2005-04-16 22:20:36 +00:00
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
|
# Security configuration
|
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
menu "Security options"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
config KEYS
|
|
|
|
|
bool "Enable access key retention support"
|
|
|
|
|
help
|
|
|
|
|
This option provides support for retaining authentication tokens and
|
|
|
|
|
access keys in the kernel.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It also includes provision of methods by which such keys might be
|
|
|
|
|
associated with a process so that network filesystems, encryption
|
|
|
|
|
support and the like can find them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Furthermore, a special type of key is available that acts as keyring:
|
|
|
|
|
a searchable sequence of keys. Each process is equipped with access
|
|
|
|
|
to five standard keyrings: UID-specific, GID-specific, session,
|
|
|
|
|
process and thread.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you are unsure as to whether this is required, answer N.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
config KEYS_DEBUG_PROC_KEYS
|
2006-06-26 07:24:56 +00:00
|
|
|
bool "Enable the /proc/keys file by which keys may be viewed"
|
2005-04-16 22:20:36 +00:00
|
|
|
depends on KEYS
|
|
|
|
|
help
|
2006-06-26 07:24:56 +00:00
|
|
|
This option turns on support for the /proc/keys file - through which
|
|
|
|
|
can be listed all the keys on the system that are viewable by the
|
|
|
|
|
reading process.
|
2005-04-16 22:20:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2006-06-26 07:24:56 +00:00
|
|
|
The only keys included in the list are those that grant View
|
|
|
|
|
permission to the reading process whether or not it possesses them.
|
|
|
|
|
Note that LSM security checks are still performed, and may further
|
|
|
|
|
filter out keys that the current process is not authorised to view.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Only key attributes are listed here; key payloads are not included in
|
|
|
|
|
the resulting table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you are unsure as to whether this is required, answer N.
|
2005-04-16 22:20:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
config SECURITY
|
|
|
|
|
bool "Enable different security models"
|
2005-08-22 16:20:50 +00:00
|
|
|
depends on SYSFS
|
2005-04-16 22:20:36 +00:00
|
|
|
help
|
|
|
|
|
This allows you to choose different security modules to be
|
|
|
|
|
configured into your kernel.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If this option is not selected, the default Linux security
|
|
|
|
|
model will be used.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you are unsure how to answer this question, answer N.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-08-22 15:35:57 +00:00
|
|
|
config SECURITYFS
|
|
|
|
|
bool "Enable the securityfs filesystem"
|
|
|
|
|
help
|
|
|
|
|
This will build the securityfs filesystem. It is currently used by
|
2009-02-04 14:06:58 +00:00
|
|
|
the TPM bios character driver and IMA, an integrity provider. It is
|
|
|
|
|
not used by SELinux or SMACK.
|
2008-08-22 15:35:57 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you are unsure how to answer this question, answer N.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 22:20:36 +00:00
|
|
|
config SECURITY_NETWORK
|
|
|
|
|
bool "Socket and Networking Security Hooks"
|
|
|
|
|
depends on SECURITY
|
|
|
|
|
help
|
|
|
|
|
This enables the socket and networking security hooks.
|
|
|
|
|
If enabled, a security module can use these hooks to
|
|
|
|
|
implement socket and networking access controls.
|
|
|
|
|
If you are unsure how to answer this question, answer N.
|
[LSM-IPSec]: Security association restriction.
This patch series implements per packet access control via the
extension of the Linux Security Modules (LSM) interface by hooks in
the XFRM and pfkey subsystems that leverage IPSec security
associations to label packets. Extensions to the SELinux LSM are
included that leverage the patch for this purpose.
This patch implements the changes necessary to the XFRM subsystem,
pfkey interface, ipv4/ipv6, and xfrm_user interface to restrict a
socket to use only authorized security associations (or no security
association) to send/receive network packets.
Patch purpose:
The patch is designed to enable access control per packets based on
the strongly authenticated IPSec security association. Such access
controls augment the existing ones based on network interface and IP
address. The former are very coarse-grained, and the latter can be
spoofed. By using IPSec, the system can control access to remote
hosts based on cryptographic keys generated using the IPSec mechanism.
This enables access control on a per-machine basis or per-application
if the remote machine is running the same mechanism and trusted to
enforce the access control policy.
