Commit Graph

58 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
95ac706744 ACPI: processor: Replace deprecated CPU-hotplug functions
The functions cpu_hotplug_begin, cpu_hotplug_done, get_online_cpus() and
put_online_cpus() have been deprecated during the CPU hotplug rework. They map
directly to cpus_write_lock(), cpus_write_unlock, cpus_read_lock() and
cpus_read_unlock().

Replace deprecated CPU-hotplug functions with the official version.
The behavior remains unchanged.

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-08-04 20:25:54 +02:00
Rafael J. Wysocki
b6237f61fc Merge branch 'acpi-misc'
* acpi-misc:
  ACPI: dock: fix some coding style issues
  ACPI: sysfs: fix some coding style issues
  ACPI: PM: add a missed blank line after declarations
  ACPI: custom_method: fix a coding style issue
  ACPI: CPPC: fix some coding style issues
  ACPI: button: fix some coding style issues
  ACPI: battery: fix some coding style issues
  ACPI: acpi_pad: add a missed blank line after declarations
  ACPI: LPSS: add a missed blank line after declarations
  ACPI: ipmi: remove useless return statement for void function
  ACPI: processor: fix some coding style issues
  ACPI: APD: fix a block comment align issue
  ACPI: AC: fix some coding style issues
  ACPI: fix various typos in comments
2021-04-26 17:04:41 +02:00
Xiaofei Tan
c8deb1c257 ACPI: processor: fix some coding style issues
Fix some coding style issues reported by checkpatch.pl, including the
following types:

ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible
WARNING: Block comments use a trailing */ on a separate line
WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations
WARNING: labels should not be indented

Signed-off-by: Xiaofei Tan <tanxiaofei@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-04-08 16:27:02 +02:00
Rafael J. Wysocki
52af99c3f5 ACPI: processor: Get rid of ACPICA message printing
The ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT() and ACPI_EXCEPTION() macros are used for
message printing in the ACPICA code and they should not be used
elsewhere.  Special configuration (either kernel command line or
sysfs-based) is needed to see the messages printed by them and
the format of those messages is also special and convoluted.

For this reason, replace all of the ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT() and
ACPI_EXCEPTION() instances in the ACPI processor driver with
corresponding dev_*(), acpi_handle_*() and pr_*() calls depending
on the context in which they appear.

Also drop the ACPI_PROCESSOR_COMPONENT definition that is not going
to be necessary any more.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
2021-03-08 16:51:19 +01:00
Alex Hung
d85cc6635a ACPI: processor: remove comment regarding string _UID support
ACPI 6.3 Errata A no longer allows _UID to return a string except for
Itanium (for historical reasons) as stated in section 5.2.12:

"From ACPI Specification 6.3 onward, all processor objects for all
architectures except Itanium must now use Device() objects with an
_HID of ACPI0007, and use only integer _UID values."

Therefore, the "we don't handle string _UIDs yet" comment, which
implies a missing feature, is redundant, so drop it.

Signed-off-by: Alex Hung <alex.hung@canonical.com>
[ rjw: Subject and changelog edits ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-10-16 18:11:27 +02:00
Chen Yu
653f68b6ec ACPI: processor: Print more information when acpi_processor_evaluate_cst() fails
Some platforms have bogus _CST which might cause unexpectd behavior
in the CPU idle driver. Some bogus _CST might be unable to be
disassembled by acpica-tools due to broken format.

Print extra log if the _CST extraction/verification failes.

This can be used to help narrow down why the CPU idle driver fails
to behave as expected.

Suggested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
[ rjw: Subject and changelog edits ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-09-21 18:24:35 +02:00
Gustavo A. R. Silva
57d2dd4bd1 ACPI: Use fallthrough pseudo-keyword
Replace the existing /* fall through */ comments and its variants with
the new pseudo-keyword macro fallthrough[1]. Also, remove unnecessary
fall-through markings when it is the case.

Link: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html?highlight=fallthrough#implicit-switch-case-fall-through # [1]
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-07-09 14:09:28 +02:00
Rafael J. Wysocki
77fb4e0a55 ACPI: processor: Export acpi_processor_evaluate_cst()
The intel_idle driver will be modified to use ACPI _CST subsequently
and it will need to call acpi_processor_evaluate_cst(), so move that
function to acpi_processor.c so that it is always present (which is
required by intel_idle) and export it to modules to allow the ACPI
processor driver (which is modular) to call it.

No intentional functional impact.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-12-27 11:02:07 +01:00
Rafael J. Wysocki
bc94638886 ACPI: processor: Export function to claim _CST control
The intel_idle driver will be modified to use ACPI _CST subsequently
and it will need to notify the platform firmware of that if
acpi_gbl_FADT.cst_control is set, so add a routine for this purpose,
acpi_processor_claim_cst_control(), to acpi_processor.c (so that it
is always present which is required by intel_idle) and export it
to allow the ACPI processor driver (which is modular) to call it.

