drain(), at wait_event(root->deactivate_waitq, atomic_read(&kn->active) == KN_DEACTIVATED_BIAS); Process #1120 is trying to online memory499 by echo 1 > memory499/online In .kernfs_fop_write, it uses kernfs_get_active() to increase &kn->active, thus blocking process #1141. While itself is blocked later when trying to acquire memory_hotplug_mutex, which is held by process The backtrace of both processes are shown below: [<c000000001b18600>] 0xc000000001b18600 [<c000000000015044>] .__switch_to+0x144/0x200 [<c000000000263ca4>] .online_pages+0x74/0x7b0 [<c00000000055b40c>] .memory_subsys_online+0x9c/0x150 [<c00000000053cbe8>] .device_online+0xb8/0x120 [<c00000000053cd04>] .online_store+0xb4/0xc0 [<c000000000538ce4>] .dev_attr_store+0x64/0xa0 [<c00000000030f4ec>] .sysfs_kf_write+0x7c/0xb0 [<c00000000030e574>] .kernfs_fop_write+0x154/0x1e0 [<c000000000268450>] .vfs_write+0xe0/0x260 [<c000000000269144>] .SyS_write+0x64/0x110 [<c000000000009ffc>] syscall_exit+0x0/0x7c [<c000000001b18600>] 0xc000000001b18600 [<c000000000015044>] .__switch_to+0x144/0x200 [<c00000000030be14>] .__kernfs_remove+0x204/0x300 [<c00000000030d428>] .kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x68/0xf0 [<c00000000030fb38>] .sysfs_remove_file_ns+0x38/0x60 [<c000000000539354>] .device_remove_attrs+0x54/0xc0 [<c000000000539fd8>] .device_del+0x158/0x250 [<c00000000053a104>] .device_unregister+0x34/0xa0 [<c00000000055bc14>] .unregister_memory_section+0x164/0x170 [<c00000000024ee18>] .__remove_pages+0x108/0x4c0 [<c00000000004b590>] .arch_remove_memory+0x60/0xc0 [<c00000000026446c>] .remove_memory+0x8c/0xe0 [<c00000000007f9f4>] .pseries_remove_memblock+0xd4/0x160 [<c00000000007fcfc>] .pseries_memory_notifier+0x27c/0x290 [<c0000000008ae6cc>] .notifier_call_chain+0x8c/0x100 [<c0000000000d858c>] .__blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x6c/0xe0 [<c00000000071ddec>] .of_property_notify+0x7c/0xc0 [<c00000000071ed3c>] .of_update_property+0x3c/0x1b0 [<c0000000000756cc>] .ofdt_write+0x3dc/0x740 [<c0000000002f60fc>] .proc_reg_write+0xac/0x110 [<c000000000268450>] .vfs_write+0xe0/0x260 [<c000000000269144>] .SyS_write+0x64/0x110 [<c000000000009ffc>] syscall_exit+0x0/0x7c This patch uses lock_device_hotplug() to protect remove_memory() called in pseries_remove_memblock(), which is also stated before function remove_memory(): * NOTE: The caller must call lock_device_hotplug() to serialize hotplug * and online/offline operations before this call, as required by * try_offline_node(). */ void __ref remove_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size) With this lock held, the other process(#1120 above) trying to online the memory block will retry the system call when calling lock_device_hotplug_sysfs(), and finally find No such device error. Signed-off-by: Li Zhong <zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2014-04-10 08:25:31 +00:00
lock_device_hotplug();
if (!pfn_valid(start_pfn))
goto out;
block_sz = pseries_memory_block_size();
sections_per_block = block_sz / MIN_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE;
nid = memory_add_physaddr_to_nid(base);
for (i = 0; i < sections_per_block; i++) {
mm/memory_hotplug: make remove_memory() take the device_hotplug_lock Patch series "mm: online/offline_pages called w.o. mem_hotplug_lock", v3. Reading through the code and studying how mem_hotplug_lock is to be used, I noticed that there are two places where we can end up calling device_online()/device_offline() - online_pages()/offline_pages() without the mem_hotplug_lock. And there are other places where we call device_online()/device_offline() without the device_hotplug_lock. While e.g. echo "online" > /sys/devices/system/memory/memory9/state is fine, e.g. echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/memory/memory9/online Will not take the mem_hotplug_lock. However the device_lock() and device_hotplug_lock. E.g. via memory_probe_store(), we can end up calling add_memory()->online_pages() without the device_hotplug_lock. So we can have concurrent callers in online_pages(). We e.g. touch in online_pages() basically unprotected zone->present_pages then. Looks like there is a longer history to that (see Patch #2 for details), and fixing it to work the way it was intended is not really possible. We would e.g. have to take the mem_hotplug_lock in device/base/core.c, which sounds wrong. Summary: We had a lock inversion on mem_hotplug_lock and device_lock(). More details can be found in patch 3 and patch 6. I propose the general rules (documentation added in patch 6): 1. add_memory/add_memory_resource() must only be called with device_hotplug_lock. 2. remove_memory() must only be called with device_hotplug_lock. This is already documented and holds for all callers. 3. device_online()/device_offline() must only be called with device_hotplug_lock. This is already documented and true for now in core code. Other callers (related to memory hotplug) have to be fixed up. 4. mem_hotplug_lock is taken inside of add_memory/remove_memory/ online_pages/offline_pages. To me, this looks way cleaner than what we have right now (and easier to verify). And looking at the documentation of remove_memory, using lock_device_hotplug also for add_memory() feels natural. This patch (of 6): remove_memory() is exported right now but requires the device_hotplug_lock, which is not exported. So let's provide a variant that takes the lock and only export that one. The lock is already held in arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/memtrace.c Apart from that, there are not other users in the tree. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180925091457.28651-2-david@redhat.com Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Pavel Tatashin <pavel.tatashin@microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Rashmica Gupta <rashmica.g@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Cc: Rashmica Gupta <rashmica.g@gmail.com> Cc: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org> Cc: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com> Cc: Nathan Fontenot <nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: John Allen <jallen@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: YASUAKI ISHIMATSU <yasu.isimatu@gmail.com> Cc: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org> Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> Cc: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Cc: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com> Cc: Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-10-30 22:10:18 +00:00
__remove_memory(nid, base, MIN_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE);
base += MIN_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE;
