The call to kernel_queue_uninit(NULL) will trigger a BUG(), and also the
error code is incorrect.
Fixes: 45102048f7 ('amdkfd: Add process queue manager module')
Reviewed-by: Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@amd.com>
There is a typo here so the errors from kfd_bind_process_to_device()
are not detected.
Reviewed-by: Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@amd.com>
The component must be deleted if the probe fails.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
exynos_dpi_remove() should receive a exynos_drm_display but when
DRM_EXYNOS_DPI was disabled it was receiving a struct device resulting in
ia compiler warning.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
This patch adds component support for vidi driver.
vidi driver is a kms driver so it doesn't need to be registered
to exynos_drm_subdrv_list. For this, it changes for the component
framework to be used for vidi driver.
This patch fixes below error also,
# echo 1 > /sys/devices/platform/exynos-drm-vidi/connection
[ 55.618529] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 55.621960] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1397 at drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c:1203 exynos_drm_crtc_dpms+0x88/0x17c()
[ 55.631268] Modules linked in:
[ 55.634278] CPU: 0 PID: 1397 Comm: sh Not tainted 3.18.0-rc2-146253-g31449d7 #1154
[ 55.641885] [<c0014400>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c0011570>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
[ 55.649597] [<c0011570>] (show_stack) from [<c04764f4>] (dump_stack+0x84/0xc4)
[ 55.656802] [<c04764f4>] (dump_stack) from [<c00218b8>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x6c/0x88)
[ 55.664866] [<c00218b8>] (warn_slowpath_common) from [<c0021970>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x1c/0x24)
[ 55.673632] [<c0021970>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c027a780>] (exynos_drm_crtc_dpms+0x88/0x17c)
[ 55.682482] [<c027a780>] (exynos_drm_crtc_dpms) from [<c027a910>] (exynos_drm_crtc_commit+0x14/0x44)
[ 55.691622] [<c027a910>] (exynos_drm_crtc_commit) from [<c025521c>] (drm_crtc_helper_set_mode+0x3d0/0x51c)
[ 55.701233] [<c025521c>] (drm_crtc_helper_set_mode) from [<c0255d68>] (drm_crtc_helper_set_config+0x87c/0x9dc)
[ 55.711230] [<c0255d68>] (drm_crtc_helper_set_config) from [<c026afa8>] (drm_mode_set_config_internal+0x58/0xd4)
[ 55.721380] [<c026afa8>] (drm_mode_set_config_internal) from [<c025c208>] (restore_fbdev_mode+0xcc/0xec)
[ 55.730834] [<c025c208>] (restore_fbdev_mode) from [<c025c244>] (drm_fb_helper_restore_fbdev_mode_unlocked+0x1c/0x30)
[ 55.741424] [<c025c244>] (drm_fb_helper_restore_fbdev_mode_unlocked) from [<c025e0a8>] (drm_fb_helper_set_par+0x1c/0x60)
[ 55.752271] [<c025e0a8>] (drm_fb_helper_set_par) from [<c025e174>] (drm_fb_helper_hotplug_event+0x88/0xc4)
[ 55.761906] [<c025e174>] (drm_fb_helper_hotplug_event) from [<c02571c4>] (drm_helper_hpd_irq_event+0xc8/0x134)
[ 55.771898] [<c02571c4>] (drm_helper_hpd_irq_event) from [<c028e27c>] (vidi_store_connection+0x90/0xc8)
[ 55.781268] [<c028e27c>] (vidi_store_connection) from [<c0125f80>] (kernfs_fop_write+0xc0/0x180)
[ 55.790045] [<c0125f80>] (kernfs_fop_write) from [<c00cdf60>] (vfs_write+0xa0/0x1ac)
[ 55.797757] [<c00cdf60>] (vfs_write) from [<c00ce468>] (SyS_write+0x44/0x9c)
[ 55.804790] [<c00ce468>] (SyS_write) from [<c000e6a0>] (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x30)
[ 55.812328] ---[ end trace 3c0fe4386702d4dd ]---
This issue occurs when modeset to vidi is tried in case that drm_vblank_init
is called prior to crtc creation of vidi driver. In this case, crtc number
of vidi is invalid so any requests with the crtc number will fail.
