linux/kernel/livepatch/transition.c

638 lines
18 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

livepatch: change to a per-task consistency model Change livepatch to use a basic per-task consistency model. This is the foundation which will eventually enable us to patch those ~10% of security patches which change function or data semantics. This is the biggest remaining piece needed to make livepatch more generally useful. This code stems from the design proposal made by Vojtech [1] in November 2014. It's a hybrid of kGraft and kpatch: it uses kGraft's per-task consistency and syscall barrier switching combined with kpatch's stack trace switching. There are also a number of fallback options which make it quite flexible. Patches are applied on a per-task basis, when the task is deemed safe to switch over. When a patch is enabled, livepatch enters into a transition state where tasks are converging to the patched state. Usually this transition state can complete in a few seconds. The same sequence occurs when a patch is disabled, except the tasks converge from the patched state to the unpatched state. An interrupt handler inherits the patched state of the task it interrupts. The same is true for forked tasks: the child inherits the patched state of the parent. Livepatch uses several complementary approaches to determine when it's safe to patch tasks: 1. The first and most effective approach is stack checking of sleeping tasks. If no affected functions are on the stack of a given task, the task is patched. In most cases this will patch most or all of the tasks on the first try. Otherwise it'll keep trying periodically. This option is only available if the architecture has reliable stacks (HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE). 2. The second approach, if needed, is kernel exit switching. A task is switched when it returns to user space from a system call, a user space IRQ, or a signal. It's useful in the following cases: a) Patching I/O-bound user tasks which are sleeping on an affected function. In this case you have to send SIGSTOP and SIGCONT to force it to exit the kernel and be patched. b) Patching CPU-bound user tasks. If the task is highly CPU-bound then it will get patched the next time it gets interrupted by an IRQ. c) In the future it could be useful for applying patches for architectures which don't yet have HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE. In this case you would have to signal most of the tasks on the system. However this isn't supported yet because there's currently no way to patch kthreads without HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE. 3. For idle "swapper" tasks, since they don't ever exit the kernel, they instead have a klp_update_patch_state() call in the idle loop which allows them to be patched before the CPU enters the idle state. (Note there's not yet such an approach for kthreads.) All the above approaches may be skipped by setting the 'immediate' flag in the 'klp_patch' struct, which will disable per-task consistency and patch all tasks immediately. This can be useful if the patch doesn't change any function or data semantics. Note that, even with this flag set, it's possible that some tasks may still be running with an old version of the function, until that function returns. There's also an 'immediate' flag in the 'klp_func' struct which allows you to specify that certain functions in the patch can be applied without per-task consistency. This might be useful if you want to patch a common function like schedule(), and the function change doesn't need consistency but the rest of the patch does. For architectures which don't have HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE, the user must set patch->immediate which causes all tasks to be patched immediately. This option should be used with care, only when the patch doesn't change any function or data semantics. In the future, architectures which don't have HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE may be allowed to use per-task consistency if we can come up with another way to patch kthreads. The /sys/kernel/livepatch/<patch>/transition file shows whether a patch is in transition. Only a single patch (the topmost patch on the stack) can be in transition at a given time. A patch can remain in transition indefinitely, if any of the tasks are stuck in the initial patch state. A transition can be reversed and effectively canceled by writing the opposite value to the /sys/kernel/livepatch/<patch>/enabled file while the transition is in progress. Then all the tasks will attempt to converge back to the original patch state. [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20141107140458.GA21774@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Acked-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> # for the scheduler changes Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
2017-02-14 01:42:40 +00:00
/*
* transition.c - Kernel Live Patching transition functions
*
* Copyright (C) 2015-2016 Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
* modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
* as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2
* of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
*
* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
* GNU General Public License for more details.
*
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
* along with this program; if not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
*/
#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
#include <linux/cpu.h>
#include <linux/stacktrace.h>
#include "core.h"
livepatch: change to a per-task consistency model Change livepatch to use a basic per-task consistency model. This is the foundation which will eventually enable us to patch those ~10% of security patches which change function or data semantics. This is the biggest remaining piece needed to make livepatch more generally useful. This code stems from the design proposal made by Vojtech [1] in November 2014. It's a hybrid of kGraft and kpatch: it uses kGraft's per-task consistency and syscall barrier switching combined with kpatch's stack trace switching. There are also a number of fallback options which make it quite flexible. Patches are applied on a per-task basis, when the task is deemed safe to switch over. When a patch is enabled, livepatch enters into a transition state where tasks are converging to the patched state. Usually this transition state can complete in a few seconds. The same sequence occurs when a patch is disabled, except the tasks converge from the patched state to the unpatched state. An interrupt handler inherits the patched state of the task it interrupts. The same is true for forked tasks: the child inherits the patched state of the parent. Livepatch uses several complementary approaches to determine when it's safe to patch tasks: 1. The first and most effective approach is stack checking of sleeping tasks. If no affected functions are on the stack of a given task, the task is patched. In most cases this will patch most or all of the tasks on the first try. Otherwise it'll keep trying periodically. This option is only available if the architecture has reliable stacks (HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE). 2. The second approach, if needed, is kernel exit switching. A task is switched when it returns to user space from a system call, a user space IRQ, or a signal. It's useful in the following cases: a) Patching I/O-bound user tasks which are sleeping on an affected function. In this case you have to send SIGSTOP and SIGCONT to force it to exit the kernel and be patched. b) Patching CPU-bound user tasks. If the task is highly CPU-bound then it will get patched the next time it gets interrupted by an IRQ. c) In the future it could be useful for applying patches for architectures which don't yet have HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE. In this case you would have to signal most of the tasks on the system. However this isn't supported yet because there's currently no way to patch kthreads without HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE. 3. For idle "swapper" tasks, since they don't ever exit the kernel, they instead have a klp_update_patch_state() call in the idle loop which allows them to be patched before the CPU enters the idle state. (Note there's not yet such an approach for kthreads.) All the above approaches may be skipped by setting the 'immediate' flag in the 'klp_patch' struct, which will disable per-task consistency and patch all tasks immediately. This can be useful if the patch doesn't change any function or data semantics. Note that, even with this flag set, it's possible that some tasks may still be running with an old version of the function, until that function returns. There's also an 'immediate' flag in the 'klp_func' struct which allows you to specify that certain functions in the patch can be applied without per-task consistency. This might be useful if you want to patch a common function like schedule(), and the function change doesn't need consistency but the rest of the patch does. For architectures which don't have HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE, the user must set patch->immediate which causes all tasks to be patched immediately. This option should be used with care, only when the patch doesn't change any function or data semantics. In the future, architectures which don't have HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE may be allowed to use per-task consistency if we can come up with another way to patch kthreads. The /sys/kernel/livepatch/<patch>/transition file shows whether a patch is in transition. Only a single patch (the topmost patch on the stack) can be in transition at a given time. A patch can remain in transition indefinitely, if any of the tasks are stuck in the initial patch state. A transition can be reversed and effectively canceled by writing the opposite value to the /sys/kernel/livepatch/<patch>/enabled file while the transition is in progress. Then all the tasks will attempt to converge back to the original patch state. [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20141107140458.GA21774@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Acked-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> # for the scheduler changes Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
2017-02-14 01:42:40 +00:00
#include "patch.h"
#include "transition.h"
#include "../sched/sched.h"
#define MAX_STACK_ENTRIES 100
#define STACK_ERR_BUF_SIZE 128
struct klp_patch *klp_transition_patch;
static int klp_target_state = KLP_UNDEFINED;
static bool klp_forced = false;
livepatch: change to a per-task consistency model Change livepatch to use a basic per-task consistency model. This is the foundation which will eventually enable us to patch those ~10% of security patches which change function or data semantics. This is the biggest remaining piece needed to make livepatch more generally useful. This code stems from the design proposal made by Vojtech [1] in November 2014. It's a hybrid of kGraft and kpatch: it uses kGraft's per-task consistency and syscall barrier switching combined with kpatch's stack trace switching. There are also a number of fallback options which make it quite flexible. Patches are applied on a per-task basis, when the task is deemed safe to switch over. When a patch is enabled, livepatch enters into a transition state where tasks are converging to the patched state. Usually this transition state can complete in a few seconds. The same sequence occurs when a patch is disabled, except the tasks converge from the patched state to the unpatched state. An interrupt handler inherits the patched state of the task it interrupts. The same is true for forked tasks: the child inherits the patched state of the parent. Livepatch uses several complementary approaches to determine when it's safe to patch tasks: 1. The first and most effective approach is stack checking of sleeping tasks. If no affected functions are on the stack of a given task, the task is patched. In most cases this will patch most or all of the tasks on the first try. Otherwise it'll keep trying periodically. This option is only available if the architecture has reliable stacks (HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE). 2. The second approach, if needed, is kernel exit switching. A task is switched when it returns to user space from a system call, a user space IRQ, or a signal. It's useful in the following cases: a) Patching I/O-bound user tasks which are sleeping on an affected function. In this case you have to send SIGSTOP and SIGCONT to force it to exit the kernel and be patched. b) Patching CPU-bound user tasks. If the task is highly CPU-bound then it will get patched the next time it gets interrupted by an IRQ. c) In the future it could be useful for applying patches for architectures which don't yet have HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE. In this case you would have to signal most of the tasks on the system. However this isn't supported yet because there's currently no way to patch kthreads without HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE. 3. For idle "swapper" tasks, since they don't ever exit the kernel, they instead have a klp_update_patch_state() call in the idle loop which allows them to be patched before the CPU enters the idle state. (Note there's not yet such an approach for kthreads.) All the above approaches may be skipped by setting the 'immediate' flag in the 'klp_patch' struct, which will disable per-task consistency and patch all tasks immediately. This can be useful if the patch doesn't change any function or data semantics. Note that, even with this flag set, it's possible that some tasks may still be running with an old version of the function, until that function returns. There's also an 'immediate' flag in the 'klp_func' struct which allows you to specify that certain functions in the patch can be applied without per-task consistency. This might be useful if you want to patch a common function like schedule(), and the function change doesn't need consistency but the rest of the patch does. For architectures which don't have HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE, the user must set patch->immediate which causes all tasks to be patched immediately. This option should be used with care, only when the patch doesn't change any function or data semantics. In the future, architectures which don't have HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE may be allowed to use per-task consistency if we can come up with another way to patch kthreads. The /sys/kernel/livepatch/<patch>/transition file shows whether a patch is in transition. Only a single patch (the topmost patch on the stack) can be in transition at a given time. A patch can remain in transition indefinitely, if any of the tasks are stuck in the initial patch state. A transition can be reversed and effectively canceled by writing the opposite value to the /sys/kernel/livepatch/<patch>/enabled file while the transition is in progress. Then all the tasks will attempt to converge back to the original patch state. [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20141107140458.GA21774@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Acked-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> # for the scheduler changes Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
2017-02-14 01:42:40 +00:00
/*
* This work can be performed periodically to finish patching or unpatching any
* "straggler" tasks which failed to transition in the first attempt.