memory-hotplug: suppress "Trying to free nonexistent resource <XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX-YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY>" warning When our x86 box calls __remove_pages(), release_mem_region() shows many warnings. And x86 box cannot unregister iomem_resource. "Trying to free nonexistent resource <XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX-YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY>" release_mem_region() has been changed to be called in each PAGES_PER_SECTION by commit de7f0cba9678 ("memory hotplug: release memory regions in PAGES_PER_SECTION chunks"). Because powerpc registers iomem_resource in each PAGES_PER_SECTION chunk. But when I hot add memory on x86 box, iomem_resource is register in each _CRS not PAGES_PER_SECTION chunk. So x86 box unregisters iomem_resource. The patch fixes the problem. Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com> Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Nathan Fontenot <nfont@austin.ibm.com> Cc: Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com> Cc: Yasunori Goto <y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-10-08 23:34:14 +00:00
}
powerpc/pseries: Protect remove_memory() with device hotplug lock While testing memory hot-remove, I found following dead lock: Process #1141 is drmgr, trying to remove some memory, i.e. memory499. It holds the memory_hotplug_mutex, and blocks when trying to remove file "online" under dir memory499, in kernfs_drain(), at wait_event(root->deactivate_waitq, atomic_read(&kn->active) == KN_DEACTIVATED_BIAS); Process #1120 is trying to online memory499 by echo 1 > memory499/online In .kernfs_fop_write, it uses kernfs_get_active() to increase &kn->active, thus blocking process #1141. While itself is blocked later when trying to acquire memory_hotplug_mutex, which is held by process The backtrace of both processes are shown below: [<c000000001b18600>] 0xc000000001b18600 [<c000000000015044>] .__switch_to+0x144/0x200 [<c000000000263ca4>] .online_pages+0x74/0x7b0 [<c00000000055b40c>] .memory_subsys_online+0x9c/0x150 [<c00000000053cbe8>] .device_online+0xb8/0x120 [<c00000000053cd04>] .online_store+0xb4/0xc0 [<c000000000538ce4>] .dev_attr_store+0x64/0xa0 [<c00000000030f4ec>] .sysfs_kf_write+0x7c/0xb0 [<c00000000030e574>] .kernfs_fop_write+0x154/0x1e0 [<c000000000268450>] .vfs_write+0xe0/0x260 [<c000000000269144>] .SyS_write+0x64/0x110 [<c000000000009ffc>] syscall_exit+0x0/0x7c [<c000000001b18600>] 0xc000000001b18600 [<c000000000015044>] .__switch_to+0x144/0x200 [<c00000000030be14>] .__kernfs_remove+0x204/0x300 [<c00000000030d428>] .kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x68/0xf0 [<c00000000030fb38>] .sysfs_remove_file_ns+0x38/0x60 [<c000000000539354>] .device_remove_attrs+0x54/0xc0 [<c000000000539fd8>] .device_del+0x158/0x250 [<c00000000053a104>] .device_unregister+0x34/0xa0 [<c00000000055bc14>] .unregister_memory_section+0x164/0x170 [<c00000000024ee18>] .__remove_pages+0x108/0x4c0 [<c00000000004b590>] .arch_remove_memory+0x60/0xc0 [<c00000000026446c>] .remove_memory+0x8c/0xe0 [<c00000000007f9f4>] .pseries_remove_memblock+0xd4/0x160 [<c00000000007fcfc>] .pseries_memory_notifier+0x27c/0x290 [<c0000000008ae6cc>] .notifier_call_chain+0x8c/0x100 [<c0000000000d858c>] .__blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x6c/0xe0 [<c00000000071ddec>] .of_property_notify+0x7c/0xc0 [<c00000000071ed3c>] .of_update_property+0x3c/0x1b0 [<c0000000000756cc>] .ofdt_write+0x3dc/0x740 [<c0000000002f60fc>] .proc_reg_write+0xac/0x110 [<c000000000268450>] .vfs_write+0xe0/0x260 [<c000000000269144>] .SyS_write+0x64/0x110 [<c000000000009ffc>] syscall_exit+0x0/0x7c This patch uses lock_device_hotplug() to protect remove_memory() called in pseries_remove_memblock(), which is also stated before function remove_memory(): * NOTE: The caller must call lock_device_hotplug() to serialize hotplug * and online/offline operations before this call, as required by * try_offline_node(). */ void __ref remove_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size) With this lock held, the other process(#1120 above) trying to online the memory block will retry the system call when calling lock_device_hotplug_sysfs(), and finally find No such device error. Signed-off-by: Li Zhong <zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2014-04-10 08:25:31 +00:00
out:
/* Update memory regions for memory remove */
memblock_remove(base, memblock_size);
powerpc/pseries: Protect remove_memory() with device hotplug lock While testing memory hot-remove, I found following dead lock: Process #1141 is drmgr, trying to remove some memory, i.e. memory499. It holds the memory_hotplug_mutex, and blocks when trying to remove file "online" under dir memory499, in kernfs_drain(), at wait_event(root->deactivate_waitq, atomic_read(&kn->active) == KN_DEACTIVATED_BIAS); Process #1120 is trying to online memory499 by echo 1 > memory499/online In .kernfs_fop_write, it uses kernfs_get_active() to increase &kn->active, thus blocking process #1141. While itself is blocked later when trying to acquire memory_hotplug_mutex, which is held by process The backtrace of both processes are shown below: [<c000000001b18600>] 0xc000000001b18600 [<c000000000015044>] .__switch_to+0x144/0x200 [<c000000000263ca4>] .online_pages+0x74/0x7b0 [<c00000000055b40c>] .memory_subsys_online+0x9c/0x150 [<c00000000053cbe8>] .device_online+0xb8/0x120 [<c00000000053cd04>] .online_store+0xb4/0xc0 [<c000000000538ce4>] .dev_attr_store+0x64/0xa0 [<c00000000030f4ec>] .sysfs_kf_write+0x7c/0xb0 [<c00000000030e574>] .kernfs_fop_write+0x154/0x1e0 [<c000000000268450>] .vfs_write+0xe0/0x260 [<c000000000269144>] .SyS_write+0x64/0x110 [<c000000000009ffc>] syscall_exit+0x0/0x7c [<c000000001b18600>] 0xc000000001b18600 [<c000000000015044>] .__switch_to+0x144/0x200 [<c00000000030be14>] .__kernfs_remove+0x204/0x300 [<c00000000030d428>] .kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x68/0xf0 [<c00000000030fb38>] .sysfs_remove_file_ns+0x38/0x60 [<c000000000539354>] .device_remove_attrs+0x54/0xc0 [<c000000000539fd8>] .device_del+0x158/0x250 [<c00000000053a104>] .device_unregister+0x34/0xa0 [<c00000000055bc14>] .unregister_memory_section+0x164/0x170 [<c00000000024ee18>] .__remove_pages+0x108/0x4c0 [<c00000000004b590>] .arch_remove_memory+0x60/0xc0 [<c00000000026446c>] .remove_memory+0x8c/0xe0 [<c00000000007f9f4>] .pseries_remove_memblock+0xd4/0x160 [<c00000000007fcfc>] .pseries_memory_notifier+0x27c/0x290 [<c0000000008ae6cc>] .notifier_call_chain+0x8c/0x100 [<c0000000000d858c>] .__blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x6c/0xe0 [<c00000000071ddec>] .of_property_notify+0x7c/0xc0 [<c00000000071ed3c>] .of_update_property+0x3c/0x1b0 [<c0000000000756cc>] .ofdt_write+0x3dc/0x740 [<c0000000002f60fc>] .proc_reg_write+0xac/0x110 [<c000000000268450>] .vfs_write+0xe0/0x260 [<c000000000269144>] .SyS_write+0x64/0x110 [<c000000000009ffc>] syscall_exit+0x0/0x7c This patch uses lock_device_hotplug() to protect remove_memory() called in pseries_remove_memblock(), which is also stated before function remove_memory(): * NOTE: The caller must call lock_device_hotplug() to serialize hotplug * and online/offline operations before this call, as required by * try_offline_node(). */ void __ref remove_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size) With this lock held, the other process(#1120 above) trying to online the memory block will retry the system call when calling lock_device_hotplug_sysfs(), and finally find No such device error. Signed-off-by: Li Zhong <zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2014-04-10 08:25:31 +00:00
