2019-09-23 09:02:31 +00:00
|
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Base unit test (KUnit) API.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Copyright (C) 2019, Google LLC.
|
|
|
|
* Author: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
2022-03-28 17:41:43 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <kunit/resource.h>
|
2019-09-23 09:02:31 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <kunit/test.h>
|
2021-03-11 15:23:13 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <kunit/test-bug.h>
|
2019-09-23 09:02:31 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/kernel.h>
|
2022-07-09 03:19:57 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/module.h>
|
2021-08-04 05:08:08 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/moduleparam.h>
|
2022-07-01 08:47:43 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/panic.h>
|
2019-09-23 09:02:39 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/sched/debug.h>
|
2020-10-13 23:55:02 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/sched.h>
|
2019-09-23 09:02:31 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-26 14:25:07 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "debugfs.h"
|
2020-01-06 22:28:18 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "string-stream.h"
|
2020-01-06 22:28:19 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "try-catch-impl.h"
|
2020-01-06 22:28:18 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-03-11 15:23:13 +00:00
|
|
|
#if IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_KUNIT)
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Fail the current test and print an error message to the log.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
void __kunit_fail_current_test(const char *file, int line, const char *fmt, ...)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
va_list args;
|
|
|
|
int len;
|
|
|
|
char *buffer;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!current->kunit_test)
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kunit_set_failure(current->kunit_test);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* kunit_err() only accepts literals, so evaluate the args first. */
|
|
|
|
va_start(args, fmt);
|
|
|
|
len = vsnprintf(NULL, 0, fmt, args) + 1;
|
|
|
|
va_end(args);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
buffer = kunit_kmalloc(current->kunit_test, len, GFP_KERNEL);
|
|
|
|
if (!buffer)
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
va_start(args, fmt);
|
|
|
|
vsnprintf(buffer, len, fmt, args);
|
|
|
|
va_end(args);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kunit_err(current->kunit_test, "%s:%d: %s", file, line, buffer);
|
|
|
|
kunit_kfree(current->kunit_test, buffer);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__kunit_fail_current_test);
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
2022-08-23 14:24:54 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Enable KUnit tests to run.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
#ifdef CONFIG_KUNIT_DEFAULT_ENABLED
|
|
|
|
static bool enable_param = true;
|
|
|
|
#else
|
|
|
|
static bool enable_param;
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
module_param_named(enable, enable_param, bool, 0);
|
|
|
|
MODULE_PARM_DESC(enable, "Enable KUnit tests");
|
|
|
|
|
2021-08-04 05:08:08 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* KUnit statistic mode:
|
|
|
|
* 0 - disabled
|
|
|
|
* 1 - only when there is more than one subtest
|
|
|
|
* 2 - enabled
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
static int kunit_stats_enabled = 1;
|
|
|
|
module_param_named(stats_enabled, kunit_stats_enabled, int, 0644);
|
|
|
|
MODULE_PARM_DESC(stats_enabled,
|
|
|
|
"Print test stats: never (0), only for multiple subtests (1), or always (2)");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct kunit_result_stats {
|
|
|
|
unsigned long passed;
|
|
|
|
unsigned long skipped;
|
|
|
|
unsigned long failed;
|
|
|
|
unsigned long total;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static bool kunit_should_print_stats(struct kunit_result_stats stats)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
if (kunit_stats_enabled == 0)
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (kunit_stats_enabled == 2)
|
|
|
|
return true;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return (stats.total > 1);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void kunit_print_test_stats(struct kunit *test,
|
|
|
|
struct kunit_result_stats stats)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
if (!kunit_should_print_stats(stats))
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kunit_log(KERN_INFO, test,
|
|
|
|
KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT
|
|
|
|
"# %s: pass:%lu fail:%lu skip:%lu total:%lu",
|
|
|
|
test->name,
|
|
|
|
stats.passed,
|
|
|
|
stats.failed,
|
|
|
|
stats.skipped,
|
|
|
|
stats.total);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-26 14:25:07 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Append formatted message to log, size of which is limited to
|
|
|
|
* KUNIT_LOG_SIZE bytes (including null terminating byte).
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
void kunit_log_append(char *log, const char *fmt, ...)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
char line[KUNIT_LOG_SIZE];
|
|
|
|
va_list args;
|
|
|
|
int len_left;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!log)
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
len_left = KUNIT_LOG_SIZE - strlen(log) - 1;
|
|
|
|
if (len_left <= 0)
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
va_start(args, fmt);
|
|
|
|
vsnprintf(line, sizeof(line), fmt, args);
|
|
|
|
va_end(args);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
strncat(log, line, len_left);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_log_append);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
size_t kunit_suite_num_test_cases(struct kunit_suite *suite)
|
2019-09-23 09:02:31 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct kunit_case *test_case;
|
|
|
|
size_t len = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-26 14:25:07 +00:00
|
|
|
kunit_suite_for_each_test_case(suite, test_case)
|
2019-09-23 09:02:31 +00:00
|
|
|
len++;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return len;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2020-03-26 14:25:07 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_suite_num_test_cases);
|
2019-09-23 09:02:31 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-04-29 18:12:56 +00:00
|
|
|
static void kunit_print_suite_start(struct kunit_suite *suite)
|
2019-09-23 09:02:31 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2020-03-26 14:25:09 +00:00
|
|
|
kunit_log(KERN_INFO, suite, KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT "# Subtest: %s",
|
|
|
|
suite->name);
|
|
|
|
kunit_log(KERN_INFO, suite, KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT "1..%zd",
|
2020-03-26 14:25:07 +00:00
|
|
|
kunit_suite_num_test_cases(suite));
|
2019-09-23 09:02:31 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-26 14:25:07 +00:00
|
|
|
static void kunit_print_ok_not_ok(void *test_or_suite,
|
|
|
|
bool is_test,
|
2021-06-25 06:58:12 +00:00
|
|
|
enum kunit_status status,
|
2019-09-23 09:02:31 +00:00
|
|
|
size_t test_number,
|
2021-06-25 06:58:12 +00:00
|
|
|
const char *description,
|
|
|
|
const char *directive)
|
2019-09-23 09:02:31 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2020-03-26 14:25:07 +00:00
|
|
|
struct kunit_suite *suite = is_test ? NULL : test_or_suite;
|
|
|
|
struct kunit *test = is_test ? test_or_suite : NULL;
|
2021-06-25 06:58:12 +00:00
|
|
|
const char *directive_header = (status == KUNIT_SKIPPED) ? " # SKIP " : "";
|
2019-09-23 09:02:31 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-26 14:25:07 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* We do not log the test suite results as doing so would
|
|
|
|
* mean debugfs display would consist of the test suite
|
|
|
|
* description and status prior to individual test results.
