Commit Graph

32839 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Josef Bacik
de2b530bfb Btrfs: actually log directory we are fsync()'ing
If you just create a directory and then fsync that directory and then pull the
power plug you will come back up and the directory will not be there.  That is
because we won't actually create directories if we've logged files inside of
them since they will be created on replay, but in this check we will set our
logged_trans of our current directory if it happens to be a directory, making us
think it doesn't need to be logged.  Fix the logic to only do this to parent
directories.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-21 11:05:24 -04:00
Josef Bacik
573aecafca Btrfs: actually limit the size of delalloc range
So forever we have had this thing to limit the amount of delalloc pages we'll
setup to be written out to 128mb.  This is because we have to lock all the pages
in this range, so anything above this gets a bit unweildly, and also without a
limit we'll happily allocate gigantic chunks of disk space.  Turns out our check
for this wasn't quite right, we wouldn't actually limit the chunk we wanted to
write out, we'd just stop looking for more space after we went over the limit.
So if you do a giant 20gb dd on my box with lots of ram I could get 2gig
extents.  This is fine normally, except when you go to relocate these extents
and we can't find enough space to relocate these moster extents, since we have
to be able to allocate exactly the same sized extent to move it around.  So fix
this by actually enforcing the limit.  With this patch I'm no longer seeing
giant 1.5gb extents.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-21 11:05:24 -04:00
Miao Xie
a482039889 Btrfs: allocate the free space by the existed max extent size when ENOSPC
By the current code, if the requested size is very large, and all the extents
in the free space cache are small, we will waste lots of the cpu time to cut
the requested size in half and search the cache again and again until it gets
down to the size the allocator can return. In fact, we can know the max extent
size in the cache after the first search, so we needn't cut the size in half
repeatedly, and just use the max extent size directly. This way can save
lots of cpu time and make the performance grow up when there are only fragments
in the free space cache.

According to my test, if there are only 4KB free space extents in the fs,
and the total size of those extents are 256MB, we can reduce the execute
time of the following test from 5.4s to 1.4s.
  dd if=/dev/zero of=<testfile> bs=1MB count=1 oflag=sync

Changelog v2 -> v3:
- fix the problem that we skip the block group with the space which is
  less than we need.

Changelog v1 -> v2:
- address the problem that we return a wrong start position when searching
  the free space in a bitmap.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-21 11:05:23 -04:00
David Sterba
13fd8da98f btrfs: add lockdep and tracing annotations for uuid tree
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-21 10:58:56 -04:00
Stefan Behrens
79556c3d88 btrfs: show compiled-in config features at module load time
We want to know if there are debugging features compiled in, this may
affect performance. The message is printed before the sanity checks.

(This commit message is a copy of David Sterba's commit message when
he introduced btrfs_print_info()).

Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-21 10:58:56 -04:00
Filipe David Borba Manana
cef2193729 Btrfs: more efficient inode tree replace operation
Instead of removing the current inode from the red black tree
and then add the new one, just use the red black tree replace
operation, which is more efficient.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-21 10:58:55 -04:00
Ilya Dryomov
55e50e458e Btrfs: do not add replace target to the alloc_list
If replace was suspended by the umount, replace target device is added
to the fs_devices->alloc_list during a later mount.  This is obviously
wrong.  ->is_tgtdev_for_dev_replace is supposed to guard against that,
but ->is_tgtdev_for_dev_replace is (and can only ever be) initialized
*after* everything is opened and fs_devices lists are populated.  Fix
this by checking the devid instead: for replace targets it's always
equal to BTRFS_DEV_REPLACE_DEVID.

