In arraymap.c:
In bpf_array_map_seq_start() and bpf_array_map_seq_next()
cast return values from the __percpu address space to
the generic address space via uintptr_t [1].
Correct the declaration of pptr pointer in __bpf_array_map_seq_show()
to void __percpu * and cast the value from the generic address
space to the __percpu address space via uintptr_t [1].
In hashtab.c:
Assign the return value from bpf_mem_cache_alloc() to void pointer
and cast the value to void __percpu ** (void pointer to percpu void
pointer) before dereferencing.
In memalloc.c:
Explicitly declare __percpu variables.
Cast obj to void __percpu **.
In helpers.c:
Cast ptr in BPF_CALL_1 and BPF_CALL_2 from generic address space
to __percpu address space via const uintptr_t [1].
Found by GCC's named address space checks.
There were no changes in the resulting object files.
[1] https://sparse.docs.kernel.org/en/latest/annotations.html#address-space-name
Signed-off-by: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
Cc: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Cc: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Cc: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Cc: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
Cc: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>
Cc: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240811161414.56744-1-ubizjak@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM used to be a user-visible option for whether slab
tracking is enabled. It has been default-enabled and equivalent to
CONFIG_MEMCG for almost a decade. We've only grown more kernel memory
accounting sites since, and there is no imaginable cgroup usecase going
forward that wants to track user pages but not the multitude of
user-drivable kernel allocations.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240701153148.452230-1-hannes@cmpxchg.org
Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Acked-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
9 out of 16 callers perform a NULL check before calling obj_cgroup_put().
Move the NULL check in the function, similar to mem_cgroup_put(). The
unlikely() NULL check in current_objcg_update() was left alone to avoid
dropping the unlikey() annotation as this a fast path.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240316015803.2777252-1-yosryahmed@google.com
Signed-off-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Currently, refill low/high marks are set with the assumption
of normal non-percpu memory allocation. For example, for
an allocation size 256, for non-percpu memory allocation,
low mark is 32 and high mark is 96, resulting in the
batch allocation of 48 elements and the allocated memory
will be 48 * 256 = 12KB for this particular cpu.
Assuming an 128-cpu system, the total memory consumption
across all cpus will be 12K * 128 = 1.5MB memory.
This might be okay for non-percpu allocation, but may not be
good for percpu allocation, which will consume 1.5MB * 128 = 192MB
memory in the worst case if every cpu has a chance of memory
allocation.
In practice, percpu allocation is very rare compared to
non-percpu allocation. So let us have smaller low/high marks
which can avoid unnecessary memory consumption.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Acked-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231222031755.1289671-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Typically for percpu map element or data structure, once allocated,
most operations are lookup or in-place update. Deletion are really
rare. Currently, for percpu data strcture, 4 elements will be
refilled if the size is <= 256. Let us just do with one element
for percpu data. For example, for size 256 and 128 cpus, the
potential saving will be 3 * 256 * 128 * 128 = 12MB.
Acked-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231222031750.1289290-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Commit 41a5db8d81 ("Add support for non-fix-size percpu mem allocation")
added support for non-fix-size percpu memory allocation.
Such allocation will allocate percpu memory for all buckets on all
cpus and the memory consumption is in the order to quadratic.
For example, let us say, 4 cpus, unit size 16 bytes, so each
cpu has 16 * 4 = 64 bytes, with 4 cpus, total will be 64 * 4 = 256 bytes.
Then let us say, 8 cpus with the same unit size, each cpu
has 16 * 8 = 128 bytes, with 8 cpus, total will be 128 * 8 = 1024 bytes.
So if the number of cpus doubles, the number of memory consumption
will be 4 times. So for a system with large number of cpus, the
memory consumption goes up quickly with quadratic order.
For example, for 4KB percpu allocation, 128 cpus. The total memory
consumption will 4KB * 128 * 128 = 64MB. Things will become
worse if the number of cpus is bigger (e.g., 512, 1024, etc.)
In Commit 41a5db8d81, the non-fix-size percpu memory allocation is
done in boot time, so for system with large number of cpus, the initial
percpu memory consumption is very visible. For example, for 128 cpu
system, the total percpu memory allocation will be at least
(16 + 32 + 64 + 96 + 128 + 196 + 256 + 512 + 1024 + 2048 + 4096)
* 128 * 128 = ~138MB.
which is pretty big. It will be even bigger for larger number of cpus.