No intentional functional impact.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-12-16 12:06:18 +01:00
Jiri Slaby
2c2b005f54 ACPI / processor: don't print errors for processorIDs == 0xff
Some platforms define their processors in this manner:
    Device (SCK0)
    {
	Name (_HID, "ACPI0004" /* Module Device */)  // _HID: Hardware ID
	Name (_UID, "CPUSCK0")  // _UID: Unique ID
	Processor (CP00, 0x00, 0x00000410, 0x06){}
	Processor (CP01, 0x02, 0x00000410, 0x06){}
	Processor (CP02, 0x04, 0x00000410, 0x06){}
	Processor (CP03, 0x06, 0x00000410, 0x06){}
	Processor (CP04, 0x01, 0x00000410, 0x06){}
	Processor (CP05, 0x03, 0x00000410, 0x06){}
	Processor (CP06, 0x05, 0x00000410, 0x06){}
	Processor (CP07, 0x07, 0x00000410, 0x06){}
	Processor (CP08, 0xFF, 0x00000410, 0x06){}
	Processor (CP09, 0xFF, 0x00000410, 0x06){}
	Processor (CP0A, 0xFF, 0x00000410, 0x06){}
	Processor (CP0B, 0xFF, 0x00000410, 0x06){}
...

The processors marked as 0xff are invalid, there are only 8 of them in
this case.

So do not print an error on ids == 0xff, just print an info message.
Actually, we could return ENODEV even on the first CPU with ID 0xff, but
ACPI spec does not forbid the 0xff value to be a processor ID. Given
0xff could be a correct one, we would break working systems if we
returned ENODEV.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-08-09 10:48:34 +02:00
Thomas Gleixner
d2912cb15b treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 500
Based on 2 normalized pattern(s):

  this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify
  it under the terms of the gnu general public license version 2 as
  published by the free software foundation

  this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify
  it under the terms of the gnu general public license version 2 as
  published by the free software foundation #

extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier

  GPL-2.0-only

has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 4122 file(s).

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Enrico Weigelt <info@metux.net>
Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net>
Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190604081206.933168790@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-06-19 17:09:55 +02:00
Dou Liyang
d0381bf4f8 ACPI / processor: Fix the return value of acpi_processor_ids_walk()
ACPI driver should make sure all the processor IDs in their ACPI Namespace
are unique. the driver performs a depth-first walk of the namespace tree
and calls the acpi_processor_ids_walk() to check the duplicate IDs.

But, the acpi_processor_ids_walk() mistakes the return value. If a
processor is checked, it returns true which causes the walk break
immediately, and other processors will never be checked.

Repace the value with AE_OK which is the standard acpi_status value.
And don't abort the namespace walk even on error.

Fixes: 8c8cb30f49 (acpi/processor: Implement DEVICE operator for processor enumeration)
Signed-off-by: Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-10-04 08:58:32 +02:00
Gustavo A. R. Silva
1be9c3a0a0 ACPI: Mark expected switch fall-throughs
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.

Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-11-09 00:55:16 +01:00
Colin Ian King
0ed780e316 ACPI / processor: make function acpi_processor_check_duplicates() static
The function acpi_processor_check_duplicates() is local to the source
and does not need to be in global scope, so make it static.

Cleans up sparse warnings:
symbol 'acpi_processor_check_duplicates' was not declared. Should it
be static?

Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-08-24 03:25:47 +02:00
Prakash, Prashanth
35b6873598 ACPI / Processor: Drop setup_max_cpus check from acpi_processor_add()
When maxcpus=X kernel argument is used, we parse the ACPI tables only
for the first X cpus. The per-cpu ACPI data include the _PSD tables
which gives information about related cpus.

cppc_cpufreq and acpi-cpufreq parses the table once during init to
deduce the related cpus. If a user brings a new cpu online after boot
the related cpu data becomes incorrect.

acpi_get_psd_map() in acpi_cppc.c returns error if it fails to find
the parsed ACPI data for possible CPU resulting in cppc_cpufreq
initialization failure.

With this change we will probe all possible CPUs prior to cpufreq
initialization, but will bring only setup_max_cpus online. nr_cpus
kernel parameter can be used to restict even parsing per-cpu ACPI
tables.

Signed-off-by: Prashanth Prakash <pprakash@codeaurora.org>
[ rjw: Subject ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-04-18 16:50:24 +02:00
Dou Liyang
a77d6cd968 acpi/processor: Check for duplicate processor ids at hotplug time
The check for duplicate processor ids happens at boot time based on the
ACPI table contents, but the final sanity checks for a processor happen
at hotplug time.