Cc: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-21 10:58:55 -04:00
Josef Bacik
83d4cfd4da Btrfs: fixup error handling in btrfs_reloc_cow
If we failed to actually allocate the correct size of the extent to relocate we
will end up in an infinite loop because we won't return an error, we'll just
move on to the next extent.  So fix this up by returning an error, and then fix
all the callers to return an error up the stack rather than BUG_ON()'ing.
Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-21 10:58:54 -04:00
Chris Mason
07f0e62e7f Linux 3.11
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
 
 iQEcBAABAgAGBQJSJPkeAAoJEHm+PkMAQRiGVWMH/jo5f01Ra7G4/CYS59K+AlBQ
 /oWL3W81r5MORlsMxwUwGtJ3sZ7UulKwiDrluWeOkz2+/9SmoHoUfkpbByq1bSIV
 y0eqhmjtkHQZz5radJIHeyz1gJIICBIgAM0l45j8SpK4n9EXRcjLSZjdjAkPzxZp
 qZpfxKhVSTu79m96bud7F+HrboHDQEyhD9zqdSi4xPQNnOmTc7K3tvui9AB3rMbV
 ablM3C+LqBYjZx+pKS/rOdfATxZvtU392HU53XTALt6VD1e8alMmhmpe0I9Zxvjv
 scsB6hfRkevfe7VaK3aVoDnQnLKd61yxs+/XdzTtkWPbVGp+kiuFUdDv/5y2r1g=
 =7Xf6
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Merge tag 'v3.11' into for-linus

Linux 3.11
2013-09-21 10:44:55 -04:00
Filipe David Borba Manana
d7396f0735 Btrfs: optimize key searches in btrfs_search_slot
When the binary search returns 0 (exact match), the target key
will necessarily be at slot 0 of all nodes below the current one,
so in this case the binary search is not needed because it will
always return 0, and we waste time doing it, holding node locks
for longer than necessary, etc.

Below follow histograms with the times spent on the current approach of
doing a binary search when the previous binary search returned 0, and
times for the new approach, which directly picks the first item/child
node in the leaf/node.

Current approach:

Count: 6682
Range: 35.000 - 8370.000; Mean: 85.837; Median: 75.000; Stddev: 106.429
Percentiles:  90th: 124.000; 95th: 145.000; 99th: 206.000
  35.000 -   61.080:  1235 ################
  61.080 -  106.053:  4207 #####################################################
 106.053 -  183.606:  1122 ##############
 183.606 -  317.341:   111 #
 317.341 -  547.959:     6 |
 547.959 - 8370.000:     1 |

Approach proposed by this patch:

Count: 6682
Range:  6.000 - 135.000; Mean: 16.690; Median: 16.000; Stddev:  7.160
Percentiles:  90th: 23.000; 95th: 27.000; 99th: 40.000
   6.000 -    8.418:    58 #
   8.418 -   11.670:  1149 #########################
  11.670 -   16.046:  2418 #####################################################
  16.046 -   21.934:  2098 ##############################################
  21.934 -   29.854:   744 ################
  29.854 -   40.511:   154 ###
  40.511 -   54.848:    41 #
  54.848 -   74.136:     5 |
  74.136 -  100.087:     9 |
 100.087 -  135.000:     6 |

These samples were captured during a run of the btrfs tests 001, 002 and
004 in the xfstests, with a leaf/node size of 4Kb.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-01 08:16:42 -04:00
Josef Bacik
45d5fd14d2 Btrfs: don't use an async starter for most of our workers
We only need an async starter if we can't make a GFP_NOFS allocation in our
current path.  This is the case for the endio stuff since it happens in IRQ
context, but things like the caching thread workers and the delalloc flushers we
can easily make this allocation and start threads right away.  Also change the
worker count for the caching thread pool.  Traditionally we limited this to 2
since we took read locks while caching, but nowadays we do this lockless so
there's no reason to limit the number of caching threads.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-01 08:16:41 -04:00
Josef Bacik
7f4f6e0a3f Btrfs: only update disk_i_size as we remove extents
This fixes a problem where if we fail a truncate we will leave the i_size set
where we wanted to truncate to instead of where we were able to truncate to.
Fix this by making btrfs_truncate_inode_items do the disk_i_size update as it
removes extents, that way it will always be consistent with where its extents
are.  Then if the truncate fails at all we can update the in-ram i_size with
what we have on disk and delete the orphan item.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-01 08:16:40 -04:00
Filipe David Borba Manana
f45388f387 Btrfs: fix deadlock in uuid scan kthread
If there's an ongoing transaction when the uuid scan kthread attempts
to create one, the kthread will block, waiting for that transaction to
finish while it's keeping locks on the tree root, and in turn the existing
transaction is waiting for those locks to be free.