Note that the current prefill also allocates 4 entries if the unit size
is less than 256. So on top of 138MB memory consumption, this will
add more consumption with
3 * (16 + 32 + 64 + 96 + 128 + 196 + 256) * 128 * 128 = ~38MB.
Next patch will try to reduce this memory consumption.
Later on, Commit 1fda5bb66a ("bpf: Do not allocate percpu memory
at init stage") moved the non-fix-size percpu memory allocation
to bpf verificaiton stage. Once a particular bpf_percpu_obj_new()
is called by bpf program, the memory allocator will try to fill in
the cache with all sizes, causing the same amount of percpu memory
consumption as in the boot stage.
To reduce the initial percpu memory consumption for non-fix-size
percpu memory allocation, instead of filling the cache with all
supported allocation sizes, this patch intends to fill the cache
only for the requested size. As typically users will not use large
percpu data structure, this can save memory significantly.
For example, the allocation size is 64 bytes with 128 cpus.
Then total percpu memory amount will be 64 * 128 * 128 = 1MB,
much less than previous 138MB.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Acked-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231222031745.1289082-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
The objcg is a bpf_mem_alloc level property since all bpf_mem_cache's
are with the same objcg. This patch made such a property explicit.
The next patch will use this property to save and restore objcg
for percpu unit allocator.
Acked-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231222031739.1288590-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Currently, for percpu memory allocation, say if the user
requests allocation size to be 32 bytes, the actually
calculated size will be 40 bytes and it further rounds
to 64 bytes, and eventually 64 bytes are allocated,
wasting 32-byte memory.
Change bpf_mem_alloc() to calculate the cache index
based on the user-provided allocation size so unnecessary
extra memory can be avoided.
Suggested-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231222031734.1288400-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
At present, bpf memory allocator uses check_obj_size() to ensure that
ksize() of allocated pointer is equal with the unit_size of used
bpf_mem_cache. Its purpose is to prevent bpf_mem_free() from selecting
a bpf_mem_cache which has different unit_size compared with the
bpf_mem_cache used for allocation. But as reported by lkp, the return
value of ksize() or kmalloc_size_roundup() may change due to slab merge
and it will lead to the warning report in check_obj_size().
The reported warning happened as follows:
(1) in bpf_mem_cache_adjust_size(), kmalloc_size_roundup(96) returns the
object_size of kmalloc-96 instead of kmalloc-cg-96. The object_size of
kmalloc-96 is 96, so size_index for 96 is not adjusted accordingly.
(2) the object_size of kmalloc-cg-96 is adjust from 96 to 128 due to
slab merge in __kmem_cache_alias(). For SLAB, SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN is
enabled by default for kmalloc slab, so align is 64 and size is 128 for
kmalloc-cg-96. SLUB has a similar merge logic, but its object_size will
not be changed, because its align is 8 under x86-64.
(3) when unit_alloc() does kmalloc_node(96, __GFP_ACCOUNT, node),
ksize() returns 128 instead of 96 for the returned pointer.
(4) the warning in check_obj_size() is triggered.
Considering the slab merge can happen in anytime (e.g, a slab created in
a new module), the following case is also possible: during the
initialization of bpf_global_ma, there is no slab merge and ksize() for
a 96-bytes object returns 96. But after that a new slab created by a
kernel module is merged to kmalloc-cg-96 and the object_size of
kmalloc-cg-96 is adjust from 96 to 128 (which is possible for x86-64 +
CONFIG_SLAB, because its alignment requirement is 64 for 96-bytes slab).
So soon or later, when bpf_global_ma frees a 96-byte-sized pointer
which is allocated from bpf_mem_cache with unit_size=96, bpf_mem_free()
will free the pointer through a bpf_mem_cache in which unit_size is 128,
because the return value of ksize() changes. The warning for the
mismatch will be triggered again.
A feasible fix is introducing similar APIs compared with ksize() and
kmalloc_size_roundup() to return the actually-allocated size instead of
size which may change due to slab merge, but it will introduce
unnecessary dependency on the implementation details of mm subsystem.
As for now the pointer of bpf_mem_cache is saved in the 8-bytes area
(or 4-bytes under 32-bit host) above the returned pointer, using
unit_size in the saved bpf_mem_cache to select the target cache instead
of inferring the size from the pointer itself. Beside no extra
dependency on mm subsystem, the performance for bpf_mem_free_rcu() is
also improved as shown below.
