[Why]
The sequence for collecting down_reply from source perspective should
be:
Request_n->repeat (get partial reply of Request_n->clear message ready
flag to ack DPRX that the message is received) till all partial
replies for Request_n are received->new Request_n+1.
Now there is chance that drm_dp_mst_hpd_irq() will fire new down
request in the tx queue when the down reply is incomplete. Source is
restricted to generate interveleaved message transactions so we should
avoid it.
Also, while assembling partial reply packets, reading out DPCD DOWN_REP
Sideband MSG buffer + clearing DOWN_REP_MSG_RDY flag should be
wrapped up as a complete operation for reading out a reply packet.
Kicking off a new request before clearing DOWN_REP_MSG_RDY flag might
be risky. e.g. If the reply of the new request has overwritten the
DPRX DOWN_REP Sideband MSG buffer before source writing one to clear
DOWN_REP_MSG_RDY flag, source then unintentionally flushes the reply
for the new request. Should handle the up request in the same way.
[How]
Separete drm_dp_mst_hpd_irq() into 2 steps. After acking the MST IRQ
event, driver calls drm_dp_mst_hpd_irq_send_new_request() and might
trigger drm_dp_mst_kick_tx() only when there is no on going message
transaction.
Changes since v1:
* Reworked on review comments received
-> Adjust the fix to let driver explicitly kick off new down request
when mst irq event is handled and acked
-> Adjust the commit message
Changes since v2:
* Adjust the commit message
* Adjust the naming of the divided 2 functions and add a new input
parameter "ack".
* Adjust code flow as per review comments.
Changes since v3:
* Update the function description of drm_dp_mst_hpd_irq_handle_event
Changes since v4:
* Change ack of drm_dp_mst_hpd_irq_handle_event() to be an array align
the size of esi[]
Signed-off-by: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
72f1de49ff