The stack trace reported by the kernel follows.

[36700.671601] INFO: task btrfs-uuid:15480 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
[36700.671602] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
[36700.671602] btrfs-uuid      D 0000000000000000     0 15480      2 0x00000000
[36700.671604]  ffff880710bd5b88 0000000000000046 ffff8803d36ba850 0000000000030000
[36700.671605]  ffff8806d76dc530 ffff880710bd5fd8 ffff880710bd5fd8 ffff880710bd5fd8
[36700.671607]  ffff8808098ac530 ffff8806d76dc530 ffff880710bd5b98 ffff8805e4508e40
[36700.671608] Call Trace:
[36700.671610]  [<ffffffff816f36b9>] schedule+0x29/0x70
[36700.671620]  [<ffffffffa05a3bdf>] wait_current_trans.isra.33+0xbf/0x120 [btrfs]
[36700.671623]  [<ffffffff81066760>] ? add_wait_queue+0x60/0x60
[36700.671629]  [<ffffffffa05a5b06>] start_transaction+0x3d6/0x530 [btrfs]
[36700.671636]  [<ffffffffa05bb1f4>] ? btrfs_get_token_32+0x64/0xf0 [btrfs]
[36700.671642]  [<ffffffffa05a5fbb>] btrfs_start_transaction+0x1b/0x20 [btrfs]
[36700.671649]  [<ffffffffa05c8a81>] btrfs_uuid_scan_kthread+0x211/0x3d0 [btrfs]
[36700.671655]  [<ffffffffa05c8870>] ? __btrfs_open_devices+0x2a0/0x2a0 [btrfs]
[36700.671657]  [<ffffffff81065fa0>] kthread+0xc0/0xd0
[36700.671659]  [<ffffffff81065ee0>] ? flush_kthread_worker+0xb0/0xb0
[36700.671661]  [<ffffffff816fcd1c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
[36700.671662]  [<ffffffff81065ee0>] ? flush_kthread_worker+0xb0/0xb0
[36700.671663] INFO: task btrfs:15481 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
[36700.671664] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
[36700.671665] btrfs           D 0000000000000000     0 15481  15212 0x00000004
[36700.671666]  ffff880248cbf4c8 0000000000000086 ffff8803d36ba700 ffff8801dbd5c280
[36700.671668]  ffff880807815c40 ffff880248cbffd8 ffff880248cbffd8 ffff880248cbffd8
[36700.671669]  ffff8805e86a0000 ffff880807815c40 ffff880248cbf4d8 ffff8801dbd5c280
[36700.671670] Call Trace:
[36700.671672]  [<ffffffff816f36b9>] schedule+0x29/0x70
[36700.671679]  [<ffffffffa05d9b0d>] btrfs_tree_lock+0x6d/0x230 [btrfs]
[36700.671680]  [<ffffffff81066760>] ? add_wait_queue+0x60/0x60
[36700.671685]  [<ffffffffa0582829>] btrfs_search_slot+0x999/0xb00 [btrfs]
[36700.671691]  [<ffffffffa05bd9de>] ? btrfs_lookup_first_ordered_extent+0x5e/0xb0 [btrfs]
[36700.671698]  [<ffffffffa05e3e54>] __btrfs_write_out_cache+0x8c4/0xa80 [btrfs]
[36700.671704]  [<ffffffffa05e4362>] btrfs_write_out_cache+0xb2/0xf0 [btrfs]
[36700.671710]  [<ffffffffa05c4441>] ? free_extent_buffer+0x61/0xc0 [btrfs]
[36700.671716]  [<ffffffffa0594c82>] btrfs_write_dirty_block_groups+0x562/0x650 [btrfs]
[36700.671723]  [<ffffffffa0610092>] commit_cowonly_roots+0x171/0x24b [btrfs]
[36700.671729]  [<ffffffffa05a4dde>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x4fe/0xa10 [btrfs]
[36700.671735]  [<ffffffffa0610af3>] create_subvol+0x5c0/0x636 [btrfs]
[36700.671742]  [<ffffffffa05d49ff>] btrfs_mksubvol.isra.60+0x33f/0x3f0 [btrfs]
[36700.671747]  [<ffffffffa05d4bf2>] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_transid+0x142/0x190 [btrfs]
[36700.671752]  [<ffffffffa05d4c6c>] ? btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x2c/0x80 [btrfs]
[36700.671757]  [<ffffffffa05d4c9e>] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x5e/0x80 [btrfs]
[36700.671759]  [<ffffffff8113a764>] ? handle_pte_fault+0x84/0x920
[36700.671764]  [<ffffffffa05d87eb>] btrfs_ioctl+0xf0b/0x1d00 [btrfs]
[36700.671766]  [<ffffffff8113c120>] ? handle_mm_fault+0x210/0x310
[36700.671768]  [<ffffffff816f83a4>] ? __do_page_fault+0x284/0x4e0
[36700.671770]  [<ffffffff81180aa6>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x96/0x550
[36700.671772]  [<ffffffff81170fe3>] ? __sb_end_write+0x33/0x70
[36700.671774]  [<ffffffff81180ff1>] SyS_ioctl+0x91/0xb0
[36700.671775]  [<ffffffff816fcdc2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-01 08:16:39 -04:00
Ilya Dryomov
795a332139 Btrfs: stop refusing the relocation of chunk 0
AFAICT chunk 0 is no longer special, and so it should be restriped just
like every other chunk.  One reason for this change is us refusing the
relocation can lead to filesystems that can only be mounted ro, and
never rw -- see the bugzilla [1] for details.  The other reason is that
device removal code is already doing this: it will happily relocate
chunk 0 is part of shrinking the device.