Before applying the patch, the performances of bpf_mem_alloc() and
bpf_mem_free_rcu() on 8-CPUs VM with one producer are as follows:
kmalloc : alloc 11.69 ± 0.28M/s free 29.58 ± 0.93M/s
percpu : alloc 14.11 ± 0.52M/s free 14.29 ± 0.99M/s
After apply the patch, the performance for bpf_mem_free_rcu() increases
9% and 146% for kmalloc memory and per-cpu memory respectively:
kmalloc: alloc 11.01 ± 0.03M/s free 32.42 ± 0.48M/s
percpu: alloc 12.84 ± 0.12M/s free 35.24 ± 0.23M/s
After the fixes, there is no need to adjust size_index to fix the
mismatch between allocation and free, so remove it as well. Also return
NULL instead of ZERO_SIZE_PTR for zero-sized alloc in bpf_mem_alloc(),
because there is no bpf_mem_cache pointer saved above ZERO_SIZE_PTR.
Fixes: 9077fc228f ("bpf: Use kmalloc_size_roundup() to adjust size_index")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/202310302113.9f8fe705-oliver.sang@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231216131052.27621-2-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
bpf_mem_cache_alloc_flags() may call __alloc() directly when there is no
free object in free list, but it doesn't initialize the allocation hint
for the returned pointer. It may lead to bad memory dereference when
freeing the pointer, so fix it by initializing the allocation hint.
Fixes: 822fb26bdb ("bpf: Add a hint to allocated objects.")
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231111043821.2258513-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
There are two possible mismatched alloc and free cases in BPF memory
allocator:
1) allocate from cache X but free by cache Y with a different unit_size
2) allocate from per-cpu cache but free by kmalloc cache or vice versa
So add more WARN_ON_ONCE checks in free_bulk() and __free_by_rcu() to
spot these mismatched alloc and free early.
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231021014959.3563841-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com
For bpf_global_percpu_ma, the pointer passed to bpf_mem_free_rcu() is
allocated by kmalloc() and its size is fixed (16-bytes on x86-64). So
no matter which cache allocates the dynamic per-cpu area, on x86-64
cache[2] will always be used to free the per-cpu area.
Fix the unbalance by checking whether the bpf memory allocator is
per-cpu or not and use pcpu_alloc_size() instead of ksize() to
find the correct cache for per-cpu free.
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231020133202.4043247-5-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
With pcpu_alloc_size() in place, check whether or not the size of
the dynamic per-cpu area is matched with unit_size.
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231020133202.4043247-4-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Commit d52b59315b ("bpf: Adjust size_index according to the value of
KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE") uses KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE to adjust size_index, but as
reported by Nathan, the adjustment is not enough, because
__kmalloc_minalign() also decides the minimal alignment of slab object
as shown in new_kmalloc_cache() and its value may be greater than
KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE (e.g., 64 bytes vs 8 bytes under a riscv QEMU VM).
Instead of invoking __kmalloc_minalign() in bpf subsystem to find the
maximal alignment, just using kmalloc_size_roundup() directly to get the
corresponding slab object size for each allocation size. If these two
sizes are unmatched, adjust size_index to select a bpf_mem_cache with
unit_size equal to the object_size of the underlying slab cache for the
allocation size.
Fixes: 822fb26bdb ("bpf: Add a hint to allocated objects.")
Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230914181407.GA1000274@dev-arch.thelio-3990X/
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Tested-by: Emil Renner Berthing <emil.renner.berthing@canonical.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230928101558.2594068-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Add extra check in bpf_mem_alloc_init() to ensure the unit_size of
bpf_mem_cache is matched with the object_size of underlying slab cache.
If these two sizes are unmatched, print a warning once and return
-EINVAL in bpf_mem_alloc_init(), so the mismatch can be found early and
the potential issue can be prevented.
Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230908133923.2675053-4-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
When the unit_size of a bpf_mem_cache is unmatched with the object_size
of the underlying slab cache, the bpf_mem_cache will not be used, and
the allocation will be redirected to a bpf_mem_cache with a bigger
unit_size instead, so there is no need to prefill for these
unused bpf_mem_caches.
