While renaming one of the fields in the driver data struct, the kerneldoc
was not updated which apparently angers the test robot now.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202308171538.nKKUOtbg-lkp@intel.com/
Fixes: a3f7c1d6dd ("gpio: pca9570: rename platform_data to chip_data")
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
After commit b8a1a4cd5a ("i2c: Provide a temporary .probe_new()
call-back type"), all drivers being converted to .probe_new() and then
03c835f498 ("i2c: Switch .probe() to not take an id parameter") convert
back to (the new) .probe() to be able to eventually drop .probe_new() from
struct i2c_driver.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
By convention platform_data refers to structures passed to drivers by
code that registers devices. When talking about model-specific data
structures associated with OF compatibles, we usually call them chip_data.
In order to avoid confusion rename all mentions of platform_data to
chip_data.
Fixes: fbb19fe17e ("gpio: pca9570: add slg7xl45106 support")
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Dialog semiconductors SLG7XL45106 is an 8-bit I2C GPO expander.
The output port is controlled by a data byte with register
address. Add a compatible string for the same. Also update
the driver to write and read from it.
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti Datta <shubhrajyoti.datta@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Add struct pca9570_platform_data for adding the platform data
structure. Also modify the existing structs for pca9570 and pca9571
Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti Datta <shubhrajyoti.datta@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
The PCA9571 very similar to the PCA9570, it only differs in the
number of GPIOs.
Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