[1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60594

Reported-by: Xavier Bassery <xavier@bartica.org>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-01 08:16:38 -04:00
Filipe David Borba Manana
d8f980391f Btrfs: fix memory leak of uuid_root in free_fs_info
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-01 08:16:37 -04:00
Andy Shevchenko
ed84885d1e btrfs: reuse kbasename helper
To get name of the file from a pathname let's use kbasename() helper. It allows
to simplify code a bit.

Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-01 08:16:36 -04:00
Anand Jain
e57138b3e9 btrfs: return btrfs error code for dev excl ops err
now threads can return BTRFS_ERROR_DEV_EXCL_RUN_IN_PROGRESS
as defined in btrfs.h for the dev excl operation error in
the FS, which means with this kernel would stop logging
(almost an user error) into the /var/log/messages

v2: accepts Josef' comment

Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-01 08:16:35 -04:00
Josef Bacik
77cef2ec54 Btrfs: allow partial ordered extent completion
We currently have this problem where you can truncate pages that have not yet
been written for an ordered extent.  We do this because the truncate will be
coming behind to clean us up anyway so what's the harm right?  Well if truncate
fails for whatever reason we leave an orphan item around for the file to be
cleaned up later.  But if the user goes and truncates up the file and tries to
read from the area that had been discarded previously they will get a csum error
because we never actually wrote that data out.

This patch fixes this by allowing us to either discard the ordered extent
completely, by which I mean we just free up the space we had allocated and not
add the file extent, or adjust the length of the file extent we write.  We do
this by setting the length we truncated down to in the ordered extent, and then
we set the file extent length and ram bytes to this length.  The total disk
space stays unchanged since we may be compressed and we can't just chop off the
disk space, but at least this way the file extent only points to the valid data.
Then when the file extent is free'd the extent and csums will be freed normally.