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230908133923.2675053-3-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
The following warning was reported when running "./test_progs -a
link_api -a linked_list" on a RISC-V QEMU VM:
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 261 at kernel/bpf/memalloc.c:342 bpf_mem_refill
Modules linked in: bpf_testmod(OE)
CPU: 3 PID: 261 Comm: test_progs- ... 6.5.0-rc5-01743-gdcb152bb8328 #2
Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT)
epc : bpf_mem_refill+0x1fc/0x206
ra : irq_work_single+0x68/0x70
epc : ffffffff801b1bc4 ra : ffffffff8015fe84 sp : ff2000000001be20
gp : ffffffff82d26138 tp : ff6000008477a800 t0 : 0000000000046600
t1 : ffffffff812b6ddc t2 : 0000000000000000 s0 : ff2000000001be70
s1 : ff5ffffffffe8998 a0 : ff5ffffffffe8998 a1 : ff600003fef4b000
a2 : 000000000000003f a3 : ffffffff80008250 a4 : 0000000000000060
a5 : 0000000000000080 a6 : 0000000000000000 a7 : 0000000000735049
s2 : ff5ffffffffe8998 s3 : 0000000000000022 s4 : 0000000000001000
s5 : 0000000000000007 s6 : ff5ffffffffe8570 s7 : ffffffff82d6bd30
s8 : 000000000000003f s9 : ffffffff82d2c5e8 s10: 000000000000ffff
s11: ffffffff82d2c5d8 t3 : ffffffff81ea8f28 t4 : 0000000000000000
t5 : ff6000008fd28278 t6 : 0000000000040000
[<ffffffff801b1bc4>] bpf_mem_refill+0x1fc/0x206
[<ffffffff8015fe84>] irq_work_single+0x68/0x70
[<ffffffff8015feb4>] irq_work_run_list+0x28/0x36
[<ffffffff8015fefa>] irq_work_run+0x38/0x66
[<ffffffff8000828a>] handle_IPI+0x3a/0xb4
[<ffffffff800a5c3a>] handle_percpu_devid_irq+0xa4/0x1f8
[<ffffffff8009fafa>] generic_handle_domain_irq+0x28/0x36
[<ffffffff800ae570>] ipi_mux_process+0xac/0xfa
[<ffffffff8000a8ea>] sbi_ipi_handle+0x2e/0x88
[<ffffffff8009fafa>] generic_handle_domain_irq+0x28/0x36
[<ffffffff807ee70e>] riscv_intc_irq+0x36/0x4e
[<ffffffff812b5d3a>] handle_riscv_irq+0x54/0x86
[<ffffffff812b6904>] do_irq+0x66/0x98
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
The warning is due to WARN_ON_ONCE(tgt->unit_size != c->unit_size) in
free_bulk(). The direct reason is that a object is allocated and
freed by bpf_mem_caches with different unit_size.
The root cause is that KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE is 64 and there is no 96-bytes
slab cache in the specific VM. When linked_list test allocates a
72-bytes object through bpf_obj_new(), bpf_global_ma will allocate it
from a bpf_mem_cache with 96-bytes unit_size, but this bpf_mem_cache is
backed by 128-bytes slab cache. When the object is freed, bpf_mem_free()
uses ksize() to choose the corresponding bpf_mem_cache. Because the
object is allocated from 128-bytes slab cache, ksize() returns 128,
bpf_mem_free() chooses a 128-bytes bpf_mem_cache to free the object and
triggers the warning.
A similar warning will also be reported when using CONFIG_SLAB instead
of CONFIG_SLUB in a x86-64 kernel. Because CONFIG_SLUB defines
KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE as 8 but CONFIG_SLAB defines KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE as 32.
An alternative fix is to use kmalloc_size_round() in bpf_mem_alloc() to
choose a bpf_mem_cache which has the same unit_size with the backing
slab cache, but it may introduce performance degradation, so fix the
warning by adjusting the indexes in size_index according to the value of
KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE just like setup_kmalloc_cache_index_table() does.
Fixes: 822fb26bdb ("bpf: Add a hint to allocated objects.")