*/
static void klp_transition_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
{
mutex_lock(&klp_mutex);
if (klp_transition_patch)
klp_try_complete_transition();
mutex_unlock(&klp_mutex);
}
static DECLARE_DELAYED_WORK(klp_transition_work, klp_transition_work_fn);
livepatch: Fix stacking of patches with respect to RCU rcu_read_(un)lock(), list_*_rcu(), and synchronize_rcu() are used for a secure access and manipulation of the list of patches that modify the same function. In particular, it is the variable func_stack that is accessible from the ftrace handler via struct ftrace_ops and klp_ops. Of course, it synchronizes also some states of the patch on the top of the stack, e.g. func->transition in klp_ftrace_handler. At the same time, this mechanism guards also the manipulation of task->patch_state. It is modified according to the state of the transition and the state of the process. Now, all this works well as long as RCU works well. Sadly livepatching might get into some corner cases when this is not true. For example, RCU is not watching when rcu_read_lock() is taken in idle threads. It is because they might sleep and prevent reaching the grace period for too long. There are ways how to make RCU watching even in idle threads, see rcu_irq_enter(). But there is a small location inside RCU infrastructure when even this does not work. This small problematic location can be detected either before calling rcu_irq_enter() by rcu_irq_enter_disabled() or later by rcu_is_watching(). Sadly, there is no safe way how to handle it. Once we detect that RCU was not watching, we might see inconsistent state of the function stack and the related variables in klp_ftrace_handler(). Then we could do a wrong decision, use an incompatible implementation of the function and break the consistency of the system. We could warn but we could not avoid the damage. Fortunately, ftrace has similar problems and they seem to be solved well there. It uses a heavy weight implementation of some RCU operations. In particular, it replaces: + rcu_read_lock() with preempt_disable_notrace() + rcu_read_unlock() with preempt_enable_notrace() + synchronize_rcu() with schedule_on_each_cpu(sync_work) My understanding is that this is RCU implementation from a stone age. It meets the core RCU requirements but it is rather ineffective. Especially, it does not allow to batch or speed up the synchronize calls. On the other hand, it is very trivial. It allows to safely trace and/or livepatch even the RCU core infrastructure. And the effectiveness is a not a big issue because using ftrace or livepatches on productive systems is a rare operation. The safety is much more important than a negligible extra load. Note that the alternative implementation follows the RCU principles. Therefore, we could and actually must use list_*_rcu() variants when manipulating the func_stack. These functions allow to access the pointers in the right order and with the right barriers. But they do not use any other information that would be set only by rcu_read_lock(). Also note that there are actually two problems solved in ftrace: First, it cares about the consistency of RCU read sections. It is being solved the way as described and used in this patch. Second, ftrace needs to make sure that nobody is inside the dynamic trampoline when it is being freed. For this, it also calls synchronize_rcu_tasks() in preemptive kernel in ftrace_shutdown(). Livepatch has similar problem but it is solved by ftrace for free. klp_ftrace_handler() is a good guy and never sleeps. In addition, it is registered with FTRACE_OPS_FL_DYNAMIC. It causes that unregister_ftrace_function() calls: * schedule_on_each_cpu(ftrace_sync) - always * synchronize_rcu_tasks() - in preemptive kernel The effect is that nobody is neither inside the dynamic trampoline nor inside the ftrace handler after unregister_ftrace_function() returns. [jkosina@suse.cz: reformat changelog, fix comment] Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Acked-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Acked-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
2017-06-14 08:54:52 +00:00
/*
* This function is just a stub to implement a hard force
* of synchronize_rcu(). This requires synchronizing
livepatch: Fix stacking of patches with respect to RCU rcu_read_(un)lock(), list_*_rcu(), and synchronize_rcu() are used for a secure access and manipulation of the list of patches that modify the same function. In particular, it is the variable func_stack that is accessible from the ftrace handler via struct ftrace_ops and klp_ops. Of course, it synchronizes also some states of the patch on the top of the stack, e.g. func->transition in klp_ftrace_handler. At the same time, this mechanism guards also the manipulation of task->patch_state. It is modified according to the state of the transition and the state of the process. Now, all this works well as long as RCU works well. Sadly livepatching might get into some corner cases when this is not true. For example, RCU is not watching when rcu_read_lock() is taken in idle threads. It is because they might sleep and prevent reaching the grace period for too long. There are ways how to make RCU watching even in idle threads, see rcu_irq_enter(). But there is a small location inside RCU infrastructure when even this does not work. This small problematic location can be detected either before calling rcu_irq_enter() by rcu_irq_enter_disabled() or later by rcu_is_watching(). Sadly, there is no safe way how to handle it. Once we detect that RCU was not watching, we might see inconsistent state of the function stack and the related variables in klp_ftrace_handler(). Then we could do a wrong decision, use an incompatible implementation of the function and break the consistency of the system. We could warn but we could not avoid the damage. Fortunately, ftrace has similar problems and they seem to be solved well there. It uses a heavy weight implementation of some RCU operations. In particular, it replaces: + rcu_read_lock() with preempt_disable_notrace() + rcu_read_unlock() with preempt_enable_notrace() + synchronize_rcu() with schedule_on_each_cpu(sync_work) My understanding is that this is RCU implementation from a stone age. It meets the core RCU requirements but it is rather ineffective. Especially, it does not allow to batch or speed up the synchronize calls. On the other hand, it is very trivial. It allows to safely trace and/or livepatch even the RCU core infrastructure. And the effectiveness is a not a big issue because using ftrace or livepatches on productive systems is a rare operation. The safety is much more important than a negligible extra load. Note that the alternative implementation follows the RCU principles. Therefore, we could and actually must use list_*_rcu() variants when manipulating the func_stack. These functions allow to access the pointers in the right order and with the right barriers. But they do not use any other information that would be set only by rcu_read_lock(). Also note that there are actually two problems solved in ftrace: First, it cares about the consistency of RCU read sections. It is being solved the way as described and used in this patch. Second, ftrace needs to make sure that nobody is inside the dynamic trampoline when it is being freed. For this, it also calls synchronize_rcu_tasks() in preemptive kernel in ftrace_shutdown(). Livepatch has similar problem but it is solved by ftrace for free. klp_ftrace_handler() is a good guy and never sleeps. In addition, it is registered with FTRACE_OPS_FL_DYNAMIC. It causes that unregister_ftrace_function() calls: * schedule_on_each_cpu(ftrace_sync) - always * synchronize_rcu_tasks() - in preemptive kernel The effect is that nobody is neither inside the dynamic trampoline nor inside the ftrace handler after unregister_ftrace_function() returns. [jkosina@suse.cz: reformat changelog, fix comment] Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Acked-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Acked-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
2017-06-14 08:54:52 +00:00
* tasks even in userspace and idle.
*/
static void klp_sync(struct work_struct *work)
{
}
/*
* We allow to patch also functions where RCU is not watching,
* e.g. before user_exit(). We can not rely on the RCU infrastructure
* to do the synchronization. Instead hard force the sched synchronization.
*
* This approach allows to use RCU functions for manipulating func_stack
* safely.
*/
static void klp_synchronize_transition(void)
{
schedule_on_each_cpu(klp_sync);
}
livepatch: change to a per-task consistency model Change livepatch to use a basic per-task consistency model. This is the foundation which will eventually enable us to patch those ~10% of security patches which change function or data semantics. This is the biggest remaining piece needed to make livepatch more generally useful. This code stems from the design proposal made by Vojtech [1] in November 2014. It's a hybrid of kGraft and kpatch: it uses kGraft's per-task consistency and syscall barrier switching combined with kpatch's stack trace switching. There are also a number of fallback options which make it quite flexible. Patches are applied on a per-task basis, when the task is deemed safe to switch over. When a patch is enabled, livepatch enters into a transition state where tasks are converging to the patched state. Usually this transition state can complete in a few seconds. The same sequence occurs when a patch is disabled, except the tasks converge from the patched state to the unpatched state. An interrupt handler inherits the patched state of the task it interrupts. The same is true for forked tasks: the child inherits the patched state of the parent. Livepatch uses several complementary approaches to determine when it's safe to patch tasks: 1. The first and most effective approach is stack checking of sleeping tasks. If no affected functions are on the stack of a given task, the task is patched. In most cases this will patch most or all of the tasks on the first try. Otherwise it'll keep trying periodically. This option is only available if the architecture has reliable stacks (HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE). 2. The second approach, if needed, is kernel exit switching. A task is switched when it returns to user space from a system call, a user space IRQ, or a signal. It's useful in the following cases: a) Patching I/O-bound user tasks which are sleeping on an affected function. In this case you have to send SIGSTOP and SIGCONT to force it to exit the kernel and be patched. b) Patching CPU-bound user tasks. If the task is highly CPU-bound then it will get patched the next time it gets interrupted by an IRQ. c) In the future it could be useful for applying patches for architectures which don't yet have HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE. In this case you would have to signal most of the tasks on the system. However this isn't supported yet because there's currently no way to patch kthreads without HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE. 3. For idle "swapper" tasks, since they don't ever exit the kernel, they instead have a klp_update_patch_state() call in the idle loop which allows them to be patched before the CPU enters the idle state. (Note there's not yet such an approach for kthreads.) All the above approaches may be skipped by setting the 'immediate' flag in the 'klp_patch' struct, which will disable per-task consistency and patch all tasks immediately. This can be useful if the patch doesn't change any function or data semantics. Note that, even with this flag set, it's possible that some tasks may still be running with an old version of the function, until that function returns. There's also an 'immediate' flag in the 'klp_func' struct which allows you to specify that certain functions in the patch can be applied without per-task consistency. This might be useful if you want to patch a common function like schedule(), and the function change doesn't need consistency but the rest of the patch does. For architectures which don't have HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE, the user must set patch->immediate which causes all tasks to be patched immediately. This option should be used with care, only when the patch doesn't change any function or data semantics. In the future, architectures which don't have HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE may be allowed to use per-task consistency if we can come up with another way to patch kthreads. The /sys/kernel/livepatch/<patch>/transition file shows whether a patch is in transition. Only a single patch (the topmost patch on the stack) can be in transition at a given time. A patch can remain in transition indefinitely, if any of the tasks are stuck in the initial patch state. A transition can be reversed and effectively canceled by writing the opposite value to the /sys/kernel/livepatch/<patch>/enabled file while the transition is in progress. Then all the tasks will attempt to converge back to the original patch state. [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20141107140458.GA21774@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Acked-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> # for the scheduler changes Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
2017-02-14 01:42:40 +00:00
/*
* The transition to the target patch state is complete. Clean up the data
* structures.
*/
static void klp_complete_transition(void)
{
struct klp_object *obj;
struct klp_func *func;
struct task_struct *g, *task;
unsigned int cpu;
pr_debug("'%s': completing %s transition\n",
klp_transition_patch->mod->name,
klp_target_state == KLP_PATCHED ? "patching" : "unpatching");
livepatch: change to a per-task consistency model Change livepatch to use a basic per-task consistency model. This is the foundation which will eventually enable us to patch those ~10% of security patches which change function or data semantics. This is the biggest remaining piece needed to make livepatch more generally useful. This code stems from the design proposal made by Vojtech [1] in November 2014. It's a hybrid of kGraft and kpatch: it uses kGraft's per-task consistency and syscall barrier switching combined with kpatch's stack trace switching. There are also a number of fallback options which make it quite flexible. Patches are applied on a per-task basis, when the task is deemed safe to switch over. When a patch is enabled, livepatch enters into a transition state where tasks are converging to the patched state. Usually this transition state can complete in a few seconds. The same sequence occurs when a patch is disabled, except the tasks converge from the patched state to the unpatched state. An interrupt handler inherits the patched state of the task it interrupts. The same is true for forked tasks: the child inherits the patched state of the parent. Livepatch uses several complementary approaches to determine when it's safe to patch tasks: 1. The first and most effective approach is stack checking of sleeping tasks. If no affected functions are on the stack of a given task, the task is patched. In most cases this will patch most or all of the tasks on the first try. Otherwise it'll keep trying periodically. This option is only available if the architecture has reliable stacks (HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE). 2. The second approach, if needed, is kernel exit switching. A task is switched when it returns to user space from a system call, a user space IRQ, or a signal. It's useful in the following cases: a) Patching I/O-bound user tasks which are sleeping on an affected function. In this case you have to send SIGSTOP and SIGCONT to force it to exit the kernel and be patched. b) Patching CPU-bound user tasks. If the task is highly CPU-bound then it will get patched the next time it gets interrupted by an IRQ. c) In the future it could be useful for applying patches for architectures which don't yet have HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE. In this case you would have to signal most of the tasks on the system. However this isn't supported yet because there's currently no way to patch kthreads without HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE. 3. For idle "swapper" tasks, since they don't ever exit the kernel, they instead have a klp_update_patch_state() call in the idle loop which allows them to be patched before the CPU enters the idle state. (Note there's not yet such an approach for kthreads.) All the above approaches may be skipped by setting the 'immediate' flag in the 'klp_patch' struct, which will disable per-task consistency and patch all tasks immediately. This can be useful if the patch doesn't change any function or data semantics. Note that, even with this flag set, it's possible that some tasks may still be running with an old version of the function, until that function returns. There's also an 'immediate' flag in the 'klp_func' struct which allows you to specify that certain functions in the patch can be applied without per-task consistency. This might be useful if you want to patch a common function like schedule(), and the function change doesn't need consistency but the rest of the patch does. For architectures which don't have HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE, the user must set patch->immediate which causes all tasks to be patched immediately. This option should be used with care, only when the patch doesn't change any function or data semantics. In the future, architectures which don't have HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE may be allowed to use per-task consistency if we can come up with another way to patch kthreads. The /sys/kernel/livepatch/<patch>/transition file shows whether a patch is in transition. Only a single patch (the topmost patch on the stack) can be in transition at a given time. A patch can remain in transition indefinitely, if any of the tasks are stuck in the initial patch state. A transition can be reversed and effectively canceled by writing the opposite value to the /sys/kernel/livepatch/<patch>/enabled file while the transition is in progress. Then all the tasks will attempt to converge back to the original patch state. [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20141107140458.GA21774@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Acked-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> # for the scheduler changes Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
2017-02-14 01:42:40 +00:00
if (klp_target_state == KLP_UNPATCHED) {
/*
* All tasks have transitioned to KLP_UNPATCHED so we can now
* remove the new functions from the func_stack.
*/
klp_unpatch_objects(klp_transition_patch);
/*
* Make sure klp_ftrace_handler() can no longer see functions
* from this patch on the ops->func_stack. Otherwise, after
* func->transition gets cleared, the handler may choose a
* removed function.