|
|
|
|
* Hence directly printk the suite status, and we will
|
|
|
|
* separately seq_printf() the suite status for the debugfs
|
|
|
|
* representation.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
if (suite)
|
2021-06-25 06:58:12 +00:00
|
|
|
pr_info("%s %zd - %s%s%s\n",
|
|
|
|
kunit_status_to_ok_not_ok(status),
|
|
|
|
test_number, description, directive_header,
|
|
|
|
(status == KUNIT_SKIPPED) ? directive : "");
|
2019-09-23 09:02:31 +00:00
|
|
|
else
|
2021-06-25 06:58:12 +00:00
|
|
|
kunit_log(KERN_INFO, test,
|
|
|
|
KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT "%s %zd - %s%s%s",
|
|
|
|
kunit_status_to_ok_not_ok(status),
|
|
|
|
test_number, description, directive_header,
|
|
|
|
(status == KUNIT_SKIPPED) ? directive : "");
|
2019-09-23 09:02:31 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-06-25 06:58:12 +00:00
|
|
|
enum kunit_status kunit_suite_has_succeeded(struct kunit_suite *suite)
|
2019-09-23 09:02:31 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
const struct kunit_case *test_case;
|
2021-06-25 06:58:12 +00:00
|
|
|
enum kunit_status status = KUNIT_SKIPPED;
|
2019-09-23 09:02:31 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-04-29 18:12:57 +00:00
|
|
|
if (suite->suite_init_err)
|
|
|
|
return KUNIT_FAILURE;
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-26 14:25:07 +00:00
|
|
|
kunit_suite_for_each_test_case(suite, test_case) {
|
2021-06-25 06:58:12 +00:00
|
|
|
if (test_case->status == KUNIT_FAILURE)
|
|
|
|
return KUNIT_FAILURE;
|
|
|
|
else if (test_case->status == KUNIT_SUCCESS)
|
|
|
|
status = KUNIT_SUCCESS;
|
2020-03-26 14:25:07 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2019-09-23 09:02:31 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-06-25 06:58:12 +00:00
|
|
|
return status;
|
2019-09-23 09:02:31 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2020-03-26 14:25:07 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_suite_has_succeeded);
|
2019-09-23 09:02:31 +00:00
|
|
|
|
kunit: Reset suite count after running tests
There are some KUnit tests (KFENCE, Thunderbolt) which, for various
reasons, do not use the kunit_test_suite() macro and end up running
before the KUnit executor runs its tests. This means that their results
are printed separately, and they aren't included in the suite count used
by the executor.
This causes the executor output to be invalid TAP, however, as the suite
numbers used are no-longer 1-based, and don't match the test plan.
kunit_tool, therefore, prints a large number of warnings.
While it'd be nice to fix the tests to run in the executor, in the
meantime, reset the suite counter to 1 in __kunit_test_suites_exit.
Not only does this fix the executor, it means that if there are multiple
calls to __kunit_test_suites_init() across different tests, they'll each
get their own numbering.
kunit_tool likes this better: even if it's lacking the results for those
tests which don't use the executor (due to the lack of TAP header), the
output for the other tests is valid.
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-10-06 04:41:11 +00:00
|
|
|
static size_t kunit_suite_counter = 1;
|
|
|
|
|
2022-04-29 18:12:56 +00:00
|
|
|
static void kunit_print_suite_end(struct kunit_suite *suite)
|
2019-09-23 09:02:31 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2020-03-26 14:25:07 +00:00
|
|
|
kunit_print_ok_not_ok((void *)suite, false,
|
2019-09-23 09:02:31 +00:00
|
|
|
kunit_suite_has_succeeded(suite),
|
|
|
|
kunit_suite_counter++,
|
2021-06-25 06:58:12 +00:00
|
|
|
suite->name,
|
|
|
|
suite->status_comment);
|
2019-09-23 09:02:31 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-26 14:25:07 +00:00
|
|
|
unsigned int kunit_test_case_num(struct kunit_suite *suite,
|
|
|
|
struct kunit_case *test_case)
|
2019-09-23 09:02:31 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2020-03-26 14:25:07 +00:00
|
|
|
struct kunit_case *tc;
|
|
|
|
unsigned int i = 1;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kunit_suite_for_each_test_case(suite, tc) {
|
|
|
|
if (tc == test_case)
|
|
|
|
return i;
|
|
|
|
i++;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
2019-09-23 09:02:31 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2020-03-26 14:25:07 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_test_case_num);
|
2019-09-23 09:02:31 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-23 09:02:35 +00:00
|
|
|
static void kunit_print_string_stream(struct kunit *test,
|
|
|
|
struct string_stream *stream)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct string_stream_fragment *fragment;
|
|
|
|
char *buf;
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-26 14:25:07 +00:00
|
|
|
if (string_stream_is_empty(stream))
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-23 09:02:35 +00:00
|
|
|
buf = string_stream_get_string(stream);
|
|
|
|
if (!buf) {
|
|
|
|
kunit_err(test,
|
|
|
|
"Could not allocate buffer, dumping stream:\n");
|
|
|
|
list_for_each_entry(fragment, &stream->fragments, node) {
|
kunit: fix failure to build without printk
Previously KUnit assumed that printk would always be present, which is
not a valid assumption to make. Fix that by removing call to
vprintk_emit, and calling printk directly.
This fixes a build error[1] reported by Randy.
For context this change comes after much discussion. My first stab[2] at
this was just to make the KUnit logging code compile out; however, it
was agreed that if we were going to use vprintk_emit, then vprintk_emit
should provide a no-op stub, which lead to my second attempt[3]. In
response to me trying to stub out vprintk_emit, Sergey Senozhatsky
suggested a way for me to remove our usage of vprintk_emit, which led to
my third attempt at solving this[4].
In my third version of this patch[4], I completely removed vprintk_emit,
as suggested by Sergey; however, there was a bit of debate over whether
Sergey's solution was the best. The debate arose due to Sergey's version
resulting in a checkpatch warning, which resulted in a debate over
correct printk usage. Joe Perches offered an alternative fix which was
somewhat less far reaching than what Sergey had suggested and
importantly relied on continuing to use %pV. Much of the debated
centered around whether %pV should be widely used, and whether Sergey's
version would result in object size bloat. Ultimately, we decided to go
with Sergey's version.
Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Link[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/c7229254-0d90-d90e-f3df-5b6d6fc0b51f@infradead.org/
Link[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20190827174932.44177-1-brendanhiggins@google.com/
Link[3]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20190827234835.234473-1-brendanhiggins@google.com/
Link[4]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20190828093143.163302-1-brendanhiggins@google.com/
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Tim.Bird@sony.com
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> # build-tested
Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-23 09:02:49 +00:00
|
|
|
kunit_err(test, "%s", fragment->fragment);
|
2019-09-23 09:02:35 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
kunit_err(test, "\n");
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
kunit: fix failure to build without printk
Previously KUnit assumed that printk would always be present, which is
not a valid assumption to make. Fix that by removing call to
vprintk_emit, and calling printk directly.
This fixes a build error[1] reported by Randy.
For context this change comes after much discussion. My first stab[2] at
this was just to make the KUnit logging code compile out; however, it
was agreed that if we were going to use vprintk_emit, then vprintk_emit
should provide a no-op stub, which lead to my second attempt[3]. In
response to me trying to stub out vprintk_emit, Sergey Senozhatsky
suggested a way for me to remove our usage of vprintk_emit, which led to
my third attempt at solving this[4].
In my third version of this patch[4], I completely removed vprintk_emit,
as suggested by Sergey; however, there was a bit of debate over whether
Sergey's solution was the best. The debate arose due to Sergey's version
resulting in a checkpatch warning, which resulted in a debate over
correct printk usage. Joe Perches offered an alternative fix which was
somewhat less far reaching than what Sergey had suggested and
importantly relied on continuing to use %pV. Much of the debated
centered around whether %pV should be widely used, and whether Sergey's
version would result in object size bloat. Ultimately, we decided to go
with Sergey's version.
Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Link[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/c7229254-0d90-d90e-f3df-5b6d6fc0b51f@infradead.org/
Link[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20190827174932.44177-1-brendanhiggins@google.com/
Link[3]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20190827234835.234473-1-brendanhiggins@google.com/
Link[4]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20190828093143.163302-1-brendanhiggins@google.com/
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Tim.Bird@sony.com
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> # build-tested
Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-23 09:02:49 +00:00
|
|
|
kunit_err(test, "%s", buf);
|
2019-09-23 09:02:35 +00:00
|
|
|
kunit_kfree(test, buf);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
kunit: split out part of kunit_assert into a static const
This is per Linus's suggestion in [1].
The issue there is that every KUNIT_EXPECT/KUNIT_ASSERT puts a
kunit_assert object onto the stack. Normally we rely on compilers to
elide this, but when that doesn't work out, this blows up the stack
usage of kunit test functions.
We can move some data off the stack by making it static.
This change introduces a new `struct kunit_loc` to hold the file and
line number and then just passing assert_type (EXPECT or ASSERT) as an
argument.
In [1], it was suggested to also move out the format string as well, but
users could theoretically craft a format string at runtime, so we can't.
This change leaves a copy of `assert_type` in kunit_assert for now
because cleaning up all the macros to not pass it around is a bit more
involved.
Here's an example of the expanded code for KUNIT_FAIL():
if (__builtin_expect(!!(!(false)), 0)) {
static const struct kunit_loc loc = { .file = ... };
struct kunit_fail_assert __assertion = { .assert = { .type ... };
kunit_do_failed_assertion(test, &loc, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, &__assertion.assert, ...);
};
[1] https://groups.google.com/g/kunit-dev/c/i3fZXgvBrfA/m/VULQg1z6BAAJ
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-01-13 16:59:30 +00:00
|
|
|
static void kunit_fail(struct kunit *test, const struct kunit_loc *loc,
|
2022-05-02 09:36:25 +00:00
|
|
|
enum kunit_assert_type type, const struct kunit_assert *assert,
|
2022-10-01 00:26:35 +00:00
|
|
|
assert_format_t assert_format, const struct va_format *message)
|
2019-09-23 09:02:35 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct string_stream *stream;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kunit_set_failure(test);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
stream = alloc_string_stream(test, GFP_KERNEL);
|
2022-10-14 09:37:25 +00:00
|
|
|
if (IS_ERR(stream)) {
|
2019-09-23 09:02:35 +00:00
|
|
|
WARN(true,
|
|
|
|
"Could not allocate stream to print failed assertion in %s:%d\n",
|
kunit: split out part of kunit_assert into a static const
This is per Linus's suggestion in [1].
The issue there is that every KUNIT_EXPECT/KUNIT_ASSERT puts a
kunit_assert object onto the stack. Normally we rely on compilers to
elide this, but when that doesn't work out, this blows up the stack
usage of kunit test functions.
We can move some data off the stack by making it static.
This change introduces a new `struct kunit_loc` to hold the file and
line number and then just passing assert_type (EXPECT or ASSERT) as an
argument.
In [1], it was suggested to also move out the format string as well, but
users could theoretically craft a format string at runtime, so we can't.
This change leaves a copy of `assert_type` in kunit_assert for now
because cleaning up all the macros to not pass it around is a bit more
involved.
Here's an example of the expanded code for KUNIT_FAIL():
if (__builtin_expect(!!(!(false)), 0)) {
static const struct kunit_loc loc = { .file = ... };
struct kunit_fail_assert __assertion = { .assert = { .type ... };
kunit_do_failed_assertion(test, &loc, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, &__assertion.assert, ...);
};
[1] https://groups.google.com/g/kunit-dev/c/i3fZXgvBrfA/m/VULQg1z6BAAJ
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-01-13 16:59:30 +00:00
|
|
|
loc->file,
|
|
|
|
loc->line);
|
2019-09-23 09:02:35 +00:00
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
kunit: split out part of kunit_assert into a static const
This is per Linus's suggestion in [1].
The issue there is that every KUNIT_EXPECT/KUNIT_ASSERT puts a
kunit_assert object onto the stack. Normally we rely on compilers to
elide this, but when that doesn't work out, this blows up the stack
usage of kunit test functions.
We can move some data off the stack by making it static.
This change introduces a new `struct kunit_loc` to hold the file and
line number and then just passing assert_type (EXPECT or ASSERT) as an
argument.
