mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-24 13:11:40 +00:00
A mirror of the official Linux kernel repository just in case
620c266f39
A current limitation of open_by_handle_at() is that it's currently not possible to use it from within containers at all because we require CAP_DAC_READ_SEARCH in the initial namespace. That's unfortunate because there are scenarios where using open_by_handle_at() from within containers. Two examples: (1) cgroupfs allows to encode cgroups to file handles and reopen them with open_by_handle_at(). (2) Fanotify allows placing filesystem watches they currently aren't usable in containers because the returned file handles cannot be used. Here's a proposal for relaxing the permission check for open_by_handle_at(). (1) Opening file handles when the caller has privileges over the filesystem (1.1) The caller has an unobstructed view of the filesystem. (1.2) The caller has permissions to follow a path to the file handle. This doesn't address the problem of opening a file handle when only a portion of a filesystem is exposed as is common in containers by e.g., bind-mounting a subtree. The proposal to solve this use-case is: (2) Opening file handles when the caller has privileges over a subtree (2.1) The caller is able to reach the file from the provided mount fd. (2.2) The caller has permissions to construct an unobstructed path to the file handle. (2.3) The caller has permissions to follow a path to the file handle. The relaxed permission checks are currently restricted to directory file handles which are what both cgroupfs and fanotify need. Handling disconnected non-directory file handles would lead to a potentially non-deterministic api. If a disconnected non-directory file handle is provided we may fail to decode a valid path that we could use for permission checking. That in itself isn't a problem as we would just return EACCES in that case. However, confusion may arise if a non-disconnected dentry ends up in the cache later and those opening the file handle would suddenly succeed. * It's potentially possible to use timing information (side-channel) to infer whether a given inode exists. I don't think that's particularly problematic. Thanks to Jann for bringing this to my attention. * An unrelated note (IOW, these are thoughts that apply to open_by_handle_at() generically and are unrelated to the changes here): Jann pointed out that we should verify whether deleted files could potentially be reopened through open_by_handle_at(). I don't think that's possible though. Another potential thing to check is whether open_by_handle_at() could be abused to open internal stuff like memfds or gpu stuff. I don't think so but I haven't had the time to completely verify this. This dates back to discussions Amir and I had quite some time ago and thanks to him for providing a lot of details around the export code and related patches! Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240524-vfs-open_by_handle_at-v1-1-3d4b7d22736b@kernel.org Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> |
||
---|---|---|
arch | ||
block | ||
certs | ||
crypto | ||
Documentation | ||
drivers | ||
fs | ||
include | ||
init | ||
io_uring | ||
ipc | ||
kernel | ||
lib | ||
LICENSES | ||
mm | ||
net | ||
rust | ||
samples | ||
scripts | ||
security | ||
sound | ||
tools | ||
usr | ||
virt | ||
.clang-format | ||
.cocciconfig | ||
.editorconfig | ||
.get_maintainer.ignore | ||
.gitattributes | ||
.gitignore | ||
.mailmap | ||
.rustfmt.toml | ||
COPYING | ||
CREDITS | ||
Kbuild | ||
Kconfig | ||
MAINTAINERS | ||
Makefile | ||
README |
Linux kernel ============ There are several guides for kernel developers and users. These guides can be rendered in a number of formats, like HTML and PDF. Please read Documentation/admin-guide/README.rst first. In order to build the documentation, use ``make htmldocs`` or ``make pdfdocs``. The formatted documentation can also be read online at: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/ There are various text files in the Documentation/ subdirectory, several of them using the reStructuredText markup notation. Please read the Documentation/process/changes.rst file, as it contains the requirements for building and running the kernel, and information about the problems which may result by upgrading your kernel.