Patch design approach:
The overall approach is that policy (xfrm_policy) entries set by
user-level programs (e.g., setkey for ipsec-tools) are extended with a
security context that is used at policy selection time in the XFRM
subsystem to restrict the sockets that can send/receive packets via
security associations (xfrm_states) that are built from those
policies.
A presentation available at
www.selinux-symposium.org/2005/presentations/session2/2-3-jaeger.pdf
from the SELinux symposium describes the overall approach.
Patch implementation details:
On output, the policy retrieved (via xfrm_policy_lookup or
xfrm_sk_policy_lookup) must be authorized for the security context of
the socket and the same security context is required for resultant
security association (retrieved or negotiated via racoon in
ipsec-tools). This is enforced in xfrm_state_find.
On input, the policy retrieved must also be authorized for the socket
(at __xfrm_policy_check), and the security context of the policy must
also match the security association being used.
The patch has virtually no impact on packets that do not use IPSec.
The existing Netfilter (outgoing) and LSM rcv_skb hooks are used as
before.
Also, if IPSec is used without security contexts, the impact is
minimal. The LSM must allow such policies to be selected for the
combination of socket and remote machine, but subsequent IPSec
processing proceeds as in the original case.
Testing:
The pfkey interface is tested using the ipsec-tools. ipsec-tools have
been modified (a separate ipsec-tools patch is available for version
0.5) that supports assignment of xfrm_policy entries and security
associations with security contexts via setkey and the negotiation
using the security contexts via racoon.
The xfrm_user interface is tested via ad hoc programs that set
security contexts. These programs are also available from me, and
contain programs for setting, getting, and deleting policy for testing
this interface. Testing of sa functions was done by tracing kernel
behavior.
Signed-off-by: Trent Jaeger <tjaeger@cse.psu.edu>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-12-14 07:12:27 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
config SECURITY_NETWORK_XFRM
|
|
|
|
|
bool "XFRM (IPSec) Networking Security Hooks"
|
|
|
|
|
depends on XFRM && SECURITY_NETWORK
|
|
|
|
|
help
|
|
|
|
|
This enables the XFRM (IPSec) networking security hooks.
|
|
|
|
|
If enabled, a security module can use these hooks to
|
|
|
|
|
implement per-packet access controls based on labels
|
|
|
|
|
derived from IPSec policy. Non-IPSec communications are
|
|
|
|
|
designated as unlabelled, and only sockets authorized
|
|
|
|
|
to communicate unlabelled data can send without using
|
|
|
|
|
IPSec.
|
|
|
|
|
If you are unsure how to answer this question, answer N.
|
2005-04-16 22:20:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2008-12-17 04:24:15 +00:00
|
|
|
config SECURITY_PATH
|
|
|
|
|
bool "Security hooks for pathname based access control"
|
|
|
|
|
depends on SECURITY
|
|
|
|
|
help
|
|
|
|
|
This enables the security hooks for pathname based access control.
|
|
|
|
|
If enabled, a security module can use these hooks to
|
|
|
|
|
implement pathname based access controls.
|
|
|
|
|
If you are unsure how to answer this question, answer N.
|
|
|
|
|
|
x86, intel_txt: Intel TXT boot support
This patch adds kernel configuration and boot support for Intel Trusted
Execution Technology (Intel TXT).
Intel's technology for safer computing, Intel Trusted Execution
Technology (Intel TXT), defines platform-level enhancements that
provide the building blocks for creating trusted platforms.
Intel TXT was formerly known by the code name LaGrande Technology (LT).
Intel TXT in Brief:
o Provides dynamic root of trust for measurement (DRTM)
o Data protection in case of improper shutdown
o Measurement and verification of launched environment
Intel TXT is part of the vPro(TM) brand and is also available some
non-vPro systems. It is currently available on desktop systems based on
the Q35, X38, Q45, and Q43 Express chipsets (e.g. Dell Optiplex 755, HP
dc7800, etc.) and mobile systems based on the GM45, PM45, and GS45
Express chipsets.
For more information, see http://www.intel.com/technology/security/.
This site also has a link to the Intel TXT MLE Developers Manual, which
has been updated for the new released platforms.