This patch guarantees drm_vblank_init to be called after all kms drivers
are ready by using component framework.
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
This patch resolves the issue that component object isn't removed
correctly.
A given component object couldn't be placed to head of drm_component_list
so all component objects added to the drm_component_list should be checked
to remove the given component object.
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
Propagate the returned error code on failure.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
identifier ret; expression e1,e2;
@@
(
if (\(ret < 0\|ret != 0\))
{ ... return ret; }
|
ret = 0
)
... when != ret = e1
when != &ret
*if(...)
{
... when != ret = e2
when forall
return ret;
}
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
Registering the Exynos DRM subdevices platform drivers in the probe
function is causing an infinite loop. Fix this by moving it to the
exynos_drm_init() function to register the drivers on module init.
Registering drivers in the probe functions causes a deadlock in the parent
device lock. See Grant Likely explanation on the topic:
"I think the problem is that exynos_drm_init() is registering a normal
(non-OF) platform device, so the parent will be /sys/devices/platform.
It immediately gets bound against exynos_drm_platform_driver which
calls the exynos drm_platform_probe() hook. The driver core obtains
device_lock() on the device *and on the device parent*.
Inside the probe hook, additional platform_drivers get registered.
Each time one does, it tries to bind against every platform device in
the system, which includes the ones created by OF. When it attempts to
bind, it obtains device_lock() on the device *and on the device
parent*.
Before the change to move of-generated platform devices into
/sys/devices/platform, the devices had different parents. Now both
devices have /sys/devices/platform as the parent, so yes they are
going to deadlock.
The real problem is registering drivers from within a probe hook. That
is completely wrong for the above deadlock reason. __driver_attach()
will deadlock. Those registrations must be pulled out of .probe().
Registering devices in .probe() is okay because __device_attach()
doesn't try to obtain device_lock() on the parent."
INFO: task swapper/0:1 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
Not tainted 3.18.0-rc3-next-20141105 #794
"echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
swapper/0 D c052534c 0 1 0 0x00000000
[<c052534c>] (__schedule) from [<c0525b34>] (schedule_preempt_disabled+0x14/0x20)
[<c0525b34>] (schedule_preempt_disabled) from [<c0526d44>] (mutex_lock_nested+0x1c4/0x464
[<c0526d44>] (mutex_lock_nested) from [<c02be908>] (__driver_attach+0x48/0x98)
[<c02be908>] (__driver_attach) from [<c02bcc00>] (bus_for_each_dev+0x54/0x88)
[<c02bcc00>] (bus_for_each_dev) from [<c02bdce0>] (bus_add_driver+0xe4/0x200)
[<c02bdce0>] (bus_add_driver) from [<c02bef94>] (driver_register+0x78/0xf4)
[<c02bef94>] (driver_register) from [<c029e99c>] (exynos_drm_platform_probe+0x34/0x234)
[<c029e99c>] (exynos_drm_platform_probe) from [<c02bfcf0>] (platform_drv_probe+0x48/0xa4)
[<c02bfcf0>] (platform_drv_probe) from [<c02be680>] (driver_probe_device+0x13c/0x37c)
[<c02be680>] (driver_probe_device) from [<c02be954>] (__driver_attach+0x94/0x98)
[<c02be954>] (__driver_attach) from [<c02bcc00>] (bus_for_each_dev+0x54/0x88)
[<c02bcc00>] (bus_for_each_dev) from [<c02bdce0>] (bus_add_driver+0xe4/0x200)
[<c02bdce0>] (bus_add_driver) from [<c02bef94>] (driver_register+0x78/0xf4)
[<c02bef94>] (driver_register) from [<c029e938>] (exynos_drm_init+0x70/0xa0)
[<c029e938>] (exynos_drm_init) from [<c00089b0>] (do_one_initcall+0xac/0x1f0)
[<c00089b0>] (do_one_initcall) from [<c074bd90>] (kernel_init_freeable+0x10c/0x1d8)
[<c074bd90>] (kernel_init_freeable) from [<c051eabc>] (kernel_init+0x8/0xec)
[<c051eabc>] (kernel_init) from [<c000f268>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c)
3 locks held by swapper/0/1:
#0: (&dev->mutex){......}, at: [<c02be908>] __driver_attach+0x48/0x98
#1: (&dev->mutex){......}, at: [<c02be918>] __driver_attach+0x58/0x98
#2: (&dev->mutex){......}, at: [<c02be908>] __driver_attach+0x48/0x98
Changelog v2:
- call platform_driver_register after all kms and non kms drivers are
registered
- rebased it to exynos-drm-next
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
This reverts commit cea24824ab432f8acabb254d6805e9aa756de6af.