Reported-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@kernel.org>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/87jztjmmy4.fsf@all.your.base.are.belong.to.us
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230908133923.2675053-2-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Both unit_free() and unit_free_rcu() invoke irq_work_raise() to free
freed objects back to slab and the invocation may also be preempted by
unit_alloc() and unit_alloc() may return NULL unexpectedly as shown in
the following case:
task A task B
unit_free()
// high_watermark = 48
// free_cnt = 49 after free
irq_work_raise()
// mark irq work as IRQ_WORK_PENDING
irq_work_claim()
// task B preempts task A
unit_alloc()
// free_cnt = 48 after alloc
// does unit_alloc() 32-times
......
// free_cnt = 16
unit_alloc()
// free_cnt = 15 after alloc
// irq work is already PENDING,
// so just return
irq_work_raise()
// does unit_alloc() 15-times
......
// free_cnt = 0
unit_alloc()
// free_cnt = 0 before alloc
return NULL
Fix it by enabling IRQ after irq_work_raise() completes.
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230901111954.1804721-3-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
When doing stress test for qp-trie, bpf_mem_alloc() returned NULL
unexpectedly because all qp-trie operations were initiated from
bpf syscalls and there was still available free memory. bpf_obj_new()
has the same problem as shown by the following selftest.
The failure is due to the preemption. irq_work_raise() will invoke
irq_work_claim() first to mark the irq work as pending and then inovke
__irq_work_queue_local() to raise an IPI. So when the current task
which is invoking irq_work_raise() is preempted by other task,
unit_alloc() may return NULL for preemption task as shown below:
task A task B
unit_alloc()
// low_watermark = 32
// free_cnt = 31 after alloc
irq_work_raise()
// mark irq work as IRQ_WORK_PENDING
irq_work_claim()
// task B preempts task A
unit_alloc()
// free_cnt = 30 after alloc
// irq work is already PENDING,
// so just return
irq_work_raise()
// does unit_alloc() 30-times
......
unit_alloc()
// free_cnt = 0 before alloc
return NULL
Fix it by enabling IRQ after irq_work_raise() completes. An alternative
fix is using preempt_{disable|enable}_notrace() pair, but it may have
extra overhead. Another feasible fix is to only disable preemption or
IRQ before invoking irq_work_queue() and enable preemption or IRQ after
the invocation completes, but it can't handle the case when
c->low_watermark is 1.
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230901111954.1804721-2-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
This is needed for later percpu mem allocation when the
allocation is done by bpf program. For such cases, a global
bpf_global_percpu_ma is added where a flexible allocation
size is needed.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230827152734.1995725-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
In internal testing of test_maps, we sometimes observed failures like:
test_maps: test_maps.c:173: void test_hashmap_percpu(unsigned int, void *):
Assertion `bpf_map_update_elem(fd, &key, value, BPF_ANY) == 0' failed.
where the errno is ENOMEM. After some troubleshooting and enabling
the warnings, we saw:
[ 91.304708] percpu: allocation failed, size=8 align=8 atomic=1, atomic alloc failed, no space left
[ 91.304716] CPU: 51 PID: 24145 Comm: test_maps Kdump: loaded Tainted: G N 6.1.38-smp-DEV #7
[ 91.304719] Hardware name: Google Astoria/astoria, BIOS 0.20230627.0-0 06/27/2023
[ 91.304721] Call Trace:
[ 91.304724] <TASK>
[ 91.304730] [<ffffffffa7ef83b9>] dump_stack_lvl+0x59/0x88
[ 91.304737] [<ffffffffa7ef83f8>] dump_stack+0x10/0x18
[ 91.304738] [<ffffffffa75caa0c>] pcpu_alloc+0x6fc/0x870
[ 91.304741] [<ffffffffa75ca302>] __alloc_percpu_gfp+0x12/0x20
[ 91.304743] [<ffffffffa756785e>] alloc_bulk+0xde/0x1e0
[ 91.304746] [<ffffffffa7566c02>] bpf_mem_alloc_init+0xd2/0x2f0
[ 91.304747] [<ffffffffa7547c69>] htab_map_alloc+0x479/0x650
[ 91.304750] [<ffffffffa751d6e0>] map_create+0x140/0x2e0
[ 91.304752] [<ffffffffa751d413>] __sys_bpf+0x5a3/0x6c0
[ 91.304753] [<ffffffffa751c3ec>] __x64_sys_bpf+0x1c/0x30
[ 91.304754] [<ffffffffa7ef847a>] do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x80
[ 91.304756] [<ffffffffa800009b>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
This makes sense, because in atomic context, percpu allocation would
not create new chunks; it would only create in non-atomic contexts.