A much more complete description of how these patches support TXT, how to
configure a system for it, etc. is in the Documentation/intel_txt.txt file
in this patch.
This patch provides the TXT support routines for complete functionality,
documentation for TXT support and for the changes to the boot_params structure,
and boot detection of a TXT launch. Attempts to shutdown (reboot, Sx) the system
will result in platform resets; subsequent patches will support these shutdown modes
properly.
Documentation/intel_txt.txt | 210 +++++++++++++++++++++
Documentation/x86/zero-page.txt | 1
arch/x86/include/asm/bootparam.h | 3
arch/x86/include/asm/fixmap.h | 3
arch/x86/include/asm/tboot.h | 197 ++++++++++++++++++++
arch/x86/kernel/Makefile | 1
arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 4
arch/x86/kernel/tboot.c | 379 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
security/Kconfig | 30 +++
9 files changed, 827 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Signed-off-by: Joseph Cihula <joseph.cihula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Shane Wang <shane.wang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gang Wei <gang.wei@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
2009-07-01 02:30:59 +00:00
|
|
|
config INTEL_TXT
|
|
|
|
|
bool "Enable Intel(R) Trusted Execution Technology (Intel(R) TXT)"
|
2009-09-02 01:25:07 +00:00
|
|
|
depends on HAVE_INTEL_TXT
|
x86, intel_txt: Intel TXT boot support
This patch adds kernel configuration and boot support for Intel Trusted
Execution Technology (Intel TXT).
Intel's technology for safer computing, Intel Trusted Execution
Technology (Intel TXT), defines platform-level enhancements that
provide the building blocks for creating trusted platforms.
Intel TXT was formerly known by the code name LaGrande Technology (LT).
Intel TXT in Brief:
o Provides dynamic root of trust for measurement (DRTM)
o Data protection in case of improper shutdown
o Measurement and verification of launched environment
Intel TXT is part of the vPro(TM) brand and is also available some
non-vPro systems. It is currently available on desktop systems based on
the Q35, X38, Q45, and Q43 Express chipsets (e.g. Dell Optiplex 755, HP
dc7800, etc.) and mobile systems based on the GM45, PM45, and GS45
Express chipsets.
For more information, see http://www.intel.com/technology/security/.
This site also has a link to the Intel TXT MLE Developers Manual, which
has been updated for the new released platforms.
A much more complete description of how these patches support TXT, how to
configure a system for it, etc. is in the Documentation/intel_txt.txt file
in this patch.
This patch provides the TXT support routines for complete functionality,
documentation for TXT support and for the changes to the boot_params structure,
and boot detection of a TXT launch. Attempts to shutdown (reboot, Sx) the system
will result in platform resets; subsequent patches will support these shutdown modes
properly.
Documentation/intel_txt.txt | 210 +++++++++++++++++++++
Documentation/x86/zero-page.txt | 1
arch/x86/include/asm/bootparam.h | 3
arch/x86/include/asm/fixmap.h | 3
arch/x86/include/asm/tboot.h | 197 ++++++++++++++++++++
arch/x86/kernel/Makefile | 1
arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 4
arch/x86/kernel/tboot.c | 379 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
security/Kconfig | 30 +++
9 files changed, 827 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Signed-off-by: Joseph Cihula <joseph.cihula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Shane Wang <shane.wang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gang Wei <gang.wei@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
2009-07-01 02:30:59 +00:00
|
|
|
help
|
|
|
|
|
This option enables support for booting the kernel with the
|
|
|
|
|
Trusted Boot (tboot) module. This will utilize
|
|
|
|
|
Intel(R) Trusted Execution Technology to perform a measured launch
|
|
|
|
|
of the kernel. If the system does not support Intel(R) TXT, this
|
|
|
|
|
will have no effect.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-08-12 15:00:40 +00:00
|
|
|
Intel TXT will provide higher assurance of system configuration and
|
x86, intel_txt: Intel TXT boot support
This patch adds kernel configuration and boot support for Intel Trusted
Execution Technology (Intel TXT).
Intel's technology for safer computing, Intel Trusted Execution
Technology (Intel TXT), defines platform-level enhancements that
provide the building blocks for creating trusted platforms.
Intel TXT was formerly known by the code name LaGrande Technology (LT).
