As discussed during the distro-centric session within the sched_ext
Microconference at LPC 2024, introduce a sequence counter that is
incremented every time a BPF scheduler is loaded.
This feature can help distributions in diagnosing potential performance
regressions by identifying systems where users are running (or have ran)
custom BPF schedulers.
Example:
arighi@virtme-ng~> cat /sys/kernel/sched_ext/enable_seq
0
arighi@virtme-ng~> sudo scx_simple
local=1 global=0
^CEXIT: unregistered from user space
arighi@virtme-ng~> cat /sys/kernel/sched_ext/enable_seq
1
In this way user-space tools (such as Ubuntu's apport and similar) are
able to gather and include this information in bug reports.
Cc: Giovanni Gherdovich <giovanni.gherdovich@suse.com>
Cc: Kleber Sacilotto de Souza <kleber.souza@canonical.com>
Cc: Marcelo Henrique Cerri <marcelo.cerri@canonical.com>
Cc: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
a2f4b16e73 ("sched_ext: Build fix on !CONFIG_STACKTRACE[_SUPPORT]") tried
fixing build when !CONFIG_STACKTRACE but didn't so fully. Also put
stack_trace_print() and stack_trace_save() inside CONFIG_STACKTRACE to fix
build when !CONFIG_STACKTRACE.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202409220642.fDW2OmWc-lkp@intel.com/
A task moving across CPUs should not trigger quiescent/runnable task state
events as the task is staying runnable the whole time and just stopping and
then starting on different CPUs. Suppress quiescent/runnable task state
events if task_on_rq_migrating().
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Suggested-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Cc: Daniel Hodges <hodges.daniel.scott@gmail.com>
Cc: Changwoo Min <multics69@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@linux.dev>
Cc: Dan Schatzberg <schatzberg.dan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
While the BPF scheduler is being unloaded, the following warning messages
trigger sometimes:
NOHZ tick-stop error: local softirq work is pending, handler #80!!!
This is caused by the CPU entering idle while there are pending softirqs.
The main culprit is the bypassing state assertion not being synchronized
with rq operations. As the BPF scheduler cannot be trusted in the disable
path, the first step is entering the bypass mode where the BPF scheduler is
ignored and scheduling becomes global FIFO.
This is implemented by turning scx_ops_bypassing() true. However, the
transition isn't synchronized against anything and it's possible for enqueue
and dispatch paths to have different ideas on whether bypass mode is on.
Make each rq track its own bypass state with SCX_RQ_BYPASSING which is
modified while rq is locked.
This removes most of the NOHZ tick-stop messages but not completely. I
believe the stragglers are from the sched core bug where pick_task_scx() can
be called without preceding balance_scx(). Once that bug is fixed, we should
verify that all occurrences of this error message are gone too.
v2: scx_enabled() test moved inside the for_each_possible_cpu() loop so that
the per-cpu states are always synchronized with the global state.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reported-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Once a task is put into a DSQ, the allowed operations are fairly limited.
Tasks in the built-in local and global DSQs are executed automatically and,
ignoring dequeue, there is only one way a task in a user DSQ can be
manipulated - scx_bpf_consume() moves the first task to the dispatching
local DSQ. This inflexibility sometimes gets in the way and is an area where
multiple feature requests have been made.
Implement scx_bpf_dispatch[_vtime]_from_dsq(), which can be called during
DSQ iteration and can move the task to any DSQ - local DSQs, global DSQ and
user DSQs. The kfuncs can be called from ops.dispatch() and any BPF context
which dosen't hold a rq lock including BPF timers and SYSCALL programs.
This is an expansion of an earlier patch which only allowed moving into the
dispatching local DSQ:
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/Zn4Cw4FDTmvXnhaf@slm.duckdns.org
v2: Remove @slice and @vtime from scx_bpf_dispatch_from_dsq[_vtime]() as
they push scx_bpf_dispatch_from_dsq_vtime() over the kfunc argument
count limit and often won't be needed anyway. Instead provide
scx_bpf_dispatch_from_dsq_set_{slice|vtime}() kfuncs which can be called
only when needed and override the specified parameter for the subsequent
dispatch.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Daniel Hodges <hodges.daniel.scott@gmail.com>
Cc: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Cc: Changwoo Min <multics69@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@linux.dev>
Cc: Dan Schatzberg <schatzberg.dan@gmail.com>
struct scx_iter_scx_dsq is defined as 6 u64's and scx_dsq_iter_kern was
using 5 of them. We want to add two more u64 fields but it's better if we do
so while staying within scx_iter_scx_dsq to maintain binary compatibility.
