This change addresses a comment made earlier [0] about a missing return
of an error when __bpf_core_types_match is invoked from
bpf_core_composites_match, which could have let to us erroneously
ignoring errors.
Regarding the typedef name check pointed out in the same context, it is
not actually an issue, because callers of the function perform a name
check for the root type anyway. To make that more obvious, let's add
comments to the function (similar to what we have for
bpf_core_types_are_compat, which is called in pretty much the same
context).
[0]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/165708121449.4919.13204634393477172905.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org/T/#m55141e8f8cfd2e8d97e65328fa04852870d01af6
Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Müller <deso@posteo.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220707211931.3415440-1-deso@posteo.net
This patch adds support for the proposed type match relation to
relo_core where it is shared between userspace and kernel. It plumbs
through both kernel-side and libbpf-side support.
The matching relation is defined as follows (copy from source):
- modifiers and typedefs are stripped (and, hence, effectively ignored)
- generally speaking types need to be of same kind (struct vs. struct, union
vs. union, etc.)
- exceptions are struct/union behind a pointer which could also match a
forward declaration of a struct or union, respectively, and enum vs.
enum64 (see below)
Then, depending on type:
- integers:
- match if size and signedness match
- arrays & pointers:
- target types are recursively matched
- structs & unions:
- local members need to exist in target with the same name
- for each member we recursively check match unless it is already behind a
pointer, in which case we only check matching names and compatible kind
- enums:
- local variants have to have a match in target by symbolic name (but not
numeric value)
- size has to match (but enum may match enum64 and vice versa)
- function pointers:
- number and position of arguments in local type has to match target
- for each argument and the return value we recursively check match
Signed-off-by: Daniel Müller <deso@posteo.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220628160127.607834-5-deso@posteo.net
BPF type compatibility checks (bpf_core_types_are_compat()) are
currently duplicated between kernel and user space. That's a historical
artifact more than intentional doing and can lead to subtle bugs where
one implementation is adjusted but another is forgotten.
That happened with the enum64 work, for example, where the libbpf side
was changed (commit 23b2a3a8f6 ("libbpf: Add enum64 relocation
support")) to use the btf_kind_core_compat() helper function but the
kernel side was not (commit 6089fb325c ("bpf: Add btf enum64
support")).
This patch addresses both the duplication issue, by merging both
implementations and moving them into relo_core.c, and fixes the alluded
to kind check (by giving preference to libbpf's already adjusted logic).
For discussion of the topic, please refer to:
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAADnVQKbWR7oarBdewgOBZUPzryhRYvEbkhyPJQHHuxq=0K1gw@mail.gmail.com/T/#mcc99f4a33ad9a322afaf1b9276fb1f0b7add9665
Changelog:
v1 -> v2:
- limited libbpf recursion limit to 32
- changed name to __bpf_core_types_are_compat
- included warning previously present in libbpf version
- merged kernel and user space changes into a single patch
Signed-off-by: Daniel Müller <deso@posteo.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220623182934.2582827-1-deso@posteo.net
The enum64 relocation support is added. The bpf local type
could be either enum or enum64 and the remote type could be
either enum or enum64 too. The all combinations of local enum/enum64
and remote enum/enum64 are supported.
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220607062647.3721719-1-yhs@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Currently, the 64bit relocation value in the instruction
is computed as follows:
__u64 imm = insn[0].imm + ((__u64)insn[1].imm << 32)
Suppose insn[0].imm = -1 (0xffffffff) and insn[1].imm = 1.
With the above computation, insn[0].imm will first sign-extend
to 64bit -1 (0xffffffffFFFFFFFF) and then add 0x1FFFFFFFF,
producing incorrect value 0xFFFFFFFF. The correct value
should be 0x1FFFFFFFF.
Changing insn[0].imm to __u32 first will prevent 64bit sign
extension and fix the issue. Merging high and low 32bit values
also changed from '+' to '|' to be consistent with other
similar occurences in kernel and libbpf.
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220607062610.3717378-1-yhs@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Currently, the libbpf limits the relocation value to be 32bit
since all current relocations have such a limit. But with
BTF_KIND_ENUM64 support, the enum value could be 64bit.
So let us permit 64bit relocation value in libbpf.
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220607062605.3716779-1-yhs@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
This change fixes a couple of typos that were encountered while studying
the source code.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Müller <deso@posteo.net>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220601154025.3295035-1-deso@posteo.net
Teach libbpf to post-process BPF verifier log on BPF program load
failure and detect known error patterns to provide user with more
context.
Currently there is one such common situation: an "unguarded" failed BPF
CO-RE relocation. While failing CO-RE relocation is expected, it is
expected to be property guarded in BPF code such that BPF verifier
always eliminates BPF instructions corresponding to such failed CO-RE
relos as dead code. In cases when user failed to take such precautions,
BPF verifier provides the best log it can:
123: (85) call unknown#195896080
invalid func unknown#195896080
Such incomprehensible log error is due to libbpf "poisoning" BPF
instruction that corresponds to failed CO-RE relocation by replacing it
with invalid `call 0xbad2310` instruction (195896080 == 0xbad2310 reads
"bad relo" if you squint hard enough).
Luckily, libbpf has all the necessary information to look up CO-RE
relocation that failed and provide more human-readable description of
what's going on:
5: <invalid CO-RE relocation>
failed to resolve CO-RE relocation <byte_off> [6] struct task_struct___bad.fake_field_subprog (0:2 @ offset 8)
This hopefully makes it much easier to understand what's wrong with
user's BPF program without googling magic constants.
This BPF verifier log fixup is setup to be extensible and is going to be
used for at least one other upcoming feature of libbpf in follow up patches.
Libbpf is parsing lines of BPF verifier log starting from the very end.