Intel TXT in Brief:
o Provides dynamic root of trust for measurement (DRTM)
o Data protection in case of improper shutdown
o Measurement and verification of launched environment
Intel TXT is part of the vPro(TM) brand and is also available some
non-vPro systems. It is currently available on desktop systems based on
the Q35, X38, Q45, and Q43 Express chipsets (e.g. Dell Optiplex 755, HP
dc7800, etc.) and mobile systems based on the GM45, PM45, and GS45
Express chipsets.
For more information, see http://www.intel.com/technology/security/.
This site also has a link to the Intel TXT MLE Developers Manual, which
has been updated for the new released platforms.
A much more complete description of how these patches support TXT, how to
configure a system for it, etc. is in the Documentation/intel_txt.txt file
in this patch.
This patch provides the TXT support routines for complete functionality,
documentation for TXT support and for the changes to the boot_params structure,
and boot detection of a TXT launch. Attempts to shutdown (reboot, Sx) the system
will result in platform resets; subsequent patches will support these shutdown modes
properly.
Documentation/intel_txt.txt | 210 +++++++++++++++++++++
Documentation/x86/zero-page.txt | 1
arch/x86/include/asm/bootparam.h | 3
arch/x86/include/asm/fixmap.h | 3
arch/x86/include/asm/tboot.h | 197 ++++++++++++++++++++
arch/x86/kernel/Makefile | 1
arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 4
arch/x86/kernel/tboot.c | 379 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
security/Kconfig | 30 +++
9 files changed, 827 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Signed-off-by: Joseph Cihula <joseph.cihula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Shane Wang <shane.wang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gang Wei <gang.wei@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
2009-07-01 02:30:59 +00:00
|
|
|
initial state as well as data reset protection. This is used to
|
|
|
|
|
create a robust initial kernel measurement and verification, which
|
|
|
|
|
helps to ensure that kernel security mechanisms are functioning
|
|
|
|
|
correctly. This level of protection requires a root of trust outside
|
|
|
|
|
of the kernel itself.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intel TXT also helps solve real end user concerns about having
|
|
|
|
|
confidence that their hardware is running the VMM or kernel that
|
2009-08-12 15:00:40 +00:00
|
|
|
it was configured with, especially since they may be responsible for
|
x86, intel_txt: Intel TXT boot support
This patch adds kernel configuration and boot support for Intel Trusted
Execution Technology (Intel TXT).
Intel's technology for safer computing, Intel Trusted Execution
Technology (Intel TXT), defines platform-level enhancements that
provide the building blocks for creating trusted platforms.
Intel TXT was formerly known by the code name LaGrande Technology (LT).
Intel TXT in Brief:
o Provides dynamic root of trust for measurement (DRTM)
o Data protection in case of improper shutdown
o Measurement and verification of launched environment
Intel TXT is part of the vPro(TM) brand and is also available some
non-vPro systems. It is currently available on desktop systems based on
the Q35, X38, Q45, and Q43 Express chipsets (e.g. Dell Optiplex 755, HP
dc7800, etc.) and mobile systems based on the GM45, PM45, and GS45
Express chipsets.
For more information, see http://www.intel.com/technology/security/.
This site also has a link to the Intel TXT MLE Developers Manual, which
has been updated for the new released platforms.
A much more complete description of how these patches support TXT, how to
configure a system for it, etc. is in the Documentation/intel_txt.txt file
in this patch.
This patch provides the TXT support routines for complete functionality,
documentation for TXT support and for the changes to the boot_params structure,
and boot detection of a TXT launch. Attempts to shutdown (reboot, Sx) the system
will result in platform resets; subsequent patches will support these shutdown modes
properly.