*/
livepatch: Fix stacking of patches with respect to RCU rcu_read_(un)lock(), list_*_rcu(), and synchronize_rcu() are used for a secure access and manipulation of the list of patches that modify the same function. In particular, it is the variable func_stack that is accessible from the ftrace handler via struct ftrace_ops and klp_ops. Of course, it synchronizes also some states of the patch on the top of the stack, e.g. func->transition in klp_ftrace_handler. At the same time, this mechanism guards also the manipulation of task->patch_state. It is modified according to the state of the transition and the state of the process. Now, all this works well as long as RCU works well. Sadly livepatching might get into some corner cases when this is not true. For example, RCU is not watching when rcu_read_lock() is taken in idle threads. It is because they might sleep and prevent reaching the grace period for too long. There are ways how to make RCU watching even in idle threads, see rcu_irq_enter(). But there is a small location inside RCU infrastructure when even this does not work. This small problematic location can be detected either before calling rcu_irq_enter() by rcu_irq_enter_disabled() or later by rcu_is_watching(). Sadly, there is no safe way how to handle it. Once we detect that RCU was not watching, we might see inconsistent state of the function stack and the related variables in klp_ftrace_handler(). Then we could do a wrong decision, use an incompatible implementation of the function and break the consistency of the system. We could warn but we could not avoid the damage. Fortunately, ftrace has similar problems and they seem to be solved well there. It uses a heavy weight implementation of some RCU operations. In particular, it replaces: + rcu_read_lock() with preempt_disable_notrace() + rcu_read_unlock() with preempt_enable_notrace() + synchronize_rcu() with schedule_on_each_cpu(sync_work) My understanding is that this is RCU implementation from a stone age. It meets the core RCU requirements but it is rather ineffective. Especially, it does not allow to batch or speed up the synchronize calls. On the other hand, it is very trivial. It allows to safely trace and/or livepatch even the RCU core infrastructure. And the effectiveness is a not a big issue because using ftrace or livepatches on productive systems is a rare operation. The safety is much more important than a negligible extra load. Note that the alternative implementation follows the RCU principles. Therefore, we could and actually must use list_*_rcu() variants when manipulating the func_stack. These functions allow to access the pointers in the right order and with the right barriers. But they do not use any other information that would be set only by rcu_read_lock(). Also note that there are actually two problems solved in ftrace: First, it cares about the consistency of RCU read sections. It is being solved the way as described and used in this patch. Second, ftrace needs to make sure that nobody is inside the dynamic trampoline when it is being freed. For this, it also calls synchronize_rcu_tasks() in preemptive kernel in ftrace_shutdown(). Livepatch has similar problem but it is solved by ftrace for free. klp_ftrace_handler() is a good guy and never sleeps. In addition, it is registered with FTRACE_OPS_FL_DYNAMIC. It causes that unregister_ftrace_function() calls: * schedule_on_each_cpu(ftrace_sync) - always * synchronize_rcu_tasks() - in preemptive kernel The effect is that nobody is neither inside the dynamic trampoline nor inside the ftrace handler after unregister_ftrace_function() returns. [jkosina@suse.cz: reformat changelog, fix comment] Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Acked-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Acked-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
2017-06-14 08:54:52 +00:00
klp_synchronize_transition();
livepatch: change to a per-task consistency model Change livepatch to use a basic per-task consistency model. This is the foundation which will eventually enable us to patch those ~10% of security patches which change function or data semantics. This is the biggest remaining piece needed to make livepatch more generally useful. This code stems from the design proposal made by Vojtech [1] in November 2014. It's a hybrid of kGraft and kpatch: it uses kGraft's per-task consistency and syscall barrier switching combined with kpatch's stack trace switching. There are also a number of fallback options which make it quite flexible. Patches are applied on a per-task basis, when the task is deemed safe to switch over. When a patch is enabled, livepatch enters into a transition state where tasks are converging to the patched state. Usually this transition state can complete in a few seconds. The same sequence occurs when a patch is disabled, except the tasks converge from the patched state to the unpatched state. An interrupt handler inherits the patched state of the task it interrupts. The same is true for forked tasks: the child inherits the patched state of the parent. Livepatch uses several complementary approaches to determine when it's safe to patch tasks: 1. The first and most effective approach is stack checking of sleeping tasks. If no affected functions are on the stack of a given task, the task is patched. In most cases this will patch most or all of the tasks on the first try. Otherwise it'll keep trying periodically. This option is only available if the architecture has reliable stacks (HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE). 2. The second approach, if needed, is kernel exit switching. A task is switched when it returns to user space from a system call, a user space IRQ, or a signal. It's useful in the following cases: a) Patching I/O-bound user tasks which are sleeping on an affected function. In this case you have to send SIGSTOP and SIGCONT to force it to exit the kernel and be patched. b) Patching CPU-bound user tasks. If the task is highly CPU-bound then it will get patched the next time it gets interrupted by an IRQ. c) In the future it could be useful for applying patches for architectures which don't yet have HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE. In this case you would have to signal most of the tasks on the system. However this isn't supported yet because there's currently no way to patch kthreads without HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE. 3. For idle "swapper" tasks, since they don't ever exit the kernel, they instead have a klp_update_patch_state() call in the idle loop which allows them to be patched before the CPU enters the idle state. (Note there's not yet such an approach for kthreads.) All the above approaches may be skipped by setting the 'immediate' flag in the 'klp_patch' struct, which will disable per-task consistency and patch all tasks immediately. This can be useful if the patch doesn't change any function or data semantics. Note that, even with this flag set, it's possible that some tasks may still be running with an old version of the function, until that function returns. There's also an 'immediate' flag in the 'klp_func' struct which allows you to specify that certain functions in the patch can be applied without per-task consistency. This might be useful if you want to patch a common function like schedule(), and the function change doesn't need consistency but the rest of the patch does. For architectures which don't have HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE, the user must set patch->immediate which causes all tasks to be patched immediately. This option should be used with care, only when the patch doesn't change any function or data semantics. In the future, architectures which don't have HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE may be allowed to use per-task consistency if we can come up with another way to patch kthreads. The /sys/kernel/livepatch/<patch>/transition file shows whether a patch is in transition. Only a single patch (the topmost patch on the stack) can be in transition at a given time. A patch can remain in transition indefinitely, if any of the tasks are stuck in the initial patch state. A transition can be reversed and effectively canceled by writing the opposite value to the /sys/kernel/livepatch/<patch>/enabled file while the transition is in progress. Then all the tasks will attempt to converge back to the original patch state. [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20141107140458.GA21774@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Acked-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> # for the scheduler changes Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
2017-02-14 01:42:40 +00:00
}
klp_for_each_object(klp_transition_patch, obj)
klp_for_each_func(obj, func)
livepatch: change to a per-task consistency model Change livepatch to use a basic per-task consistency model. This is the foundation which will eventually enable us to patch those ~10% of security patches which change function or data semantics. This is the biggest remaining piece needed to make livepatch more generally useful. This code stems from the design proposal made by Vojtech [1] in November 2014. It's a hybrid of kGraft and kpatch: it uses kGraft's per-task consistency and syscall barrier switching combined with kpatch's stack trace switching. There are also a number of fallback options which make it quite flexible. Patches are applied on a per-task basis, when the task is deemed safe to switch over. When a patch is enabled, livepatch enters into a transition state where tasks are converging to the patched state. Usually this transition state can complete in a few seconds. The same sequence occurs when a patch is disabled, except the tasks converge from the patched state to the unpatched state. An interrupt handler inherits the patched state of the task it interrupts. The same is true for forked tasks: the child inherits the patched state of the parent. Livepatch uses several complementary approaches to determine when it's safe to patch tasks: 1. The first and most effective approach is stack checking of sleeping tasks. If no affected functions are on the stack of a given task, the task is patched. In most cases this will patch most or all of the tasks on the first try. Otherwise it'll keep trying periodically. This option is only available if the architecture has reliable stacks (HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE). 2. The second approach, if needed, is kernel exit switching. A task is switched when it returns to user space from a system call, a user space IRQ, or a signal. It's useful in the following cases: a) Patching I/O-bound user tasks which are sleeping on an affected function. In this case you have to send SIGSTOP and SIGCONT to force it to exit the kernel and be patched. b) Patching CPU-bound user tasks. If the task is highly CPU-bound then it will get patched the next time it gets interrupted by an IRQ. c) In the future it could be useful for applying patches for architectures which don't yet have HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE. In this case you would have to signal most of the tasks on the system. However this isn't supported yet because there's currently no way to patch kthreads without HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE. 3. For idle "swapper" tasks, since they don't ever exit the kernel, they instead have a klp_update_patch_state() call in the idle loop which allows them to be patched before the CPU enters the idle state. (Note there's not yet such an approach for kthreads.) All the above approaches may be skipped by setting the 'immediate' flag in the 'klp_patch' struct, which will disable per-task consistency and patch all tasks immediately. This can be useful if the patch doesn't change any function or data semantics. Note that, even with this flag set, it's possible that some tasks may still be running with an old version of the function, until that function returns. There's also an 'immediate' flag in the 'klp_func' struct which allows you to specify that certain functions in the patch can be applied without per-task consistency. This might be useful if you want to patch a common function like schedule(), and the function change doesn't need consistency but the rest of the patch does. For architectures which don't have HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE, the user must set patch->immediate which causes all tasks to be patched immediately. This option should be used with care, only when the patch doesn't change any function or data semantics. In the future, architectures which don't have HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE may be allowed to use per-task consistency if we can come up with another way to patch kthreads. The /sys/kernel/livepatch/<patch>/transition file shows whether a patch is in transition. Only a single patch (the topmost patch on the stack) can be in transition at a given time. A patch can remain in transition indefinitely, if any of the tasks are stuck in the initial patch state. A transition can be reversed and effectively canceled by writing the opposite value to the /sys/kernel/livepatch/<patch>/enabled file while the transition is in progress. Then all the tasks will attempt to converge back to the original patch state. [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20141107140458.GA21774@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Acked-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> # for the scheduler changes Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
2017-02-14 01:42:40 +00:00
func->transition = false;
livepatch: allow removal of a disabled patch Currently we do not allow patch module to unload since there is no method to determine if a task is still running in the patched code. The consistency model gives us the way because when the unpatching finishes we know that all tasks were marked as safe to call an original function. Thus every new call to the function calls the original code and at the same time no task can be somewhere in the patched code, because it had to leave that code to be marked as safe. We can safely let the patch module go after that. Completion is used for synchronization between module removal and sysfs infrastructure in a similar way to commit 942e443127e9 ("module: Fix mod->mkobj.kobj potentially freed too early"). Note that we still do not allow the removal for immediate model, that is no consistency model. The module refcount may increase in this case if somebody disables and enables the patch several times. This should not cause any harm. With this change a call to try_module_get() is moved to __klp_enable_patch from klp_register_patch to make module reference counting symmetric (module_put() is in a patch disable path) and to allow to take a new reference to a disabled module when being enabled. Finally, we need to be very careful about possible races between klp_unregister_patch(), kobject_put() functions and operations on the related sysfs files. kobject_put(&patch->kobj) must be called without klp_mutex. Otherwise, it might be blocked by enabled_store() that needs the mutex as well. In addition, enabled_store() must check if the patch was not unregisted in the meantime. There is no need to do the same for other kobject_put() callsites at the moment. Their sysfs operations neither take the lock nor they access any data that might be freed in the meantime. There was an attempt to use kobjects the right way and prevent these races by design. But it made the patch definition more complicated and opened another can of worms. See https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464018848-4303-1-git-send-email-pmladek@suse.com [Thanks to Petr Mladek for improving the commit message.] Signed-off-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Acked-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
2017-03-06 17:20:29 +00:00