In [1], it was suggested to also move out the format string as well, but
users could theoretically craft a format string at runtime, so we can't.
This change leaves a copy of `assert_type` in kunit_assert for now
because cleaning up all the macros to not pass it around is a bit more
involved.
Here's an example of the expanded code for KUNIT_FAIL():
if (__builtin_expect(!!(!(false)), 0)) {
static const struct kunit_loc loc = { .file = ... };
struct kunit_fail_assert __assertion = { .assert = { .type ... };
kunit_do_failed_assertion(test, &loc, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, &__assertion.assert, ...);
};
[1] https://groups.google.com/g/kunit-dev/c/i3fZXgvBrfA/m/VULQg1z6BAAJ
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-01-13 16:59:30 +00:00
|
|
|
kunit_assert_prologue(loc, type, stream);
|
2022-10-01 00:26:35 +00:00
|
|
|
assert_format(assert, message, stream);
|
2019-09-23 09:02:35 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kunit_print_string_stream(test, stream);
|
|
|
|
|
2022-07-22 17:15:30 +00:00
|
|
|
string_stream_destroy(stream);
|
2019-09-23 09:02:35 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-23 09:02:39 +00:00
|
|
|
static void __noreturn kunit_abort(struct kunit *test)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
kunit_try_catch_throw(&test->try_catch); /* Does not return. */
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Throw could not abort from test.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* XXX: we should never reach this line! As kunit_try_catch_throw is
|
|
|
|
* marked __noreturn.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
WARN_ONCE(true, "Throw could not abort from test!\n");
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2022-01-13 16:59:27 +00:00
|
|
|
void kunit_do_failed_assertion(struct kunit *test,
|
kunit: split out part of kunit_assert into a static const
This is per Linus's suggestion in [1].
The issue there is that every KUNIT_EXPECT/KUNIT_ASSERT puts a
kunit_assert object onto the stack. Normally we rely on compilers to
elide this, but when that doesn't work out, this blows up the stack
usage of kunit test functions.
We can move some data off the stack by making it static.
This change introduces a new `struct kunit_loc` to hold the file and
line number and then just passing assert_type (EXPECT or ASSERT) as an
argument.
In [1], it was suggested to also move out the format string as well, but
users could theoretically craft a format string at runtime, so we can't.
This change leaves a copy of `assert_type` in kunit_assert for now
because cleaning up all the macros to not pass it around is a bit more
involved.
Here's an example of the expanded code for KUNIT_FAIL():
if (__builtin_expect(!!(!(false)), 0)) {
static const struct kunit_loc loc = { .file = ... };
struct kunit_fail_assert __assertion = { .assert = { .type ... };
kunit_do_failed_assertion(test, &loc, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, &__assertion.assert, ...);
};
[1] https://groups.google.com/g/kunit-dev/c/i3fZXgvBrfA/m/VULQg1z6BAAJ
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-01-13 16:59:30 +00:00
|
|
|
const struct kunit_loc *loc,
|
|
|
|
enum kunit_assert_type type,
|
2022-05-02 09:36:25 +00:00
|
|
|
const struct kunit_assert *assert,
|
2022-10-01 00:26:35 +00:00
|
|
|
assert_format_t assert_format,
|
2022-01-13 16:59:27 +00:00
|
|
|
const char *fmt, ...)
|
2019-09-23 09:02:35 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
va_list args;
|
2022-01-25 21:00:09 +00:00
|
|
|
struct va_format message;
|
2019-09-23 09:02:35 +00:00
|
|
|
va_start(args, fmt);
|
|
|
|
|
2022-01-25 21:00:09 +00:00
|
|
|
message.fmt = fmt;
|
|
|
|
message.va = &args;
|
2019-09-23 09:02:35 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-10-01 00:26:35 +00:00
|
|
|
kunit_fail(test, loc, type, assert, assert_format, &message);
|
2019-09-23 09:02:35 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
va_end(args);
|
2019-09-23 09:02:39 +00:00
|
|
|
|
kunit: split out part of kunit_assert into a static const
This is per Linus's suggestion in [1].
The issue there is that every KUNIT_EXPECT/KUNIT_ASSERT puts a
kunit_assert object onto the stack. Normally we rely on compilers to
elide this, but when that doesn't work out, this blows up the stack
usage of kunit test functions.
We can move some data off the stack by making it static.
This change introduces a new `struct kunit_loc` to hold the file and
line number and then just passing assert_type (EXPECT or ASSERT) as an
argument.
In [1], it was suggested to also move out the format string as well, but
users could theoretically craft a format string at runtime, so we can't.
This change leaves a copy of `assert_type` in kunit_assert for now
because cleaning up all the macros to not pass it around is a bit more
involved.
Here's an example of the expanded code for KUNIT_FAIL():
if (__builtin_expect(!!(!(false)), 0)) {
static const struct kunit_loc loc = { .file = ... };
struct kunit_fail_assert __assertion = { .assert = { .type ... };
kunit_do_failed_assertion(test, &loc, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, &__assertion.assert, ...);
};
[1] https://groups.google.com/g/kunit-dev/c/i3fZXgvBrfA/m/VULQg1z6BAAJ
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-01-13 16:59:30 +00:00
|
|
|
if (type == KUNIT_ASSERTION)
|
2019-09-23 09:02:39 +00:00
|
|
|
kunit_abort(test);
|
2019-09-23 09:02:35 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2022-01-13 16:59:27 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_do_failed_assertion);
|
2019-09-23 09:02:35 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-26 14:25:07 +00:00
|
|
|
void kunit_init_test(struct kunit *test, const char *name, char *log)
|
2019-09-23 09:02:31 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2019-09-23 09:02:32 +00:00
|
|
|
spin_lock_init(&test->lock);
|
|
|
|
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&test->resources);
|
2019-09-23 09:02:31 +00:00
|
|
|
test->name = name;
|
2020-03-26 14:25:07 +00:00
|
|
|
test->log = log;
|
|
|
|
if (test->log)
|
|
|
|
test->log[0] = '\0';
|
2021-06-25 06:58:12 +00:00
|
|
|
test->status = KUNIT_SUCCESS;
|
|
|
|
test->status_comment[0] = '\0';
|
2019-09-23 09:02:31 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2020-01-06 22:28:20 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_init_test);
|
2019-09-23 09:02:31 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
2019-09-23 09:02:39 +00:00
|
|
|
* Initializes and runs test case. Does not clean up or do post validations.