The way scx_iter_scx_dsq_kern is laid out is rather inefficient - the node
field takes up three u64's but only one bit of the last u64 is used. Turn
the bool into u32 flags and only use the lower 16 bits freeing up 48 bits -
16 bits for flags, 32 bits for a u32 - for use by struct
bpf_iter_scx_dsq_kern.
This allows moving the dsq_seq and flags fields of bpf_iter_scx_dsq_kern
into the cursor field reducing the struct size by a full u64.
No behavior changes intended.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
- Rename move_task_to_local_dsq() to move_remote_task_to_local_dsq().
- Rename consume_local_task() to move_local_task_to_local_dsq() and remove
task_unlink_from_dsq() and source DSQ unlocking from it.
This is to make the migration code easier to reuse.
No functional changes intended.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
So that the local case comes first and two CONFIG_SMP blocks can be merged.
No functional changes intended.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
All task_unlink_from_dsq() users are doing dsq_mod_nr(dsq, -1). Move it into
task_unlink_from_dsq(). Also move sanity check into it.
No functional changes intended.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Reorder args for consistency in the order of:
current_rq, p, src_[rq|dsq], dst_[rq|dsq].
No functional changes intended.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Now that there's nothing left after the big if block, flip the if condition
and unindent the body.
No functional changes intended.
v2: Add BUG() to clarify control can't reach the end of
dispatch_to_local_dsq() in UP kernels per David.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
With the preceding update, the only return value which makes meaningful
difference is DTL_INVALID, for which one caller, finish_dispatch(), falls
back to the global DSQ and the other, process_ddsp_deferred_locals(),
doesn't do anything.
It should always fallback to the global DSQ. Move the global DSQ fallback
into dispatch_to_local_dsq() and remove the return value.
v2: Patch title and description updated to reflect the behavior fix for
process_ddsp_deferred_locals().
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
find_dsq_for_dispatch() handles all DSQ IDs except SCX_DSQ_LOCAL_ON.
Instead, each caller is hanlding SCX_DSQ_LOCAL_ON before calling it. Move
SCX_DSQ_LOCAL_ON lookup into find_dsq_for_dispatch() to remove duplicate
code in direct_dispatch() and dispatch_to_local_dsq().
No functional changes intended.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
The tricky p->scx.holding_cpu handling was split across
consume_remote_task() body and move_task_to_local_dsq(). Refactor such that:
- All the tricky part is now in the new unlink_dsq_and_lock_src_rq() with
consolidated documentation.
- move_task_to_local_dsq() now implements straightforward task migration
making it easier to use in other places.
- dispatch_to_local_dsq() is another user move_task_to_local_dsq(). The
usage is updated accordingly. This makes the local and remote cases more
symmetric.
No functional changes intended.
v2: s/task_rq/src_rq/ for consistency.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Sleepables don't need to be in its own kfunc set as each is tagged with
KF_SLEEPABLE. Rename to scx_kfunc_set_unlocked indicating that rq lock is
not held and relocate right above the any set. This will be used to add
kfuncs that are allowed to be called from SYSCALL but not TRACING.
No functional changes intended.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
pick_task_scx() must be preceded by balance_scx() but there currently is a
bug where fair could say yes on balance() but no on pick_task(), which then
ends up calling pick_task_scx() without preceding balance_scx(). Work around
by dropping WARN_ON_ONCE() and ignoring cases which don't make sense.
This isn't great and can theoretically lead to stalls. However, for
switch_all cases, this happens only while a BPF scheduler is being loaded or
unloaded, and, for partial cases, fair will likely keep triggering this CPU.
This will be reverted once the fair behavior is fixed.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Add sched_ext_ops operations to init/exit cgroups, and track task migrations
and config changes. A BPF scheduler may not implement or implement only
subset of cgroup features. The implemented features can be indicated using
%SCX_OPS_HAS_CGOUP_* flags. If cgroup configuration makes use of features
that are not implemented, a warning is triggered.