unlock_device_hotplug();
return 0;
}
static int pseries_remove_mem_node(struct device_node *np)
{
const __be32 *regs;
unsigned long base;
unsigned int lmb_size;
int ret = -EINVAL;
/*
* Check to see if we are actually removing memory
*/
if (!of_node_is_type(np, "memory"))
return 0;
/*
* Find the base address and size of the memblock
*/
regs = of_get_property(np, "reg", NULL);
if (!regs)
return ret;
base = be64_to_cpu(*(unsigned long *)regs);
lmb_size = be32_to_cpu(regs[3]);
pseries_remove_memblock(base, lmb_size);
return 0;
}
static bool lmb_is_removable(struct drmem_lmb *lmb)
{
int i, scns_per_block;
int rc = 1;
unsigned long pfn, block_sz;
u64 phys_addr;
if (!(lmb->flags & DRCONF_MEM_ASSIGNED))
return false;
block_sz = memory_block_size_bytes();
scns_per_block = block_sz / MIN_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE;
phys_addr = lmb->base_addr;
#ifdef CONFIG_FA_DUMP
/*
* Don't hot-remove memory that falls in fadump boot memory area
* and memory that is reserved for capturing old kernel memory.
*/
if (is_fadump_memory_area(phys_addr, block_sz))
return false;
#endif
for (i = 0; i < scns_per_block; i++) {
pfn = PFN_DOWN(phys_addr);
if (!pfn_present(pfn))
continue;
rc &= is_mem_section_removable(pfn, PAGES_PER_SECTION);
phys_addr += MIN_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE;
}
return rc ? true : false;
}
static int dlpar_add_lmb(struct drmem_lmb *);
static int dlpar_remove_lmb(struct drmem_lmb *lmb)
{
unsigned long block_sz;
int nid, rc;
if (!lmb_is_removable(lmb))
return -EINVAL;
powerpc/pseries: Check memory device state before onlining/offlining When DLPAR adding or removing memory we need to check the device offline status before trying to online/offline the memory. This is needed because calls to device_online() and device_offline() will return non-zero for memory that is already online and offline respectively. This update resolves two scenarios. First, for a kernel built with auto-online memory enabled (CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG_DEFAULT_ONLINE=y), memory will be onlined as part of calls to add_memory(). After adding the memory the pseries DLPAR code tries to online it and fails since the memory is already online. The DLPAR code then tries to remove the memory which produces the oops message below because the memory is not offline. The second scenario occurs when removing memory that is already offline, i.e. marking memory offline (via sysfs) and then trying to remove that memory. This doesn't work because offlining the already offline memory does not succeed and the DLPAR code then fails the DLPAR remove operation. The fix for both scenarios is to check the device.offline status before making the calls to device_online() or device_offline(). kernel BUG at mm/memory_hotplug.c:1936! ... NIP [c0000000002ca428] .remove_memory+0xb8/0xc0 LR [c0000000002ca3cc] .remove_memory+0x5c/0xc0 Call Trace: .remove_memory+0x5c/0xc0 (unreliable) .dlpar_add_lmb+0x384/0x400 .dlpar_memory+0x5dc/0xca0 .handle_dlpar_errorlog+0x74/0xe0 .pseries_hp_work_fn+0x2c/0x90 .process_one_work+0x17c/0x460 .worker_thread+0x88/0x500 .kthread+0x15c/0x1a0 .ret_from_kernel_thread+0x58/0xc0 Fixes: 943db62c316c ("powerpc/pseries: Revert 'Auto-online hotplugged memory'") Signed-off-by: Nathan Fontenot <nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [mpe: Use bool, add explicit rc=0 case, change log typos & formatting] Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-08-02 18:03:22 +00:00
rc = dlpar_offline_lmb(lmb);
if (rc)
return rc;
block_sz = pseries_memory_block_size();
nid = memory_add_physaddr_to_nid(lmb->base_addr);
mm/memory_hotplug: make remove_memory() take the device_hotplug_lock Patch series "mm: online/offline_pages called w.o. mem_hotplug_lock", v3. Reading through the code and studying how mem_hotplug_lock is to be used, I noticed that there are two places where we can end up calling device_online()/device_offline() - online_pages()/offline_pages() without the mem_hotplug_lock. And there are other places where we call device_online()/device_offline() without the device_hotplug_lock. While e.g. echo "online" > /sys/devices/system/memory/memory9/state is fine, e.g. echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/memory/memory9/online Will not take the mem_hotplug_lock. However the device_lock() and device_hotplug_lock. E.g. via memory_probe_store(), we can end up calling add_memory()->online_pages() without the device_hotplug_lock. So we can have concurrent callers in online_pages(). We e.g. touch in online_pages() basically unprotected zone->present_pages then. Looks like there is a longer history to that (see Patch #2 for details), and fixing it to work the way it was intended is not really possible. We would e.g. have to take the mem_hotplug_lock in device/base/core.c, which sounds wrong. Summary: We had a lock inversion on mem_hotplug_lock and device_lock(). More details can be found in patch 3 and patch 6. I propose the general rules (documentation added in patch 6): 1. add_memory/add_memory_resource() must only be called with device_hotplug_lock. 2. remove_memory() must only be called with device_hotplug_lock. This is already documented and holds for all callers. 3. device_online()/device_offline() must only be called with device_hotplug_lock. This is already documented and true for now in core code. Other callers (related to memory hotplug) have to be fixed up. 4. mem_hotplug_lock is taken inside of add_memory/remove_memory/ online_pages/offline_pages. To me, this looks way cleaner than what we have right now (and easier to verify). And looking at the documentation of remove_memory, using lock_device_hotplug also for add_memory() feels natural. This patch (of 6): remove_memory() is exported right now but requires the device_hotplug_lock, which is not exported. So let's provide a variant that takes the lock and only export that one. The lock is already held in arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/memtrace.c Apart from that, there are not other users in the tree. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180925091457.28651-2-david@redhat.com Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Pavel Tatashin <pavel.tatashin@microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Rashmica Gupta <rashmica.g@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Cc: Rashmica Gupta <rashmica.g@gmail.com> Cc: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org> Cc: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com> Cc: Nathan Fontenot <nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: John Allen <jallen@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: YASUAKI ISHIMATSU <yasu.isimatu@gmail.com> Cc: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org> Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> Cc: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Cc: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com> Cc: Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-10-30 22:10:18 +00:00
__remove_memory(nid, lmb->base_addr, block_sz);
/* Update memory regions for memory remove */
memblock_remove(lmb->base_addr, block_sz);
invalidate_lmb_associativity_index(lmb);
lmb->flags &= ~DRCONF_MEM_ASSIGNED;
return 0;
}
static int dlpar_memory_remove_by_count(u32 lmbs_to_remove)
{
struct drmem_lmb *lmb;
int lmbs_removed = 0;
int lmbs_available = 0;
int rc;
pr_info("Attempting to hot-remove %d LMB(s)\n", lmbs_to_remove);
if (lmbs_to_remove == 0)
return -EINVAL;
/* Validate that there are enough LMBs to satisfy the request */
for_each_drmem_lmb(lmb) {
if (lmb_is_removable(lmb))
lmbs_available++;
if (lmbs_available == lmbs_to_remove)
break;
}
if (lmbs_available < lmbs_to_remove) {
pr_info("Not enough LMBs available (%d of %d) to satisfy request\n",
lmbs_available, lmbs_to_remove);
return -EINVAL;
}
for_each_drmem_lmb(lmb) {
rc = dlpar_remove_lmb(lmb);
if (rc)
continue;
/* Mark this lmb so we can add it later if all of the
* requested LMBs cannot be removed.
*/
drmem_mark_lmb_reserved(lmb);
lmbs_removed++;
if (lmbs_removed == lmbs_to_remove)
break;
}
if (lmbs_removed != lmbs_to_remove) {
pr_err("Memory hot-remove failed, adding LMB's back\n");
for_each_drmem_lmb(lmb) {
if (!drmem_lmb_reserved(lmb))
continue;
rc = dlpar_add_lmb(lmb);
if (rc)
pr_err("Failed to add LMB back, drc index %x\n",
lmb->drc_index);
drmem_remove_lmb_reservation(lmb);
}
rc = -EINVAL;
} else {
for_each_drmem_lmb(lmb) {
if (!drmem_lmb_reserved(lmb))
continue;
dlpar_release_drc(lmb->drc_index);
pr_info("Memory at %llx was hot-removed\n",
lmb->base_addr);
drmem_remove_lmb_reservation(lmb);
}
rc = 0;
}
return rc;
}
static int dlpar_memory_remove_by_index(u32 drc_index)
{
struct drmem_lmb *lmb;
int lmb_found;
int rc;
pr_info("Attempting to hot-remove LMB, drc index %x\n", drc_index);
lmb_found = 0;
for_each_drmem_lmb(lmb) {
if (lmb->drc_index == drc_index) {
lmb_found = 1;
rc = dlpar_remove_lmb(lmb);
if (!rc)
dlpar_release_drc(lmb->drc_index);
break;
}
}
if (!lmb_found)
rc = -EINVAL;
if (rc)
pr_info("Failed to hot-remove memory at %llx\n",
lmb->base_addr);
else
pr_info("Memory at %llx was hot-removed\n", lmb->base_addr);
return rc;
}
static int dlpar_memory_readd_by_index(u32 drc_index)
{
struct drmem_lmb *lmb;
int lmb_found;
int rc;
pr_info("Attempting to update LMB, drc index %x\n", drc_index);
lmb_found = 0;
for_each_drmem_lmb(lmb) {
if (lmb->drc_index == drc_index) {
lmb_found = 1;
rc = dlpar_remove_lmb(lmb);
if (!rc) {
rc = dlpar_add_lmb(lmb);
if (rc)
dlpar_release_drc(lmb->drc_index);
}
break;
}
}
if (!lmb_found)
rc = -EINVAL;
if (rc)
pr_info("Failed to update memory at %llx\n",
lmb->base_addr);
else
pr_info("Memory at %llx was updated\n", lmb->base_addr);
return rc;
}
static int dlpar_memory_remove_by_ic(u32 lmbs_to_remove, u32 drc_index)
{
struct drmem_lmb *lmb, *start_lmb, *end_lmb;
int lmbs_available = 0;
int rc;
pr_info("Attempting to hot-remove %u LMB(s) at %x\n",
lmbs_to_remove, drc_index);
if (lmbs_to_remove == 0)
return -EINVAL;
rc = get_lmb_range(drc_index, lmbs_to_remove, &start_lmb, &end_lmb);
if (rc)
return -EINVAL;
/* Validate that there are enough LMBs to satisfy the request */
for_each_drmem_lmb_in_range(lmb, start_lmb, end_lmb) {
if (lmb->flags & DRCONF_MEM_RESERVED)
break;
lmbs_available++;
}
if (lmbs_available < lmbs_to_remove)
return -EINVAL;
for_each_drmem_lmb_in_range(lmb, start_lmb, end_lmb) {
if (!(lmb->flags & DRCONF_MEM_ASSIGNED))
continue;
rc = dlpar_remove_lmb(lmb);
if (rc)
break;
drmem_mark_lmb_reserved(lmb);
}
if (rc) {
pr_err("Memory indexed-count-remove failed, adding any removed LMBs\n");
for_each_drmem_lmb_in_range(lmb, start_lmb, end_lmb) {
if (!drmem_lmb_reserved(lmb))
continue;
rc = dlpar_add_lmb(lmb);
if (rc)
pr_err("Failed to add LMB, drc index %x\n",
lmb->drc_index);
drmem_remove_lmb_reservation(lmb);
}
rc = -EINVAL;
} else {
for_each_drmem_lmb_in_range(lmb, start_lmb, end_lmb) {
if (!drmem_lmb_reserved(lmb))
continue;
dlpar_release_drc(lmb->drc_index);
pr_info("Memory at %llx (drc index %x) was hot-removed\n",
lmb->base_addr, lmb->drc_index);
drmem_remove_lmb_reservation(lmb);
}
}
return rc;
}
#else
static inline int pseries_remove_memblock(unsigned long base,
unsigned int memblock_size)
{
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
static inline int pseries_remove_mem_node(struct device_node *np)
{
return 0;
}
static inline int dlpar_memory_remove(struct pseries_hp_errorlog *hp_elog)
{
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
static int dlpar_remove_lmb(struct drmem_lmb *lmb)
{
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
static int dlpar_memory_remove_by_count(u32 lmbs_to_remove)
{
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
static int dlpar_memory_remove_by_index(u32 drc_index)
{
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
static int dlpar_memory_readd_by_index(u32 drc_index)
{
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
static int dlpar_memory_remove_by_ic(u32 lmbs_to_remove, u32 drc_index)
{
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
#endif /* CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE */
static int dlpar_add_lmb(struct drmem_lmb *lmb)
{
unsigned long block_sz;
int nid, rc;
if (lmb->flags & DRCONF_MEM_ASSIGNED)
return -EINVAL;
rc = update_lmb_associativity_index(lmb);
if (rc) {
dlpar_release_drc(lmb->drc_index);
return rc;
}
block_sz = memory_block_size_bytes();
/* Find the node id for this address */
nid = memory_add_physaddr_to_nid(lmb->base_addr);