And if during prefill all precpu chunks are full, -ENOMEM would
happen immediately upon next unit_alloc.
Prefill phase does not actually run in atomic context, so we can
use this fact to allocate non-atomically with GFP_KERNEL instead
of GFP_NOWAIT. This avoids the immediate -ENOMEM.
GFP_NOWAIT has to be used in unit_alloc when bpf program runs
in atomic context. Even if bpf program runs in non-atomic context,
in most cases, rcu read lock is enabled for the program so
GFP_NOWAIT is still needed. This is often also the case for
BPF_MAP_UPDATE_ELEM syscalls.
Signed-off-by: YiFei Zhu <zhuyifei@google.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Acked-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230728043359.3324347-1-zhuyifei@google.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Splitting these out into separate helper functions means that we
actually pass an uninitialized variable into another function call
if dec_active() happens to not be inlined, and CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
is disabled:
kernel/bpf/memalloc.c: In function 'add_obj_to_free_list':
kernel/bpf/memalloc.c:200:9: error: 'flags' is used uninitialized [-Werror=uninitialized]
200 | dec_active(c, flags);
Avoid this by passing the flags by reference, so they either get
initialized and dereferenced through a pointer, or the pointer never
gets accessed at all.
Fixes: 18e027b1c7 ("bpf: Factor out inc/dec of active flag into helpers.")
Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230725202653.2905259-1-arnd@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
The object leak check is cheap. Do it unconditionally to spot difficult races
in bpf_mem_alloc.
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230706033447.54696-15-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Introduce bpf_mem_[cache_]free_rcu() similar to kfree_rcu().
Unlike bpf_mem_[cache_]free() that links objects for immediate reuse into
per-cpu free list the _rcu() flavor waits for RCU grace period and then moves
objects into free_by_rcu_ttrace list where they are waiting for RCU
task trace grace period to be freed into slab.
The life cycle of objects:
alloc: dequeue free_llist
free: enqeueu free_llist
free_rcu: enqueue free_by_rcu -> waiting_for_gp
free_llist above high watermark -> free_by_rcu_ttrace
after RCU GP waiting_for_gp -> free_by_rcu_ttrace
free_by_rcu_ttrace -> waiting_for_gp_ttrace -> slab
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230706033447.54696-13-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
alloc_bulk() can reuse elements from free_by_rcu_ttrace.
Let it reuse from waiting_for_gp_ttrace as well to avoid unnecessary kmalloc().
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230706033447.54696-10-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
To address OOM issue when one cpu is allocating and another cpu is freeing add
a target bpf_mem_cache hint to allocated objects and when local cpu free_llist
overflows free to that bpf_mem_cache. The hint addresses the OOM while
maintaining the same performance for common case when alloc/free are done on the
same cpu.
Note that do_call_rcu_ttrace() now has to check 'draining' flag in one more case,
since do_call_rcu_ttrace() is called not only for current cpu.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230706033447.54696-9-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
The next patch will introduce cross-cpu llist access and existing
irq_work_sync() + drain_mem_cache() + rcu_barrier_tasks_trace() mechanism will
not be enough, since irq_work_sync() + drain_mem_cache() on cpu A won't
guarantee that llist on cpu A are empty. The free_bulk() on cpu B might add
objects back to llist of cpu A. Add 'bool draining' flag.
The modified sequence looks like:
for_each_cpu:
WRITE_ONCE(c->draining, true); // do_call_rcu_ttrace() won't be doing call_rcu() any more
irq_work_sync(); // wait for irq_work callback (free_bulk) to finish
drain_mem_cache(); // free all objects
rcu_barrier_tasks_trace(); // wait for RCU callbacks to execute
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230706033447.54696-8-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
In certain scenarios alloc_bulk() might be taking free objects mainly from
free_by_rcu_ttrace list. In such case get_memcg() and set_active_memcg() are
redundant, but they show up in perf profile. Split the loop and only set memcg
when allocating from slab. No performance difference in this patch alone, but
it helps in combination with further patches.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230706033447.54696-7-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Let free_all() helper return the number of freed elements.
It's not used in this patch, but helps in debug/development of bpf_mem_alloc.