|
2019-09-23 09:02:31 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
2019-09-23 09:02:39 +00:00
|
|
|
static void kunit_run_case_internal(struct kunit *test,
|
|
|
|
struct kunit_suite *suite,
|
|
|
|
struct kunit_case *test_case)
|
2019-09-23 09:02:31 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
if (suite->init) {
|
|
|
|
int ret;
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-23 09:02:39 +00:00
|
|
|
ret = suite->init(test);
|
2019-09-23 09:02:31 +00:00
|
|
|
if (ret) {
|
2019-09-23 09:02:39 +00:00
|
|
|
kunit_err(test, "failed to initialize: %d\n", ret);
|
|
|
|
kunit_set_failure(test);
|
2019-09-23 09:02:31 +00:00
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-23 09:02:39 +00:00
|
|
|
test_case->run_case(test);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void kunit_case_internal_cleanup(struct kunit *test)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
kunit_cleanup(test);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2019-09-23 09:02:31 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-23 09:02:39 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Performs post validations and cleanup after a test case was run.
|
|
|
|
* XXX: Should ONLY BE CALLED AFTER kunit_run_case_internal!
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
static void kunit_run_case_cleanup(struct kunit *test,
|
|
|
|
struct kunit_suite *suite)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2019-09-23 09:02:31 +00:00
|
|
|
if (suite->exit)
|
2019-09-23 09:02:39 +00:00
|
|
|
suite->exit(test);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kunit_case_internal_cleanup(test);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct kunit_try_catch_context {
|
|
|
|
struct kunit *test;
|
|
|
|
struct kunit_suite *suite;
|
|
|
|
struct kunit_case *test_case;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void kunit_try_run_case(void *data)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct kunit_try_catch_context *ctx = data;
|
|
|
|
struct kunit *test = ctx->test;
|
|
|
|
struct kunit_suite *suite = ctx->suite;
|
|
|
|
struct kunit_case *test_case = ctx->test_case;
|
|
|
|
|
2020-10-13 23:55:02 +00:00
|
|
|
current->kunit_test = test;
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-23 09:02:39 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* kunit_run_case_internal may encounter a fatal error; if it does,
|
|
|
|
* abort will be called, this thread will exit, and finally the parent
|
|
|
|
* thread will resume control and handle any necessary clean up.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
kunit_run_case_internal(test, suite, test_case);
|
|
|
|
/* This line may never be reached. */
|
|
|
|
kunit_run_case_cleanup(test, suite);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void kunit_catch_run_case(void *data)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct kunit_try_catch_context *ctx = data;
|
|
|
|
struct kunit *test = ctx->test;
|
|
|
|
struct kunit_suite *suite = ctx->suite;
|
|
|
|
int try_exit_code = kunit_try_catch_get_result(&test->try_catch);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (try_exit_code) {
|
|
|
|
kunit_set_failure(test);
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Test case could not finish, we have no idea what state it is
|
|
|
|
* in, so don't do clean up.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
if (try_exit_code == -ETIMEDOUT) {
|
|
|
|
kunit_err(test, "test case timed out\n");
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Unknown internal error occurred preventing test case from
|
|
|
|
* running, so there is nothing to clean up.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
kunit_err(test, "internal error occurred preventing test case from running: %d\n",
|
|
|
|
try_exit_code);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Test case was run, but aborted. It is the test case's business as to
|
|
|
|
* whether it failed or not, we just need to clean up.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
kunit_run_case_cleanup(test, suite);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Performs all logic to run a test case. It also catches most errors that
|
|
|
|
* occur in a test case and reports them as failures.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
static void kunit_run_case_catch_errors(struct kunit_suite *suite,
|
2020-11-16 05:40:35 +00:00
|
|
|
struct kunit_case *test_case,
|
|
|
|
struct kunit *test)
|
2019-09-23 09:02:39 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct kunit_try_catch_context context;
|
|
|
|
struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch;
|
|
|
|
|
2020-11-16 05:40:35 +00:00
|
|
|
kunit_init_test(test, test_case->name, test_case->log);
|
|
|
|
try_catch = &test->try_catch;
|
2019-09-23 09:02:31 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-23 09:02:39 +00:00
|
|
|
kunit_try_catch_init(try_catch,
|
2020-11-16 05:40:35 +00:00
|
|
|
test,
|
2019-09-23 09:02:39 +00:00
|
|
|
kunit_try_run_case,
|
|
|
|
kunit_catch_run_case);
|
2020-11-16 05:40:35 +00:00
|
|
|
context.test = test;
|
2019-09-23 09:02:39 +00:00
|
|
|
context.suite = suite;
|
|
|
|
context.test_case = test_case;
|
|
|
|
kunit_try_catch_run(try_catch, &context);
|
2019-09-23 09:02:32 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-06-25 06:58:12 +00:00
|
|
|
/* Propagate the parameter result to the test case. */
|
|
|
|
if (test->status == KUNIT_FAILURE)
|
|
|
|
test_case->status = KUNIT_FAILURE;
|
|
|
|
else if (test_case->status != KUNIT_FAILURE && test->status == KUNIT_SUCCESS)
|
|
|
|
test_case->status = KUNIT_SUCCESS;
|
2019-09-23 09:02:31 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-08-04 05:08:08 +00:00
|
|
|
static void kunit_print_suite_stats(struct kunit_suite *suite,
|
|
|
|
struct kunit_result_stats suite_stats,
|
|
|
|
struct kunit_result_stats param_stats)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
if (kunit_should_print_stats(suite_stats)) {
|
|
|
|
kunit_log(KERN_INFO, suite,
|
|
|
|
"# %s: pass:%lu fail:%lu skip:%lu total:%lu",