This patch is needed for the next series which will give us more graceful
recovery of failed truncates.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-01 08:16:34 -04:00
Josef Bacik
b12d6869f6 Btrfs: convert all bug_ons in free-space-cache.c
All of these are logic checks to make sure we're not breaking anything, so
convert them over to ASSERT().  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-01 08:16:33 -04:00
Josef Bacik
2e17c7c65e Btrfs: add support for asserts
One of the complaints we get a lot is how many BUG_ON()'s we have.  So to help
with this I'm introducing a kconfig option to enable/disable a new ASSERT()
mechanism much like what XFS does.  This will allow us developers to still get
our nice panics but allow users/distros to compile them out.  With this we can
go through and convert any BUG_ON()'s that we have to catch actual programming
mistakes to the new ASSERT() and then fix everybody else to return errors.  This
will also allow developers to leave sanity checks in their new code to make sure
we don't trip over problems while testing stuff and vetting new features.
Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-01 08:16:32 -04:00
Josef Bacik
726551ebc7 Btrfs: adjust the fs_devices->missing count on unmount
I noticed that if I tried to mount a file system with -o degraded after having
done it once already we would fail to mount.  This is because the
fs_devices->missing count was getting bumped everytime we mounted, but not
getting reset whenever we unmounted.  To fix this we just drop the missing count
as we're closing devices to make sure this doesn't happen.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-01 08:16:31 -04:00
Stefan Behrens
23fa76b0ba Btrf: cleanup: don't check for root_refs == 0 twice
btrfs_read_fs_root_no_name() already checks if btrfs_root_refs()
is zero and returns ENOENT in this case. There is no need to do
it again in three more places.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-01 08:16:29 -04:00
Stefan Behrens
4847547172 Btrfs: fix for patch "cleanup: don't check the same thing twice"
Mitch Harder noticed that the patch 3c64a1a mentioned in the subject
line was causing a kernel BUG() on snapshot deletion.

The patch was wrong. It did not handle cached roots correctly. The
check for root_refs == 0 was removed everywhere where
btrfs_read_fs_root_no_name() had been used to retrieve the root,
because this check was already dealt with in
btrfs_read_fs_root_no_name(). But in the case when the root was
found in the cache, there was no such check.

This patch adds the missing check in the case where the root is
found in the cache.

Reported-by: Mitch Harder <mitch.harder@sabayonlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
Reviewed-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-01 08:16:29 -04:00
Stefan Behrens
9d565ba433 Btrfs: get rid of one BUG() in write_all_supers()
The second round uses btrfs_error() and return -EIO, the first round
can handle write errors the same way.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-01 08:16:28 -04:00
Wang Shilong
b9e9a6cbc6 Btrfs: allocate prelim_ref with a slab allocater
struct __prelim_ref is allocated and freed frequently when
walking backref tree, using slab allocater can not only
speed up allocating but also detect memory leaks.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-01 08:16:27 -04:00
Wang Shilong
742916b885 Btrfs: pass gfp_t to __add_prelim_ref() to avoid always using GFP_ATOMIC
Currently, only add_delayed_refs have to allocate with GFP_ATOMIC,
So just pass arg 'gfp_t' to decide which allocation mode.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-01 08:16:26 -04:00
Filipe David Borba Manana
f717175024 Btrfs: fix race conditions in BTRFS_IOC_FS_INFO ioctl
The handler for the ioctl BTRFS_IOC_FS_INFO was reading the
number of devices before acquiring the device list mutex.

This could lead to inconsistent results because the update of
the device list and the number of devices counter (amongst other
counters related to the device list) are updated in volumes.c
while holding the device list mutex - except for 2 places, one
was volumes.c:btrfs_prepare_sprout() and the other was
volumes.c:device_list_add().

For example, if we have 2 devices, with IDs 1 and 2 and then add
a new device, with ID 3, and while adding the device is in progress
an BTRFS_IOC_FS_INFO ioctl arrives, it could return a number of
devices of 2 and a max dev id of 3. This would be incorrect.

