This is a fix from reviewing the code, but it looks like it might be
able to lead to an Oops. It affects 32bit systems.
The KVM_MEMORY_ENCRYPT_REG_REGION ioctl uses a u64 for range->addr and
range->size but the high 32 bits would be truncated away on a 32 bit
system. This is harmless but it's also harmless to prevent it.
Then in sev_pin_memory() the "uaddr + ulen" calculation can wrap around.
The wrap around can happen on 32 bit or 64 bit systems, but I was only
able to figure out a problem for 32 bit systems. We would pick a number
which results in "npages" being zero. The sev_pin_memory() would then
return ZERO_SIZE_PTR without allocating anything.
I made it illegal to call sev_pin_memory() with "ulen" set to zero.
Hopefully, that doesn't cause any problems. I also changed the type of
"first" and "last" to long, just for cosmetic reasons. Otherwise on a
64 bit system you're saving "uaddr >> 12" in an int and it truncates the
high 20 bits away. The math works in the current code so far as I can
see but it's just weird.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
[Brijesh noted that the code is only reachable on X86_64.]
Reviewed-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
86bf20cb57