For example this diff for __free_rcu():
- free_all(llist_del_all(&c->waiting_for_gp_ttrace), !!c->percpu_size);
+ printk("cpu %d freed %d objs after tasks trace\n", raw_smp_processor_id(),
+ free_all(llist_del_all(&c->waiting_for_gp_ttrace), !!c->percpu_size));
would show how busy RCU tasks trace is.
In artificial benchmark where one cpu is allocating and different cpu is freeing
the RCU tasks trace won't be able to keep up and the list of objects
would keep growing from thousands to millions and eventually OOMing.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230706033447.54696-4-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
This patch adds a few bpf mem allocator functions which will
be used in the bpf_local_storage in a later patch.
bpf_mem_cache_alloc_flags(..., gfp_t flags) is added. When the
flags == GFP_KERNEL, it will fallback to __alloc(..., GFP_KERNEL).
bpf_local_storage knows its running context is sleepable (GFP_KERNEL)
and provides a better guarantee on memory allocation.
bpf_local_storage has some uncommon cases that its selem
cannot be reused immediately. It handles its own
rcu_head and goes through a rcu_trace gp and then free it.
bpf_mem_cache_raw_free() is added for direct free purpose
without leaking the LLIST_NODE_SZ internal knowledge.
During free time, the 'struct bpf_mem_alloc *ma' is no longer
available. However, the caller should know if it is
percpu memory or not and it can call different raw_free functions.
bpf_local_storage does not support percpu value, so only
the non-percpu 'bpf_mem_cache_raw_free()' is added in
this patch.
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230322215246.1675516-2-martin.lau@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Currently the freed element in bpf memory allocator may be immediately
reused, for htab map the reuse will reinitialize special fields in map
value (e.g., bpf_spin_lock), but lookup procedure may still access
these special fields, and it may lead to hard-lockup as shown below:
NMI backtrace for cpu 16
CPU: 16 PID: 2574 Comm: htab.bin Tainted: G L 6.1.0+ #1
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996),
RIP: 0010:queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x283/0x2c0
......
Call Trace:
<TASK>
copy_map_value_locked+0xb7/0x170
bpf_map_copy_value+0x113/0x3c0
__sys_bpf+0x1c67/0x2780
__x64_sys_bpf+0x1c/0x20
do_syscall_64+0x30/0x60
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0
......
</TASK>
For htab map, just like the preallocated case, these is no need to
initialize these special fields in map value again once these fields
have been initialized. For preallocated htab map, these fields are
initialized through __GFP_ZERO in bpf_map_area_alloc(), so do the
similar thing for non-preallocated htab in bpf memory allocator. And
there is no need to use __GFP_ZERO for per-cpu bpf memory allocator,
because __alloc_percpu_gfp() does it implicitly.
Fixes: 0fd7c5d433 ("bpf: Optimize call_rcu in non-preallocated hash map.")
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230215082132.3856544-2-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
We can simply set root memcg as the map's memcg to disable bpf memory
accounting. bpf_map_area_alloc is a little special as it gets the memcg
from current rather than from the map, so we need to disable GFP_ACCOUNT
specifically for it.
Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230210154734.4416-4-laoar.shao@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
According to the definition of sizes[NUM_CACHES], when the size passed
to bpf_mem_cache_size() is 256, it should return 6 instead 7.
Fixes: 7c8199e24f ("bpf: Introduce any context BPF specific memory allocator.")
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230118084630.3750680-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
If there are pending rcu callback, free_mem_alloc() will use
rcu_barrier_tasks_trace() and rcu_barrier() to wait for the pending
__free_rcu_tasks_trace() and __free_rcu() callback.
If rcu_trace_implies_rcu_gp() is true, there will be no pending
__free_rcu(), so it will be OK to skip rcu_barrier() as well.
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221209010947.3130477-3-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
When there are batched freeing operations on a specific CPU, part of
the freed elements ((high_watermark - lower_watermark) / 2 + 1) will be
indirectly moved into waiting_for_gp list through free_by_rcu list.
After call_rcu_in_progress becomes false again, the remaining elements
in free_by_rcu list will be moved to waiting_for_gp list by the next
invocation of free_bulk(). However if the expiration of RCU tasks trace
grace period is relatively slow, none element in free_by_rcu list will
be moved.
So instead of invoking __alloc_percpu_gfp() or kmalloc_node() to
allocate a new object, in alloc_bulk() just check whether or not there is
freed element in free_by_rcu list and reuse it if available.
