With the v4l2_i2c_new_subdev* functions now supporting loading modules
based on modaliases, remove the module names hardcoded in platform data
and pass a NULL module name to those functions.
All corresponding I2C modules have been checked, and all of them include
a module aliases table with names corresponding to what the soc_camera
platform data uses.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
As the kernel contains a copy of the GPL anyhow just get rid of the address
specification instead of fixing it.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
In preparation for a new robot which needs the
OTG port as host.
This moves the OTG device registration into board
initialisation.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Rétornaz <philippe.retornaz@epfl.ch>
Acked-by: Valentin Longchamp <valentin.longchamp@epfl.ch>
Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
percpu.h is included by sched.h and module.h and thus ends up being
included when building most .c files. percpu.h includes slab.h which
in turn includes gfp.h making everything defined by the two files
universally available and complicating inclusion dependencies.
percpu.h -> slab.h dependency is about to be removed. Prepare for
this change by updating users of gfp and slab facilities include those
headers directly instead of assuming availability. As this conversion
needs to touch large number of source files, the following script is
used as the basis of conversion.
http://userweb.kernel.org/~tj/misc/slabh-sweep.py
The script does the followings.
* Scan files for gfp and slab usages and update includes such that
only the necessary includes are there. ie. if only gfp is used,
gfp.h, if slab is used, slab.h.
* When the script inserts a new include, it looks at the include
blocks and try to put the new include such that its order conforms
to its surrounding. It's put in the include block which contains
core kernel includes, in the same order that the rest are ordered -
alphabetical, Christmas tree, rev-Xmas-tree or at the end if there
doesn't seem to be any matching order.
* If the script can't find a place to put a new include (mostly
because the file doesn't have fitting include block), it prints out
an error message indicating which .h file needs to be added to the
file.
The conversion was done in the following steps.
1. The initial automatic conversion of all .c files updated slightly
over 4000 files, deleting around 700 includes and adding ~480 gfp.h
and ~3000 slab.h inclusions. The script emitted errors for ~400
files.
2. Each error was manually checked. Some didn't need the inclusion,
some needed manual addition while adding it to implementation .h or
embedding .c file was more appropriate for others. This step added
inclusions to around 150 files.
3. The script was run again and the output was compared to the edits
from #2 to make sure no file was left behind.
4. Several build tests were done and a couple of problems were fixed.
e.g. lib/decompress_*.c used malloc/free() wrappers around slab
APIs requiring slab.h to be added manually.
5. The script was run on all .h files but without automatically
editing them as sprinkling gfp.h and slab.h inclusions around .h
files could easily lead to inclusion dependency hell. Most gfp.h
inclusion directives were ignored as stuff from gfp.h was usually
wildly available and often used in preprocessor macros. Each
slab.h inclusion directive was examined and added manually as
necessary.
6. percpu.h was updated not to include slab.h.
7. Build test were done on the following configurations and failures
were fixed. CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL was turned off for all tests (as my
distributed build env didn't work with gcov compiles) and a few
more options had to be turned off depending on archs to make things
build (like ipr on powerpc/64 which failed due to missing writeq).
* x86 and x86_64 UP and SMP allmodconfig and a custom test config.
* powerpc and powerpc64 SMP allmodconfig
* sparc and sparc64 SMP allmodconfig
* ia64 SMP allmodconfig
* s390 SMP allmodconfig
* alpha SMP allmodconfig
* um on x86_64 SMP allmodconfig
8. percpu.h modifications were reverted so that it could be applied as
a separate patch and serve as bisection point.
Given the fact that I had only a couple of failures from tests on step
6, I'm fairly confident about the coverage of this conversion patch.
If there is a breakage, it's likely to be something in one of the arch
headers which should be easily discoverable easily on most builds of
the specific arch.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Guess-its-ok-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
This baseboard is used on the handbot and eybot robots.
The sel gpios are used as enables and rst signals on smartbot, thus the
sel init is moved from mx31moboard file to board files.
Signed-off-by: Valentin Longchamp <valentin.longchamp@epfl.ch>
Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
We want the microcontrollers to be held in reset during kernel boot.
We also set the turretcam as the default camera since it is present on all
marxbots.
Signed-off-by: Valentin Longchamp <valentin.longchamp@epfl.ch>
Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Adds requirement for ADC on mc13783 and moves the spidev declaration
to marxbot file.
Signed-off-by: Valentin Longchamp <valentin.longchamp@epfl.ch>
Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
We have two mt9t031 cameras that have a muxed bus on the robot.
Only one is currently initialized because of limitations in
soc_camera that should be removed later.
Signed-off-by: Valentin Longchamp <valentin.longchamp@epfl.ch>
Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
since all boards finally have this device
Signed-off-by: Valentin Longchamp <valentin.longchamp@epfl.ch>
Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Small confusion with our hardware engineer, the WP signal (RO) is
active low on our boards, the signal has to inverted.
This is a pretty straightforward patch, it could even go to -rc,
but if not, then push it for 2.6.32.
Signed-off-by: Valentin Longchamp <valentin.longchamp@epfl.ch>
Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
This is used on all board of our system, so again this is done in the
mx31moboard.c file.
changes since v2: call to gpio_request added in platform code, and
moved device initialization in baseboard files.
changes since v1: pins are claimed in another patch
Signed-off-by: Valentin Longchamp <valentin.longchamp@epfl.ch>
Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
In order to use the gpiolib, we now have to call gpio_request in
the plaform code since it is not done in iomux code anymore.
Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
This support both sdhc1 and sdhc2 with WP and CD for the marxbot and
devboard mx31moboard baseboards.
sdhc2 is present on both, but is not directly included in the
mx31moboard file because a third baseboard (not supported yet) without
sdhc2 is planned.
Changes since v1: removed pin initialization from init/exit function and
taken different comments into account
Changes since v2: pin initialiation now is done in another patch for all
current mx31moboard pins
Signed-off-by: Valentin Longchamp <valentin.longchamp@epfl.ch>
Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
As suggested by Sascha, here we setup all the pins that we are using in
the current (and currently reviewed) drivers for mx31moboard system.
changes since v1: changed I2C1 pin names
Signed-off-by: Valentin Longchamp <valentin.longchamp@epfl.ch>
Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Various improvements (includes in alphabetical order, platform devices
declaration order change, ...)
The pins now are claimed in a single function call from a main table for
every board for a better clarity and to adopt the current agreement for
mx31 devices.
Signed-off-by: Valentin Longchamp <valentin.longchamp@epfl.ch>
Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
This enables our mx31moboard to be used on the different baseboards that
we are developping according to the application needs. There are not
many differences between the boards for now, but when other peripherals
are available for mx31 the differences are going to grow.
v2: takes Sascha's comments into account
Signed-off-by: Valentin Longchamp <valentin.longchamp@epfl.ch>
Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