/* Add the memory */
mm/memory_hotplug: make add_memory() take the device_hotplug_lock add_memory() currently does not take the device_hotplug_lock, however is aleady called under the lock from arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c to synchronize against CPU hot-remove and similar. In general, we should hold the device_hotplug_lock when adding memory to synchronize against online/offline request (e.g. from user space) - which already resulted in lock inversions due to device_lock() and mem_hotplug_lock - see 30467e0b3be ("mm, hotplug: fix concurrent memory hot-add deadlock"). add_memory()/add_memory_resource() will create memory block devices, so this really feels like the right thing to do. Holding the device_hotplug_lock makes sure that a memory block device can really only be accessed (e.g. via .online/.state) from user space, once the memory has been fully added to the system. The lock is not held yet in drivers/xen/balloon.c arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/memtrace.c drivers/s390/char/sclp_cmd.c drivers/hv/hv_balloon.c So, let's either use the locked variants or take the lock. Don't export add_memory_resource(), as it once was exported to be used by XEN, which is never built as a module. If somebody requires it, we also have to export a locked variant (as device_hotplug_lock is never exported). Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180925091457.28651-3-david@redhat.com Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Pavel Tatashin <pavel.tatashin@microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Rashmica Gupta <rashmica.g@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Cc: Nathan Fontenot <nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: John Allen <jallen@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org> Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pavel.tatashin@microsoft.com> Cc: YASUAKI ISHIMATSU <yasu.isimatu@gmail.com> Cc: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com> Cc: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org> Cc: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com> Cc: Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-10-30 22:10:24 +00:00
rc = __add_memory(nid, lmb->base_addr, block_sz);
if (rc) {
invalidate_lmb_associativity_index(lmb);
return rc;
}
rc = dlpar_online_lmb(lmb);
if (rc) {
mm/memory_hotplug: make remove_memory() take the device_hotplug_lock Patch series "mm: online/offline_pages called w.o. mem_hotplug_lock", v3. Reading through the code and studying how mem_hotplug_lock is to be used, I noticed that there are two places where we can end up calling device_online()/device_offline() - online_pages()/offline_pages() without the mem_hotplug_lock. And there are other places where we call device_online()/device_offline() without the device_hotplug_lock. While e.g. echo "online" > /sys/devices/system/memory/memory9/state is fine, e.g. echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/memory/memory9/online Will not take the mem_hotplug_lock. However the device_lock() and device_hotplug_lock. E.g. via memory_probe_store(), we can end up calling add_memory()->online_pages() without the device_hotplug_lock. So we can have concurrent callers in online_pages(). We e.g. touch in online_pages() basically unprotected zone->present_pages then. Looks like there is a longer history to that (see Patch #2 for details), and fixing it to work the way it was intended is not really possible. We would e.g. have to take the mem_hotplug_lock in device/base/core.c, which sounds wrong. Summary: We had a lock inversion on mem_hotplug_lock and device_lock(). More details can be found in patch 3 and patch 6. I propose the general rules (documentation added in patch 6): 1. add_memory/add_memory_resource() must only be called with device_hotplug_lock. 2. remove_memory() must only be called with device_hotplug_lock. This is already documented and holds for all callers. 3. device_online()/device_offline() must only be called with device_hotplug_lock. This is already documented and true for now in core code. Other callers (related to memory hotplug) have to be fixed up. 4. mem_hotplug_lock is taken inside of add_memory/remove_memory/ online_pages/offline_pages. To me, this looks way cleaner than what we have right now (and easier to verify). And looking at the documentation of remove_memory, using lock_device_hotplug also for add_memory() feels natural. This patch (of 6): remove_memory() is exported right now but requires the device_hotplug_lock, which is not exported. So let's provide a variant that takes the lock and only export that one. The lock is already held in arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/memtrace.c Apart from that, there are not other users in the tree. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180925091457.28651-2-david@redhat.com Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Pavel Tatashin <pavel.tatashin@microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Rashmica Gupta <rashmica.g@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Cc: Rashmica Gupta <rashmica.g@gmail.com> Cc: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org> Cc: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com> Cc: Nathan Fontenot <nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: John Allen <jallen@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: YASUAKI ISHIMATSU <yasu.isimatu@gmail.com> Cc: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org> Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> Cc: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Cc: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com> Cc: Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-10-30 22:10:18 +00:00
__remove_memory(nid, lmb->base_addr, block_sz);
invalidate_lmb_associativity_index(lmb);
} else {
lmb->flags |= DRCONF_MEM_ASSIGNED;
}
return rc;
}
static int dlpar_memory_add_by_count(u32 lmbs_to_add)
{
struct drmem_lmb *lmb;
int lmbs_available = 0;
int lmbs_added = 0;
int rc;
pr_info("Attempting to hot-add %d LMB(s)\n", lmbs_to_add);
if (lmbs_to_add == 0)
return -EINVAL;
/* Validate that there are enough LMBs to satisfy the request */
for_each_drmem_lmb(lmb) {
if (!(lmb->flags & DRCONF_MEM_ASSIGNED))
lmbs_available++;
if (lmbs_available == lmbs_to_add)
break;
}
if (lmbs_available < lmbs_to_add)
return -EINVAL;
for_each_drmem_lmb(lmb) {
if (lmb->flags & DRCONF_MEM_ASSIGNED)
continue;
rc = dlpar_acquire_drc(lmb->drc_index);
if (rc)
continue;
rc = dlpar_add_lmb(lmb);
if (rc) {
dlpar_release_drc(lmb->drc_index);
continue;
}
/* Mark this lmb so we can remove it later if all of the
* requested LMBs cannot be added.
