Move common code in ext4_ind_punch_hole() and ext4_ext_punch_hole()
into ext4_punch_hole(). This saves over 150 lines of code.
This also fixes a potential bug when the punch_hole() code is racing
against indirect-to-extents or extents-to-indirect migation. We are
currently using i_mutex to protect against changes to the inode flag;
specifically, the append-only, immutable, and extents inode flags. So
we need to take i_mutex before deciding whether to use the
extents-specific or indirect-specific punch_hole code.
Also, there was a missing call to ext4_inode_block_unlocked_dio() in
the indirect punch codepath. This was added in commit 02d262dffc
to block DIO readers racing against the punch operation in the
codepath for extent-mapped inodes, but it was missing for
indirect-block mapped inodes. One of the advantages of refactoring
the code is that it makes such oversights much less likely.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
26a4c0c6cc