soc_pcm_trigger() calls DAI/Component/Link trigger,
but some of them might be failed.
static int soc_pcm_trigger(...)
{
...
switch (cmd) {
case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_START:
case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_RESUME:
case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_PAUSE_RELEASE:
ret = snd_soc_link_trigger(substream, cmd);
if (ret < 0)
break;
(*) ret = snd_soc_pcm_component_trigger(substream, cmd);
if (ret < 0)
break;
ret = snd_soc_pcm_dai_trigger(substream, cmd);
break;
case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_STOP:
case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_SUSPEND:
case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_PAUSE_PUSH:
ret = snd_soc_pcm_dai_trigger(substream, cmd);
if (ret < 0)
break;
ret = snd_soc_pcm_component_trigger(substream, cmd);
if (ret < 0)
break;
ret = snd_soc_link_trigger(substream, cmd);
break;
}
...
}
For example, if soc_pcm_trigger() failed at (*) point,
we need to rollback previous succeeded trigger.
This patch adds trigger mark for DAI/Component/Link,
and do STOP if START/RESUME/PAUSE_RELEASE were failed.
Because it need to use new rollback parameter,
we need to modify DAI/Component/Link trigger functions in the same time.
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87a6uycssd.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
soc_compr_open() does rollback when failed (A),
but, it is almost same as soc_compr_free().
static int soc_compr_open(xxx)
{
...
if (ret < 0)
goto xxx_err;
...
return 0;
^ machine_err:
| ...
| out:
(A) ...
| pm_err:
| ...
v return ret;
}
The difference is
soc_compr_free() is for all dai/component/substream,
rollback is for succeeded part only.
This kind of duplicated code can be a hotbed of bugs,
thus, we want to share soc_compr_free() and rollback.
1) snd_soc_dai_compr_startup/shutdown()
2) snd_soc_component_compr_open/free()
=> 3) snd_soc_link_compr_startup/shutdown()
This patch is for 3) snd_soc_link_compr_startup/shutdown()
and adds new cstream mark.
It will mark cstream when startup() was suceeded.
If rollback happen *after* that, it will check rollback flag
and marked cstream.
It cares *previous* startup() only now,
but we might want to check *whole* marked cstream in the future.
This patch is using macro so that it can be easily adjust to it.
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87k0ui5iwf.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
soc_pcm_hw_params() does rollback when failed (A),
but, it is almost same as soc_pcm_hw_free().
static int soc_pcm_hw_params(xxx)
{
...
if (ret < 0)
goto xxx_err;
...
return ret;
^ component_err:
| ...
| interface_err:
(A) ...
| codec_err:
| ...
v return ret;
}
The difference is
soc_pcm_hw_free() is for all dai/component/substream,
rollback is for succeeded part only.
This kind of duplicated code can be a hotbed of bugs,
thus, we want to share soc_pcm_hw_free() and rollback.
Now, soc_pcm_hw_params/free() are handling
=> 1) snd_soc_link_hw_params/free()
2) snd_soc_pcm_component_hw_params/free()
3) snd_soc_dai_hw_params/free()
This patch is for 1) snd_soc_link_hw_params/free().
The idea of having bit-flag or counter is not enough for this purpose.
For example if one DAI is used for 2xPlaybacks for some reasons,
and if 1st Playback was succeeded but 2nd Playback was failed,
2nd Playback rollback doesn't need to call shutdown.
But it has succeeded bit-flag or counter via 1st Playback,
thus, 2nd Playback rollback will call unneeded shutdown.
And 1st Playback's necessary shutdown will not be called,
because bit-flag or counter was cleared by wrong 2nd Playback rollback.
To avoid such case, this patch marks substream pointer when hw_params() was
succeeded. If rollback needed, it will check rollback flag and marked
substream pointer.
One note here ist that it cares *previous* hw_params() only now,
but we might want to check *whole* marked substream in the future.
This patch is using macro named "push/pop", so that it can be easily
update.
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87lfgtgqba.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
soc_pcm_open() does rollback when failed (A),
but, it is almost same as soc_pcm_close().
static int soc_pcm_open(xxx)
{
...
if (ret < 0)
goto xxx_err;
...
return 0;
^ config_err:
| ...
| rtd_startup_err:
(A) ...
| component_err:
| ...
v return ret;
}
The difference is
soc_pcm_close() is for all dai/component/substream,
rollback is for succeeded part only.
This kind of duplicated code can be a hotbed of bugs,
thus, we want to share soc_pcm_close() and rollback.
Now, soc_pcm_open/close() are handling
1) snd_soc_dai_startup/shutdown()
=> 2) snd_soc_link_startup/shutdown()
3) snd_soc_component_module_get/put()
4) snd_soc_component_open/close()
5) pm_runtime_put/get()
This patch is for 2) snd_soc_link_startup/shutdown().
The idea of having bit-flag or counter is not enough for this purpose.
For example if one DAI is used for 2xPlaybacks for some reasons,
and if 1st Playback was succeeded but 2nd Playback was failed,
2nd Playback rollback doesn't need to call shutdown.
But it has succeeded bit-flag or counter via 1st Playback,
thus, 2nd Playback rollback will call unneeded shutdown.
And 1st Playback's necessary shutdown will not be called,
because bit-flag or counter was cleared by wrong 2nd Playback rollback.
To avoid such case, this patch marks substream pointer when startup() was
succeeded. If rollback needed, it will check rollback flag and marked
substream pointer.
One note here is that it cares *current* startup() only now.
but we might want to check *whole* marked substream in the future.
This patch is using macro named "push/pop", so that it can be easily
update.
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87k0webwnv.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Some machine drivers allocate or request resources with
snd_soc_link_init() phase of the card probe. These resources need to
be properly released when removing a card, and this patch suggests a
dual exit() callback.
The exit() is invoked in soc_remove_pcm_runtime(), which is not
completely symmetric with the init() invoked in soc_init_pcm_runtime().
Alternate solutions were considered, e.g. adding a .remove() callback
for the platform driver, but that's not symmetrical at all and would
be difficult to handle if there are more than one dailink implementing
an .init(). We looked also into using .remove_dai_link() callback, but
that would also be imbalanced.
Note that because of the error handling in snd_soc_bind_card(), which
jumps to probe_end, there is no way to guarantee the exit() is invoked
with resources allocated in the init(). Prior to releasing those
resources, implementations of the exit() callback shall check the
resources are valid.
Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <guennadi.liakhovetski@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Curtis Malainey <curtis@malainey.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200622154241.29053-2-pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
dai_link related function should be implemented at soc-link.c.
This patch adds snd_soc_link_compr_set_params().
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87sgfo3k6q.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
dai_link related function should be implemented at soc-link.c.
This patch adds snd_soc_link_compr_shutdown().
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87tv043k6u.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
dai_link related function should be implemented at soc-link.c.
This patch adds snd_soc_link_compr_startup().
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87v9kk3k6y.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
dai_link related function should be implemented at soc-link.c.
This patch adds snd_soc_link_be_hw_params_fixup().
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87wo503k73.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
"rtd" can be created from "substream".
Let's cleanup snd_soc_link_xxx().
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87y2pg3k78.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
dai_link related function should be implemented at
soc-link.c.
This patch moves soc-pcm soc_rtd_xxx()
to soc-link as snd_soc_link_xxx()
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87zh9w3k7k.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Current ALSA SoC has many dai_link->xxx() functions.
But, it is implemented randomly at random place.
This patch creats new soc-link.c and collect dai_link related
operation into it.
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/871rn84ys5.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