While a BPF scheduler is being enabled and disabled, relevant cgroup
operations are locked out using scx_cgroup_rwsem. This avoids situations
like task prep taking place while the task is being moved across cgroups,
making things easier for BPF schedulers.
v7: - cgroup interface file visibility toggling is dropped in favor just
warning messages. Dynamically changing interface visiblity caused more
confusion than helping.
v6: - Updated to reflect the removal of SCX_KF_SLEEPABLE.
- Updated to use CONFIG_GROUP_SCHED_WEIGHT and fixes for
!CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED && CONFIG_EXT_GROUP_SCHED.
v5: - Flipped the locking order between scx_cgroup_rwsem and
cpus_read_lock() to avoid locking order conflict w/ cpuset. Better
documentation around locking.
- sched_move_task() takes an early exit if the source and destination
are identical. This triggered the warning in scx_cgroup_can_attach()
as it left p->scx.cgrp_moving_from uncleared. Updated the cgroup
migration path so that ops.cgroup_prep_move() is skipped for identity
migrations so that its invocations always match ops.cgroup_move()
one-to-one.
v4: - Example schedulers moved into their own patches.
- Fix build failure when !CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED, reported by Andrea Righi.
v3: - Make scx_example_pair switch all tasks by default.
- Convert to BPF inline iterators.
- scx_bpf_task_cgroup() is added to determine the current cgroup from
CPU controller's POV. This allows BPF schedulers to accurately track
CPU cgroup membership.
- scx_example_flatcg added. This demonstrates flattened hierarchy
implementation of CPU cgroup control and shows significant performance
improvement when cgroups which are nested multiple levels are under
competition.
v2: - Build fixes for different CONFIG combinations.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: David Vernet <dvernet@meta.com>
Acked-by: Josh Don <joshdon@google.com>
Acked-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>
Acked-by: Barret Rhoden <brho@google.com>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>
During scx_ops_enable(), SCX needs to invoke the sleepable ops.init_task()
on every task. To do this, it does get_task_struct() on each iterated task,
drop the lock and then call ops.init_task().
However, a TASK_DEAD task may already have lost all its usage count and be
waiting for RCU grace period to be freed. If get_task_struct() is called on
such task, use-after-free can happen. To avoid such situations,
scx_ops_enable() skips initialization of TASK_DEAD tasks, which seems safe
as they are never going to be scheduled again.
Unfortunately, a racing sched_setscheduler(2) can grab the task before the
task is unhashed and then continue to e.g. move the task from RT to SCX
after TASK_DEAD is set and ops_enable skipped the task. As the task hasn't
gone through scx_ops_init_task(), scx_ops_enable_task() called from
switching_to_scx() triggers the following warning:
sched_ext: Invalid task state transition 0 -> 3 for stress-ng-race-[2872]
WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 2367 at kernel/sched/ext.c:3327 scx_ops_enable_task+0x18f/0x1f0
...
RIP: 0010:scx_ops_enable_task+0x18f/0x1f0
...
switching_to_scx+0x13/0xa0
__sched_setscheduler+0x84e/0xa50
do_sched_setscheduler+0x104/0x1c0
__x64_sys_sched_setscheduler+0x18/0x30
do_syscall_64+0x7b/0x140
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
As in the ops_disable path, it just doesn't seem like a good idea to leave
any task in an inconsistent state, even when the task is dead. The root
cause is ops_enable not being able to tell reliably whether a task is truly
dead (no one else is looking at it and it's about to be freed) and was
testing TASK_DEAD instead. Fix it by testing the task's usage count
directly.
- ops_init no longer ignores TASK_DEAD tasks. As now all users iterate all
tasks, @include_dead is removed from scx_task_iter_next_locked() along
with dead task filtering.
- tryget_task_struct() is added. Tasks are skipped iff tryget_task_struct()
fails.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
scx_ops_disable_workfn() only switches !TASK_DEAD tasks out of SCX while
calling scx_ops_exit_task() on all tasks including dead ones. This can leave
a dead task on SCX but with SCX_TASK_NONE state, which is inconsistent.