livepatch: change to a per-task consistency model Change livepatch to use a basic per-task consistency model. This is the foundation which will eventually enable us to patch those ~10% of security patches which change function or data semantics. This is the biggest remaining piece needed to make livepatch more generally useful. This code stems from the design proposal made by Vojtech [1] in November 2014. It's a hybrid of kGraft and kpatch: it uses kGraft's per-task consistency and syscall barrier switching combined with kpatch's stack trace switching. There are also a number of fallback options which make it quite flexible. Patches are applied on a per-task basis, when the task is deemed safe to switch over. When a patch is enabled, livepatch enters into a transition state where tasks are converging to the patched state. Usually this transition state can complete in a few seconds. The same sequence occurs when a patch is disabled, except the tasks converge from the patched state to the unpatched state. An interrupt handler inherits the patched state of the task it interrupts. The same is true for forked tasks: the child inherits the patched state of the parent. Livepatch uses several complementary approaches to determine when it's safe to patch tasks: 1. The first and most effective approach is stack checking of sleeping tasks. If no affected functions are on the stack of a given task, the task is patched. In most cases this will patch most or all of the tasks on the first try. Otherwise it'll keep trying periodically. This option is only available if the architecture has reliable stacks (HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE). 2. The second approach, if needed, is kernel exit switching. A task is switched when it returns to user space from a system call, a user space IRQ, or a signal. It's useful in the following cases: a) Patching I/O-bound user tasks which are sleeping on an affected function. In this case you have to send SIGSTOP and SIGCONT to force it to exit the kernel and be patched. b) Patching CPU-bound user tasks. If the task is highly CPU-bound then it will get patched the next time it gets interrupted by an IRQ. c) In the future it could be useful for applying patches for architectures which don't yet have HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE. In this case you would have to signal most of the tasks on the system. However this isn't supported yet because there's currently no way to patch kthreads without HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE. 3. For idle "swapper" tasks, since they don't ever exit the kernel, they instead have a klp_update_patch_state() call in the idle loop which allows them to be patched before the CPU enters the idle state. (Note there's not yet such an approach for kthreads.) All the above approaches may be skipped by setting the 'immediate' flag in the 'klp_patch' struct, which will disable per-task consistency and patch all tasks immediately. This can be useful if the patch doesn't change any function or data semantics. Note that, even with this flag set, it's possible that some tasks may still be running with an old version of the function, until that function returns. There's also an 'immediate' flag in the 'klp_func' struct which allows you to specify that certain functions in the patch can be applied without per-task consistency. This might be useful if you want to patch a common function like schedule(), and the function change doesn't need consistency but the rest of the patch does. For architectures which don't have HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE, the user must set patch->immediate which causes all tasks to be patched immediately. This option should be used with care, only when the patch doesn't change any function or data semantics. In the future, architectures which don't have HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE may be allowed to use per-task consistency if we can come up with another way to patch kthreads. The /sys/kernel/livepatch/<patch>/transition file shows whether a patch is in transition. Only a single patch (the topmost patch on the stack) can be in transition at a given time. A patch can remain in transition indefinitely, if any of the tasks are stuck in the initial patch state. A transition can be reversed and effectively canceled by writing the opposite value to the /sys/kernel/livepatch/<patch>/enabled file while the transition is in progress. Then all the tasks will attempt to converge back to the original patch state. [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20141107140458.GA21774@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Acked-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> # for the scheduler changes Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
2017-02-14 01:42:40 +00:00
/* Prevent klp_ftrace_handler() from seeing KLP_UNDEFINED state */
if (klp_target_state == KLP_PATCHED)
livepatch: Fix stacking of patches with respect to RCU rcu_read_(un)lock(), list_*_rcu(), and synchronize_rcu() are used for a secure access and manipulation of the list of patches that modify the same function. In particular, it is the variable func_stack that is accessible from the ftrace handler via struct ftrace_ops and klp_ops. Of course, it synchronizes also some states of the patch on the top of the stack, e.g. func->transition in klp_ftrace_handler. At the same time, this mechanism guards also the manipulation of task->patch_state. It is modified according to the state of the transition and the state of the process. Now, all this works well as long as RCU works well. Sadly livepatching might get into some corner cases when this is not true. For example, RCU is not watching when rcu_read_lock() is taken in idle threads. It is because they might sleep and prevent reaching the grace period for too long. There are ways how to make RCU watching even in idle threads, see rcu_irq_enter(). But there is a small location inside RCU infrastructure when even this does not work. This small problematic location can be detected either before calling rcu_irq_enter() by rcu_irq_enter_disabled() or later by rcu_is_watching(). Sadly, there is no safe way how to handle it. Once we detect that RCU was not watching, we might see inconsistent state of the function stack and the related variables in klp_ftrace_handler(). Then we could do a wrong decision, use an incompatible implementation of the function and break the consistency of the system. We could warn but we could not avoid the damage. Fortunately, ftrace has similar problems and they seem to be solved well there. It uses a heavy weight implementation of some RCU operations. In particular, it replaces: + rcu_read_lock() with preempt_disable_notrace() + rcu_read_unlock() with preempt_enable_notrace() + synchronize_rcu() with schedule_on_each_cpu(sync_work) My understanding is that this is RCU implementation from a stone age. It meets the core RCU requirements but it is rather ineffective. Especially, it does not allow to batch or speed up the synchronize calls. On the other hand, it is very trivial. It allows to safely trace and/or livepatch even the RCU core infrastructure. And the effectiveness is a not a big issue because using ftrace or livepatches on productive systems is a rare operation. The safety is much more important than a negligible extra load. Note that the alternative implementation follows the RCU principles. Therefore, we could and actually must use list_*_rcu() variants when manipulating the func_stack. These functions allow to access the pointers in the right order and with the right barriers. But they do not use any other information that would be set only by rcu_read_lock(). Also note that there are actually two problems solved in ftrace: First, it cares about the consistency of RCU read sections. It is being solved the way as described and used in this patch. Second, ftrace needs to make sure that nobody is inside the dynamic trampoline when it is being freed. For this, it also calls synchronize_rcu_tasks() in preemptive kernel in ftrace_shutdown(). Livepatch has similar problem but it is solved by ftrace for free. klp_ftrace_handler() is a good guy and never sleeps. In addition, it is registered with FTRACE_OPS_FL_DYNAMIC. It causes that unregister_ftrace_function() calls: * schedule_on_each_cpu(ftrace_sync) - always * synchronize_rcu_tasks() - in preemptive kernel The effect is that nobody is neither inside the dynamic trampoline nor inside the ftrace handler after unregister_ftrace_function() returns. [jkosina@suse.cz: reformat changelog, fix comment] Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Acked-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Acked-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
2017-06-14 08:54:52 +00:00
klp_synchronize_transition();
livepatch: change to a per-task consistency model Change livepatch to use a basic per-task consistency model. This is the foundation which will eventually enable us to patch those ~10% of security patches which change function or data semantics. This is the biggest remaining piece needed to make livepatch more generally useful. This code stems from the design proposal made by Vojtech [1] in November 2014. It's a hybrid of kGraft and kpatch: it uses kGraft's per-task consistency and syscall barrier switching combined with kpatch's stack trace switching. There are also a number of fallback options which make it quite flexible. Patches are applied on a per-task basis, when the task is deemed safe to switch over. When a patch is enabled, livepatch enters into a transition state where tasks are converging to the patched state. Usually this transition state can complete in a few seconds. The same sequence occurs when a patch is disabled, except the tasks converge from the patched state to the unpatched state. An interrupt handler inherits the patched state of the task it interrupts. The same is true for forked tasks: the child inherits the patched state of the parent. Livepatch uses several complementary approaches to determine when it's safe to patch tasks: 1. The first and most effective approach is stack checking of sleeping tasks. If no affected functions are on the stack of a given task, the task is patched. In most cases this will patch most or all of the tasks on the first try. Otherwise it'll keep trying periodically. This option is only available if the architecture has reliable stacks (HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE). 2. The second approach, if needed, is kernel exit switching. A task is switched when it returns to user space from a system call, a user space IRQ, or a signal. It's useful in the following cases: a) Patching I/O-bound user tasks which are sleeping on an affected function. In this case you have to send SIGSTOP and SIGCONT to force it to exit the kernel and be patched. b) Patching CPU-bound user tasks. If the task is highly CPU-bound then it will get patched the next time it gets interrupted by an IRQ. c) In the future it could be useful for applying patches for architectures which don't yet have HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE. In this case you would have to signal most of the tasks on the system. However this isn't supported yet because there's currently no way to patch kthreads without HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE. 3. For idle "swapper" tasks, since they don't ever exit the kernel, they instead have a klp_update_patch_state() call in the idle loop which allows them to be patched before the CPU enters the idle state. (Note there's not yet such an approach for kthreads.) All the above approaches may be skipped by setting the 'immediate' flag in the 'klp_patch' struct, which will disable per-task consistency and patch all tasks immediately. This can be useful if the patch doesn't change any function or data semantics. Note that, even with this flag set, it's possible that some tasks may still be running with an old version of the function, until that function returns. There's also an 'immediate' flag in the 'klp_func' struct which allows you to specify that certain functions in the patch can be applied without per-task consistency. This might be useful if you want to patch a common function like schedule(), and the function change doesn't need consistency but the rest of the patch does. For architectures which don't have HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE, the user must set patch->immediate which causes all tasks to be patched immediately. This option should be used with care, only when the patch doesn't change any function or data semantics. In the future, architectures which don't have HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE may be allowed to use per-task consistency if we can come up with another way to patch kthreads. The /sys/kernel/livepatch/<patch>/transition file shows whether a patch is in transition. Only a single patch (the topmost patch on the stack) can be in transition at a given time. A patch can remain in transition indefinitely, if any of the tasks are stuck in the initial patch state. A transition can be reversed and effectively canceled by writing the opposite value to the /sys/kernel/livepatch/<patch>/enabled file while the transition is in progress. Then all the tasks will attempt to converge back to the original patch state. [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20141107140458.GA21774@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Acked-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> # for the scheduler changes Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
2017-02-14 01:42:40 +00:00
read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
for_each_process_thread(g, task) {
WARN_ON_ONCE(test_tsk_thread_flag(task, TIF_PATCH_PENDING));
task->patch_state = KLP_UNDEFINED;
}
read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
task = idle_task(cpu);
WARN_ON_ONCE(test_tsk_thread_flag(task, TIF_PATCH_PENDING));
task->patch_state = KLP_UNDEFINED;
}
klp_for_each_object(klp_transition_patch, obj) {
if (!klp_is_object_loaded(obj))
continue;
if (klp_target_state == KLP_PATCHED)
klp_post_patch_callback(obj);
else if (klp_target_state == KLP_UNPATCHED)
klp_post_unpatch_callback(obj);
}
pr_notice("'%s': %s complete\n", klp_transition_patch->mod->name,
klp_target_state == KLP_PATCHED ? "patching" : "unpatching");
/*
* klp_forced set implies unbounded increase of module's ref count if
* the module is disabled/enabled in a loop.
*/
if (!klp_forced && klp_target_state == KLP_UNPATCHED)
module_put(klp_transition_patch->mod);
livepatch: change to a per-task consistency model Change livepatch to use a basic per-task consistency model. This is the foundation which will eventually enable us to patch those ~10% of security patches which change function or data semantics. This is the biggest remaining piece needed to make livepatch more generally useful. This code stems from the design proposal made by Vojtech [1] in November 2014. It's a hybrid of kGraft and kpatch: it uses kGraft's per-task consistency and syscall barrier switching combined with kpatch's stack trace switching. There are also a number of fallback options which make it quite flexible. Patches are applied on a per-task basis, when the task is deemed safe to switch over. When a patch is enabled, livepatch enters into a transition state where tasks are converging to the patched state. Usually this transition state can complete in a few seconds. The same sequence occurs when a patch is disabled, except the tasks converge from the patched state to the unpatched state. An interrupt handler inherits the patched state of the task it interrupts. The same is true for forked tasks: the child inherits the patched state of the parent. Livepatch uses several complementary approaches to determine when it's safe to patch tasks: 1. The first and most effective approach is stack checking of sleeping tasks. If no affected functions are on the stack of a given task, the task is patched. In most cases this will patch most or all of the tasks on the first try. Otherwise it'll keep trying periodically. This option is only available if the architecture has reliable stacks (HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE). 2. The second approach, if needed, is kernel exit switching. A task is switched when it returns to user space from a system call, a user space IRQ, or a signal. It's useful in the following cases: a) Patching I/O-bound user tasks which are sleeping on an affected function. In this case you have to send SIGSTOP and SIGCONT to force it to exit the kernel and be patched. b) Patching CPU-bound user tasks. If the task is highly CPU-bound then it will get patched the next time it gets interrupted by an IRQ. c) In the future it could be useful for applying patches for architectures which don't yet have HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE. In this case you would have to signal most of the tasks on the system. However this isn't supported yet because there's currently no way to patch kthreads without HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE. 3. For idle "swapper" tasks, since they don't ever exit the kernel, they instead have a klp_update_patch_state() call in the idle loop which allows them to be patched before the CPU enters the idle state. (Note there's not yet such an approach for kthreads.) All the above approaches may be skipped by setting the 'immediate' flag in the 'klp_patch' struct, which will disable per-task consistency and patch all tasks immediately. This can be useful if the patch doesn't change any function or data semantics. Note that, even with this flag set, it's possible that some tasks may still be running with an old version of the function, until that function returns. There's also an 'immediate' flag in the 'klp_func' struct which allows you to specify that certain functions in the patch can be applied without per-task consistency. This might be useful if you want to patch a common function like schedule(), and the function change doesn't need consistency but the rest of the patch does. For architectures which don't have HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE, the user must set patch->immediate which causes all tasks to be patched immediately. This option should be used with care, only when the patch doesn't change any function or data semantics. In the future, architectures which don't have HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE may be allowed to use per-task consistency if we can come up with another way to patch kthreads. The /sys/kernel/livepatch/<patch>/transition file shows whether a patch is in transition. Only a single patch (the topmost patch on the stack) can be in transition at a given time. A patch can remain in transition indefinitely, if any of the tasks are stuck in the initial patch state. A transition can be reversed and effectively canceled by writing the opposite value to the /sys/kernel/livepatch/<patch>/enabled file while the transition is in progress. Then all the tasks will attempt to converge back to the original patch state. [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20141107140458.GA21774@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Acked-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> # for the scheduler changes Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
2017-02-14 01:42:40 +00:00
klp_target_state = KLP_UNDEFINED;
klp_transition_patch = NULL;
}
/*
* This is called in the error path, to cancel a transition before it has
* started, i.e. klp_init_transition() has been called but
* klp_start_transition() hasn't. If the transition *has* been started,
* klp_reverse_transition() should be used instead.