|
|
|
|
suite->name,
|
|
|
|
suite_stats.passed,
|
|
|
|
suite_stats.failed,
|
|
|
|
suite_stats.skipped,
|
|
|
|
suite_stats.total);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (kunit_should_print_stats(param_stats)) {
|
|
|
|
kunit_log(KERN_INFO, suite,
|
|
|
|
"# Totals: pass:%lu fail:%lu skip:%lu total:%lu",
|
|
|
|
param_stats.passed,
|
|
|
|
param_stats.failed,
|
|
|
|
param_stats.skipped,
|
|
|
|
param_stats.total);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void kunit_update_stats(struct kunit_result_stats *stats,
|
|
|
|
enum kunit_status status)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
switch (status) {
|
|
|
|
case KUNIT_SUCCESS:
|
|
|
|
stats->passed++;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case KUNIT_SKIPPED:
|
|
|
|
stats->skipped++;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case KUNIT_FAILURE:
|
|
|
|
stats->failed++;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
stats->total++;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void kunit_accumulate_stats(struct kunit_result_stats *total,
|
|
|
|
struct kunit_result_stats add)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
total->passed += add.passed;
|
|
|
|
total->skipped += add.skipped;
|
|
|
|
total->failed += add.failed;
|
|
|
|
total->total += add.total;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-23 09:02:31 +00:00
|
|
|
int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2020-11-16 05:40:35 +00:00
|
|
|
char param_desc[KUNIT_PARAM_DESC_SIZE];
|
2019-09-23 09:02:31 +00:00
|
|
|
struct kunit_case *test_case;
|
2021-08-04 05:08:08 +00:00
|
|
|
struct kunit_result_stats suite_stats = { 0 };
|
|
|
|
struct kunit_result_stats total_stats = { 0 };
|
2019-09-23 09:02:31 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-07-01 08:47:43 +00:00
|
|
|
/* Taint the kernel so we know we've run tests. */
|
|
|
|
add_taint(TAINT_TEST, LOCKDEP_STILL_OK);
|
|
|
|
|
2022-04-29 18:12:57 +00:00
|
|
|
if (suite->suite_init) {
|
|
|
|
suite->suite_init_err = suite->suite_init(suite);
|
|
|
|
if (suite->suite_init_err) {
|
|
|
|
kunit_err(suite, KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT
|
|
|
|
"# failed to initialize (%d)", suite->suite_init_err);
|
|
|
|
goto suite_end;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2022-04-29 18:12:56 +00:00
|
|
|
kunit_print_suite_start(suite);
|
2019-09-23 09:02:31 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-11-16 05:40:35 +00:00
|
|
|
kunit_suite_for_each_test_case(suite, test_case) {
|
|
|
|
struct kunit test = { .param_value = NULL, .param_index = 0 };
|
2021-08-04 05:08:08 +00:00
|
|
|
struct kunit_result_stats param_stats = { 0 };
|
2021-06-25 06:58:12 +00:00
|
|
|
test_case->status = KUNIT_SKIPPED;
|
2020-11-16 05:40:35 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-11-02 07:30:13 +00:00
|
|
|
if (!test_case->generate_params) {
|
|
|
|
/* Non-parameterised test. */
|
|
|
|
kunit_run_case_catch_errors(suite, test_case, &test);
|
|
|
|
kunit_update_stats(¶m_stats, test.status);
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
2020-11-16 05:40:35 +00:00
|
|
|
/* Get initial param. */
|
|
|
|
param_desc[0] = '\0';
|
|
|
|
test.param_value = test_case->generate_params(NULL, param_desc);
|
kunit: Report test parameter results as (K)TAP subtests
Currently, the results for individial parameters in a parameterised test
are simply output as (K)TAP diagnostic lines.
As kunit_tool now supports nested subtests, report each parameter as its
own subtest.
For example, here's what the output now looks like:
# Subtest: inode_test_xtimestamp_decoding
ok 1 - 1901-12-13 Lower bound of 32bit < 0 timestamp, no extra bits
ok 2 - 1969-12-31 Upper bound of 32bit < 0 timestamp, no extra bits
ok 3 - 1970-01-01 Lower bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp, no extra bits
ok 4 - 2038-01-19 Upper bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp, no extra bits
ok 5 - 2038-01-19 Lower bound of 32bit <0 timestamp, lo extra sec bit on
ok 6 - 2106-02-07 Upper bound of 32bit <0 timestamp, lo extra sec bit on
ok 7 - 2106-02-07 Lower bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp, lo extra sec bit on
ok 8 - 2174-02-25 Upper bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp, lo extra sec bit on
ok 9 - 2174-02-25 Lower bound of 32bit <0 timestamp, hi extra sec bit on
ok 10 - 2242-03-16 Upper bound of 32bit <0 timestamp, hi extra sec bit on
ok 11 - 2242-03-16 Lower bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp, hi extra sec bit on
ok 12 - 2310-04-04 Upper bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp, hi extra sec bit on
ok 13 - 2310-04-04 Upper bound of 32bit>=0 timestamp, hi extra sec bit 1. 1 ns
ok 14 - 2378-04-22 Lower bound of 32bit>= timestamp. Extra sec bits 1. Max ns
ok 15 - 2378-04-22 Lower bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp. All extra sec bits on
ok 16 - 2446-05-10 Upper bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp. All extra sec bits on
# inode_test_xtimestamp_decoding: pass:16 fail:0 skip:0 total:16
ok 1 - inode_test_xtimestamp_decoding
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-11-02 07:30:14 +00:00
|
|
|
kunit_log(KERN_INFO, &test, KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT
|
|
|
|
"# Subtest: %s", test_case->name);
|
2020-11-16 05:40:35 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-11-02 07:30:13 +00:00
|
|
|
while (test.param_value) {
|
|
|
|
kunit_run_case_catch_errors(suite, test_case, &test);
|
2020-11-16 05:40:35 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (param_desc[0] == '\0') {
|
|
|
|
snprintf(param_desc, sizeof(param_desc),
|
|
|
|
"param-%d", test.param_index);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kunit_log(KERN_INFO, &test,
|
kunit: Report test parameter results as (K)TAP subtests
Currently, the results for individial parameters in a parameterised test
are simply output as (K)TAP diagnostic lines.
As kunit_tool now supports nested subtests, report each parameter as its
own subtest.