At hotplug time, where the physical information is available, which might
differ from the ACPI table information, a check for duplicate processor
ids is missing.

Add it to the hotplug checks and rename the function so it better
reflects its purpose.

Signed-off-by: Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: Xiaolong Ye <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>
Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: guzheng1@huawei.com
Cc: izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com
Cc: lenb@kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1488528147-2279-6-git-send-email-douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2017-03-11 14:41:20 +01:00
Dou Liyang
8c8cb30f49 acpi/processor: Implement DEVICE operator for processor enumeration
ACPI allows to declare processors either with the PROCESSOR or with the
DEVICE operator. The current implementation handles only the PROCESSOR
operator.

On a system which uses the DEVICE operator for processor enumeration the
evaluation fails.

Check for the ACPI type of the ACPI handle and evaluate PROCESSOR and
DEVICE types separately.

Signed-off-by: Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: Xiaolong Ye <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>
Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: guzheng1@huawei.com
Cc: izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com
Cc: lenb@kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1488528147-2279-5-git-send-email-douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2017-03-11 14:41:20 +01:00
Dou Liyang
c962cff17d Revert "x86/acpi: Set persistent cpuid <-> nodeid mapping when booting"
Revert: dc6db24d24 ("x86/acpi: Set persistent cpuid <-> nodeid mapping when booting")

The mapping of "cpuid <-> nodeid" is established at boot time via ACPI
tables to keep associations of workqueues and other node related items
consistent across cpu hotplug.

But, ACPI tables are unreliable and failures with that boot time mapping
have been reported on machines where the ACPI table and the physical
information which is retrieved at actual hotplug is inconsistent.

Revert the mapping implementation so it can be replaced with a less error
prone approach.

Signed-off-by: Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: Xiaolong Ye <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>
Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: guzheng1@huawei.com
Cc: izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com
Cc: lenb@kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1488528147-2279-2-git-send-email-douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2017-03-11 14:41:18 +01:00
Vitaly Kuznetsov
febf240741 x86/ACPI: keep x86_cpu_to_acpiid mapping valid on CPU hotplug
We may or may not have all possible CPUs in MADT on boot but in any
case we're overwriting x86_cpu_to_acpiid mapping with U32_MAX when
acpi_register_lapic() is called again on the CPU hotplug path:

acpi_processor_hotadd_init()
  -> acpi_map_cpu()
    -> acpi_register_lapic()

As we have the required acpi_id information in acpi_processor_hotadd_init()
propagate it to acpi_map_cpu() to always keep x86_cpu_to_acpiid
mapping valid.

Reported-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-02-07 13:34:56 +01:00
Dou Liyang
fd74da217d acpi: Validate processor id when mapping the processor
When we want to identify whether the proc_id is unreasonable or not, we
can call the "acpi_processor_validate_proc_id" function. It will search
in the duplicate IDs. If we find the proc_id in the IDs, we return true
to the call function. Conversely, the false represents available.

When we establish all possible cpuid <-> nodeid mapping to handle the
cpu hotplugs, we will use the proc_id from ACPI table.

We do validation when we get the proc_id. If the result is true, we
will stop the mapping.

[ tglx: Mark the new function __init ]

Signed-off-by: Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: mika.j.penttila@gmail.com
Cc: len.brown@intel.com
Cc: rafael@kernel.org
Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net
Cc: yasu.isimatu@gmail.com
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com
Cc: gongzhaogang@inspur.com
Cc: tj@kernel.org
Cc: izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com
Cc: cl@linux.com
Cc: chen.tang@easystack.cn
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com
Cc: lenb@kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1472114120-3281-8-git-send-email-douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2016-09-21 21:18:40 +02:00
Dou Liyang
8e089eaa19 acpi: Provide mechanism to validate processors in the ACPI tables
[Problem]

When we set cpuid <-> nodeid mapping to be persistent, it will use the DSDT
As we know, the ACPI tables are just like user's input in that respect, and
we don't crash if user's input is unreasonable.

Such as, the mapping of the proc_id and pxm in some machine's ACPI table is
like this:

proc_id   |    pxm
--------------------
0       <->     0
1       <->     0
2       <->     1
3       <->     1
89      <->     0
89      <->     0
89      <->     0
89      <->     1
89      <->     1
89      <->     2
89      <->     3
.....

We can't be sure which one is correct to the proc_id 89. We may map a wrong
node to a cpu. When pages are allocated, this may cause a kernal panic.

So, we should provide mechanisms to validate the ACPI tables, just like we
do validation to check user's input in web project.

The mechanism is that the processor objects which have the duplicate IDs
are not valid.