If another task was in the process of changing the TASK_DEAD task's
scheduling class and grabs the rq lock after scx_ops_disable_workfn() is
done with the task, the task ends up calling scx_ops_disable_task() on the
dead task which is in an inconsistent state triggering a warning:
WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 3316 at kernel/sched/ext.c:3411 scx_ops_disable_task+0x12c/0x160
...
RIP: 0010:scx_ops_disable_task+0x12c/0x160
...
Call Trace:
<TASK>
check_class_changed+0x2c/0x70
__sched_setscheduler+0x8a0/0xa50
do_sched_setscheduler+0x104/0x1c0
__x64_sys_sched_setscheduler+0x18/0x30
do_syscall_64+0x7b/0x140
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
RIP: 0033:0x7f140d70ea5b
There is no reason to leave dead tasks on SCX when unloading the BPF
scheduler. Fix by making scx_ops_disable_workfn() eject all tasks including
the dead ones from SCX.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Now that put_prev_task_scx() is called with @next on task switches, there's
no reason to use sched_class.switch_class(). Rename switch_class_scx() to
switch_class() and call it from put_prev_task_scx().
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Because the BPF scheduler's dispatch path is invoked from balance(),
sched_ext needs to invoke balance_one() on all sibling rq's before picking
the next task for core-sched.
Before the recent pick_next_task() updates, sched_ext couldn't share pick
task between regular and core-sched paths because pick_next_task() depended
on put_prev_task() being called on the current task. Tasks currently running
on sibling rq's can't be put when one rq is trying to pick the next task, so
pick_task_scx() had to have a separate mechanism to pick between a sibling
rq's current task and the first task in its local DSQ.
However, with the preceding updates, pick_next_task_scx() no longer depends
on the current task being put and can compare the current task and the next
in line statelessly, and the pick task logic should be shareable between
regular and core-sched paths.
Unify regular and core-sched pick task paths:
- There's no reason to distinguish local and sibling picks anymore. @local
is removed from balance_one().
- pick_next_task_scx() is turned into pick_task_scx() by dropping the
put_prev_set_next_task() call.
- The old pick_task_scx() is dropped.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
SCX_TASK_BAL_KEEP is used by balance_one() to tell pick_next_task_scx() to
keep running the current task. It's not really a task property. Replace it
with SCX_RQ_BAL_KEEP which resides in rq->scx.flags and is a better fit for
the usage. Also, the existing clearing rule is unnecessarily strict and
makes it difficult to use with core-sched. Just clear it on entry to
balance_one().
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
fd03c5b858 ("sched: Rework pick_next_task()") changed the definition of
pick_next_task() from:
pick_next_task() := pick_task() + set_next_task(.first = true)
to:
pick_next_task(prev) := pick_task() + put_prev_task() + set_next_task(.first = true)
making invoking put_prev_task() pick_next_task()'s responsibility. This
reordering allows pick_task() to be shared between regular and core-sched
paths and put_prev_task() to know the next task.
sched_ext depended on put_prev_task_scx() enqueueing the current task before
pick_next_task_scx() is called. While pulling sched/core changes,
70cc76aa0d80 ("Merge branch 'tip/sched/core' into for-6.12") added an
explicit put_prev_task_scx() call for SCX tasks in pick_next_task_scx()
before picking the first task as a workaround.
Clean it up and adopt the conventions that other sched classes are
following.
The operation of keeping running the current task was spread and required
the task to be put on the local DSQ before picking:
- balance_one() used SCX_TASK_BAL_KEEP to indicate that the task is still
runnable, hasn't exhausted its slice, and thus should keep running.
- put_prev_task_scx() enqueued the task to local DSQ if SCX_TASK_BAL_KEEP
is set. It also called do_enqueue_task() with SCX_ENQ_LAST if it is the
only runnable task. do_enqueue_task() in turn decided whether to use the
local DSQ depending on SCX_OPS_ENQ_LAST.
Consolidate the logic in balance_one() as it always knows whether it is
going to keep the current task. balance_one() now considers all conditions
where the current task should be kept and uses SCX_TASK_BAL_KEEP to tell
pick_next_task_scx() to keep the current task instead of picking one from
the local DSQ. Accordingly, SCX_ENQ_LAST handling is removed from
put_prev_task_scx() and do_enqueue_task() and pick_next_task_scx() is
updated to pick the current task if SCX_TASK_BAL_KEEP is set.