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221209010947.3130477-2-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Except for waiting_for_gp list, there are no concurrent operations on
free_by_rcu, free_llist and free_llist_extra lists, so use
__llist_del_all() instead of llist_del_all(). waiting_for_gp list can be
deleted by RCU callback concurrently, so still use llist_del_all().
Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221021114913.60508-3-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
A busy irq work is an unfinished irq work and it can be either in the
pending state or in the running state. When destroying bpf memory
allocator, refill_work may be busy for PREEMPT_RT kernel in which irq
work is invoked in a per-CPU RT-kthread. It is also possible for kernel
with arch_irq_work_has_interrupt() being false (e.g. 1-cpu arm32 host or
mips) and irq work is inovked in timer interrupt.
The busy refill_work leads to various issues. The obvious one is that
there will be concurrent operations on free_by_rcu and free_list between
irq work and memory draining. Another one is call_rcu_in_progress will
not be reliable for the checking of pending RCU callback because
do_call_rcu() may have not been invoked by irq work yet. The other is
there will be use-after-free if irq work is freed before the callback
of irq work is invoked as shown below:
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000
#PF: supervisor instruction fetch in kernel mode
#PF: error_code(0x0010) - not-present page
PGD 12ab94067 P4D 12ab94067 PUD 1796b4067 PMD 0
Oops: 0010 [#1] PREEMPT_RT SMP
CPU: 5 PID: 64 Comm: irq_work/5 Not tainted 6.0.0-rt11+ #1
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)
RIP: 0010:0x0
Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at 0xffffffffffffffd6.
RSP: 0018:ffffadc080293e78 EFLAGS: 00010286
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffcdc07fb6a388 RCX: ffffa05000a2e000
RDX: ffffa05000a2e000 RSI: ffffffff96cc9827 RDI: ffffcdc07fb6a388
......
Call Trace:
<TASK>
irq_work_single+0x24/0x60
irq_work_run_list+0x24/0x30
run_irq_workd+0x23/0x30
smpboot_thread_fn+0x203/0x300
kthread+0x126/0x150
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
</TASK>
Considering the ease of concurrency handling, no overhead for
irq_work_sync() under non-PREEMPT_RT kernel and has-irq-work-interrupt
kernel and the short wait time used for irq_work_sync() under PREEMPT_RT
(When running two test_maps on PREEMPT_RT kernel and 72-cpus host, the
max wait time is about 8ms and the 99th percentile is 10us), just using
irq_work_sync() to wait for busy refill_work to complete before memory
draining and memory freeing.
Fixes: 7c8199e24f ("bpf: Introduce any context BPF specific memory allocator.")
Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221021114913.60508-2-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
The memory free logic in bpf memory allocator chains a RCU Tasks Trace
grace period and a normal RCU grace period one after the other, so it
can ensure that both sleepable and non-sleepable programs have finished.
With the introduction of rcu_trace_implies_rcu_gp(),
__free_rcu_tasks_trace() can check whether or not a normal RCU grace
period has also passed after a RCU Tasks Trace grace period has passed.
If it is true, freeing these elements directly, else freeing through
call_rcu().
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221014113946.965131-3-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
llnode could be NULL if there are new allocations after the checking of
c-free_cnt > c->high_watermark in bpf_mem_refill() and before the
calling of __llist_del_first() in free_bulk (e.g. a PREEMPT_RT kernel
or allocation in NMI context). And it will incur oops as shown below:
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000
#PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode
#PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page
PGD 0 P4D 0
Oops: 0002 [#1] PREEMPT_RT SMP
CPU: 39 PID: 373 Comm: irq_work/39 Tainted: G W 6.0.0-rc6-rt9+ #1
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)
RIP: 0010:bpf_mem_refill+0x66/0x130
......
Call Trace:
<TASK>
irq_work_single+0x24/0x60
irq_work_run_list+0x24/0x30
run_irq_workd+0x18/0x20
smpboot_thread_fn+0x13f/0x2c0
kthread+0x121/0x140
? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x20/0x20
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
</TASK>
Simply fixing it by checking whether or not llnode is NULL in free_bulk().
Fixes: 8d5a8011b3 ("bpf: Batch call_rcu callbacks instead of SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU.")
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220919144811.3570825-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
__ksize() was made private. Use ksize() instead.
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