[Solution]

We add a validation function, like this:

foreach Processor in DSDT
	proc_id = get_ACPI_Processor_number(Processor)
	if (proc_id exists )
		mark both of them as being unreasonable;

The function will record the unique or duplicate processor IDs.

The duplicate processor IDs such as 89 are regarded as the unreasonable IDs
which mean that the processor objects in question are not valid.

[ tglx: Add __init[data] annotations ]

Signed-off-by: Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: mika.j.penttila@gmail.com
Cc: len.brown@intel.com
Cc: rafael@kernel.org
Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net
Cc: yasu.isimatu@gmail.com
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com
Cc: gongzhaogang@inspur.com
Cc: tj@kernel.org
Cc: izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com
Cc: cl@linux.com
Cc: chen.tang@easystack.cn
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com
Cc: lenb@kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1472114120-3281-7-git-send-email-douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2016-09-21 21:18:39 +02:00
Gu Zheng
dc6db24d24 x86/acpi: Set persistent cpuid <-> nodeid mapping when booting
The whole patch-set aims at making cpuid <-> nodeid mapping persistent. So that,
when node online/offline happens, cache based on cpuid <-> nodeid mapping such as
wq_numa_possible_cpumask will not cause any problem.
It contains 4 steps:
1. Enable apic registeration flow to handle both enabled and disabled cpus.
2. Introduce a new array storing all possible cpuid <-> apicid mapping.
3. Enable _MAT and MADT relative apis to return non-present or disabled cpus' apicid.
4. Establish all possible cpuid <-> nodeid mapping.

This patch finishes step 4.

This patch set the persistent cpuid <-> nodeid mapping for all enabled/disabled
processors at boot time via an additional acpi namespace walk for processors.

[ tglx: Remove the unneeded exports ]

Signed-off-by: Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhu Guihua <zhugh.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: mika.j.penttila@gmail.com
Cc: len.brown@intel.com
Cc: rafael@kernel.org
Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net
Cc: yasu.isimatu@gmail.com
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com
Cc: gongzhaogang@inspur.com
Cc: tj@kernel.org
Cc: izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com
Cc: cl@linux.com
Cc: chen.tang@easystack.cn
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com
Cc: lenb@kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1472114120-3281-6-git-send-email-douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2016-09-21 21:18:39 +02:00
Gu Zheng
8ad893faf2 x86/acpi: Enable MADT APIs to return disabled apicids
The whole patch-set aims at making cpuid <-> nodeid mapping persistent. So that,
when node online/offline happens, cache based on cpuid <-> nodeid mapping such as
wq_numa_possible_cpumask will not cause any problem.
It contains 4 steps:
1. Enable apic registeration flow to handle both enabled and disabled cpus.
2. Introduce a new array storing all possible cpuid <-> apicid mapping.
3. Enable _MAT and MADT relative apis to return non-present or disabled cpus' apicid.
4. Establish all possible cpuid <-> nodeid mapping.

This patch finishes step 3.

There are four mappings in the kernel:
1. nodeid (logical node id)   <->   pxm        (persistent)
2. apicid (physical cpu id)   <->   nodeid     (persistent)
3. cpuid (logical cpu id)     <->   apicid     (not persistent, now persistent by step 2)
4. cpuid (logical cpu id)     <->   nodeid     (not persistent)

So, in order to setup persistent cpuid <-> nodeid mapping for all possible CPUs,
we should:
1. Setup cpuid <-> apicid mapping for all possible CPUs, which has been done in step 1, 2.
2. Setup cpuid <-> nodeid mapping for all possible CPUs. But before that, we should
   obtain all apicids from MADT.

All processors' apicids can be obtained by _MAT method or from MADT in ACPI.
The current code ignores disabled processors and returns -ENODEV.

After this patch, a new parameter will be added to MADT APIs so that caller
is able to control if disabled processors are ignored.

Signed-off-by: Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhu Guihua <zhugh.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: mika.j.penttila@gmail.com
Cc: len.brown@intel.com
Cc: rafael@kernel.org
Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net
Cc: yasu.isimatu@gmail.com
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com
Cc: gongzhaogang@inspur.com
Cc: tj@kernel.org
Cc: izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com
Cc: cl@linux.com
Cc: chen.tang@easystack.cn
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com
Cc: lenb@kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1472114120-3281-5-git-send-email-douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2016-09-21 21:18:39 +02:00
Rafael J. Wysocki
86314751c7 ACPI / processor: Avoid reserving IO regions too early
Roland Dreier reports that one of his systems cannot boot because of
the changes made by commit ac212b6980 (ACPI / processor: Use common
hotplug infrastructure).

The problematic part of it is the request_region() call in
acpi_processor_get_info() that used to run at module init time before
the above commit and now it runs much earlier.  Unfortunately, the
region(s) reserved by it fall into a range the PCI subsystem attempts
to reserve for AHCI IO BARs.  As a result, the PCI reservation fails
and AHCI doesn't work, while previously the PCI reservation would
be made before acpi_processor_get_info() and it would succeed.