Also, this ioctl handler was reading the fsid while it can be
updated concurrently. This can happen when while a new device is
being added and the current filesystem is in seeding mode.
Example:

$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb1
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb2
$ btrfstune -S 1 /dev/sdb1
$ mount /dev/sdb1 /mnt/test
$ btrfs device add /dev/sdb2 /mnt/test

If during the last step a BTRFS_IOC_FS_INFO ioctl was requested, it
could read an fsid that was never valid (some bits part of the old
fsid and others part of the new fsid). Also, it could read a number
of devices that doesn't match the number of devices in the list and
the max device id, as explained before.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-01 08:16:25 -04:00
Filipe David Borba Manana
d730680184 Btrfs: fix race between removing a dev and writing sbs
This change fixes an issue when removing a device and writing
all super blocks run simultaneously. Here's the steps necessary
for the issue to happen:

1) disk-io.c:write_all_supers() gets a number of N devices from the
   super_copy, so it will not panic if it fails to write super blocks
   for N - 1 devices;

2) Then it tries to acquire the device_list_mutex, but blocks because
   volumes.c:btrfs_rm_device() got it first;

3) btrfs_rm_device() removes the device from the list, then unlocks the
   mutex and after the unlock it updates the number of devices in
   super_copy to N - 1.

4) write_all_supers() finally acquires the mutex, iterates over all the
   devices in the list and gets N - 1 errors, that is, it failed to write
   super blocks to all the devices;

5) Because write_all_supers() thinks there are a total of N devices, it
   considers N - 1 errors to be ok, and therefore won't panic.

So this change just makes sure that write_all_supers() reads the number
of devices from super_copy after it acquires the device_list_mutex.
Conversely, it changes btrfs_rm_device() to update the number of devices
in super_copy before it releases the device list mutex.

The code path to add a new device (volumes.c:btrfs_init_new_device),
already has the right behaviour: it updates the number of devices in
super_copy while holding the device_list_mutex.

The only code path that doesn't lock the device list mutex
before updating the number of devices in the super copy is
disk-io.c:next_root_backup(), called by open_ctree() during
mount time where concurrency issues can't happen.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-01 08:16:24 -04:00
Josef Bacik
b8d0c69b94 Btrfs: remove ourselves from the cluster list under lock
A user was reporting weird warnings from btrfs_put_delayed_ref() and I noticed
that we were doing this list_del_init() on our head ref outside of
delayed_refs->lock.  This is a problem if we have people still on the list, we
could end up modifying old pointers and such.  Fix this by removing us from the
list before we do our run_delayed_ref on our head ref.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-01 08:16:23 -04:00
Josef Bacik
e8e7cff667 Btrfs: do not clear our orphan item runtime flag on eexist
We were unconditionally clearing our runtime flag on the inode on error when
trying to insert an orphan item.  This is wrong in the case of -EEXIST since we
obviously have an orphan item.  This was causing us to not do the correct
cleanup of our orphan items which caused issues on cleanup.  This happens
because currently when truncate fails we just leave the orphan item on there so
it can be cleaned up, so if we go to remove the file later we will hit this
issue.  What we do for truncate isn't right either, but we shouldn't screw this
sort of thing up on error either, so fix this and then I'll fix truncate in a
different patch.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-01 08:16:22 -04:00
Josef Bacik
57cfd46270 Btrfs: fix send to deal with sparse files properly
Send was just sending everything it found, even if the extent was a hole.  This
is unpleasant for users, so just skip holes when we are sending.  This will also
skip sending prealloc extents since the send spec doesn't have a prealloc
command.  Eventually we will add a prealloc command and rev the send version so
we can send down the prealloc info.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-01 08:16:21 -04:00
Filipe David Borba Manana
bdab49d760 Btrfs: fix printing of non NULL terminated string
The name buffer is not terminated by a '\0' character,
therefore it needs to be printed with %.*s and use the
length of the buffer.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-01 08:16:20 -04:00
Geert Uytterhoeven
8d78eb1663 Btrfs: Use %z to format size_t
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-01 08:16:19 -04:00
Geert Uytterhoeven
fce29364e5 Btrfs: Do not truncate sector_t on 32-bit with CONFIG_LBDAF=y
sector_t may be either "u64" (always 64 bit) or "unsigned long" (32 or 64
bit).  Casting it to "unsigned long" will truncate it on 32-bit platforms
where CONFIG_LBDAF=y.