The workaround put_prev_task[_scx]() calls are replaced with
put_prev_set_next_task().
This causes two behavior changes observable from the BPF scheduler:
- When a task keep running, it no longer goes through enqueue/dequeue cycle
and thus ops.stopping/running() transitions. The new behavior is better
and all the existing schedulers should be able to handle the new behavior.
- The BPF scheduler cannot keep executing the current task by enqueueing
SCX_ENQ_LAST task to the local DSQ. If SCX_OPS_ENQ_LAST is specified, the
BPF scheduler is responsible for resuming execution after each
SCX_ENQ_LAST. SCX_OPS_ENQ_LAST is mostly useful for cases where scheduling
decisions are not made on the local CPU - e.g. central or userspace-driven
schedulin - and the new behavior is more logical and shouldn't pose any
problems. SCX_OPS_ENQ_LAST demonstration from scx_qmap is dropped as it
doesn't fit that well anymore and the last task handling is moved to the
end of qmap_dispatch().
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Cc: Andrea Righi <righi.andrea@gmail.com>
Cc: Changwoo Min <multics69@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Hodges <hodges.daniel.scott@gmail.com>
Cc: Dan Schatzberg <schatzberg.dan@gmail.com>
- Resolve trivial context conflicts from dl_server clearing being moved
around.
- Add @next to put_prev_task_scx() and @prev to pick_next_task_scx() to
match sched/core.
- Merge sched_class->switch_class() addition from sched_ext with
tip/sched/core changes in __pick_next_task().
- Make pick_next_task_scx() call put_prev_task_scx() to emulate the previous
behavior where sched_class->put_prev_task() was called before
sched_class->pick_next_task().
While this makes sched_ext build and function, the behavior is not in line
with other sched classes. The follow-up patches will address the
discrepancies and remove sched_class->switch_class().
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Since 3cf78c5d01 ("sched_ext: Unpin and repin rq lock from
balance_scx()"), sched_ext's balance path terminates rq_pin in the outermost
function. This is simpler and in line with what other balance functions are
doing but it loses control over rq->clock_update_flags which makes
assert_clock_udpated() trigger if other CPUs pins the rq lock.
The only place this matters is touch_core_sched() which uses the timestamp
to order tasks from sibling rq's. Switch to sched_clock_cpu(). Later, it may
be better to use per-core dispatch sequence number.
v2: Use sched_clock_cpu() instead of ktime_get_ns() per David.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Fixes: 3cf78c5d01 ("sched_ext: Unpin and repin rq lock from balance_scx()")
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
When deciding whether a task can be migrated to a CPU,
dispatch_to_local_dsq() was open-coding p->cpus_allowed and scx_rq_online()
tests instead of using task_can_run_on_remote_rq(). This had two problems.
- It was missing is_migration_disabled() check and thus could try to migrate
a task which shouldn't leading to assertion and scheduling failures.
- It was testing p->cpus_ptr directly instead of using task_allowed_on_cpu()
and thus failed to consider ISA compatibility.
Update dispatch_to_local_dsq() to use task_can_run_on_remote_rq():
- Move scx_ops_error() triggering into task_can_run_on_remote_rq().
- When migration isn't allowed, fall back to the global DSQ instead of the
source DSQ by returning DTL_INVALID. This is both simpler and an overall
better behavior.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
consume_remote_task() and dispatch_to_local_dsq() use
move_task_to_local_dsq() to migrate the task to the target CPU. Currently,
move_task_to_local_dsq() expects the caller to lock both the source and
destination rq's. While this may save a few lock operations while the rq's
are not contended, under contention, the double locking can exacerbate the
situation significantly (refer to the linked message below).
Update the migration path so that double locking is not used.
move_task_to_local_dsq() now expects the caller to be locking the source rq,
drops it and then acquires the destination rq lock. Code is simpler this way
and, on a 2-way NUMA machine w/ Xeon Gold 6138, 'hackbench 100 thread 5000`
shows ~3% improvement with scx_simple.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240806082716.GP37996@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
`__bpf_ops_sched_ext_ops` was missing the initialization of some struct
attributes. With
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240722183049.2254692-4-martin.lau@linux.dev/
every single attributes need to be initialized programs (like scx_layered)
will fail to load.
