mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-12-03 17:41:22 +00:00
d6b399a0e0
We should be able to ndelay() from any context, even from an interrupt context! However, this is broken (not functionally, but locking-wise) in time-travel because we'll get into the time-travel code and enable interrupts to handle messages on other time-travel aware subsystems (only virtio for now). Luckily, I've already reworked the time-travel aware signal (interrupt) delivery for suspend/resume to have a time travel handler, which runs directly in the context of the signal and not from the Linux interrupt. In order to fix this time-travel issue then, we need to do a few things: 1) rework the signal handling code to call time-travel handlers (only) if interrupts are disabled but signals aren't blocked, instead of marking it only pending there. This is needed to not deadlock other communication. 2) rework time-travel to not enable interrupts while it's waiting for a message; 3) rework time-travel to not (just) disable interrupts but rather block signals at a lower level while it needs them disabled for communicating with the controller. Finally, since now we can actually spend even virtual time in interrupts-disabled sections, the delay warning when we deliver a time-travel delayed interrupt is no longer valid, things can (and should) now get delayed. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
alpha | ||
arc | ||
arm | ||
arm64 | ||
csky | ||
h8300 | ||
hexagon | ||
ia64 | ||
m68k | ||
microblaze | ||
mips | ||
nds32 | ||
nios2 | ||
openrisc | ||
parisc | ||
powerpc | ||
riscv | ||
s390 | ||
sh | ||
sparc | ||
um | ||
x86 | ||
xtensa | ||
.gitignore | ||
Kconfig |