*/
void klp_cancel_transition(void)
{
livepatch: allow removal of a disabled patch Currently we do not allow patch module to unload since there is no method to determine if a task is still running in the patched code. The consistency model gives us the way because when the unpatching finishes we know that all tasks were marked as safe to call an original function. Thus every new call to the function calls the original code and at the same time no task can be somewhere in the patched code, because it had to leave that code to be marked as safe. We can safely let the patch module go after that. Completion is used for synchronization between module removal and sysfs infrastructure in a similar way to commit 942e443127e9 ("module: Fix mod->mkobj.kobj potentially freed too early"). Note that we still do not allow the removal for immediate model, that is no consistency model. The module refcount may increase in this case if somebody disables and enables the patch several times. This should not cause any harm. With this change a call to try_module_get() is moved to __klp_enable_patch from klp_register_patch to make module reference counting symmetric (module_put() is in a patch disable path) and to allow to take a new reference to a disabled module when being enabled. Finally, we need to be very careful about possible races between klp_unregister_patch(), kobject_put() functions and operations on the related sysfs files. kobject_put(&patch->kobj) must be called without klp_mutex. Otherwise, it might be blocked by enabled_store() that needs the mutex as well. In addition, enabled_store() must check if the patch was not unregisted in the meantime. There is no need to do the same for other kobject_put() callsites at the moment. Their sysfs operations neither take the lock nor they access any data that might be freed in the meantime. There was an attempt to use kobjects the right way and prevent these races by design. But it made the patch definition more complicated and opened another can of worms. See https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464018848-4303-1-git-send-email-pmladek@suse.com [Thanks to Petr Mladek for improving the commit message.] Signed-off-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Acked-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
2017-03-06 17:20:29 +00:00
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(klp_target_state != KLP_PATCHED))
return;
pr_debug("'%s': canceling patching transition, going to unpatch\n",
klp_transition_patch->mod->name);
livepatch: allow removal of a disabled patch Currently we do not allow patch module to unload since there is no method to determine if a task is still running in the patched code. The consistency model gives us the way because when the unpatching finishes we know that all tasks were marked as safe to call an original function. Thus every new call to the function calls the original code and at the same time no task can be somewhere in the patched code, because it had to leave that code to be marked as safe. We can safely let the patch module go after that. Completion is used for synchronization between module removal and sysfs infrastructure in a similar way to commit 942e443127e9 ("module: Fix mod->mkobj.kobj potentially freed too early"). Note that we still do not allow the removal for immediate model, that is no consistency model. The module refcount may increase in this case if somebody disables and enables the patch several times. This should not cause any harm. With this change a call to try_module_get() is moved to __klp_enable_patch from klp_register_patch to make module reference counting symmetric (module_put() is in a patch disable path) and to allow to take a new reference to a disabled module when being enabled. Finally, we need to be very careful about possible races between klp_unregister_patch(), kobject_put() functions and operations on the related sysfs files. kobject_put(&patch->kobj) must be called without klp_mutex. Otherwise, it might be blocked by enabled_store() that needs the mutex as well. In addition, enabled_store() must check if the patch was not unregisted in the meantime. There is no need to do the same for other kobject_put() callsites at the moment. Their sysfs operations neither take the lock nor they access any data that might be freed in the meantime. There was an attempt to use kobjects the right way and prevent these races by design. But it made the patch definition more complicated and opened another can of worms. See https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464018848-4303-1-git-send-email-pmladek@suse.com [Thanks to Petr Mladek for improving the commit message.] Signed-off-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Acked-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
2017-03-06 17:20:29 +00:00
klp_target_state = KLP_UNPATCHED;
livepatch: change to a per-task consistency model Change livepatch to use a basic per-task consistency model. This is the foundation which will eventually enable us to patch those ~10% of security patches which change function or data semantics. This is the biggest remaining piece needed to make livepatch more generally useful. This code stems from the design proposal made by Vojtech [1] in November 2014. It's a hybrid of kGraft and kpatch: it uses kGraft's per-task consistency and syscall barrier switching combined with kpatch's stack trace switching. There are also a number of fallback options which make it quite flexible. Patches are applied on a per-task basis, when the task is deemed safe to switch over. When a patch is enabled, livepatch enters into a transition state where tasks are converging to the patched state. Usually this transition state can complete in a few seconds. The same sequence occurs when a patch is disabled, except the tasks converge from the patched state to the unpatched state. An interrupt handler inherits the patched state of the task it interrupts. The same is true for forked tasks: the child inherits the patched state of the parent. Livepatch uses several complementary approaches to determine when it's safe to patch tasks: 1. The first and most effective approach is stack checking of sleeping tasks. If no affected functions are on the stack of a given task, the task is patched. In most cases this will patch most or all of the tasks on the first try. Otherwise it'll keep trying periodically. This option is only available if the architecture has reliable stacks (HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE). 2. The second approach, if needed, is kernel exit switching. A task is switched when it returns to user space from a system call, a user space IRQ, or a signal. It's useful in the following cases: a) Patching I/O-bound user tasks which are sleeping on an affected function. In this case you have to send SIGSTOP and SIGCONT to force it to exit the kernel and be patched. b) Patching CPU-bound user tasks. If the task is highly CPU-bound then it will get patched the next time it gets interrupted by an IRQ. c) In the future it could be useful for applying patches for architectures which don't yet have HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE. In this case you would have to signal most of the tasks on the system. However this isn't supported yet because there's currently no way to patch kthreads without HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE. 3. For idle "swapper" tasks, since they don't ever exit the kernel, they instead have a klp_update_patch_state() call in the idle loop which allows them to be patched before the CPU enters the idle state. (Note there's not yet such an approach for kthreads.) All the above approaches may be skipped by setting the 'immediate' flag in the 'klp_patch' struct, which will disable per-task consistency and patch all tasks immediately. This can be useful if the patch doesn't change any function or data semantics. Note that, even with this flag set, it's possible that some tasks may still be running with an old version of the function, until that function returns. There's also an 'immediate' flag in the 'klp_func' struct which allows you to specify that certain functions in the patch can be applied without per-task consistency. This might be useful if you want to patch a common function like schedule(), and the function change doesn't need consistency but the rest of the patch does. For architectures which don't have HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE, the user must set patch->immediate which causes all tasks to be patched immediately. This option should be used with care, only when the patch doesn't change any function or data semantics. In the future, architectures which don't have HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE may be allowed to use per-task consistency if we can come up with another way to patch kthreads. The /sys/kernel/livepatch/<patch>/transition file shows whether a patch is in transition. Only a single patch (the topmost patch on the stack) can be in transition at a given time. A patch can remain in transition indefinitely, if any of the tasks are stuck in the initial patch state. A transition can be reversed and effectively canceled by writing the opposite value to the /sys/kernel/livepatch/<patch>/enabled file while the transition is in progress. Then all the tasks will attempt to converge back to the original patch state. [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20141107140458.GA21774@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Acked-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> # for the scheduler changes Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
2017-02-14 01:42:40 +00:00
klp_complete_transition();
}
/*
* Switch the patched state of the task to the set of functions in the target
* patch state.
*
* NOTE: If task is not 'current', the caller must ensure the task is inactive.
* Otherwise klp_ftrace_handler() might read the wrong 'patch_state' value.
*/
void klp_update_patch_state(struct task_struct *task)
{
livepatch: Fix stacking of patches with respect to RCU rcu_read_(un)lock(), list_*_rcu(), and synchronize_rcu() are used for a secure access and manipulation of the list of patches that modify the same function. In particular, it is the variable func_stack that is accessible from the ftrace handler via struct ftrace_ops and klp_ops. Of course, it synchronizes also some states of the patch on the top of the stack, e.g. func->transition in klp_ftrace_handler. At the same time, this mechanism guards also the manipulation of task->patch_state. It is modified according to the state of the transition and the state of the process. Now, all this works well as long as RCU works well. Sadly livepatching might get into some corner cases when this is not true. For example, RCU is not watching when rcu_read_lock() is taken in idle threads. It is because they might sleep and prevent reaching the grace period for too long. There are ways how to make RCU watching even in idle threads, see rcu_irq_enter(). But there is a small location inside RCU infrastructure when even this does not work. This small problematic location can be detected either before calling rcu_irq_enter() by rcu_irq_enter_disabled() or later by rcu_is_watching(). Sadly, there is no safe way how to handle it. Once we detect that RCU was not watching, we might see inconsistent state of the function stack and the related variables in klp_ftrace_handler(). Then we could do a wrong decision, use an incompatible implementation of the function and break the consistency of the system. We could warn but we could not avoid the damage. Fortunately, ftrace has similar problems and they seem to be solved well there. It uses a heavy weight implementation of some RCU operations. In particular, it replaces: + rcu_read_lock() with preempt_disable_notrace() + rcu_read_unlock() with preempt_enable_notrace() + synchronize_rcu() with schedule_on_each_cpu(sync_work) My understanding is that this is RCU implementation from a stone age. It meets the core RCU requirements but it is rather ineffective. Especially, it does not allow to batch or speed up the synchronize calls. On the other hand, it is very trivial. It allows to safely trace and/or livepatch even the RCU core infrastructure. And the effectiveness is a not a big issue because using ftrace or livepatches on productive systems is a rare operation. The safety is much more important than a negligible extra load. Note that the alternative implementation follows the RCU principles. Therefore, we could and actually must use list_*_rcu() variants when manipulating the func_stack. These functions allow to access the pointers in the right order and with the right barriers. But they do not use any other information that would be set only by rcu_read_lock(). Also note that there are actually two problems solved in ftrace: First, it cares about the consistency of RCU read sections. It is being solved the way as described and used in this patch. Second, ftrace needs to make sure that nobody is inside the dynamic trampoline when it is being freed. For this, it also calls synchronize_rcu_tasks() in preemptive kernel in ftrace_shutdown(). Livepatch has similar problem but it is solved by ftrace for free. klp_ftrace_handler() is a good guy and never sleeps. In addition, it is registered with FTRACE_OPS_FL_DYNAMIC. It causes that unregister_ftrace_function() calls: * schedule_on_each_cpu(ftrace_sync) - always * synchronize_rcu_tasks() - in preemptive kernel The effect is that nobody is neither inside the dynamic trampoline nor inside the ftrace handler after unregister_ftrace_function() returns. [jkosina@suse.cz: reformat changelog, fix comment] Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Acked-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Acked-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
2017-06-14 08:54:52 +00:00
/*
* A variant of synchronize_rcu() is used to allow patching functions
livepatch: Fix stacking of patches with respect to RCU rcu_read_(un)lock(), list_*_rcu(), and synchronize_rcu() are used for a secure access and manipulation of the list of patches that modify the same function. In particular, it is the variable func_stack that is accessible from the ftrace handler via struct ftrace_ops and klp_ops. Of course, it synchronizes also some states of the patch on the top of the stack, e.g. func->transition in klp_ftrace_handler. At the same time, this mechanism guards also the manipulation of task->patch_state. It is modified according to the state of the transition and the state of the process. Now, all this works well as long as RCU works well. Sadly livepatching might get into some corner cases when this is not true. For example, RCU is not watching when rcu_read_lock() is taken in idle threads. It is because they might sleep and prevent reaching the grace period for too long. There are ways how to make RCU watching even in idle threads, see rcu_irq_enter(). But there is a small location inside RCU infrastructure when even this does not work. This small problematic location can be detected either before calling rcu_irq_enter() by rcu_irq_enter_disabled() or later by rcu_is_watching(). Sadly, there is no safe way how to handle it. Once we detect that RCU was not watching, we might see inconsistent state of the function stack and the related variables in klp_ftrace_handler(). Then we could do a wrong decision, use an incompatible implementation of the function and break the consistency of the system. We could warn but we could not avoid the damage. Fortunately, ftrace has similar problems and they seem to be solved well there. It uses a heavy weight implementation of some RCU operations. In particular, it replaces: + rcu_read_lock() with preempt_disable_notrace() + rcu_read_unlock() with preempt_enable_notrace() + synchronize_rcu() with schedule_on_each_cpu(sync_work) My understanding is that this is RCU implementation from a stone age. It meets the core RCU requirements but it is rather ineffective. Especially, it does not allow to batch or speed up the synchronize calls. On the other hand, it is very trivial. It allows to safely trace and/or livepatch even the RCU core infrastructure. And the effectiveness is a not a big issue because using ftrace or livepatches on productive systems is a rare operation. The safety is much more important than a negligible extra load. Note that the alternative implementation follows the RCU principles. Therefore, we could and actually must use list_*_rcu() variants when manipulating the func_stack. These functions allow to access the pointers in the right order and with the right barriers. But they do not use any other information that would be set only by rcu_read_lock(). Also note that there are actually two problems solved in ftrace: First, it cares about the consistency of RCU read sections. It is being solved the way as described and used in this patch. Second, ftrace needs to make sure that nobody is inside the dynamic trampoline when it is being freed. For this, it also calls synchronize_rcu_tasks() in preemptive kernel in ftrace_shutdown(). Livepatch has similar problem but it is solved by ftrace for free. klp_ftrace_handler() is a good guy and never sleeps. In addition, it is registered with FTRACE_OPS_FL_DYNAMIC. It causes that unregister_ftrace_function() calls: * schedule_on_each_cpu(ftrace_sync) - always * synchronize_rcu_tasks() - in preemptive kernel The effect is that nobody is neither inside the dynamic trampoline nor inside the ftrace handler after unregister_ftrace_function() returns. [jkosina@suse.cz: reformat changelog, fix comment] Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Acked-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Acked-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
2017-06-14 08:54:52 +00:00
* where RCU is not watching, see klp_synchronize_transition().