For example, here's what the output now looks like:
# Subtest: inode_test_xtimestamp_decoding
ok 1 - 1901-12-13 Lower bound of 32bit < 0 timestamp, no extra bits
ok 2 - 1969-12-31 Upper bound of 32bit < 0 timestamp, no extra bits
ok 3 - 1970-01-01 Lower bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp, no extra bits
ok 4 - 2038-01-19 Upper bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp, no extra bits
ok 5 - 2038-01-19 Lower bound of 32bit <0 timestamp, lo extra sec bit on
ok 6 - 2106-02-07 Upper bound of 32bit <0 timestamp, lo extra sec bit on
ok 7 - 2106-02-07 Lower bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp, lo extra sec bit on
ok 8 - 2174-02-25 Upper bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp, lo extra sec bit on
ok 9 - 2174-02-25 Lower bound of 32bit <0 timestamp, hi extra sec bit on
ok 10 - 2242-03-16 Upper bound of 32bit <0 timestamp, hi extra sec bit on
ok 11 - 2242-03-16 Lower bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp, hi extra sec bit on
ok 12 - 2310-04-04 Upper bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp, hi extra sec bit on
ok 13 - 2310-04-04 Upper bound of 32bit>=0 timestamp, hi extra sec bit 1. 1 ns
ok 14 - 2378-04-22 Lower bound of 32bit>= timestamp. Extra sec bits 1. Max ns
ok 15 - 2378-04-22 Lower bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp. All extra sec bits on
ok 16 - 2446-05-10 Upper bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp. All extra sec bits on
# inode_test_xtimestamp_decoding: pass:16 fail:0 skip:0 total:16
ok 1 - inode_test_xtimestamp_decoding
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-11-02 07:30:14 +00:00
|
|
|
KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT
|
|
|
|
"%s %d - %s",
|
2021-06-25 06:58:12 +00:00
|
|
|
kunit_status_to_ok_not_ok(test.status),
|
2020-11-16 05:40:35 +00:00
|
|
|
test.param_index + 1, param_desc);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Get next param. */
|
|
|
|
param_desc[0] = '\0';
|
|
|
|
test.param_value = test_case->generate_params(test.param_value, param_desc);
|
|
|
|
test.param_index++;
|
2021-08-04 05:08:08 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-11-02 07:30:13 +00:00
|
|
|
kunit_update_stats(¶m_stats, test.status);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2021-08-04 05:08:08 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-11-16 05:40:35 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-08-04 05:08:08 +00:00
|
|
|
kunit_print_test_stats(&test, param_stats);
|
|
|
|
|
2021-06-25 06:58:12 +00:00
|
|
|
kunit_print_ok_not_ok(&test, true, test_case->status,
|
2020-11-16 05:40:35 +00:00
|
|
|
kunit_test_case_num(suite, test_case),
|
2021-06-25 06:58:12 +00:00
|
|
|
test_case->name,
|
|
|
|
test.status_comment);
|
2021-08-04 05:08:08 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kunit_update_stats(&suite_stats, test_case->status);
|
|
|
|
kunit_accumulate_stats(&total_stats, param_stats);
|
2020-11-16 05:40:35 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2019-09-23 09:02:31 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-04-29 18:12:57 +00:00
|
|
|
if (suite->suite_exit)
|
|
|
|
suite->suite_exit(suite);
|
|
|
|
|
2021-08-04 05:08:08 +00:00
|
|
|
kunit_print_suite_stats(suite, suite_stats, total_stats);
|
2022-04-29 18:12:57 +00:00
|
|
|
suite_end:
|
2022-04-29 18:12:56 +00:00
|
|
|
kunit_print_suite_end(suite);
|
2019-09-23 09:02:31 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2020-01-06 22:28:20 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_run_tests);
|
2019-09-23 09:02:31 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-26 14:25:07 +00:00
|
|
|
static void kunit_init_suite(struct kunit_suite *suite)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
kunit_debugfs_create_suite(suite);
|
2021-06-25 06:58:12 +00:00
|
|
|
suite->status_comment[0] = '\0';
|
2022-04-29 18:12:57 +00:00
|
|
|
suite->suite_init_err = 0;
|
2020-03-26 14:25:07 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2022-08-23 14:24:54 +00:00
|
|
|
bool kunit_enabled(void)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
return enable_param;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2022-07-09 03:19:58 +00:00
|
|
|
int __kunit_test_suites_init(struct kunit_suite * const * const suites, int num_suites)
|
2020-03-26 14:25:07 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
unsigned int i;
|
|
|
|
|
2022-08-23 14:24:54 +00:00
|
|
|
if (!kunit_enabled() && num_suites > 0) {
|
|
|
|
pr_info("kunit: disabled\n");
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2022-07-09 03:19:58 +00:00
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < num_suites; i++) {
|
2020-03-26 14:25:07 +00:00
|
|
|
kunit_init_suite(suites[i]);
|
|
|
|
kunit_run_tests(suites[i]);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__kunit_test_suites_init);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void kunit_exit_suite(struct kunit_suite *suite)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
kunit_debugfs_destroy_suite(suite);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2022-07-09 03:19:58 +00:00
|
|
|
void __kunit_test_suites_exit(struct kunit_suite **suites, int num_suites)
|
2020-03-26 14:25:07 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
unsigned int i;
|
|
|
|
|
2022-08-23 14:24:54 +00:00
|
|
|
if (!kunit_enabled())
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
|
2022-07-09 03:19:58 +00:00
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < num_suites; i++)
|
2020-03-26 14:25:07 +00:00
|
|
|
kunit_exit_suite(suites[i]);
|
kunit: Reset suite count after running tests
There are some KUnit tests (KFENCE, Thunderbolt) which, for various
reasons, do not use the kunit_test_suite() macro and end up running
before the KUnit executor runs its tests. This means that their results
are printed separately, and they aren't included in the suite count used
by the executor.
This causes the executor output to be invalid TAP, however, as the suite
numbers used are no-longer 1-based, and don't match the test plan.
kunit_tool, therefore, prints a large number of warnings.
While it'd be nice to fix the tests to run in the executor, in the
meantime, reset the suite counter to 1 in __kunit_test_suites_exit.
Not only does this fix the executor, it means that if there are multiple
calls to __kunit_test_suites_init() across different tests, they'll each
get their own numbering.
kunit_tool likes this better: even if it's lacking the results for those
tests which don't use the executor (due to the lack of TAP header), the
output for the other tests is valid.