Currently it processes up to 10 lines of code looking for familiar
patterns. This avoids wasting lots of CPU processing huge verifier logs
(especially for log_level=2 verbosity level). Actual verification error
should normally be found in last few lines, so this should work
reliably.
If libbpf needs to expand log beyond available log_buf_size, it
truncates the end of the verifier log. Given verifier log normally ends
with something like:
processed 2 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 0 total_states 0 peak_states 0 mark_read 0
... truncating this on program load error isn't too bad (end user can
always increase log size, if it needs to get complete log).
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220426004511.2691730-10-andrii@kernel.org
Simplify bpf_core_parse_spec() signature to take struct bpf_core_relo as
an input instead of requiring callers to decompose them into type_id,
relo, spec_str, etc. This makes using and reusing this helper easier.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220426004511.2691730-9-andrii@kernel.org
Refactor how CO-RE relocation is formatted. Now it dumps human-readable
representation, currently used by libbpf in either debug or error
message output during CO-RE relocation resolution process, into provided
buffer. This approach allows for better reuse of this functionality
outside of CO-RE relocation resolution, which we'll use in next patch
for providing better error message for BPF verifier rejecting BPF
program due to unguarded failed CO-RE relocation.
It also gets rid of annoying "stitching" of libbpf_print() calls, which
was the only place where we did this.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220426004511.2691730-8-andrii@kernel.org
Use type name for checking whether CO-RE relocation is referring to
anonymous type. Using spec string makes no sense.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220426004511.2691730-2-andrii@kernel.org
BTFGen needs to run the core relocation logic in order to understand
what are the types involved in a given relocation.
Currently bpf_core_apply_relo() calculates and **applies** a relocation
to an instruction. Having both operations in the same function makes it
difficult to only calculate the relocation without patching the
instruction. This commit splits that logic in two different phases: (1)
calculate the relocation and (2) patch the instruction.
For the first phase bpf_core_apply_relo() is renamed to
bpf_core_calc_relo_insn() who is now only on charge of calculating the
relocation, the second phase uses the already existing
bpf_core_patch_insn(). bpf_object__relocate_core() uses both of them and
the BTFGen will use only bpf_core_calc_relo_insn().
Signed-off-by: Mauricio Vásquez <mauricio@kinvolk.io>
Signed-off-by: Rafael David Tinoco <rafael.tinoco@aquasec.com>
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Fontana <lorenzo.fontana@elastic.co>
Signed-off-by: Leonardo Di Donato <leonardo.didonato@elastic.co>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220215225856.671072-2-mauricio@kinvolk.io
In case of BPF_CORE_TYPE_ID_LOCAL we fill out target result explicitly.
But targ_res itself isn't initialized in such a case, and subsequent
call to bpf_core_patch_insn() might read uninitialized field (like
fail_memsz_adjust in this case). So ensure that targ_res is
zero-initialized for BPF_CORE_TYPE_ID_LOCAL case.
This was reported by Coverity static analyzer.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211214010032.3843804-1-andrii@kernel.org
During linking, type IDs in the resulting linked BPF object file can
change, and so ldimm64 instructions corresponding to
BPF_CORE_TYPE_ID_TARGET and BPF_CORE_TYPE_ID_LOCAL CO-RE relos can get
their imm value out of sync with actual CO-RE relocation information
that's updated by BPF linker properly during linking process.
We could teach BPF linker to adjust such instructions, but it feels
a bit too much for linker to re-implement good chunk of
bpf_core_patch_insns logic just for this. This is a redundant safety
check for TYPE_ID relocations, as the real validation is in matching
CO-RE specs, so if that works fine, it's very unlikely that there is
something wrong with the instruction itself.
So, instead, teach libbpf (and kernel) to ignore insn->imm for
BPF_CORE_TYPE_ID_TARGET and BPF_CORE_TYPE_ID_LOCAL relos.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211213010706.100231-1-andrii@kernel.org
enum bpf_core_relo_kind is generated by llvm and processed by libbpf.
It's a de-facto uapi.
With CO-RE in the kernel the bpf_core_relo_kind values become uapi de-jure.
Also rename them with BPF_CORE_ prefix to distinguish from conflicting names in
bpf_core_read.h. The enums bpf_field_info_kind, bpf_type_id_kind,
bpf_type_info_kind, bpf_enum_value_kind are passing different values from bpf
program into llvm.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211201181040.23337-5-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Make relo_core.c to be compiled for the kernel and for user space libbpf.
Note the patch is reducing BPF_CORE_SPEC_MAX_LEN from 64 to 32.
This is the maximum number of nested structs and arrays.
For example:
struct sample {
int a;
struct {
int b[10];
};
};
struct sample *s = ...;
int *y = &s->b[5];
This field access is encoded as "0:1:0:5" and spec len is 4.
The follow up patch might bump it back to 64.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211201181040.23337-4-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
To prepare relo_core.c to be compiled in the kernel and the user space
replace btf__type_by_id with btf_type_by_id.
In libbpf btf__type_by_id and btf_type_by_id have different behavior.
bpf_core_apply_relo_insn() needs behavior of uapi btf__type_by_id
vs internal btf_type_by_id, but type_id range check is already done
in bpf_core_apply_relo(), so it's safe to replace it everywhere.
The kernel btf_type_by_id() does the check anyway. It doesn't hurt.
Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211201181040.23337-2-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Use the compiler-defined __BYTE_ORDER__ instead of the libc-defined
__BYTE_ORDER for consistency.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211026010831.748682-3-iii@linux.ibm.com
Move CO-RE logic into separate file.
The internal interface between libbpf and CO-RE is through
bpf_core_apply_relo_insn() function and few structs defined in relo_core.h.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210721000822.40958-5-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