Documentation/intel_txt.txt | 210 +++++++++++++++++++++
Documentation/x86/zero-page.txt | 1
arch/x86/include/asm/bootparam.h | 3
arch/x86/include/asm/fixmap.h | 3
arch/x86/include/asm/tboot.h | 197 ++++++++++++++++++++
arch/x86/kernel/Makefile | 1
arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 4
arch/x86/kernel/tboot.c | 379 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
security/Kconfig | 30 +++
9 files changed, 827 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Signed-off-by: Joseph Cihula <joseph.cihula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Shane Wang <shane.wang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gang Wei <gang.wei@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
2009-07-01 02:30:59 +00:00
|
|
|
providing such assurances to VMs and services running on it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See <http://www.intel.com/technology/security/> for more information
|
|
|
|
|
about Intel(R) TXT.
|
|
|
|
|
See <http://tboot.sourceforge.net> for more information about tboot.
|
|
|
|
|
See Documentation/intel_txt.txt for a description of how to enable
|
|
|
|
|
Intel TXT support in a kernel boot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you are unsure as to whether this is required, answer N.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-07-31 16:54:11 +00:00
|
|
|
config LSM_MMAP_MIN_ADDR
|
2009-08-18 20:14:29 +00:00
|
|
|
int "Low address space for LSM to protect from user allocation"
|
2009-07-31 16:54:11 +00:00
|
|
|
depends on SECURITY && SECURITY_SELINUX
|
2009-08-18 17:47:37 +00:00
|
|
|
default 65536
|
2009-07-31 16:54:11 +00:00
|
|
|
help
|
|
|
|
|
This is the portion of low virtual memory which should be protected
|
|
|
|
|
from userspace allocation. Keeping a user from writing to low pages
|
|
|
|
|
can help reduce the impact of kernel NULL pointer bugs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For most ia64, ppc64 and x86 users with lots of address space
|
|
|
|
|
a value of 65536 is reasonable and should cause no problems.
|
|
|
|
|
On arm and other archs it should not be higher than 32768.
|
|
|
|
|
Programs which use vm86 functionality or have some need to map
|
|
|
|
|
this low address space will need the permission specific to the
|
|
|
|
|
systems running LSM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 22:20:36 +00:00
|
|
|
source security/selinux/Kconfig
|
Smack: Simplified Mandatory Access Control Kernel
Smack is the Simplified Mandatory Access Control Kernel.
Smack implements mandatory access control (MAC) using labels
attached to tasks and data containers, including files, SVIPC,
and other tasks. Smack is a kernel based scheme that requires
an absolute minimum of application support and a very small
amount of configuration data.
Smack uses extended attributes and
provides a set of general mount options, borrowing technics used
elsewhere. Smack uses netlabel for CIPSO labeling. Smack provides
a pseudo-filesystem smackfs that is used for manipulation of
system Smack attributes.
The patch, patches for ls and sshd, a README, a startup script,
and x86 binaries for ls and sshd are also available on
http://www.schaufler-ca.com
Development has been done using Fedora Core 7 in a virtual machine
environment and on an old Sony laptop.
Smack provides mandatory access controls based on the label attached
to a task and the label attached to the object it is attempting to
access. Smack labels are deliberately short (1-23 characters) text
strings. Single character labels using special characters are reserved
for system use. The only operation applied to Smack labels is equality
comparison. No wildcards or expressions, regular or otherwise, are
used. Smack labels are composed of printable characters and may not
include "/".
A file always gets the Smack label of the task that created it.
Smack defines and uses these labels:
"*" - pronounced "star"
"_" - pronounced "floor"
"^" - pronounced "hat"
"?" - pronounced "huh"
The access rules enforced by Smack are, in order:
1. Any access requested by a task labeled "*" is denied.
2. A read or execute access requested by a task labeled "^"
is permitted.
3. A read or execute access requested on an object labeled "_"
is permitted.
4. Any access requested on an object labeled "*" is permitted.
5. Any access requested by a task on an object with the same
label is permitted.
6. Any access requested that is explicitly defined in the loaded
rule set is permitted.
7. Any other access is denied.
Rules may be explicitly defined by writing subject,object,access
triples to /smack/load.
Smack rule sets can be easily defined that describe Bell&LaPadula
sensitivity, Biba integrity, and a variety of interesting
configurations. Smack rule sets can be modified on the fly to
accommodate changes in the operating environment or even the time
of day.
Some practical use cases:
Hierarchical levels. The less common of the two usual uses
for MLS systems is to define hierarchical levels, often
unclassified, confidential, secret, and so on. To set up smack
to support this, these rules could be defined:
C Unclass rx
S C rx
S Unclass rx
TS S rx
TS C rx
TS Unclass rx
A TS process can read S, C, and Unclass data, but cannot write it.