That request_region() call, however, was overlooked by commit
ac212b6980, as it is not necessary for the enumeration of the
processors.  It only is needed when the ACPI processor driver
actually attempts to handle them which doesn't happen before
loading the ACPI processor driver module.  Therefore that call
should have been moved from acpi_processor_get_info() into that
module.

Address the problem by moving the request_region() call in question
out of acpi_processor_get_info() and use the observation that the
region reserved by it is only needed if the FADT-based CPU
throttling method is going to be used, which means that it should
be sufficient to invoke it from acpi_processor_get_throttling_fadt().

Fixes: ac212b6980 (ACPI / processor: Use common hotplug infrastructure)
Reported-by: Roland Dreier <roland@purestorage.com>
Tested-by: Roland Dreier <roland@purestorage.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-06-02 01:57:50 +02:00
Srinivas Pandruvada
a21211672c ACPI / processor: Request native thermal interrupt handling via _OSC
There are several reports of freeze on enabling HWP (Hardware PStates)
feature on Skylake-based systems by the Intel P-states driver. The root
cause is identified as the HWP interrupts causing BIOS code to freeze.

HWP interrupts use the thermal LVT which can be handled by Linux
natively, but on the affected Skylake-based systems SMM will respond
to it by default.  This is a problem for several reasons:
 - On the affected systems the SMM thermal LVT handler is broken (it
   will crash when invoked) and a BIOS update is necessary to fix it.
 - With thermal interrupt handled in SMM we lose all of the reporting
   features of the arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt driver.
 - Some thermal drivers like x86-package-temp depend on the thermal
   threshold interrupts signaled via the thermal LVT.
 - The HWP interrupts are useful for debugging and tuning
   performance (if the kernel can handle them).
The native handling of thermal interrupts needs to be enabled
because of that.

This requires some way to tell SMM that the OS can handle thermal
interrupts.  That can be done by using _OSC/_PDC in processor
scope very early during ACPI initialization.

The meaning of _OSC/_PDC bit 12 in processor scope is whether or
not the OS supports native handling of interrupts for Collaborative
Processor Performance Control (CPPC) notifications.  Since on
HWP-capable systems CPPC is a firmware interface to HWP, setting
this bit effectively tells the firmware that the OS will handle
thermal interrupts natively going forward.

For details on _OSC/_PDC refer to:
http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/standards/processor-vendor-specific-acpi-specification.html

To implement the _OSC/_PDC handshake as described, introduce a new
function, acpi_early_processor_osc(), that walks the ACPI
namespace looking for ACPI processor objects and invokes _OSC for
them with bit 12 in the capabilities buffer set and terminates the
namespace walk on the first success.

Also modify intel_thermal_interrupt() to clear HWP status bits in
the HWP_STATUS MSR to acknowledge HWP interrupts (which prevents
them from firing continuously).

Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
[ rjw: Subject & changelog, function rename ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-03-26 02:00:38 +01:00
Sudeep Holla
db62fda318 ACPI / processor : add support for ACPI0010 processor container
ACPI 6.0 adds support for optional processor container device which may
contain child objects that are either processor devices or other processor
containers. This allows representing hierarchical processor topologies.

It is declared using the _HID of ACPI0010. It is an abstract container
used to represent CPU topology and should not be used to hotplug
purposes.

If no matching handler is found for a device in acpi_scan_attach_handler,
acpi_bus_attach does a default enumeration for those devices with valid
HID in the acpi namespace. This patch adds a scan handler for these ACPI
processor containers to avoid default that enumeration and ensures the
platform devices are not created for them.

Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-02-22 00:53:56 +01:00
Ashwin Chaugule
56cdc2a05c ACPI: Add weak routines for ACPI CPU Hotplug
Add weak functions for architectures which do not support
hot-adding and removing CPUs which aren't detected at
bootup. (e.g. via MADT).

This helps preserve the Kconfig dependency from:

commit cbfc1bae55 ("[ACPI] ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU Kconfig dependency
update")

    prevent:

    HOTPLUG_CPU=y
    ACPI_PROCESSOR=y
    ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU=n

Signed-off-by: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-10-12 23:08:03 +02:00
Mathias Krause
8ce344c66e ACPI / processor: remove leftover __refdata annotations
The processor_handler structure does not reference any __init / __exit
code or data. Therefore the __refdata annotation is not needed. It used
to be prior to commit fe7bf106eb ("acpi: delete __cpuinit usage from
all acpi files") due to the __cpuinit annotation of acpi_processor_add().
But with that commit in place that requirement has gone.