*/
drmem_mark_lmb_reserved(lmb);
lmbs_added++;
if (lmbs_added == lmbs_to_add)
break;
}
if (lmbs_added != lmbs_to_add) {
pr_err("Memory hot-add failed, removing any added LMBs\n");
for_each_drmem_lmb(lmb) {
if (!drmem_lmb_reserved(lmb))
continue;
rc = dlpar_remove_lmb(lmb);
if (rc)
pr_err("Failed to remove LMB, drc index %x\n",
lmb->drc_index);
else
dlpar_release_drc(lmb->drc_index);
drmem_remove_lmb_reservation(lmb);
}
rc = -EINVAL;
} else {
for_each_drmem_lmb(lmb) {
if (!drmem_lmb_reserved(lmb))
continue;
pr_info("Memory at %llx (drc index %x) was hot-added\n",
lmb->base_addr, lmb->drc_index);
drmem_remove_lmb_reservation(lmb);
}
rc = 0;
}
return rc;
}
static int dlpar_memory_add_by_index(u32 drc_index)
{
struct drmem_lmb *lmb;
int rc, lmb_found;
pr_info("Attempting to hot-add LMB, drc index %x\n", drc_index);
lmb_found = 0;
for_each_drmem_lmb(lmb) {
if (lmb->drc_index == drc_index) {
lmb_found = 1;
rc = dlpar_acquire_drc(lmb->drc_index);
if (!rc) {
rc = dlpar_add_lmb(lmb);
if (rc)
dlpar_release_drc(lmb->drc_index);
}
break;
}
}
if (!lmb_found)
rc = -EINVAL;
if (rc)
pr_info("Failed to hot-add memory, drc index %x\n", drc_index);
else
pr_info("Memory at %llx (drc index %x) was hot-added\n",
lmb->base_addr, drc_index);
return rc;
}
static int dlpar_memory_add_by_ic(u32 lmbs_to_add, u32 drc_index)
{
struct drmem_lmb *lmb, *start_lmb, *end_lmb;
int lmbs_available = 0;
int rc;
pr_info("Attempting to hot-add %u LMB(s) at index %x\n",
lmbs_to_add, drc_index);
if (lmbs_to_add == 0)
return -EINVAL;
rc = get_lmb_range(drc_index, lmbs_to_add, &start_lmb, &end_lmb);
if (rc)
return -EINVAL;
/* Validate that the LMBs in this range are not reserved */
for_each_drmem_lmb_in_range(lmb, start_lmb, end_lmb) {
if (lmb->flags & DRCONF_MEM_RESERVED)
break;
lmbs_available++;
}
if (lmbs_available < lmbs_to_add)
return -EINVAL;
for_each_drmem_lmb_in_range(lmb, start_lmb, end_lmb) {
if (lmb->flags & DRCONF_MEM_ASSIGNED)
continue;
rc = dlpar_acquire_drc(lmb->drc_index);
if (rc)
break;
rc = dlpar_add_lmb(lmb);
if (rc) {
dlpar_release_drc(lmb->drc_index);
break;
}
drmem_mark_lmb_reserved(lmb);
}
if (rc) {
pr_err("Memory indexed-count-add failed, removing any added LMBs\n");
for_each_drmem_lmb_in_range(lmb, start_lmb, end_lmb) {
if (!drmem_lmb_reserved(lmb))
continue;
rc = dlpar_remove_lmb(lmb);
if (rc)
pr_err("Failed to remove LMB, drc index %x\n",
lmb->drc_index);
else
dlpar_release_drc(lmb->drc_index);
drmem_remove_lmb_reservation(lmb);
}
rc = -EINVAL;
} else {
for_each_drmem_lmb_in_range(lmb, start_lmb, end_lmb) {
if (!drmem_lmb_reserved(lmb))
continue;
pr_info("Memory at %llx (drc index %x) was hot-added\n",
lmb->base_addr, lmb->drc_index);
drmem_remove_lmb_reservation(lmb);
}
}
return rc;
}
powerpc/pseries: Create new device hotplug entry point The current hotplug (or dlpar) of devices (the process is generally the same for memory, cpu, and pci) on PowerVM systems is initiated from the HMC, which communicates the request to the partitions through the RSCT framework. The RSCT framework then invokes the drmgr command. The drmgr command performs the hotplug operation by doing some pieces, such as most of the rtas calls and device tree parsing, in userspace and make requests to the kernel to online/offline the device, update the device tree and add/remove the device. For PowerKVM the approach for device hotplug is to follow what is currently being done for pci hotplug. A hotplug request is initiated from the host. QEMU then generates an EPOW interrupt to the guest which causes the guest to make the rtas,check-exception call. In QEMU, the rtas,check-exception call returns a rtas hotplug event to the guest. Please note that the current pci hotplug path for PowerKVM involves the kernel receiving the rtas hotplug event, passing it to rtas_errd in userspace, and having rtas_errd invoke drmgr. The drmgr command then handles the request as described above for PowerVM systems. There is no need for this circuitous route, we should just handle the entire hotplug of devices in the kernel. What I am planning is to enable this by moving the code to handle hotplug from drmgr into the kernel to provide a single path for handling device hotplug for both PowerVM and PowerKVM systems. This patch provides the common iframework and entry point. For PowerKVM a future update to the kernel rtas code will recognize rtas hotplug events returned from rtas,check-exception calls and use the common entry point to handle hotplug of the device. For PowerVM systems, This patch creates /sys/kernel/dlpar that can be used by the drmgr command to initiate hotplug requests. In order to do this a string of the format "<resource> <action> <id_type> <id>" is written to this file. The string consists of a resource (cpu, memory, pci, phb), an action (add or remove), an id_type (count, drc index, drc name), and the corresponding id. The kernel will parse the string and create a rtas hotplug section that can be passed to the common entry point for handling hotplug requests. It should be noted that there is no chance of updating how we receive hotplug (dlpar) requests from the HMC on PowerVM systems. Signed-off-by: Nathan Fontenot <nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2015-02-10 19:47:02 +00:00
int dlpar_memory(struct pseries_hp_errorlog *hp_elog)
{
u32 count, drc_index;
int rc;