*/
preempt_disable_notrace();
livepatch: change to a per-task consistency model Change livepatch to use a basic per-task consistency model. This is the foundation which will eventually enable us to patch those ~10% of security patches which change function or data semantics. This is the biggest remaining piece needed to make livepatch more generally useful. This code stems from the design proposal made by Vojtech [1] in November 2014. It's a hybrid of kGraft and kpatch: it uses kGraft's per-task consistency and syscall barrier switching combined with kpatch's stack trace switching. There are also a number of fallback options which make it quite flexible. Patches are applied on a per-task basis, when the task is deemed safe to switch over. When a patch is enabled, livepatch enters into a transition state where tasks are converging to the patched state. Usually this transition state can complete in a few seconds. The same sequence occurs when a patch is disabled, except the tasks converge from the patched state to the unpatched state. An interrupt handler inherits the patched state of the task it interrupts. The same is true for forked tasks: the child inherits the patched state of the parent. Livepatch uses several complementary approaches to determine when it's safe to patch tasks: 1. The first and most effective approach is stack checking of sleeping tasks. If no affected functions are on the stack of a given task, the task is patched. In most cases this will patch most or all of the tasks on the first try. Otherwise it'll keep trying periodically. This option is only available if the architecture has reliable stacks (HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE). 2. The second approach, if needed, is kernel exit switching. A task is switched when it returns to user space from a system call, a user space IRQ, or a signal. It's useful in the following cases: a) Patching I/O-bound user tasks which are sleeping on an affected function. In this case you have to send SIGSTOP and SIGCONT to force it to exit the kernel and be patched. b) Patching CPU-bound user tasks. If the task is highly CPU-bound then it will get patched the next time it gets interrupted by an IRQ. c) In the future it could be useful for applying patches for architectures which don't yet have HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE. In this case you would have to signal most of the tasks on the system. However this isn't supported yet because there's currently no way to patch kthreads without HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE. 3. For idle "swapper" tasks, since they don't ever exit the kernel, they instead have a klp_update_patch_state() call in the idle loop which allows them to be patched before the CPU enters the idle state. (Note there's not yet such an approach for kthreads.) All the above approaches may be skipped by setting the 'immediate' flag in the 'klp_patch' struct, which will disable per-task consistency and patch all tasks immediately. This can be useful if the patch doesn't change any function or data semantics. Note that, even with this flag set, it's possible that some tasks may still be running with an old version of the function, until that function returns. There's also an 'immediate' flag in the 'klp_func' struct which allows you to specify that certain functions in the patch can be applied without per-task consistency. This might be useful if you want to patch a common function like schedule(), and the function change doesn't need consistency but the rest of the patch does. For architectures which don't have HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE, the user must set patch->immediate which causes all tasks to be patched immediately. This option should be used with care, only when the patch doesn't change any function or data semantics. In the future, architectures which don't have HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE may be allowed to use per-task consistency if we can come up with another way to patch kthreads. The /sys/kernel/livepatch/<patch>/transition file shows whether a patch is in transition. Only a single patch (the topmost patch on the stack) can be in transition at a given time. A patch can remain in transition indefinitely, if any of the tasks are stuck in the initial patch state. A transition can be reversed and effectively canceled by writing the opposite value to the /sys/kernel/livepatch/<patch>/enabled file while the transition is in progress. Then all the tasks will attempt to converge back to the original patch state. [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20141107140458.GA21774@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Acked-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> # for the scheduler changes Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
2017-02-14 01:42:40 +00:00
/*
* This test_and_clear_tsk_thread_flag() call also serves as a read
* barrier (smp_rmb) for two cases:
*
* 1) Enforce the order of the TIF_PATCH_PENDING read and the
* klp_target_state read. The corresponding write barrier is in
* klp_init_transition().
*
* 2) Enforce the order of the TIF_PATCH_PENDING read and a future read
* of func->transition, if klp_ftrace_handler() is called later on
* the same CPU. See __klp_disable_patch().
*/
if (test_and_clear_tsk_thread_flag(task, TIF_PATCH_PENDING))
task->patch_state = READ_ONCE(klp_target_state);
livepatch: Fix stacking of patches with respect to RCU rcu_read_(un)lock(), list_*_rcu(), and synchronize_rcu() are used for a secure access and manipulation of the list of patches that modify the same function. In particular, it is the variable func_stack that is accessible from the ftrace handler via struct ftrace_ops and klp_ops. Of course, it synchronizes also some states of the patch on the top of the stack, e.g. func->transition in klp_ftrace_handler. At the same time, this mechanism guards also the manipulation of task->patch_state. It is modified according to the state of the transition and the state of the process. Now, all this works well as long as RCU works well. Sadly livepatching might get into some corner cases when this is not true. For example, RCU is not watching when rcu_read_lock() is taken in idle threads. It is because they might sleep and prevent reaching the grace period for too long. There are ways how to make RCU watching even in idle threads, see rcu_irq_enter(). But there is a small location inside RCU infrastructure when even this does not work. This small problematic location can be detected either before calling rcu_irq_enter() by rcu_irq_enter_disabled() or later by rcu_is_watching(). Sadly, there is no safe way how to handle it. Once we detect that RCU was not watching, we might see inconsistent state of the function stack and the related variables in klp_ftrace_handler(). Then we could do a wrong decision, use an incompatible implementation of the function and break the consistency of the system. We could warn but we could not avoid the damage. Fortunately, ftrace has similar problems and they seem to be solved well there. It uses a heavy weight implementation of some RCU operations. In particular, it replaces: + rcu_read_lock() with preempt_disable_notrace() + rcu_read_unlock() with preempt_enable_notrace() + synchronize_rcu() with schedule_on_each_cpu(sync_work) My understanding is that this is RCU implementation from a stone age. It meets the core RCU requirements but it is rather ineffective. Especially, it does not allow to batch or speed up the synchronize calls. On the other hand, it is very trivial. It allows to safely trace and/or livepatch even the RCU core infrastructure. And the effectiveness is a not a big issue because using ftrace or livepatches on productive systems is a rare operation. The safety is much more important than a negligible extra load. Note that the alternative implementation follows the RCU principles. Therefore, we could and actually must use list_*_rcu() variants when manipulating the func_stack. These functions allow to access the pointers in the right order and with the right barriers. But they do not use any other information that would be set only by rcu_read_lock(). Also note that there are actually two problems solved in ftrace: First, it cares about the consistency of RCU read sections. It is being solved the way as described and used in this patch. Second, ftrace needs to make sure that nobody is inside the dynamic trampoline when it is being freed. For this, it also calls synchronize_rcu_tasks() in preemptive kernel in ftrace_shutdown(). Livepatch has similar problem but it is solved by ftrace for free. klp_ftrace_handler() is a good guy and never sleeps. In addition, it is registered with FTRACE_OPS_FL_DYNAMIC. It causes that unregister_ftrace_function() calls: * schedule_on_each_cpu(ftrace_sync) - always * synchronize_rcu_tasks() - in preemptive kernel The effect is that nobody is neither inside the dynamic trampoline nor inside the ftrace handler after unregister_ftrace_function() returns. [jkosina@suse.cz: reformat changelog, fix comment] Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Acked-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Acked-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
2017-06-14 08:54:52 +00:00
preempt_enable_notrace();
livepatch: change to a per-task consistency model Change livepatch to use a basic per-task consistency model. This is the foundation which will eventually enable us to patch those ~10% of security patches which change function or data semantics. This is the biggest remaining piece needed to make livepatch more generally useful. This code stems from the design proposal made by Vojtech [1] in November 2014. It's a hybrid of kGraft and kpatch: it uses kGraft's per-task consistency and syscall barrier switching combined with kpatch's stack trace switching. There are also a number of fallback options which make it quite flexible. Patches are applied on a per-task basis, when the task is deemed safe to switch over. When a patch is enabled, livepatch enters into a transition state where tasks are converging to the patched state. Usually this transition state can complete in a few seconds. The same sequence occurs when a patch is disabled, except the tasks converge from the patched state to the unpatched state. An interrupt handler inherits the patched state of the task it interrupts. The same is true for forked tasks: the child inherits the patched state of the parent. Livepatch uses several complementary approaches to determine when it's safe to patch tasks: 1. The first and most effective approach is stack checking of sleeping tasks. If no affected functions are on the stack of a given task, the task is patched. In most cases this will patch most or all of the tasks on the first try. Otherwise it'll keep trying periodically. This option is only available if the architecture has reliable stacks (HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE). 2. The second approach, if needed, is kernel exit switching. A task is switched when it returns to user space from a system call, a user space IRQ, or a signal. It's useful in the following cases: a) Patching I/O-bound user tasks which are sleeping on an affected function. In this case you have to send SIGSTOP and SIGCONT to force it to exit the kernel and be patched. b) Patching CPU-bound user tasks. If the task is highly CPU-bound then it will get patched the next time it gets interrupted by an IRQ. c) In the future it could be useful for applying patches for architectures which don't yet have HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE. In this case you would have to signal most of the tasks on the system. However this isn't supported yet because there's currently no way to patch kthreads without HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE. 3. For idle "swapper" tasks, since they don't ever exit the kernel, they instead have a klp_update_patch_state() call in the idle loop which allows them to be patched before the CPU enters the idle state. (Note there's not yet such an approach for kthreads.) All the above approaches may be skipped by setting the 'immediate' flag in the 'klp_patch' struct, which will disable per-task consistency and patch all tasks immediately. This can be useful if the patch doesn't change any function or data semantics. Note that, even with this flag set, it's possible that some tasks may still be running with an old version of the function, until that function returns. There's also an 'immediate' flag in the 'klp_func' struct which allows you to specify that certain functions in the patch can be applied without per-task consistency. This might be useful if you want to patch a common function like schedule(), and the function change doesn't need consistency but the rest of the patch does. For architectures which don't have HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE, the user must set patch->immediate which causes all tasks to be patched immediately. This option should be used with care, only when the patch doesn't change any function or data semantics. In the future, architectures which don't have HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE may be allowed to use per-task consistency if we can come up with another way to patch kthreads. The /sys/kernel/livepatch/<patch>/transition file shows whether a patch is in transition. Only a single patch (the topmost patch on the stack) can be in transition at a given time. A patch can remain in transition indefinitely, if any of the tasks are stuck in the initial patch state. A transition can be reversed and effectively canceled by writing the opposite value to the /sys/kernel/livepatch/<patch>/enabled file while the transition is in progress. Then all the tasks will attempt to converge back to the original patch state. [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20141107140458.GA21774@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Acked-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> # for the scheduler changes Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
2017-02-14 01:42:40 +00:00
}
/*
* Determine whether the given stack trace includes any references to a
* to-be-patched or to-be-unpatched function.
*/
static int klp_check_stack_func(struct klp_func *func,
struct stack_trace *trace)
{
unsigned long func_addr, func_size, address;
struct klp_ops *ops;
int i;
for (i = 0; i < trace->nr_entries; i++) {
address = trace->entries[i];
if (klp_target_state == KLP_UNPATCHED) {
/*
* Check for the to-be-unpatched function
* (the func itself).
*/
func_addr = (unsigned long)func->new_func;
func_size = func->new_size;
} else {
/*
* Check for the to-be-patched function
* (the previous func).
*/
ops = klp_find_ops(func->old_addr);
if (list_is_singular(&ops->func_stack)) {
/* original function */
func_addr = func->old_addr;
func_size = func->old_size;
} else {
/* previously patched function */
struct klp_func *prev;
prev = list_next_entry(func, stack_node);
func_addr = (unsigned long)prev->new_func;
func_size = prev->new_size;
}
}
if (address >= func_addr && address < func_addr + func_size)
return -EAGAIN;
}
return 0;
}
/*
* Determine whether it's safe to transition the task to the target patch state
* by looking for any to-be-patched or to-be-unpatched functions on its stack.
*/
static int klp_check_stack(struct task_struct *task, char *err_buf)
{
static unsigned long entries[MAX_STACK_ENTRIES];
struct stack_trace trace;
struct klp_object *obj;
struct klp_func *func;
int ret;
trace.skip = 0;
trace.nr_entries = 0;
trace.max_entries = MAX_STACK_ENTRIES;
trace.entries = entries;
ret = save_stack_trace_tsk_reliable(task, &trace);
WARN_ON_ONCE(ret == -ENOSYS);
if (ret) {
snprintf(err_buf, STACK_ERR_BUF_SIZE,
"%s: %s:%d has an unreliable stack\n",
__func__, task->comm, task->pid);
return ret;
}
klp_for_each_object(klp_transition_patch, obj) {
if (!obj->patched)
continue;
klp_for_each_func(obj, func) {
ret = klp_check_stack_func(func, &trace);
if (ret) {
snprintf(err_buf, STACK_ERR_BUF_SIZE,
"%s: %s:%d is sleeping on function %s\n",
__func__, task->comm, task->pid,
func->old_name);
return ret;
}
}
}
return 0;
}
/*
* Try to safely switch a task to the target patch state. If it's currently
* running, or it's sleeping on a to-be-patched or to-be-unpatched function, or
* if the stack is unreliable, return false.
*/
static bool klp_try_switch_task(struct task_struct *task)
{
struct rq *rq;
struct rq_flags flags;
int ret;
bool success = false;
char err_buf[STACK_ERR_BUF_SIZE];
err_buf[0] = '\0';
/* check if this task has already switched over */
if (task->patch_state == klp_target_state)
return true;
/*
* Now try to check the stack for any to-be-patched or to-be-unpatched
* functions. If all goes well, switch the task to the target patch
* state.
*/
rq = task_rq_lock(task, &flags);
if (task_running(rq, task) && task != current) {
snprintf(err_buf, STACK_ERR_BUF_SIZE,
"%s: %s:%d is running\n", __func__, task->comm,
task->pid);
goto done;
}
ret = klp_check_stack(task, err_buf);
if (ret)
goto done;
success = true;
clear_tsk_thread_flag(task, TIF_PATCH_PENDING);
task->patch_state = klp_target_state;
done:
task_rq_unlock(rq, task, &flags);
/*
* Due to console deadlock issues, pr_debug() can't be used while
* holding the task rq lock. Instead we have to use a temporary buffer
* and print the debug message after releasing the lock.
*/
if (err_buf[0] != '\0')
pr_debug("%s", err_buf);
return success;
}
/*
* Try to switch all remaining tasks to the target patch state by walking the
* stacks of sleeping tasks and looking for any to-be-patched or
* to-be-unpatched functions. If such functions are found, the task can't be
* switched yet.
*
* If any tasks are still stuck in the initial patch state, schedule a retry.
*/
void klp_try_complete_transition(void)
{
unsigned int cpu;
struct task_struct *g, *task;
bool complete = true;
WARN_ON_ONCE(klp_target_state == KLP_UNDEFINED);
/*
* Try to switch the tasks to the target patch state by walking their
* stacks and looking for any to-be-patched or to-be-unpatched
* functions. If such functions are found on a stack, or if the stack
* is deemed unreliable, the task can't be switched yet.