The same is true for the acpi_cpu_notifier notifier block.
acpi_cpu_soft_notify() used to be marked __cpuinit but lost its
annotation in the above mentioned commit as well. Therefore the __refdata
annotation isn't needed there either.

Just drop the unneded __refdata annotations to be able to catch future
section mismatches.

Signed-off-by: Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-07-21 01:01:46 +02:00
Hanjun Guo
ddcc18f5bd ACPI / processor: Introduce invalid_phys_cpuid()
Introduce invalid_phys_cpuid() to identify cpu with invalid
physical ID, then used it as replacement of the direct comparisons
with PHYS_CPUID_INVALID.

Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-05-13 23:28:16 +02:00
Hanjun Guo
8416c5bda1 ACPI / processor: remove phys_id in acpi_processor_get_info()
Use pr->phys_id to replace phys_id to simplify the code.

Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-05-13 23:28:15 +02:00
Hanjun Guo
05eb3cd8b4 ACPI / processor: remove cpu_index in acpi_processor_get_info()
Just use pr->id instead of cpu_index to simplify the code.

Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-05-13 23:28:15 +02:00
Hanjun Guo
25956b6612 ACPI / processor: Introduce invalid_logical_cpuid()
In ACPI processor drivers, we use direct comparisons of cpu logical
id with -1 which are error prone in case logical cpuid is accidentally
assinged an error code and prevents us from returning an error-encoding
cpuid directly in some cases.

So introduce invalid_logical_cpuid() to identify cpu with invalid
logical cpu num, then it will be used to replace the direct comparisons
with -1.

Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-05-13 23:28:14 +02:00
Catalin Marinas
828aef376d ACPI / processor: Introduce phys_cpuid_t for CPU hardware ID
CPU hardware ID (phys_id) is defined as u32 in structure acpi_processor,
but phys_id is used as int in acpi processor driver, so it will lead to
some inconsistence for the drivers.

Furthermore, to cater for ACPI arch ports that implement 64 bits CPU
ids a generic CPU physical id type is required.

So introduce typedef u32 phys_cpuid_t in a common file, and introduce
a macro PHYS_CPUID_INVALID as (phys_cpuid_t)(-1) if it's not defined
by other archs, this will solve the inconsistence in acpi processor driver,
and will prepare for the ACPI on ARM64 for the 64 bit CPU hardware ID
in the following patch.

CC: Rafael J Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Suggested-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Acked-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
[hj: reworked cpu physid map return codes]
Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
2015-03-26 15:12:51 +00:00
Hanjun Guo
d02dc27db0 ACPI / processor: Rename acpi_(un)map_lsapic() to acpi_(un)map_cpu()
acpi_map_lsapic() will allocate a logical CPU number and map it to
physical CPU id (such as APIC id) for the hot-added CPU, it will also
do some mapping for NUMA node id and etc, acpi_unmap_lsapic() will
do the reverse.

We can see that the name of the function is a little bit confusing and
arch (IA64) dependent so rename them as acpi_(un)map_cpu() to make arch
agnostic and explicit.

Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-01-05 23:34:26 +01:00
Hanjun Guo
af8f3f514d ACPI / processor: Convert apic_id to phys_id to make it arch agnostic
apic_id in MADT table is the CPU hardware id which identify
it self in the system for x86 and ia64, OSPM will use it for
SMP init to map APIC ID to logical cpu number in the early
boot, when the DSDT/SSDT (ACPI namespace) is scanned later, the
ACPI processor driver is probed and the driver will use acpi_id
in DSDT to get the apic_id, then map to the logical cpu number
which is needed by the processor driver.

Before ACPI 5.0, only x86 and ia64 were supported in ACPI spec,
so apic_id is used both in arch code and ACPI core which is
pretty fine. Since ACPI 5.0, ARM is supported by ACPI and
APIC is not available on ARM, this will confuse people when
apic_id is both used by x86 and ARM in one function.

So convert apic_id to phys_id (which is the original meaning)
in ACPI processor dirver to make it arch agnostic, but leave the
arch dependent code unchanged, no functional change.

Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-01-05 23:32:42 +01:00
Graeme Gregory
b50154d53e ACPI: Don't use acpi_lapic in ACPI core code
Now ARM64 support is being added to ACPI so architecture specific
values can not be used in core ACPI code.

Following on the patch "ACPI / processor: Check if LAPIC is present
during initialization" which uses acpi_lapic in acpi_processor.c,
on ARM64 platform, GIC is used instead of local APIC, so acpi_lapic
is not a suitable value for ARM64.

What is actually important at this point is if there is/are CPU
entry/entries (Local APIC/SAPIC, GICC) in MADT, so introduce
acpi_has_cpu_in_madt() to be arch specific and generic.

Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-07-21 13:50:58 +02:00
Baoquan He
c401eb8ee3 ACPI / processor: Check if LAPIC is present during initialization
In acpi_processor_get_info(), ACPI processor info is initialized including
ID, namely CPU index. Currently, on a UP system running an SMP kerenl with
no LAPIC in the MADT, cpu0_initialized is checked to decide whether or not
the CPU has been initialized.

However, this check may not be sufficient for kdump kernels. Most of time
only 1 CPU is supported because of known problems in kdump kernels. So say
the multiple CPUs are present in the boot kernel and a crash happens on
one specific CPU, say CPU2. Then it jumps into the kdump kernel with
"nr_cpus=1" in the command line. In this situation, the kdump kernel
will reuse the ACPI resources from the crashed kernel directly. That
means all LAPIC instances are enabled in the MADT while only one CPU is
in use.  In the kdump kernel, x86_cpu_to_apicid contains the correct APIC
ID and it's related to the CPU ID. If cpu0_initialized is checked only, 0
will be used as the CPU index instead of that APIC ID, which is not
correct.

In addition to checking cpu0_initialized, check acpi_lapic. If acpi_lapic
is 0, then no LAPIC is available from the MADT and the system should be
treated as a UP one without a LAPIC (that is, assign 0 to the CPU index).
Otherwise, use the original (valid) CPU index.

Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
[rjw: Subject and changelog]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-05-16 16:27:35 +02:00
Igor Mammedov
0b9d46dd7d ACPI / processor: do not mark present at boot but not onlined CPU as onlined
acpi_processor_add() assumes that present at boot CPUs
are always onlined, it is not so if a CPU failed to become
onlined. As result acpi_processor_add() will mark such CPU
device as onlined in sysfs and following attempts to
online/offline it using /sys/device/system/cpu/cpuX/online
attribute will fail.

Do not poke into device internals in acpi_processor_add()
and touch "struct device { .offline }" attribute, since
for CPUs onlined at boot it's set by:
  topology_init() -> arch_register_cpu() -> register_cpu()
before ACPI device tree is parsed, and for hotplugged
CPUs it's set when userspace onlines CPU via sysfs.

Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Cc: 3.11+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.11+
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-05-08 12:59:36 +02:00
Lan Tianyu
4985c32ee4 ACPI / processor: Fix failure of loading acpi-cpufreq driver
According commit d640113fe (ACPI: processor: fix acpi_get_cpuid for UP
processor),  BIOS may not provide _MAT or MADT tables and acpi_get_apicid()
always returns -1. For these cases, original code will pass apic_id with
vaule of -1 to acpi_map_cpuid() and it will check the acpi_id. If acpi_id
is equal to zero, ignores apic_id and return zero for CPU0.

Commit b981513 (ACPI / scan: bail out early if failed to parse APIC
ID for CPU) changed the behavior. Return ENODEV when find apic_id is
less than zero after calling acpi_get_apicid(). This causes acpi-cpufreq
driver fails to be loaded on some machines. This patch is to fix it.

Fixes: b981513f80 (ACPI / scan: bail out early if failed to parse APIC ID for CPU)
References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73781
Cc: 3.14+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.14+
Reported-and-tested-by: KATO Hiroshi <katoh@mikage.ne.jp>
Reported-and-tested-by: Stuart Foster <smf.linux@ntlworld.com>
Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-05-01 01:46:43 +02:00
Rafael J. Wysocki
82e180598b Merge branches 'acpi-processor', 'acpi-hotplug', 'acpi-init', 'acpi-pm' and 'acpica'
* acpi-processor:
  ACPI / scan: reduce log level of "ACPI: \_PR_.CPU4: failed to get CPU APIC ID"
  ACPI / processor: Return specific error value when mapping lapic id

* acpi-hotplug:
  ACPI / scan: Clear match_driver flag in acpi_bus_trim()

* acpi-init:
  ACPI / init: Flag use of ACPI and ACPI idioms for power supplies to regulator API

* acpi-pm:
  ACPI / PM: Use ACPI_COMPANION() to get ACPI companions of devices

* acpica:
  ACPICA: Remove bool usage from ACPICA.
2014-01-29 11:47:18 +01:00
Jiang Liu
f778d1218f ACPI / scan: reduce log level of "ACPI: \_PR_.CPU4: failed to get CPU APIC ID"
Commit b981513f80 (ACPI / scan: bail out early if failed to parse
APIC ID for CPU) emits an error message if ACPI processor driver fails
to query APIC ID for the CPU.

Originally it's designed to catch BIOS bugs for CPU hot-addition. But
it accidently reveals another type of BIOS bug that:
 1) BIOS implements ACPI objects for all possible instead of present
    CPUs. (It's valid to do that per ACPI specification.)
 2) BIOS doesn't implement the _STA method for CPU objects. OSPM assumes
    that all CPU objects are present and functioning and attempts to
    use those CPU objects for CPU enumeration, which then triggers the
    error message. According to ACPI spec, BIOS should implement _STA
    for those absent CPUs at least.