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-10-06 04:41:11 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kunit_suite_counter = 1;
|
2020-03-26 14:25:07 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__kunit_test_suites_exit);
|
|
|
|
|
2022-07-09 03:19:57 +00:00
|
|
|
#ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
|
|
|
|
static void kunit_module_init(struct module *mod)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2022-07-09 03:19:58 +00:00
|
|
|
__kunit_test_suites_init(mod->kunit_suites, mod->num_kunit_suites);
|
2022-07-09 03:19:57 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void kunit_module_exit(struct module *mod)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2022-07-09 03:19:58 +00:00
|
|
|
__kunit_test_suites_exit(mod->kunit_suites, mod->num_kunit_suites);
|
2022-07-09 03:19:57 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static int kunit_module_notify(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val,
|
|
|
|
void *data)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct module *mod = data;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
switch (val) {
|
|
|
|
case MODULE_STATE_LIVE:
|
|
|
|
kunit_module_init(mod);
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case MODULE_STATE_GOING:
|
|
|
|
kunit_module_exit(mod);
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case MODULE_STATE_COMING:
|
|
|
|
case MODULE_STATE_UNFORMED:
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static struct notifier_block kunit_mod_nb = {
|
|
|
|
.notifier_call = kunit_module_notify,
|
|
|
|
.priority = 0,
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
2021-05-03 20:58:34 +00:00
|
|
|
struct kunit_kmalloc_array_params {
|
|
|
|
size_t n;
|
2019-09-23 09:02:32 +00:00
|
|
|
size_t size;
|
|
|
|
gfp_t gfp;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2021-05-03 20:58:34 +00:00
|
|
|
static int kunit_kmalloc_array_init(struct kunit_resource *res, void *context)
|
2019-09-23 09:02:32 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2021-05-03 20:58:34 +00:00
|
|
|
struct kunit_kmalloc_array_params *params = context;
|
2019-09-23 09:02:32 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-05-03 20:58:34 +00:00
|
|
|
res->data = kmalloc_array(params->n, params->size, params->gfp);
|
2020-05-29 21:46:20 +00:00
|
|
|
if (!res->data)
|
2019-09-23 09:02:32 +00:00
|
|
|
return -ENOMEM;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-05-03 20:58:34 +00:00
|
|
|
static void kunit_kmalloc_array_free(struct kunit_resource *res)
|
2019-09-23 09:02:32 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2020-05-29 21:46:20 +00:00
|
|
|
kfree(res->data);
|
2019-09-23 09:02:32 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-05-03 20:58:34 +00:00
|
|
|
void *kunit_kmalloc_array(struct kunit *test, size_t n, size_t size, gfp_t gfp)
|
2019-09-23 09:02:32 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2021-05-03 20:58:34 +00:00
|
|
|
struct kunit_kmalloc_array_params params = {
|
2019-09-23 09:02:32 +00:00
|
|
|
.size = size,
|
2021-05-03 20:58:34 +00:00
|
|
|
.n = n,
|
2019-09-23 09:02:32 +00:00
|
|
|
.gfp = gfp
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return kunit_alloc_resource(test,
|
2021-05-03 20:58:34 +00:00
|
|
|
kunit_kmalloc_array_init,
|
|
|
|
kunit_kmalloc_array_free,
|
2019-09-23 09:02:32 +00:00
|
|
|
gfp,
|
|
|
|
¶ms);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2021-05-03 20:58:34 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_kmalloc_array);
|
2019-09-23 09:02:32 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-07-22 17:15:32 +00:00
|
|
|
static inline bool kunit_kfree_match(struct kunit *test,
|
|
|
|
struct kunit_resource *res, void *match_data)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
/* Only match resources allocated with kunit_kmalloc() and friends. */
|
|
|
|
return res->free == kunit_kmalloc_array_free && res->data == match_data;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-23 09:02:32 +00:00
|
|
|
void kunit_kfree(struct kunit *test, const void *ptr)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2022-07-22 17:15:34 +00:00
|
|
|
if (!ptr)
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
|
2022-07-22 17:15:33 +00:00
|
|
|
if (kunit_destroy_resource(test, kunit_kfree_match, (void *)ptr))
|
|
|
|
KUNIT_FAIL(test, "kunit_kfree: %px already freed or not allocated by kunit", ptr);
|
2019-09-23 09:02:32 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2020-01-06 22:28:20 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_kfree);
|
2019-09-23 09:02:32 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void kunit_cleanup(struct kunit *test)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2020-05-29 21:46:20 +00:00
|
|
|
struct kunit_resource *res;
|
2021-06-29 02:34:30 +00:00
|
|
|
unsigned long flags;
|
2019-09-23 09:02:32 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* test->resources is a stack - each allocation must be freed in the
|
|
|
|
* reverse order from which it was added since one resource may depend
|
|
|
|
* on another for its entire lifetime.
|
|
|
|
* Also, we cannot use the normal list_for_each constructs, even the
|
|
|
|
* safe ones because *arbitrary* nodes may be deleted when
|
|
|
|
* kunit_resource_free is called; the list_for_each_safe variants only
|
|
|
|
* protect against the current node being deleted, not the next.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
while (true) {
|
2021-06-29 02:34:30 +00:00
|
|
|
spin_lock_irqsave(&test->lock, flags);
|
2019-09-23 09:02:32 +00:00
|
|
|
if (list_empty(&test->resources)) {
|
2021-06-29 02:34:30 +00:00
|
|
|
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&test->lock, flags);
|
2019-09-23 09:02:32 +00:00
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2020-05-29 21:46:20 +00:00
|
|
|
res = list_last_entry(&test->resources,
|
|
|
|
struct kunit_resource,
|
|
|
|
node);
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Need to unlock here as a resource may remove another
|
|
|
|
* resource, and this can't happen if the test->lock
|
|
|
|
* is held.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2021-06-29 02:34:30 +00:00
|
|
|
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&test->lock, flags);
|
2020-05-29 21:46:20 +00:00
|
|
|
kunit_remove_resource(test, res);
|
2019-09-23 09:02:32 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2020-10-13 23:55:02 +00:00
|
|
|
current->kunit_test = NULL;
|
2019-09-23 09:02:32 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2020-01-06 22:28:20 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_cleanup);
|
2020-01-06 22:28:22 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static int __init kunit_init(void)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2020-03-26 14:25:07 +00:00
|
|
|
kunit_debugfs_init();
|
2022-07-09 03:19:57 +00:00
|
|
|
#ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
|
|
|
|
return register_module_notifier(&kunit_mod_nb);
|
|
|
|
#else
|
2020-01-06 22:28:22 +00:00
|
|
|
return 0;
|
2022-07-09 03:19:57 +00:00
|
|
|
#endif
|
2020-01-06 22:28:22 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
late_initcall(kunit_init);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void __exit kunit_exit(void)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2022-07-09 03:19:57 +00:00
|
|
|
#ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
|
|
|
|
unregister_module_notifier(&kunit_mod_nb);
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
2020-03-26 14:25:07 +00:00
|
|
|
kunit_debugfs_cleanup();
|
2020-01-06 22:28:22 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
module_exit(kunit_exit);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
|