Moving subdriver probe to exynos_drm_platform_probe() was making
exynos_drm_device_subdrv_probe() fail because the platform data wasn't set
yet. It only gets set in exynos_drm_load.
We need to find a smarter way to fix this issue.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
The patch replaces accesses to display->ctx pointer by container_of
construct. The field is removed as well as dpi was the last user of it.
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
exynos_drm_display is used by internal Exynos DRM framework for
representing encoder:connector pair. As it should be mapped 1:1 to dpi
private context it seems more reasonable to embed it directly in that context.
As a result further code simplification will be possible.
Moreover it will be possible to handle multiple dpi devices in the system.
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
The patch replaces accesses to display->ctx pointer by container_of
construct. It will allow to remove ctx field in the future.
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
exynos_drm_display is used by internal Exynos DRM framework for
representing encoder:connector pair. As it should be mapped 1:1 to dp
private context it seems more reasonable to embed it directly in that context.
As a result further code simplification will be possible.
Moreover it will be possible to handle multiple dp devices in the system.
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
The patch replaces accesses to display->ctx pointer by container_of
construct. It will allow to remove ctx field in the future.
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
exynos_drm_display is used by internal Exynos DRM framework for
representing encoder:connector pair. As it should be mapped 1:1 to vidi
private context it seems more reasonable to embed it directly in that context.
As a result further code simplification will be possible.
Moreover it will be possible to handle multiple vidi devices in the system.
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
The patch replaces accesses to display->ctx pointer by container_of
construct. It will allow to remove ctx field in the future.
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
exynos_drm_display is used by internal Exynos DRM framework for
representing encoder:connector pair. As it should be mapped 1:1 to hdmi
private context it seems more reasonable to embed it directly in that context.
As a result further code simplification will be possible.
Moreover it will be possible to handle multiple hdmi devices in the system.
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
The patch replaces accesses to manager->ctx pointer by container_of
construct. As fimd was the last user of ctx the patch removes
this field as well.
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
exynos_drm_manager is used by internal Exynos DRM framework for
representing crtc. As it should be mapped 1:1 to fimd private context
it seems more reasonable to embed it directly in that context.
As a result further code simplification will be possible.
Moreover it will be possible to handle multiple FIMD devices in the system.
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
The patch replaces accesses to manager->ctx pointer by container_of
construct. It will allow to remove ctx field in the future.
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
exynos_drm_manager is used by internal Exynos DRM framework for
representing crtc. As it should be mapped 1:1 to vidi private context
it seems more reasonable to embed it directly in that context.
As a result further code simplification will be possible.
Moreover it will be possible to handle multiple mixer devices in the system.
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
The patch replaces accesses to manager->ctx pointer by container_of
construct. It will allow to remove ctx field in the future.