05:26:48 [INFO] libbpf: struct_ops layered: member cgroup_init not found in kernel, skipping it as it's set to zero
05:26:48 [INFO] libbpf: struct_ops layered: member cgroup_exit not found in kernel, skipping it as it's set to zero
05:26:48 [INFO] libbpf: struct_ops layered: member cgroup_prep_move not found in kernel, skipping it as it's set to zero
05:26:48 [INFO] libbpf: struct_ops layered: member cgroup_move not found in kernel, skipping it as it's set to zero
05:26:48 [INFO] libbpf: struct_ops layered: member cgroup_cancel_move not found in kernel, skipping it as it's set to zero
05:26:48 [INFO] libbpf: struct_ops layered: member cgroup_set_weight not found in kernel, skipping it as it's set to zero
05:26:48 [WARN] libbpf: prog 'layered_dump': BPF program load failed: unknown error (-524)
05:26:48 [WARN] libbpf: prog 'layered_dump': -- BEGIN PROG LOAD LOG --
attach to unsupported member dump of struct sched_ext_ops
processed 0 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 0 total_states 0 peak_states 0 mark_read 0
-- END PROG LOAD LOG --
05:26:48 [WARN] libbpf: prog 'layered_dump': failed to load: -524
05:26:48 [WARN] libbpf: failed to load object 'bpf_bpf'
05:26:48 [WARN] libbpf: failed to load BPF skeleton 'bpf_bpf': -524
Error: Failed to load BPF program
Signed-off-by: Manu Bretelle <chantr4@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
sched_ext currently doesn't generate messages when the BPF scheduler is
enabled and disabled unless there are errors. It is useful to have paper
trail. Improve logging around enable/disable:
- Generate info messages on enable and non-error disable.
- Update error exit message formatting so that it's consistent with
non-error message. Also, prefix ei->msg with the BPF scheduler's name to
make it clear where the message is coming from.
- Shorten scx_exit_reason() strings for SCX_EXIT_UNREG* for brevity and
consistency.
v2: Use pr_*() instead of KERN_* consistently. (David)
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Suggested-by: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
scx_rq_online() currently only tests SCX_RQ_ONLINE. This isn't fully correct
- e.g. consume_dispatch_q() uses task_run_on_remote_rq() which tests
scx_rq_online() to see whether the current rq can run the task, and, if so,
calls consume_remote_task() to migrate the task to @rq. While the test
itself was done while locking @rq, @rq can be temporarily unlocked by
consume_remote_task() and nothing prevents SCX_RQ_ONLINE from going offline
before the migration takes place.
To address the issue, add cpu_active() test to scx_rq_online(). There is a
synchronize_rcu() between cpu_active() being cleared and the rq going
offline, so if an on-going scheduling operation sees cpu_active(), the
associated rq is guaranteed to not go offline until the scheduling operation
is complete.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Fixes: 60c27fb59f ("sched_ext: Implement sched_ext_ops.cpu_online/offline()")
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
process_ddsp_deferred_locals() executes deferred direct dispatches to the
local DSQs of remote CPUs. It iterates the tasks on
rq->scx.ddsp_deferred_locals list, removing and calling
dispatch_to_local_dsq() on each. However, the list is protected by the rq
lock that can be dropped by dispatch_to_local_dsq() temporarily, so the list
can be modified during the iteration, which can lead to oopses and other
failures.
Fix it by popping from the head of the list instead of iterating the list.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Fixes: 5b26f7b920 ("sched_ext: Allow SCX_DSQ_LOCAL_ON for direct dispatches")
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
task_can_run_on_remote_rq() is similar to is_cpu_allowed() but there are
subtle differences. It currently open codes all the tests. This is
cumbersome to understand and error-prone in case the intersecting tests need
to be updated.
