Comparing bits and bytes in numa benchmark assertion
I hit the issue on two socket Power8 machine presenting its numa nodes
as 0,1,16,17 (according to numactl). Therefore I got error (and hang of
parent process):
perf: bench/numa.c:296: bind_to_memnode: Assertion `!(g->p.nr_nodes > (int)sizeof(nodemask))' failed.
This is obviously false positive. We can fit all the 18 nodes into
bitfield of 8 bytes (long on 64b architecture).
Signed-off-by: Jakub Jelen <jakuje@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jakub Jelen <jjelen@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: trivial@kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1458388687-24421-1-git-send-email-jakuje@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Move the subcommand-related files from perf to a new library named
libsubcmd.a.
Since we're moving files anyway, go ahead and rename 'exec_cmd.*' to
'exec-cmd.*' to be consistent with the naming of all the other files.
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/c0a838d4c878ab17fee50998811612b2281355c1.1450193761.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
We have three benchmarking subsystems that specify some sort of 'number
of loops' parameter - but all of them do it inconsistently:
numa: -l/--nr_loops
sched messaging: -l/--loops
mem memset/memcpy: -i/--iterations
Harmonize them to -l/--nr_loops by picking the numa variant - which is
also the most likely one to have existing scripting which we don't want
to break.
Plus improve the parameter help texts to indicate the default value for
the nr_loops variable to keep users from guessing ...
Also propagate the naming to internal variables.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1445241870-24854-13-git-send-email-mingo@kernel.org
[ Let the harmonisation reach the perf-bench man page as well ]
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
We really should move the sched_getcpu() to some more suitable place,
but this one-liner fixes this build problem on ancient distros like
RHEL5.
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Vinson Lee <vlee@twitter.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-5yqg4p11f9uii6yremz3r35v@git.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
In verbose mode perf bench numa shows also GB/s speed, system and user cpu
time for each particular thread. Using of getrusage() can provide much more
per process or per thread stats in future.
Signed-off-by: Petr Holasek <pholasek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1429198699-25039-3-git-send-email-pholasek@redhat.com
[ Rename 'usage' variable to not shadow util.h's usage() ]
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
This patch fixes the race in the beginning of benchmark run when some
threads hasn't got assigned curr_cpu yet so they don't occur in
nodes-of-process stats and benchmark concludes that all remaining
threads are converged already.
The race can be reproduced with small amount of threads and some bigger
amount of shared process memory, e.g. one process, two threads and 5GB
of process memory.
Signed-off-by: Petr Holasek <pholasek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1429198699-25039-4-git-send-email-pholasek@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Corrected description and fixed function of --quiet argument.
Signed-off-by: Petr Holasek <pholasek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1429198699-25039-2-git-send-email-pholasek@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Currently,
$ perf bench numa mem
errors out with usage information. To make this more user-friendly, let
us provide a minimum set of default values required for a test
run. As an added bonus,
$ perf bench all
now goes all the way to completion.
Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1395964219-22173-2-git-send-email-artagnon@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
If we call just:
perf bench numa mem
it will present the same output as:
perf bench numa mem -h
i.e. ask for instructions about what to run.
While that is kinda ok, using 'run all tests' as the default, i.e.
making 'no parms' be equivalent to:
perf bench numa mem -a
Will allow:
perf bench numa all
to actually do what is asked: i.e. run all the 'bench' tests, instead of
responding to that by asking what to do.
That, in turn, allows:
perf bench all
to actually complete, for the same reasons.
And after that, the tests that come after that, and that at some point
hit a NULL deref, will run, allowing me to reproduce a recently reported
problem.
That when you have the needed numa libraries, which wasn't the case for
the reporter, making me a bit confused after trying to reproduce his
report.
So make no parms mean -a.
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Patrick Palka <patrick@parcs.ath.cx>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-x7h0ghx4pef4n0brywg21krk@git.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
bench/numa.c: In function 'worker_thread':
bench/numa.c:1123:20: error: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions [-Werror=sign-compare]
bench/numa.c:1171:6: error: format '%lx' expects argument of type 'long unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'u64' [-Werror=format]
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1382099356-4918-13-git-send-email-adrian.hunter@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Patch adds more subtle handling of -C and -N parameters in
parse_{cpu,node}_setup_list() functions when there isn't enough NUMA
nodes or CPUs present. Instead of assertion and terminating benchmark,
partial test is skipped with error message and perf will continue to the
next one.
Fixed problem can be easily reproduced on machine with only one NUMA
node:
# Running numa/mem benchmark...
# Running main, "perf bench numa mem -a"
...
# Running RAM-bw-remote, "perf bench numa mem -p 1 -t 1 -P 1024 -C 0 -M 1 -s
perf: bench/numa.c:622: parse_setup_node_list: Assertion `!(bind_node_0 < 0 ||
bind_node_0 >= g->p.nr_nodes)' failed.
Aborted
Signed-off-by: Petr Holasek <pholasek@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Petr Benas <pbenas@redhat.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1380821325-4017-1-git-send-email-pholasek@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Petr Benas <pbenas@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Add a suite of NUMA performance benchmarks.
The goal was simulate the behavior and access patterns of real NUMA
workloads, via a wide range of parameters, so this tool goes well
beyond simple bzero() measurements that most NUMA micro-benchmarks use:
- It processes the data and creates a chain of data dependencies,
like a real workload would. Neither the compiler, nor the
kernel (via KSM and other optimizations) nor the CPU can
eliminate parts of the workload.
- It randomizes the initial state and also randomizes the target
addresses of the processing - it's not a simple forward scan
of addresses.
- It provides flexible options to set process, thread and memory
relationship information: -G sets "global" memory shared between
all test processes, -P sets "process" memory shared by all
threads of a process and -T sets "thread" private memory.
- There's a NUMA convergence monitoring and convergence latency
measurement option via -c and -m.
- Micro-sleeps and synchronization can be injected to provoke lock
contention and scheduling, via the -u and -S options. This simulates
IO and contention.
- The -x option instructs the workload to 'perturb' itself artificially
every N seconds, by moving to the first and last CPU of the system
periodically. This way the stability of convergence equilibrium and
the number of steps taken for the scheduler to reach equilibrium again
can be measured.
- The amount of work can be specified via the -l loop count, and/or
via a -s seconds-timeout value.
- CPU and node memory binding options, to test hard binding scenarios.
THP can be turned on and off via madvise() calls.
- Live reporting of convergence progress in an 'at glance' output format.
Printing of convergence and deconvergence events.
The 'perf bench numa mem -a' option will start an array of about 30
individual tests that will each output such measurements:
# Running 5x5-bw-thread, "perf bench numa mem -p 5 -t 5 -P 512 -s 20 -zZ0q --thp 1"
5x5-bw-thread, 20.276, secs, runtime-max/thread
5x5-bw-thread, 20.004, secs, runtime-min/thread
5x5-bw-thread, 20.155, secs, runtime-avg/thread
5x5-bw-thread, 0.671, %, spread-runtime/thread
5x5-bw-thread, 21.153, GB, data/thread
5x5-bw-thread, 528.818, GB, data-total
5x5-bw-thread, 0.959, nsecs, runtime/byte/thread
5x5-bw-thread, 1.043, GB/sec, thread-speed
5x5-bw-thread, 26.081, GB/sec, total-speed
See the help text and the code for more details.
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