Cast to "unsigned long long" and format using "ll" instead.

Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-01 08:16:18 -04:00
Geert Uytterhoeven
778746b53b Btrfs: PAGE_CACHE_SIZE is already unsigned long
PAGE_CACHE_SIZE == PAGE_SIZE is "unsigned long" everywhere, so there's no
need to cast it to "unsigned long".

Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-01 08:16:17 -04:00
Geert Uytterhoeven
b308bc2f05 Btrfs: Make btrfs_header_chunk_tree_uuid() return unsigned long
Internally, btrfs_header_chunk_tree_uuid() calculates an unsigned long, but
casts it to a pointer, while all callers cast it to unsigned long again.

Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-01 08:16:16 -04:00
Geert Uytterhoeven
fba6aa7565 Btrfs: Make btrfs_header_fsid() return unsigned long
Internally, btrfs_header_fsid() calculates an unsigned long, but casts
it to a pointer, while all callers cast it to unsigned long again.

Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-01 08:16:15 -04:00
Geert Uytterhoeven
231e88f410 Btrfs: Make btrfs_dev_extent_chunk_tree_uuid() return unsigned long
Internally, btrfs_dev_extent_chunk_tree_uuid() calculates an unsigned long,
but casts it to a pointer, while all callers cast it to unsigned long
again.

Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-01 08:16:14 -04:00
Geert Uytterhoeven
1473b24ee0 Btrfs: Make btrfs_device_fsid() return unsigned long
All callers of btrfs_device_fsid() cast its return type to unsigned long.

Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-01 08:16:13 -04:00
Geert Uytterhoeven
410ba3a291 Btrfs: Make btrfs_device_uuid() return unsigned long
All callers of btrfs_device_uuid() cast its return type to unsigned long.

Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-01 08:16:12 -04:00
Geert Uytterhoeven
118a0a2514 Btrfs: Format mirror_num as int
mirror_num is always "int", hence don't cast it to "unsigned long long" and
format it as a 64-bit number.

Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-01 08:16:11 -04:00
Geert Uytterhoeven
27f9f02357 Btrfs: Format PAGE_SIZE as unsigned long
PAGE_SIZE is "unsigned long" everywhere, so there's no need to cast it to
"unsigned long long" and format it as a 64-bit number.

Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-01 08:16:10 -04:00
Geert Uytterhoeven
6e71c47afe Btrfs: Make BTRFS_DEV_REPLACE_DEVID an unsigned long long constant
The internal btrfs device id is a u64, hence make the constant
BTRFS_DEV_REPLACE_DEVID "unsigned long long" as well, so we no longer need
a cast to print it.

Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-01 08:16:09 -04:00
Geert Uytterhoeven
c1c9ff7c94 Btrfs: Remove superfluous casts from u64 to unsigned long long
u64 is "unsigned long long" on all architectures now, so there's no need to
cast it when formatting it using the "ll" length modifier.

Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-01 08:16:08 -04:00
Filipe David Borba Manana
1cb048f596 Btrfs: fix memory leak of orphan block rsv
This issue is simple to reproduce and observe if kmemleak is enabled.
Two simple ways to reproduce it:

** 1

$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/loop0
$ mount /dev/loop0 /mnt/btrfs
$ btrfs balance start /mnt/btrfs
$ umount /mnt/btrfs

** 2

$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/loop0
$ mount /dev/loop0 /mnt/btrfs
$ touch /mnt/btrfs/foobar
$ rm -f /mnt/btrfs/foobar
$ umount /mnt/btrfs

After a while, kmemleak reports the leak:

$ cat /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak
unreferenced object 0xffff880402b13e00 (size 128):
  comm "btrfs", pid 19621, jiffies 4341648183 (age 70057.844s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
    00 fc c6 b1 04 88 ff ff 04 00 04 00 ad 4e ad de  .............N..
  backtrace:
    [<ffffffff817275a6>] kmemleak_alloc+0x26/0x50
    [<ffffffff8117832b>] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0xeb/0x1d0
    [<ffffffffa04db499>] btrfs_alloc_block_rsv+0x39/0x70 [btrfs]
    [<ffffffffa04f8bad>] btrfs_orphan_add+0x13d/0x1b0 [btrfs]
    [<ffffffffa04e2b13>] btrfs_remove_block_group+0x143/0x500 [btrfs]
    [<ffffffffa0518158>] btrfs_relocate_chunk.isra.63+0x618/0x790 [btrfs]
    [<ffffffffa051bc27>] btrfs_balance+0x8f7/0xe90 [btrfs]
    [<ffffffffa05240a0>] btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x250/0x550 [btrfs]
    [<ffffffffa05269ca>] btrfs_ioctl+0xdfa/0x25f0 [btrfs]
    [<ffffffff8119c936>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x96/0x570
    [<ffffffff8119cea1>] SyS_ioctl+0x91/0xb0
    [<ffffffff81750242>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
    [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff

This affects btrfs-next, revision be8e3cd00d7293dd177e3f8a4a1645ce09ca3acb
(Btrfs: separate out tests into their own directory).

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-01 08:16:07 -04:00
Ilya Dryomov
a1e8780a89 Btrfs: rollback btrfs_device fields on umount
It turns out we don't properly rollback in-core btrfs_device state on
umount.  We zero out ->bdev, ->in_fs_metadata and that's about it.  In
particular, we don't zero out ->generation, and this can lead to us
refusing a mount -- a non-NULL fs_devices->latest_bdev is essential, but
btrfs_close_extra_devices will happily assign NULL to ->latest_bdev if
the first device on the dev_list happens to be missing and consequently
has no bdev attached.  This happens because since commit a6b0d5c8
btrfs_close_extra_devices adjusts ->latest_bdev, and in doing that,
relies on the ->generation.  Fix this, and possibly other problems, by
zeroing out everything except for what device_list_add sets, so that a
mount right after insmod and 'btrfs dev scan' is no different from any
later mount in this respect.

Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-01 08:16:06 -04:00
Ilya Dryomov
2208a378f3 Btrfs: add alloc_fs_devices and switch to it
In the spirit of btrfs_alloc_device, add a helper for allocating and
doing some common initialization of btrfs_fs_devices struct.

Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-01 08:16:05 -04:00
Ilya Dryomov
12bd2fc0d2 Btrfs: add btrfs_alloc_device and switch to it
Currently btrfs_device is allocated ad-hoc in a few different places,
and as a result not all fields are initialized properly.  In particular,
readahead state is only initialized in device_list_add (at scan time),
and not in btrfs_init_new_device (when the new device is added with
'btrfs dev add').  Fix this by adding an allocation helper and switch
everybody but __btrfs_close_devices to it.  (__btrfs_close_devices is
dealt with in a later commit.)

Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-01 08:16:04 -04:00
Ilya Dryomov
53f10659f9 Btrfs: find_next_devid: root -> fs_info
find_next_devid() knows which root to search, so it should take an
fs_info instead of an arbitrary root.

Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-01 08:16:03 -04:00
Stefan Behrens
bbb651e469 Btrfs: don't allow the replace procedure on read only filesystems
If you start the replace procedure on a read only filesystem, at
the end the procedure fails to write the updated dev_items to the
chunk tree. The problem is that this error is not indicated except
for a WARN_ON(). If the user now thinks that everything was done
as expected and destroys the source device (with mkfs or with a
hammer). The next mount fails with "failed to read chunk root" and
the filesystem is gone.

This commit adds code to fail the attempt to start the replace
procedure if the filesystem is mounted read-only.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.10+
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-01 08:16:02 -04:00