Bernard Pidoux f37f2c62a2 rose: Wrong list_lock argument in rose_node seqops ... In rose_node_start() as well as in rose_node_stop() __acquires() and spin_lock_bh() were wrongly passing rose_neigh_list_lock instead of rose_node_list_lock arguments. Signed-off-by: Bernard Pidoux <f6bvp@amsat.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>		2008-05-02 17:03:22 -07:00
..
af_rose.c	rose: Socket lock was not released before returning to user space	2008-04-19 18:41:51 -07:00
Makefile
rose_dev.c	[ROSE]: Trivial compilation CONFIG_INET=n case	2007-12-05 05:37:28 -08:00
rose_in.c	[ROSE]: Supress sparse warnings	2008-01-28 15:02:44 -08:00
rose_link.c
rose_loopback.c	[ROSE]: Fix rose.ko oops on unload	2007-10-07 23:44:17 -07:00
rose_out.c	[PATCH] remove many unneeded #includes of sched.h	2007-02-14 08:09:54 -08:00
rose_route.c	rose: Wrong list_lock argument in rose_node seqops	2008-05-02 17:03:22 -07:00
rose_subr.c	[PATCH] remove many unneeded #includes of sched.h	2007-02-14 08:09:54 -08:00
rose_timer.c
sysctl_net_rose.c	[NET]: Simple ctl_table to ctl_path conversions.	2008-01-28 15:01:07 -08:00