An S process can read C and Unclass. Note that specifying that
TS can read S and S can read C does not imply TS can read C, it
has to be explicitly stated.
Non-hierarchical categories. This is the more common of the
usual uses for an MLS system. Since the default rule is that a
subject cannot access an object with a different label no
access rules are required to implement compartmentalization.
A case that the Bell & LaPadula policy does not allow is demonstrated
with this Smack access rule:
A case that Bell&LaPadula does not allow that Smack does:
ESPN ABC r
ABC ESPN r
On my portable video device I have two applications, one that
shows ABC programming and the other ESPN programming. ESPN wants
to show me sport stories that show up as news, and ABC will
only provide minimal information about a sports story if ESPN
is covering it. Each side can look at the other's info, neither
can change the other. Neither can see what FOX is up to, which
is just as well all things considered.
Another case that I especially like:
SatData Guard w
Guard Publish w
A program running with the Guard label opens a UDP socket and
accepts messages sent by a program running with a SatData label.
The Guard program inspects the message to ensure it is wholesome
and if it is sends it to a program running with the Publish label.
This program then puts the information passed in an appropriate
place. Note that the Guard program cannot write to a Publish
file system object because file system semanitic require read as
well as write.
The four cases (categories, levels, mutual read, guardbox) here
are all quite real, and problems I've been asked to solve over
the years. The first two are easy to do with traditonal MLS systems
while the last two you can't without invoking privilege, at least
for a while.
Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Cc: Joshua Brindle <method@manicmethod.com>
Cc: Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com>
Cc: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Cc: "Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwish.07@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew G. Morgan <morgan@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-02-05 06:29:50 +00:00
|
|
|
source security/smack/Kconfig
|
2009-02-05 08:18:17 +00:00
|
|
|
source security/tomoyo/Kconfig
|
2010-07-29 21:48:08 +00:00
|
|
|
source security/apparmor/Kconfig
|
2005-04-16 22:20:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2009-02-04 14:06:58 +00:00
|
|
|
source security/integrity/ima/Kconfig
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-11-06 01:03:20 +00:00
|
|
|
choice
|
|
|
|
|
prompt "Default security module"
|
|
|
|
|
default DEFAULT_SECURITY_SELINUX if SECURITY_SELINUX
|
|
|
|
|
default DEFAULT_SECURITY_SMACK if SECURITY_SMACK
|
|
|
|
|
default DEFAULT_SECURITY_TOMOYO if SECURITY_TOMOYO
|
2010-07-29 21:48:08 +00:00
|
|
|
default DEFAULT_SECURITY_APPARMOR if SECURITY_APPARMOR
|
2009-11-06 01:03:20 +00:00
|
|
|
default DEFAULT_SECURITY_DAC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
help
|
|
|
|
|
Select the security module that will be used by default if the
|
|
|
|
|
kernel parameter security= is not specified.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
config DEFAULT_SECURITY_SELINUX
|
|
|
|
|
bool "SELinux" if SECURITY_SELINUX=y
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
config DEFAULT_SECURITY_SMACK
|
|
|
|
|
bool "Simplified Mandatory Access Control" if SECURITY_SMACK=y
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
config DEFAULT_SECURITY_TOMOYO
|
|
|
|
|
bool "TOMOYO" if SECURITY_TOMOYO=y
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-07-29 21:48:08 +00:00
|
|
|
config DEFAULT_SECURITY_APPARMOR
|
|
|
|
|
bool "AppArmor" if SECURITY_APPARMOR=y
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-11-06 01:03:20 +00:00
|
|
|
config DEFAULT_SECURITY_DAC
|
|
|
|
|
bool "Unix Discretionary Access Controls"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
endchoice
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
config DEFAULT_SECURITY
|
|
|
|
|
string
|
|
|
|
|
default "selinux" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_SELINUX
|
|
|
|
|
default "smack" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_SMACK
|
|
|
|
|
default "tomoyo" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_TOMOYO
|
2010-07-29 21:48:08 +00:00
|
|
|
default "apparmor" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_APPARMOR
|
2009-11-06 01:03:20 +00:00
|
|
|
default "" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_DAC
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 22:20:36 +00:00
|
|
|
endmenu
|
|
|
|
|
|