*
* Usually this will transition most (or all) of the tasks on a system
* unless the patch includes changes to a very common function.
*/
read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
for_each_process_thread(g, task)
if (!klp_try_switch_task(task))
complete = false;
read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
/*
* Ditto for the idle "swapper" tasks.
*/
get_online_cpus();
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
task = idle_task(cpu);
if (cpu_online(cpu)) {
if (!klp_try_switch_task(task))
complete = false;
} else if (task->patch_state != klp_target_state) {
/* offline idle tasks can be switched immediately */
clear_tsk_thread_flag(task, TIF_PATCH_PENDING);
task->patch_state = klp_target_state;
}
}
put_online_cpus();
if (!complete) {
/*
* Some tasks weren't able to be switched over. Try again
* later and/or wait for other methods like kernel exit
* switching.
*/
schedule_delayed_work(&klp_transition_work,
round_jiffies_relative(HZ));
return;
}
/* we're done, now cleanup the data structures */
klp_complete_transition();
}
/*
* Start the transition to the specified target patch state so tasks can begin
* switching to it.
*/
void klp_start_transition(void)
{
struct task_struct *g, *task;
unsigned int cpu;
WARN_ON_ONCE(klp_target_state == KLP_UNDEFINED);
pr_notice("'%s': starting %s transition\n",
klp_transition_patch->mod->name,
livepatch: change to a per-task consistency model Change livepatch to use a basic per-task consistency model. This is the foundation which will eventually enable us to patch those ~10% of security patches which change function or data semantics. This is the biggest remaining piece needed to make livepatch more generally useful. This code stems from the design proposal made by Vojtech [1] in November 2014. It's a hybrid of kGraft and kpatch: it uses kGraft's per-task consistency and syscall barrier switching combined with kpatch's stack trace switching. There are also a number of fallback options which make it quite flexible. Patches are applied on a per-task basis, when the task is deemed safe to switch over. When a patch is enabled, livepatch enters into a transition state where tasks are converging to the patched state. Usually this transition state can complete in a few seconds. The same sequence occurs when a patch is disabled, except the tasks converge from the patched state to the unpatched state. An interrupt handler inherits the patched state of the task it interrupts. The same is true for forked tasks: the child inherits the patched state of the parent. Livepatch uses several complementary approaches to determine when it's safe to patch tasks: 1. The first and most effective approach is stack checking of sleeping tasks. If no affected functions are on the stack of a given task, the task is patched. In most cases this will patch most or all of the tasks on the first try. Otherwise it'll keep trying periodically. This option is only available if the architecture has reliable stacks (HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE). 2. The second approach, if needed, is kernel exit switching. A task is switched when it returns to user space from a system call, a user space IRQ, or a signal. It's useful in the following cases: a) Patching I/O-bound user tasks which are sleeping on an affected function. In this case you have to send SIGSTOP and SIGCONT to force it to exit the kernel and be patched. b) Patching CPU-bound user tasks. If the task is highly CPU-bound then it will get patched the next time it gets interrupted by an IRQ. c) In the future it could be useful for applying patches for architectures which don't yet have HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE. In this case you would have to signal most of the tasks on the system. However this isn't supported yet because there's currently no way to patch kthreads without HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE. 3. For idle "swapper" tasks, since they don't ever exit the kernel, they instead have a klp_update_patch_state() call in the idle loop which allows them to be patched before the CPU enters the idle state. (Note there's not yet such an approach for kthreads.) All the above approaches may be skipped by setting the 'immediate' flag in the 'klp_patch' struct, which will disable per-task consistency and patch all tasks immediately. This can be useful if the patch doesn't change any function or data semantics. Note that, even with this flag set, it's possible that some tasks may still be running with an old version of the function, until that function returns. There's also an 'immediate' flag in the 'klp_func' struct which allows you to specify that certain functions in the patch can be applied without per-task consistency. This might be useful if you want to patch a common function like schedule(), and the function change doesn't need consistency but the rest of the patch does. For architectures which don't have HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE, the user must set patch->immediate which causes all tasks to be patched immediately. This option should be used with care, only when the patch doesn't change any function or data semantics. In the future, architectures which don't have HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE may be allowed to use per-task consistency if we can come up with another way to patch kthreads. The /sys/kernel/livepatch/<patch>/transition file shows whether a patch is in transition. Only a single patch (the topmost patch on the stack) can be in transition at a given time. A patch can remain in transition indefinitely, if any of the tasks are stuck in the initial patch state. A transition can be reversed and effectively canceled by writing the opposite value to the /sys/kernel/livepatch/<patch>/enabled file while the transition is in progress. Then all the tasks will attempt to converge back to the original patch state. [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20141107140458.GA21774@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Acked-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> # for the scheduler changes Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
2017-02-14 01:42:40 +00:00
klp_target_state == KLP_PATCHED ? "patching" : "unpatching");
/*
* Mark all normal tasks as needing a patch state update. They'll
* switch either in klp_try_complete_transition() or as they exit the
* kernel.
*/
read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
for_each_process_thread(g, task)
if (task->patch_state != klp_target_state)
set_tsk_thread_flag(task, TIF_PATCH_PENDING);
read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
/*
* Mark all idle tasks as needing a patch state update. They'll switch
* either in klp_try_complete_transition() or at the idle loop switch
* point.
*/
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
task = idle_task(cpu);
if (task->patch_state != klp_target_state)
set_tsk_thread_flag(task, TIF_PATCH_PENDING);
}
}
/*
* Initialize the global target patch state and all tasks to the initial patch
* state, and initialize all function transition states to true in preparation
* for patching or unpatching.
*/
void klp_init_transition(struct klp_patch *patch, int state)
{
struct task_struct *g, *task;
unsigned int cpu;
struct klp_object *obj;
struct klp_func *func;
int initial_state = !state;
WARN_ON_ONCE(klp_target_state != KLP_UNDEFINED);
klp_transition_patch = patch;
/*
* Set the global target patch state which tasks will switch to. This
* has no effect until the TIF_PATCH_PENDING flags get set later.
*/
klp_target_state = state;
pr_debug("'%s': initializing %s transition\n", patch->mod->name,
klp_target_state == KLP_PATCHED ? "patching" : "unpatching");
livepatch: change to a per-task consistency model Change livepatch to use a basic per-task consistency model. This is the foundation which will eventually enable us to patch those ~10% of security patches which change function or data semantics. This is the biggest remaining piece needed to make livepatch more generally useful. This code stems from the design proposal made by Vojtech [1] in November 2014. It's a hybrid of kGraft and kpatch: it uses kGraft's per-task consistency and syscall barrier switching combined with kpatch's stack trace switching. There are also a number of fallback options which make it quite flexible. Patches are applied on a per-task basis, when the task is deemed safe to switch over. When a patch is enabled, livepatch enters into a transition state where tasks are converging to the patched state. Usually this transition state can complete in a few seconds. The same sequence occurs when a patch is disabled, except the tasks converge from the patched state to the unpatched state. An interrupt handler inherits the patched state of the task it interrupts. The same is true for forked tasks: the child inherits the patched state of the parent. Livepatch uses several complementary approaches to determine when it's safe to patch tasks: 1. The first and most effective approach is stack checking of sleeping tasks. If no affected functions are on the stack of a given task, the task is patched. In most cases this will patch most or all of the tasks on the first try. Otherwise it'll keep trying periodically. This option is only available if the architecture has reliable stacks (HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE). 2. The second approach, if needed, is kernel exit switching. A task is switched when it returns to user space from a system call, a user space IRQ, or a signal. It's useful in the following cases: a) Patching I/O-bound user tasks which are sleeping on an affected function. In this case you have to send SIGSTOP and SIGCONT to force it to exit the kernel and be patched. b) Patching CPU-bound user tasks. If the task is highly CPU-bound then it will get patched the next time it gets interrupted by an IRQ. c) In the future it could be useful for applying patches for architectures which don't yet have HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE. In this case you would have to signal most of the tasks on the system. However this isn't supported yet because there's currently no way to patch kthreads without HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE. 3. For idle "swapper" tasks, since they don't ever exit the kernel, they instead have a klp_update_patch_state() call in the idle loop which allows them to be patched before the CPU enters the idle state. (Note there's not yet such an approach for kthreads.) All the above approaches may be skipped by setting the 'immediate' flag in the 'klp_patch' struct, which will disable per-task consistency and patch all tasks immediately. This can be useful if the patch doesn't change any function or data semantics. Note that, even with this flag set, it's possible that some tasks may still be running with an old version of the function, until that function returns. There's also an 'immediate' flag in the 'klp_func' struct which allows you to specify that certain functions in the patch can be applied without per-task consistency. This might be useful if you want to patch a common function like schedule(), and the function change doesn't need consistency but the rest of the patch does. For architectures which don't have HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE, the user must set patch->immediate which causes all tasks to be patched immediately. This option should be used with care, only when the patch doesn't change any function or data semantics. In the future, architectures which don't have HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE may be allowed to use per-task consistency if we can come up with another way to patch kthreads. The /sys/kernel/livepatch/<patch>/transition file shows whether a patch is in transition. Only a single patch (the topmost patch on the stack) can be in transition at a given time. A patch can remain in transition indefinitely, if any of the tasks are stuck in the initial patch state. A transition can be reversed and effectively canceled by writing the opposite value to the /sys/kernel/livepatch/<patch>/enabled file while the transition is in progress. Then all the tasks will attempt to converge back to the original patch state. [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20141107140458.GA21774@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Acked-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> # for the scheduler changes Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
2017-02-14 01:42:40 +00:00
/*
* Initialize all tasks to the initial patch state to prepare them for
* switching to the target state.
*/
read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
for_each_process_thread(g, task) {
WARN_ON_ONCE(task->patch_state != KLP_UNDEFINED);
task->patch_state = initial_state;
}
read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
/*
* Ditto for the idle "swapper" tasks.
*/
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
task = idle_task(cpu);
WARN_ON_ONCE(task->patch_state != KLP_UNDEFINED);
task->patch_state = initial_state;
}
/*
* Enforce the order of the task->patch_state initializations and the
* func->transition updates to ensure that klp_ftrace_handler() doesn't
* see a func in transition with a task->patch_state of KLP_UNDEFINED.
*
* Also enforce the order of the klp_target_state write and future
* TIF_PATCH_PENDING writes to ensure klp_update_patch_state() doesn't
* set a task->patch_state to KLP_UNDEFINED.
*/
smp_wmb();
/*
* Set the func transition states so klp_ftrace_handler() will know to
* switch to the transition logic.
*
* When patching, the funcs aren't yet in the func_stack and will be
* made visible to the ftrace handler shortly by the calls to
* klp_patch_object().
*
* When unpatching, the funcs are already in the func_stack and so are
* already visible to the ftrace handler.
*/
klp_for_each_object(patch, obj)
klp_for_each_func(obj, func)
func->transition = true;
}
/*
* This function can be called in the middle of an existing transition to
* reverse the direction of the target patch state. This can be done to
* effectively cancel an existing enable or disable operation if there are any
* tasks which are stuck in the initial patch state.
*/
void klp_reverse_transition(void)
{
unsigned int cpu;
struct task_struct *g, *task;
pr_debug("'%s': reversing transition from %s\n",
klp_transition_patch->mod->name,
klp_target_state == KLP_PATCHED ? "patching to unpatching" :
"unpatching to patching");
livepatch: change to a per-task consistency model Change livepatch to use a basic per-task consistency model. This is the foundation which will eventually enable us to patch those ~10% of security patches which change function or data semantics. This is the biggest remaining piece needed to make livepatch more generally useful. This code stems from the design proposal made by Vojtech [1] in November 2014. It's a hybrid of kGraft and kpatch: it uses kGraft's per-task consistency and syscall barrier switching combined with kpatch's stack trace switching. There are also a number of fallback options which make it quite flexible. Patches are applied on a per-task basis, when the task is deemed safe to switch over. When a patch is enabled, livepatch enters into a transition state where tasks are converging to the patched state. Usually this transition state can complete in a few seconds. The same sequence occurs when a patch is disabled, except the tasks converge from the patched state to the unpatched state. An interrupt handler inherits the patched state of the task it interrupts. The same is true for forked tasks: the child inherits the patched state of the parent. Livepatch uses several complementary approaches to determine when it's safe to patch tasks: 1. The first and most effective approach is stack checking of sleeping tasks. If no affected functions are on the stack of a given task, the task is patched. In most cases this will patch most or all of the tasks on the first try. Otherwise it'll keep trying periodically. This option is only available if the architecture has reliable stacks (HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE). 2. The second approach, if needed, is kernel exit switching. A task is switched when it returns to user space from a system call, a user space IRQ, or a signal. It's useful in the following cases: a) Patching I/O-bound user tasks which are sleeping on an affected function. In this case you have to send SIGSTOP and SIGCONT to force it to exit the kernel and be patched. b) Patching CPU-bound user tasks. If the task is highly CPU-bound then it will get patched the next time it gets interrupted by an IRQ. c) In the future it could be useful for applying patches for architectures which don't yet have HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE. In this case you would have to signal most of the tasks on the system. However this isn't supported yet because there's currently no way to patch kthreads without HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE. 3. For idle "swapper" tasks, since they don't ever exit the kernel, they instead have a klp_update_patch_state() call in the idle loop which allows them to be patched before the CPU enters the idle state. (Note there's not yet such an approach for kthreads.) All the above approaches may be skipped by setting the 'immediate' flag in the 'klp_patch' struct, which will disable per-task consistency and patch all tasks immediately. This can be useful if the patch doesn't change any function or data semantics. Note that, even with this flag set, it's possible that some tasks may still be running with an old version of the function, until that function returns. There's also an 'immediate' flag in the 'klp_func' struct which allows you to specify that certain functions in the patch can be applied without per-task consistency. This might be useful if you want to patch a common function like schedule(), and the function change doesn't need consistency but the rest of the patch does. For architectures which don't have HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE, the user must set patch->immediate which causes all tasks to be patched immediately. This option should be used with care, only when the patch doesn't change any function or data semantics. In the future, architectures which don't have HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE may be allowed to use per-task consistency if we can come up with another way to patch kthreads. The /sys/kernel/livepatch/<patch>/transition file shows whether a patch is in transition. Only a single patch (the topmost patch on the stack) can be in transition at a given time. A patch can remain in transition indefinitely, if any of the tasks are stuck in the initial patch state. A transition can be reversed and effectively canceled by writing the opposite value to the /sys/kernel/livepatch/<patch>/enabled file while the transition is in progress. Then all the tasks will attempt to converge back to the original patch state. [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20141107140458.GA21774@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Acked-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> # for the scheduler changes Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
2017-02-14 01:42:40 +00:00
klp_transition_patch->enabled = !klp_transition_patch->enabled;
klp_target_state = !klp_target_state;
/*
* Clear all TIF_PATCH_PENDING flags to prevent races caused by
* klp_update_patch_state() running in parallel with
* klp_start_transition().