Factor out the common part - testing whether the task is allowed on the CPU
at all regardless of the CPU state - into task_allowed_on_cpu() and make
both is_cpu_allowed() and SCX's task_can_run_on_remote_rq() use it. As the
code is now linked between the two and each contains only the extra tests
that differ between them, it's less error-prone when the conditions need to
be updated. Also, improve the comment to explain why they are different.
v2: Replace accidental "extern inline" with "static inline" (Peter).
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
scx_task_iter_next_locked() skips tasks whose sched_class is
idle_sched_class. While it has a short comment explaining why it's testing
the sched_class directly isntead of using is_idle_task(), the comment
doesn't sufficiently explain what's going on and why. Improve the comment.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
On SMP, SCX performs dispatch from sched_class->balance(). As balance() was
not available in UP, it instead called the internal balance function from
put_prev_task_scx() and pick_next_task_scx() to emulate the effect, which is
rather nasty.
Enabling sched_class->balance() on UP shouldn't cause any meaningful
overhead. Enable balance() on UP and drop the ugly workaround.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
update_curr_scx() is open coding runtime updates. Use update_curr_common()
instead and avoid unnecessary deviations.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
From 1232da7eced620537a78f19c8cf3d4a3508e2419 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 09:14:52 -1000
p->scx.disallow provides a way for the BPF scheduler to reject certain tasks
from attaching. It's currently allowed for both the load and fork paths;
however, the latter doesn't actually work as p->sched_class is already set
by the time scx_ops_init_task() is called during fork.
This is a convenience feature which is mostly useful from the load path
anyway. Allow it only from the load path.
v2: Trigger scx_ops_error() iff @p->policy == SCHED_EXT to make it a bit
easier for the BPF scheduler (David).
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reported-by: "Zhangqiao (2012 lab)" <zhangqiao22@huawei.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240711110720.1285-1-zhangqiao22@huawei.com
Fixes: 7bb6f0810e ("sched_ext: Allow BPF schedulers to disallow specific tasks from joining SCHED_EXT")
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
scx_dump_task() uses stack_trace_save_tsk() which is only available when
CONFIG_STACKTRACE. Make CONFIG_SCHED_CLASS_EXT select CONFIG_STACKTRACE if
the support is available and skip capturing stack trace if
!CONFIG_STACKTRACE.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202407161844.reewQQrR-lkp@intel.com/
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
We currently only allow calling sleepable scx kfuncs (i.e.
scx_bpf_create_dsq()) from BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS progs. The idea here
was that we'd never have to call scx_bpf_create_dsq() outside of a
sched_ext struct_ops callback, but that might not actually be true. For
example, a scheduler could do something like the following:
1. Open and load (not yet attach) a scheduler skel
2. Synchronously call into a BPF_PROG_TYPE_SYSCALL prog from user space.
For example, to initialize an LLC domain, or some other global,
read-only state.
3. Attach the skel, which actually enables the scheduler
The advantage of doing this is that it can preclude having to do pretty
ugly boilerplate like initializing a read-only, statically sized array of
u64[]'s which the kernel consumes literally once at init time to then
create struct bpf_cpumask objects which are actually queried at runtime.
Doing the above is already possible given that we can invoke core BPF
kfuncs, such as bpf_cpumask_create(), from BPF_PROG_TYPE_SYSCALL progs. We
already allow many scx kfuncs to be called from BPF_PROG_TYPE_SYSCALL progs
(e.g. scx_bpf_kick_cpu()). Let's allow the sleepable kfuncs as well.
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
The type_id is defined as u32type, if(type_id<0) is invalid, hence
modified its type to s32.
./kernel/sched/ext.c:4958:5-12: WARNING: Unsigned expression compared with zero: type_id < 0.
Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
Closes: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=9523
Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
In ops.dispatch(), SCX_DSQ_LOCAL_ON can be used to dispatch the task to the
local DSQ of any CPU. However, during direct dispatch from ops.select_cpu()
and ops.enqueue(), this isn't allowed. This is because dispatching to the
local DSQ of a remote CPU requires locking both the task's current and new
rq's and such double locking can't be done directly from ops.enqueue().