Though it's a BIOS bug in essential, there are some BIOSes in the fields
which are implmented in this way. So reduce the log level from ERR to
DEBUG to accommodate these existing BIOSes.

Fixes: b981513f80 (ACPI / scan: bail out early if failed to parse APIC ID for CPU)
Reported-and-tested-by: Jörg Otte <jrg.otte@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
[rjw: Changelog]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-01-27 23:05:44 +01:00
Rafael J. Wysocki
bcc7201a91 Merge branches 'acpi-gpe', 'acpi-video', 'acpi-thermal', 'acpi-processor', 'acpi-sleep'
* acpi-gpe:
  ACPI / EC: disable GPE before removing GPE handler
  ACPI / Button: Fix enabling button GPEs twice

* acpi-video:
  ACPI: Blacklist Win8 OSI for some HP laptop 2013 models
  ACPI / video: Fix typo in video_detect.c

* acpi-thermal:
  ACPI / thermal: remove const from thermal_zone_device_ops declaration

* acpi-processor:
  ACPI / scan: bail out early if failed to parse APIC ID for CPU

* acpi-sleep:
  ACPI / sleep: remove panic in case hardware has changed after S4
2014-01-12 23:46:55 +01:00
Jiang Liu
b981513f80 ACPI / scan: bail out early if failed to parse APIC ID for CPU
Enhance ACPI CPU hotplug driver to print clear error message and
bail out early if BIOS returns wrong value in ACPI MADT table or
_MAT method. Otherwise it will add the CPU device even if failed
to get APIC ID and fails any operations against sysfs interface:
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpux/online

Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-01-11 01:31:38 +01:00
Rafael J. Wysocki
24dee1fc99 ACPI / bind: Pass struct acpi_device pointer to acpi_bind_one()
There is no reason to pass an ACPI handle to acpi_bind_one() instead
of a struct acpi_device pointer to the target device object, so
modify that function to take a struct acpi_device pointer as its
second argument and update all code depending on it accordingly.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com> # for USB/ACPI
2013-12-07 01:05:50 +01:00
Rafael J. Wysocki
3fbc4d6374 Merge branch 'acpi-processor'
* acpi-processor:
  ACPI / processor: fixed a brace coding style issue
  ACPI / processor: Remove outdated comments
  ACPI / processor: remove unnecessary if (!pr) check
  ACPI / processor: remove some dead code in acpi_processor_get_info()
  x86 / ACPI: simplify _acpi_map_lsapic()
  ACPI / processor: use apic_id and remove duplicated _MAT evaluation
  ACPI / processor: Introduce apic_id in struct processor to save parsed APIC id
2013-10-28 01:11:24 +01:00
Hanjun Guo
7cc34680c1 ACPI / processor: Remove outdated comments
acpi_get_processor_id() can be find nowhere, and the acpi id
is synchronized to APIC id when acpi_get_cpuid() is called, so
the comments can be removed.

Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-09-24 01:39:40 +02:00
Hanjun Guo
082e12a05c ACPI / processor: remove unnecessary if (!pr) check
acpi_processor_errata() is only called in acpi_processor_get_info(),
and the argument 'pr' passed to acpi_processor_errata() will never be
NULL, so the if (!pr) check is unnecessary and can be removed.

Since the 'pr' argument is not used by acpi_processor_errata() any more,
so change the argument into void too.

Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-09-24 01:39:40 +02:00
Jiang Liu
2d4d3e2a06 ACPI / processor: remove some dead code in acpi_processor_get_info()
errata.smp is used by nowhere, so the variable assignment is meanless,
remove it.

Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-09-24 01:39:40 +02:00
Jiang Liu
d536bf3dc9 ACPI / processor: use apic_id and remove duplicated _MAT evaluation
Since APIC id is saved in processor struct, just use it and
remove the duplicated _MAT evaluation.

Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-09-24 01:39:39 +02:00
Jiang Liu
ca9f62ac78 ACPI / processor: Introduce apic_id in struct processor to save parsed APIC id
For cpu hot add, we evaluate _MAT or parse MADT twice to get APIC id,
here is the code logic:
acpi_processor_add()
	acpi_processor_get_info()
		acpi_get_cpuid() will evaluate _MAT or parse MADT;
	acpi_processor_hotadd_init()
		acpi_map_lsapic() will evaluate _MAT again;

This can be done more effectively, this patch introduces apic_id in struct
processor to save parsed APIC id, and then we can use it and remove the
duplicated _MAT evaluation.

Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-09-24 01:39:39 +02:00