powerpc/pseries: Create new device hotplug entry point The current hotplug (or dlpar) of devices (the process is generally the same for memory, cpu, and pci) on PowerVM systems is initiated from the HMC, which communicates the request to the partitions through the RSCT framework. The RSCT framework then invokes the drmgr command. The drmgr command performs the hotplug operation by doing some pieces, such as most of the rtas calls and device tree parsing, in userspace and make requests to the kernel to online/offline the device, update the device tree and add/remove the device. For PowerKVM the approach for device hotplug is to follow what is currently being done for pci hotplug. A hotplug request is initiated from the host. QEMU then generates an EPOW interrupt to the guest which causes the guest to make the rtas,check-exception call. In QEMU, the rtas,check-exception call returns a rtas hotplug event to the guest. Please note that the current pci hotplug path for PowerKVM involves the kernel receiving the rtas hotplug event, passing it to rtas_errd in userspace, and having rtas_errd invoke drmgr. The drmgr command then handles the request as described above for PowerVM systems. There is no need for this circuitous route, we should just handle the entire hotplug of devices in the kernel. What I am planning is to enable this by moving the code to handle hotplug from drmgr into the kernel to provide a single path for handling device hotplug for both PowerVM and PowerKVM systems. This patch provides the common iframework and entry point. For PowerKVM a future update to the kernel rtas code will recognize rtas hotplug events returned from rtas,check-exception calls and use the common entry point to handle hotplug of the device. For PowerVM systems, This patch creates /sys/kernel/dlpar that can be used by the drmgr command to initiate hotplug requests. In order to do this a string of the format "<resource> <action> <id_type> <id>" is written to this file. The string consists of a resource (cpu, memory, pci, phb), an action (add or remove), an id_type (count, drc index, drc name), and the corresponding id. The kernel will parse the string and create a rtas hotplug section that can be passed to the common entry point for handling hotplug requests. It should be noted that there is no chance of updating how we receive hotplug (dlpar) requests from the HMC on PowerVM systems. Signed-off-by: Nathan Fontenot <nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2015-02-10 19:47:02 +00:00
lock_device_hotplug();
switch (hp_elog->action) {
case PSERIES_HP_ELOG_ACTION_ADD:
if (hp_elog->id_type == PSERIES_HP_ELOG_ID_DRC_COUNT) {
count = hp_elog->_drc_u.drc_count;
rc = dlpar_memory_add_by_count(count);
} else if (hp_elog->id_type == PSERIES_HP_ELOG_ID_DRC_INDEX) {
drc_index = hp_elog->_drc_u.drc_index;
rc = dlpar_memory_add_by_index(drc_index);
} else if (hp_elog->id_type == PSERIES_HP_ELOG_ID_DRC_IC) {
count = hp_elog->_drc_u.ic.count;
drc_index = hp_elog->_drc_u.ic.index;
rc = dlpar_memory_add_by_ic(count, drc_index);
} else {
rc = -EINVAL;
}
break;
case PSERIES_HP_ELOG_ACTION_REMOVE:
if (hp_elog->id_type == PSERIES_HP_ELOG_ID_DRC_COUNT) {
count = hp_elog->_drc_u.drc_count;
rc = dlpar_memory_remove_by_count(count);
} else if (hp_elog->id_type == PSERIES_HP_ELOG_ID_DRC_INDEX) {
drc_index = hp_elog->_drc_u.drc_index;
rc = dlpar_memory_remove_by_index(drc_index);
} else if (hp_elog->id_type == PSERIES_HP_ELOG_ID_DRC_IC) {
count = hp_elog->_drc_u.ic.count;
drc_index = hp_elog->_drc_u.ic.index;
rc = dlpar_memory_remove_by_ic(count, drc_index);
} else {
rc = -EINVAL;
}
break;
case PSERIES_HP_ELOG_ACTION_READD:
drc_index = hp_elog->_drc_u.drc_index;
rc = dlpar_memory_readd_by_index(drc_index);
break;
powerpc/pseries: Create new device hotplug entry point The current hotplug (or dlpar) of devices (the process is generally the same for memory, cpu, and pci) on PowerVM systems is initiated from the HMC, which communicates the request to the partitions through the RSCT framework. The RSCT framework then invokes the drmgr command. The drmgr command performs the hotplug operation by doing some pieces, such as most of the rtas calls and device tree parsing, in userspace and make requests to the kernel to online/offline the device, update the device tree and add/remove the device. For PowerKVM the approach for device hotplug is to follow what is currently being done for pci hotplug. A hotplug request is initiated from the host. QEMU then generates an EPOW interrupt to the guest which causes the guest to make the rtas,check-exception call. In QEMU, the rtas,check-exception call returns a rtas hotplug event to the guest. Please note that the current pci hotplug path for PowerKVM involves the kernel receiving the rtas hotplug event, passing it to rtas_errd in userspace, and having rtas_errd invoke drmgr. The drmgr command then handles the request as described above for PowerVM systems. There is no need for this circuitous route, we should just handle the entire hotplug of devices in the kernel. What I am planning is to enable this by moving the code to handle hotplug from drmgr into the kernel to provide a single path for handling device hotplug for both PowerVM and PowerKVM systems. This patch provides the common iframework and entry point. For PowerKVM a future update to the kernel rtas code will recognize rtas hotplug events returned from rtas,check-exception calls and use the common entry point to handle hotplug of the device. For PowerVM systems, This patch creates /sys/kernel/dlpar that can be used by the drmgr command to initiate hotplug requests. In order to do this a string of the format "<resource> <action> <id_type> <id>" is written to this file. The string consists of a resource (cpu, memory, pci, phb), an action (add or remove), an id_type (count, drc index, drc name), and the corresponding id. The kernel will parse the string and create a rtas hotplug section that can be passed to the common entry point for handling hotplug requests. It should be noted that there is no chance of updating how we receive hotplug (dlpar) requests from the HMC on PowerVM systems. Signed-off-by: Nathan Fontenot <nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2015-02-10 19:47:02 +00:00