While waking up a task, as ops.select_cpu() can pick any CPU and both
ops.select_cpu() and ops.enqueue() can use SCX_DSQ_LOCAL as the dispatch
target to dispatch to the DSQ of the picked CPU, the BPF scheduler can still
do whatever it wants to do. However, while a task is being enqueued for a
different reason, e.g. after its slice expiration, only ops.enqueue() is
called and there's no way for the BPF scheduler to directly dispatch to the
local DSQ of a remote CPU. This gap in API forces schedulers into
work-arounds which are not straightforward or optimal such as skipping
direct dispatches in such cases.
Implement deferred enqueueing to allow directly dispatching to the local DSQ
of a remote CPU from ops.select_cpu() and ops.enqueue(). Such tasks are
temporarily queued on rq->scx.ddsp_deferred_locals. When the rq lock can be
safely released, the tasks are taken off the list and queued on the target
local DSQs using dispatch_to_local_dsq().
v2: - Add missing return after queue_balance_callback() in
schedule_deferred(). (David).
- dispatch_to_local_dsq() now assumes that @rq is locked but unpinned
and thus no longer takes @rf. Updated accordingly.
- UP build warning fix.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Andrea Righi <righi.andrea@gmail.com>
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Cc: Dan Schatzberg <schatzberg.dan@gmail.com>
Cc: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
SCX_RQ_BALANCING is used to mark that the rq is currently in balance().
Rename it to SCX_RQ_IN_BALANCE and add SCX_RQ_IN_WAKEUP which marks whether
the rq is currently enqueueing for a wakeup. This will be used to implement
direct dispatching to local DSQ of another CPU.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
sched_ext often needs to migrate tasks across CPUs right before execution
and thus uses the balance path to dispatch tasks from the BPF scheduler.
balance_scx() is called with rq locked and pinned but is passed @rf and thus
allowed to unpin and unlock. Currently, @rf is passed down the call stack so
the rq lock is unpinned just when double locking is needed.
This creates unnecessary complications such as having to explicitly
manipulate lock pinning for core scheduling. We also want to use
dispatch_to_local_dsq_lock() from other paths which are called with rq
locked but unpinned.
rq lock handling in the dispatch path is straightforward outside the
migration implementation and extending the pinning protection down the
callstack doesn't add enough meaningful extra protection to justify the
extra complexity.
Unpin and repin rq lock from the outer balance_scx() and drop @rf passing
and lock pinning handling from the inner functions. UP is updated to call
balance_one() instead of balance_scx() to avoid adding NULL @rf handling to
balance_scx(). AS this makes balance_scx() unused in UP, it's put inside a
CONFIG_SMP block.
No functional changes intended outside of lock annotation updates.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrea Righi <righi.andrea@gmail.com>
task_linked_on_dsq() exists as a helper because it used to test both the
rbtree and list nodes. It now only tests the list node and the list node
will soon be used for something else too. The helper doesn't improve
anything materially and the naming will become confusing. Open-code the list
node testing and remove task_linked_on_dsq()
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
When a running task is migrated to another CPU, the stop_task is used to
preempt the running task and migrate it. This, expectedly, invokes
ops.cpu_release(). If the BPF scheduler then calls
scx_bpf_reenqueue_local(), it re-enqueues all tasks on the local DSQ
including the task which is being migrated.
This creates an unnecessary re-enqueue of a task which is about to be
deactivated and re-activated for migration anyway. It can also cause
confusion for the BPF scheduler as scx_bpf_task_cpu() of the task and its
allowed CPUs may not agree while migration is pending.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Fixes: 245254f708 ("sched_ext: Implement sched_ext_ops.cpu_acquire/release()")
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
scx_bpf_reenqueue_local() is used to re-enqueue tasks on the local DSQ from
ops.cpu_release(). Because the BPF scheduler may dispatch tasks to the same
local DSQ, to avoid processing the same tasks repeatedly, it first takes the
number of queued tasks and processes the task at the head of the queue that
number of times.
This is incorrect as a task can be dispatched to the same local DSQ with
SCX_ENQ_HEAD. Such a task will be processed repeatedly until the count is
exhausted and the succeeding tasks won't be processed at all.
Fix it by first moving all candidate tasks to a private list and then
processing that list. While at it, remove the WARNs. They're rather
superflous as later steps will check them anyway.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Fixes: 245254f708 ("sched_ext: Implement sched_ext_ops.cpu_acquire/release()")
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