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
exynos_drm_manager is used by internal Exynos DRM framework for
representing crtc. As it should be mapped 1:1 to fimd private context
it seems more reasonable to embed it directly in that context.
As a result further code simplification will be possible.
Moreover it will be possible to handle multiple mixer devices in the system.
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
The exynos_dsi_te_irq_handler() works only dsi(DPMS) is on.
So it is enough to enable and disable TE GPIO IRQ in
exynos_dsi_enable(disable)_irq() like DSI IRQ.
Signed-off-by: YoungJun Cho <yj44.cho@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>a
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
The drm_helper_hpd_irq_event() does dpms control and
the panel is initialized and displayed on by it.
So the exynos_dsi_te_irq_handler() should be registered
beforehand.
Signed-off-by: YoungJun Cho <yj44.cho@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
The drm_handle_vblank should be called whenever be vsync, te interrupt
means vsync on i80 interface.
Signed-off-by: Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
There is a case like set config which requires triggering
but vblank is not enabled yet.
So triggering unset routine is required to exit from
triggering mode.
Signed-off-by: YoungJun Cho <yj44.cho@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
For the I80 interface, the video interrupt pending register(VIDINTCON1)
should be handled in fimd_irq_handler() and the video interrupt control
register(VIDINTCON0) should be handled in fimd_enable_vblank() and
fimd_disable_vblank() like RGB interface.
So this patch moves each set / unset routines into proper positions.
Signed-off-by: YoungJun Cho <yj44.cho@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
This function is valid only the SoC has SHADOWCON register
and it should be used together with fimd_enable_video_output()
to match the ENWIN_F bit in WINCON# and C#_EN_F bit in SHADOWCON.
Signed-off-by: YoungJun Cho <yj44.cho@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
This bit is used for video output and logic signal control.
So it is better for readability.
Signed-off-by: YoungJun Cho <yj44.cho@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
The C#_EN_F in SHADOWCON register is updated per frame.
So it should be protected by fimd_shadow_protect_win().
Signed-off-by: YoungJun Cho <yj44.cho@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
It's better to be checking whether triggerring in fimd_trigger function.
Also it will return if in triggerring on fimd_te_handler, then it can't
execute remain codes.
Signed-off-by: Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
The exynos fimd provides video type selection bits from system register
but exynos3 series don't has it, so needs has_vtsel flag and we can
distinguish whether set video type selection bits.
Signed-off-by: Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
During system resume from suspend to RAM the Exynos DRM driver forced
CRTC mode thus turning display on (DPMS_ON). This lead to runtime resuming
of DSI which failed because whole LCD power domain was off and it was
not allowed to turn on because of system resume in progress.
Forcing mode should not be needed and removing it solves this particular
problem.
This necessary fix for following scenario reproduced on Exynos DRM:
1. Power domain is off before suspending the system.
2. System is suspended to RAM.
3. Resuming starts. The Exynos DRM driver resume callback is called.
4. The Exynos DRM driver calls drm_helper_resume_force_mode() which turns
on the screen by calling exynos_dsi_dpms with DRM_MODE_DPMS_ON.
5. The Exynos DSI driver calls pm_runtime_get. The driver runtime
resumes and this should turn LCD power domain on.
6. Unfortunately the domain cannot be turned on because system resume is
in progress and genpd->prepared_count is positive.
Steps to reproduce:
1. Add runtime PM to Exynos DSI driver.
2. Build Exynos DRM/FB without FRAMEBUFFER_CONSOLE.
3. Enable the connector and screen (e.g. with modeset-vsync).
4. echo 3 > /sys/devices/platform/exynos-drm/graphics/fb0/blank
5. echo mem > /sys/power/state
6. Resume.
[ 77.712469] PM: early resume of devices complete after 3.854 msecs
[ 77.712739] exynos-dsi 11c80000.dsi: pm_genpd_resume()
[ 77.712758] exynos4-fimc 11800000.fimc: pm_genpd_resume()
[ 77.712774] exynos4-fimc 11810000.fimc: pm_genpd_resume()
[ 77.712787] exynos-drm-fimc 11820000.fimc: pm_genpd_resume()
[ 77.712802] exynos-drm-fimc 11830000.fimc: pm_genpd_resume()
[ 77.712815] s5p-mipi-csis 11880000.csis: pm_genpd_resume()
[ 77.712829] s5p-mipi-csis 11890000.csis: pm_genpd_resume()
[ 77.712843] exynos-fimc-lite 12390000.fimc-lite: pm_genpd_resume()
[ 77.712856] exynos-fimc-lite 123a0000.fimc-lite: pm_genpd_resume()
[ 77.713788] exynos4-fb 11c00000.fimd: pm_genpd_resume()
[ 77.713912] wake disabled for irq 184
[ 77.713923] wake disabled for irq 185
[ 77.714082] wake disabled for irq 173
[ 77.715676] wake disabled for irq 176
[ 77.718540] exynos4-fb 11c00000.fimd: pm_genpd_runtime_resume()
[ 77.718567] exynos4-fb 11c00000.fimd: state restore latency exceeded, new value 1708 ns
[ 77.718636] exynos-dsi 11c80000.dsi: pm_genpd_runtime_resume()
[ 77.892366] exynos-dsi 11c80000.dsi: PLL failed to stabilize
[ 77.892377] exynos-dsi 11c80000.dsi: failed to configure DSI PLL
[ 78.192168] exynos-dsi 11c80000.dsi: timeout waiting for reset
[ 78.211578] exynos-dsi 11c80000.dsi: waiting for bus lanes timed out
[ 78.307173] exynos-dsi 11c80000.dsi: xfer timed out: d1 00 (null)
[ 78.307190] panel_s6e8aa0 11c80000.dsi.0: error -110 reading dcs seq(0xd1)
[ 78.307199] panel_s6e8aa0 11c80000.dsi.0: read id failed
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
The command mode panel should draw image earlier than the display
on command execution to prevent showing garbage GRAM screen data.
So should set dsi->state as DSIM_STATE_ENABLED between calling
exynos_dsi_set_display_enable() and drm_panel_enable() to transmit
image data before executing display on command.
And moves the display on command execution routine from prepare()
to enable() in drm_panel_funcs also.
Signed-off-by: YoungJun Cho <yj44.cho@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
For providing VBLANK information, drm_handle_vblank() should
be called properly, but it is blocked by wait_vsync_event
condition which is set by manager_ops->wait_for_vblank().
So moves it out from wait_vsync_event routine.
Signed-off-by: YoungJun Cho <yj44.cho@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
The exynos_drm_crtc_dpms() waits until pended page flip
queue is empty, calls the drm_vblank_off() then calls
manager->ops->dpms() when mode is DRM_MODE_DPMS_OFF.
The fimd_dpms() is one of manager->ops->dpms()s and
finally calls fimd_window_suspend().
But there is no active window and vblank is already off
when it is called.
So addtional waiting vblank is not necessary any more.
Signed-off-by: YoungJun Cho <yj44.cho@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
Now that we have moved to generic phy based bindings,
we don't need to have any code related to older dptx-phy.
Nobody is using this dptx-phy anymore, so removing the
same.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <gautam.vivek@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
They are not implemented anywhere, so wipe them out.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
Description of the @create_connector callback was missing,
and the @manager was no longer needed.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
Save a few bytes by compiling them all in the same byte.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
This is a leftover, all code using this macro have been removed/
changed already.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
Re-declare struct is not a good practice, let's use the original
drm and exynos declarations.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
Re-declare struct is not a good practice, let's use the original
drm declarations.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
The struct is defined in the same file, declare it here is just
unnecessary
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
The struct is defined in the same file, declare it here is just
unnecessary.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
It is not even used in this header anymore.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