*/
read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
for_each_process_thread(g, task)
clear_tsk_thread_flag(task, TIF_PATCH_PENDING);
read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
clear_tsk_thread_flag(idle_task(cpu), TIF_PATCH_PENDING);
/* Let any remaining calls to klp_update_patch_state() complete */
livepatch: Fix stacking of patches with respect to RCU rcu_read_(un)lock(), list_*_rcu(), and synchronize_rcu() are used for a secure access and manipulation of the list of patches that modify the same function. In particular, it is the variable func_stack that is accessible from the ftrace handler via struct ftrace_ops and klp_ops. Of course, it synchronizes also some states of the patch on the top of the stack, e.g. func->transition in klp_ftrace_handler. At the same time, this mechanism guards also the manipulation of task->patch_state. It is modified according to the state of the transition and the state of the process. Now, all this works well as long as RCU works well. Sadly livepatching might get into some corner cases when this is not true. For example, RCU is not watching when rcu_read_lock() is taken in idle threads. It is because they might sleep and prevent reaching the grace period for too long. There are ways how to make RCU watching even in idle threads, see rcu_irq_enter(). But there is a small location inside RCU infrastructure when even this does not work. This small problematic location can be detected either before calling rcu_irq_enter() by rcu_irq_enter_disabled() or later by rcu_is_watching(). Sadly, there is no safe way how to handle it. Once we detect that RCU was not watching, we might see inconsistent state of the function stack and the related variables in klp_ftrace_handler(). Then we could do a wrong decision, use an incompatible implementation of the function and break the consistency of the system. We could warn but we could not avoid the damage. Fortunately, ftrace has similar problems and they seem to be solved well there. It uses a heavy weight implementation of some RCU operations. In particular, it replaces: + rcu_read_lock() with preempt_disable_notrace() + rcu_read_unlock() with preempt_enable_notrace() + synchronize_rcu() with schedule_on_each_cpu(sync_work) My understanding is that this is RCU implementation from a stone age. It meets the core RCU requirements but it is rather ineffective. Especially, it does not allow to batch or speed up the synchronize calls. On the other hand, it is very trivial. It allows to safely trace and/or livepatch even the RCU core infrastructure. And the effectiveness is a not a big issue because using ftrace or livepatches on productive systems is a rare operation. The safety is much more important than a negligible extra load. Note that the alternative implementation follows the RCU principles. Therefore, we could and actually must use list_*_rcu() variants when manipulating the func_stack. These functions allow to access the pointers in the right order and with the right barriers. But they do not use any other information that would be set only by rcu_read_lock(). Also note that there are actually two problems solved in ftrace: First, it cares about the consistency of RCU read sections. It is being solved the way as described and used in this patch. Second, ftrace needs to make sure that nobody is inside the dynamic trampoline when it is being freed. For this, it also calls synchronize_rcu_tasks() in preemptive kernel in ftrace_shutdown(). Livepatch has similar problem but it is solved by ftrace for free. klp_ftrace_handler() is a good guy and never sleeps. In addition, it is registered with FTRACE_OPS_FL_DYNAMIC. It causes that unregister_ftrace_function() calls: * schedule_on_each_cpu(ftrace_sync) - always * synchronize_rcu_tasks() - in preemptive kernel The effect is that nobody is neither inside the dynamic trampoline nor inside the ftrace handler after unregister_ftrace_function() returns. [jkosina@suse.cz: reformat changelog, fix comment] Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Acked-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Acked-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
2017-06-14 08:54:52 +00:00
klp_synchronize_transition();
livepatch: change to a per-task consistency model Change livepatch to use a basic per-task consistency model. This is the foundation which will eventually enable us to patch those ~10% of security patches which change function or data semantics. This is the biggest remaining piece needed to make livepatch more generally useful. This code stems from the design proposal made by Vojtech [1] in November 2014. It's a hybrid of kGraft and kpatch: it uses kGraft's per-task consistency and syscall barrier switching combined with kpatch's stack trace switching. There are also a number of fallback options which make it quite flexible. Patches are applied on a per-task basis, when the task is deemed safe to switch over. When a patch is enabled, livepatch enters into a transition state where tasks are converging to the patched state. Usually this transition state can complete in a few seconds. The same sequence occurs when a patch is disabled, except the tasks converge from the patched state to the unpatched state. An interrupt handler inherits the patched state of the task it interrupts. The same is true for forked tasks: the child inherits the patched state of the parent. Livepatch uses several complementary approaches to determine when it's safe to patch tasks: 1. The first and most effective approach is stack checking of sleeping tasks. If no affected functions are on the stack of a given task, the task is patched. In most cases this will patch most or all of the tasks on the first try. Otherwise it'll keep trying periodically. This option is only available if the architecture has reliable stacks (HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE). 2. The second approach, if needed, is kernel exit switching. A task is switched when it returns to user space from a system call, a user space IRQ, or a signal. It's useful in the following cases: a) Patching I/O-bound user tasks which are sleeping on an affected function. In this case you have to send SIGSTOP and SIGCONT to force it to exit the kernel and be patched. b) Patching CPU-bound user tasks. If the task is highly CPU-bound then it will get patched the next time it gets interrupted by an IRQ. c) In the future it could be useful for applying patches for architectures which don't yet have HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE. In this case you would have to signal most of the tasks on the system. However this isn't supported yet because there's currently no way to patch kthreads without HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE. 3. For idle "swapper" tasks, since they don't ever exit the kernel, they instead have a klp_update_patch_state() call in the idle loop which allows them to be patched before the CPU enters the idle state. (Note there's not yet such an approach for kthreads.) All the above approaches may be skipped by setting the 'immediate' flag in the 'klp_patch' struct, which will disable per-task consistency and patch all tasks immediately. This can be useful if the patch doesn't change any function or data semantics. Note that, even with this flag set, it's possible that some tasks may still be running with an old version of the function, until that function returns. There's also an 'immediate' flag in the 'klp_func' struct which allows you to specify that certain functions in the patch can be applied without per-task consistency. This might be useful if you want to patch a common function like schedule(), and the function change doesn't need consistency but the rest of the patch does. For architectures which don't have HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE, the user must set patch->immediate which causes all tasks to be patched immediately. This option should be used with care, only when the patch doesn't change any function or data semantics. In the future, architectures which don't have HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE may be allowed to use per-task consistency if we can come up with another way to patch kthreads. The /sys/kernel/livepatch/<patch>/transition file shows whether a patch is in transition. Only a single patch (the topmost patch on the stack) can be in transition at a given time. A patch can remain in transition indefinitely, if any of the tasks are stuck in the initial patch state. A transition can be reversed and effectively canceled by writing the opposite value to the /sys/kernel/livepatch/<patch>/enabled file while the transition is in progress. Then all the tasks will attempt to converge back to the original patch state. [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20141107140458.GA21774@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Acked-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> # for the scheduler changes Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
2017-02-14 01:42:40 +00:00
klp_start_transition();
}
/* Called from copy_process() during fork */
void klp_copy_process(struct task_struct *child)
{
child->patch_state = current->patch_state;
/* TIF_PATCH_PENDING gets copied in setup_thread_stack() */
}
livepatch: send a fake signal to all blocking tasks Live patching consistency model is of LEAVE_PATCHED_SET and SWITCH_THREAD. This means that all tasks in the system have to be marked one by one as safe to call a new patched function. Safe means when a task is not (sleeping) in a set of patched functions. That is, no patched function is on the task's stack. Another clearly safe place is the boundary between kernel and userspace. The patching waits for all tasks to get outside of the patched set or to cross the boundary. The transition is completed afterwards. The problem is that a task can block the transition for quite a long time, if not forever. It could sleep in a set of patched functions, for example. Luckily we can force the task to leave the set by sending it a fake signal, that is a signal with no data in signal pending structures (no handler, no sign of proper signal delivered). Suspend/freezer use this to freeze the tasks as well. The task gets TIF_SIGPENDING set and is woken up (if it has been sleeping in the kernel before) or kicked by rescheduling IPI (if it was running on other CPU). This causes the task to go to kernel/userspace boundary where the signal would be handled and the task would be marked as safe in terms of live patching. There are tasks which are not affected by this technique though. The fake signal is not sent to kthreads. They should be handled differently. They can be woken up so they leave the patched set and their TIF_PATCH_PENDING can be cleared thanks to stack checking. For the sake of completeness, if the task is in TASK_RUNNING state but not currently running on some CPU it doesn't get the IPI, but it would eventually handle the signal anyway. Second, if the task runs in the kernel (in TASK_RUNNING state) it gets the IPI, but the signal is not handled on return from the interrupt. It would be handled on return to the userspace in the future when the fake signal is sent again. Stack checking deals with these cases in a better way. If the task was sleeping in a syscall it would be woken by our fake signal, it would check if TIF_SIGPENDING is set (by calling signal_pending() predicate) and return ERESTART* or EINTR. Syscalls with ERESTART* return values are restarted in case of the fake signal (see do_signal()). EINTR is propagated back to the userspace program. This could disturb the program, but... * each process dealing with signals should react accordingly to EINTR return values. * syscalls returning EINTR happen to be quite common situation in the system even if no fake signal is sent. * freezer sends the fake signal and does not deal with EINTR anyhow. Thus EINTR values are returned when the system is resumed. The very safe marking is done in architectures' "entry" on syscall and interrupt/exception exit paths, and in a stack checking functions of livepatch. TIF_PATCH_PENDING is cleared and the next recalc_sigpending() drops TIF_SIGPENDING. In connection with this, also call klp_update_patch_state() before do_signal(), so that recalc_sigpending() in dequeue_signal() can clear TIF_PATCH_PENDING immediately and thus prevent a double call of do_signal(). Note that the fake signal is not sent to stopped/traced tasks. Such task prevents the patching to finish till it continues again (is not traced anymore). Last, sending the fake signal is not automatic. It is done only when admin requests it by writing 1 to signal sysfs attribute in livepatch sysfs directory. Signed-off-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: x86@kernel.org Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> (powerpc) Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
2017-11-15 13:50:13 +00:00
/*
* Sends a fake signal to all non-kthread tasks with TIF_PATCH_PENDING set.
* Kthreads with TIF_PATCH_PENDING set are woken up. Only admin can request this
* action currently.
*/
void klp_send_signals(void)
{
struct task_struct *g, *task;
pr_notice("signaling remaining tasks\n");
read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
for_each_process_thread(g, task) {
if (!klp_patch_pending(task))
continue;
/*
* There is a small race here. We could see TIF_PATCH_PENDING
* set and decide to wake up a kthread or send a fake signal.
* Meanwhile the task could migrate itself and the action
* would be meaningless. It is not serious though.
*/
if (task->flags & PF_KTHREAD) {
/*
* Wake up a kthread which sleeps interruptedly and
* still has not been migrated.
*/
wake_up_state(task, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
} else {
/*
* Send fake signal to all non-kthread tasks which are
* still not migrated.
*/
spin_lock_irq(&task->sighand->siglock);
signal_wake_up(task, 0);
spin_unlock_irq(&task->sighand->siglock);
}
}
read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
}
/*
* Drop TIF_PATCH_PENDING of all tasks on admin's request. This forces an
* existing transition to finish.
*
* NOTE: klp_update_patch_state(task) requires the task to be inactive or
* 'current'. This is not the case here and the consistency model could be
* broken. Administrator, who is the only one to execute the
* klp_force_transitions(), has to be aware of this.
*/
void klp_force_transition(void)
{
struct task_struct *g, *task;
unsigned int cpu;
pr_warn("forcing remaining tasks to the patched state\n");
read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
for_each_process_thread(g, task)
klp_update_patch_state(task);
read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
klp_update_patch_state(idle_task(cpu));
klp_forced = true;
}