default:
pr_err("Invalid action (%d) specified\n", hp_elog->action);
rc = -EINVAL;
break;
}
if (!rc) {
rtas_hp_event = true;
rc = drmem_update_dt();
rtas_hp_event = false;
}
powerpc/pseries: Create new device hotplug entry point The current hotplug (or dlpar) of devices (the process is generally the same for memory, cpu, and pci) on PowerVM systems is initiated from the HMC, which communicates the request to the partitions through the RSCT framework. The RSCT framework then invokes the drmgr command. The drmgr command performs the hotplug operation by doing some pieces, such as most of the rtas calls and device tree parsing, in userspace and make requests to the kernel to online/offline the device, update the device tree and add/remove the device. For PowerKVM the approach for device hotplug is to follow what is currently being done for pci hotplug. A hotplug request is initiated from the host. QEMU then generates an EPOW interrupt to the guest which causes the guest to make the rtas,check-exception call. In QEMU, the rtas,check-exception call returns a rtas hotplug event to the guest. Please note that the current pci hotplug path for PowerKVM involves the kernel receiving the rtas hotplug event, passing it to rtas_errd in userspace, and having rtas_errd invoke drmgr. The drmgr command then handles the request as described above for PowerVM systems. There is no need for this circuitous route, we should just handle the entire hotplug of devices in the kernel. What I am planning is to enable this by moving the code to handle hotplug from drmgr into the kernel to provide a single path for handling device hotplug for both PowerVM and PowerKVM systems. This patch provides the common iframework and entry point. For PowerKVM a future update to the kernel rtas code will recognize rtas hotplug events returned from rtas,check-exception calls and use the common entry point to handle hotplug of the device. For PowerVM systems, This patch creates /sys/kernel/dlpar that can be used by the drmgr command to initiate hotplug requests. In order to do this a string of the format "<resource> <action> <id_type> <id>" is written to this file. The string consists of a resource (cpu, memory, pci, phb), an action (add or remove), an id_type (count, drc index, drc name), and the corresponding id. The kernel will parse the string and create a rtas hotplug section that can be passed to the common entry point for handling hotplug requests. It should be noted that there is no chance of updating how we receive hotplug (dlpar) requests from the HMC on PowerVM systems. Signed-off-by: Nathan Fontenot <nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2015-02-10 19:47:02 +00:00
unlock_device_hotplug();
return rc;
}
static int pseries_add_mem_node(struct device_node *np)
{
const __be32 *regs;
unsigned long base;
unsigned int lmb_size;
int ret = -EINVAL;
/*
* Check to see if we are actually adding memory
*/
if (!of_node_is_type(np, "memory"))
return 0;
/*
* Find the base and size of the memblock
*/
regs = of_get_property(np, "reg", NULL);
if (!regs)
return ret;
base = be64_to_cpu(*(unsigned long *)regs);
lmb_size = be32_to_cpu(regs[3]);
/*
* Update memory region to represent the memory add
*/
ret = memblock_add(base, lmb_size);
return (ret < 0) ? -EINVAL : 0;
}
static int pseries_update_drconf_memory(struct of_reconfig_data *pr)
{
struct of_drconf_cell_v1 *new_drmem, *old_drmem;
unsigned long memblock_size;
u32 entries;
__be32 *p;
int i, rc = -EINVAL;
if (rtas_hp_event)
return 0;
memblock_size = pseries_memory_block_size();
if (!memblock_size)
return -EINVAL;
p = (__be32 *) pr->old_prop->value;
if (!p)
return -EINVAL;
/* The first int of the property is the number of lmb's described
* by the property. This is followed by an array of of_drconf_cell
* entries. Get the number of entries and skip to the array of
* of_drconf_cell's.
*/
entries = be32_to_cpu(*p++);
old_drmem = (struct of_drconf_cell_v1 *)p;
p = (__be32 *)pr->prop->value;
p++;
new_drmem = (struct of_drconf_cell_v1 *)p;
for (i = 0; i < entries; i++) {
if ((be32_to_cpu(old_drmem[i].flags) & DRCONF_MEM_ASSIGNED) &&
(!(be32_to_cpu(new_drmem[i].flags) & DRCONF_MEM_ASSIGNED))) {
rc = pseries_remove_memblock(
be64_to_cpu(old_drmem[i].base_addr),
memblock_size);
break;
} else if ((!(be32_to_cpu(old_drmem[i].flags) &
DRCONF_MEM_ASSIGNED)) &&
(be32_to_cpu(new_drmem[i].flags) &
DRCONF_MEM_ASSIGNED)) {
rc = memblock_add(be64_to_cpu(old_drmem[i].base_addr),
memblock_size);
rc = (rc < 0) ? -EINVAL : 0;
break;
}
}
return rc;
}
static int pseries_memory_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
unsigned long action, void *data)
{
struct of_reconfig_data *rd = data;
int err = 0;
switch (action) {
case OF_RECONFIG_ATTACH_NODE:
err = pseries_add_mem_node(rd->dn);
break;
case OF_RECONFIG_DETACH_NODE:
err = pseries_remove_mem_node(rd->dn);
break;
case OF_RECONFIG_UPDATE_PROPERTY:
if (!strcmp(rd->prop->name, "ibm,dynamic-memory"))
err = pseries_update_drconf_memory(rd);
break;
}
return notifier_from_errno(err);
}
static struct notifier_block pseries_mem_nb = {
.notifier_call = pseries_memory_notifier,
};
static int __init pseries_memory_hotplug_init(void)
{
if (firmware_has_feature(FW_FEATURE_LPAR))
of_reconfig_notifier_register(&pseries_mem_nb);
return 0;
}
machine_device_initcall(pseries, pseries_memory_hotplug_init);