The test_memcg_low() testcase in test_memcontrol.c verifies the expected
behavior of groups using the memory.low knob. Part of the testcase
verifies that a group with memory.low that experiences reclaim due to
memory pressure elsewhere in the system, observes memory.events.low events
as a result of that reclaim.
In commit 8a931f8013 ("mm: memcontrol: recursive memory.low
protection"), the memory controller was updated to propagate memory.low
and memory.min protection from a parent group to its children via a
configurable memory_recursiveprot mount option. This unfortunately broke
the memcg tests, which asserts that a sibling that experienced reclaim but
had a memory.low value of 0, would not observe any memory.low events.
This patch updates test_memcg_low() to account for the new behavior
introduced by memory_recursiveprot.
So as to make the test resilient to multiple configurations, the patch
also adds a new proc_mount_contains() helper that checks for a string in
/proc/mounts, and is used to toggle behavior based on whether the default
memory_recursiveprot was present.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220423155619.3669555-3-void@manifault.com
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Test the enforcement of memory.high limit for large amount of memory
allocation within a single kernel entry. There are valid use-cases
where the application can trigger large amount of memory allocation
within a single syscall e.g. mlock() or mmap(MAP_POPULATE).
Make sure memory.high limit enforcement works for such use-cases.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220211064917.2028469-4-shakeelb@google.com
Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Chris Down <chris@chrisdown.name>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
ARRAY_SIZE is defined in several selftests. Remove definitions from
individual test files and include header file for the define instead.
ARRAY_SIZE define is added in a separate patch to prepare for this
change.
Remove ARRAY_SIZE from cgroup_util.h and pickup the one defined in
kselftest.h.
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
as they will be used by the tests for cgroup killing.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210503143922.3093755-4-brauner@kernel.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Expand the cgroup test-suite to include tests for CLONE_INTO_CGROUP.
This adds the following tests:
- CLONE_INTO_CGROUP manages to clone a process directly into a correctly
delegated cgroup
- CLONE_INTO_CGROUP fails to clone a process into a cgroup that has been
removed after we've opened an fd to it
- CLONE_INTO_CGROUP fails to clone a process into an invalid domain
cgroup
- CLONE_INTO_CGROUP adheres to the no internal process constraint
- CLONE_INTO_CGROUP works with the freezer feature
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Add two new tests that verify that thread and threadgroup migrations
work as expected.
Signed-off-by: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Simplify task migration by being oblivious about its PID during
migration. This allows to easily migrate individual threads as well.
This change brings no functional change and prepares grounds for thread
granularity migrating tests.
Signed-off-by: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
This patch implements 9 tests for the freezer controller for
cgroup v2:
1) a simple test, which aims to freeze and unfreeze a cgroup with 100
processes
2) a more complicated tree test, which creates a hierarchy of cgroups,
puts some processes in some cgroups, and tries to freeze and unfreeze
different parts of the subtree
3) a forkbomb test: the test aims to freeze a forkbomb running in a
cgroup, kill all tasks in the cgroup and remove the cgroup without
the unfreezing.
4) rmdir test: the test creates two nested cgroups, freezes the parent
one, checks that the child can be successfully removed, and a new
child can be created
5) migration tests: the test checks migration of a task between
frozen cgroups: from a frozen to a running, from a running to a
frozen, and from a frozen to a frozen.
6) ptrace test: the test checks that it's possible to attach to
a process in a frozen cgroup, get some information and detach, and
the cgroup will remain frozen.
7) stopped test: the test checks that it's possible to freeze a cgroup
with a stopped task
8) ptraced test: the test checks that it's possible to freeze a cgroup
with a ptraced task
9) vfork test: the test checks that it's possible to freeze a cgroup
with a parent process waiting for the child process in vfork()
Expected output:
$ ./test_freezer
ok 1 test_cgfreezer_simple
ok 2 test_cgfreezer_tree
ok 3 test_cgfreezer_forkbomb
ok 4 test_cgrreezer_rmdir
ok 5 test_cgfreezer_migrate
ok 6 test_cgfreezer_ptrace
ok 7 test_cgfreezer_stopped
ok 8 test_cgfreezer_ptraced
ok 9 test_cgfreezer_vfork
Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: kernel-team@fb.com
Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Add tests for memory.oom.group for the following cases:
- Killing all processes in a leaf cgroup, but leaving the
parent untouched
- Killing all processes in a parent and leaf cgroup
- Keeping processes marked by OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MIN alive when considered
for being killed by the group oom killer.
Signed-off-by: Jay Kamat <jgkamat@fb.com>
Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan (Samsung OSG) <shuah@kernel.org>
This commit adds tests for some of the core functionalities
of cgroups v2.
The commit adds tests for some core principles of croup V2 API:
- test_cgcore_internal_process_constraint
Tests internal process constraint.
You can't add a pid to a domain parent if a controller is enabled.
- test_cgcore_top_down_constraint_enable
Tests that you can't enable a controller on a child if it's not enabled
on the parent.
- test_cgcore_top_down_constraint_disable
Tests that you can't disable a controller on a parent if it's
enabled in a child.
- test_cgcore_no_internal_process_constraint_on_threads
Tests that there's no internal process constrain on threaded cgroups.
You can add threads/processes on a parent with a controller enabled.
- test_cgcore_parent_becomes_threaded
Tests that when a child becomes threaded the parent type becomes
domain threaded.
- test_cgcore_invalid_domain
In a situation like:
A (domain threaded) - B (threaded) - C (domain)
it tests that C can't be used until it is turned into a threaded cgroup.
The "cgroup.type" file will report "domain (invalid)" in these cases.
Operations which fail due to invalid topology use EOPNOTSUPP as the errno.
- test_cgcore_populated
In a situation like:
A(0) - B(0) - C(1)
\ D(0)
It tests that A, B and C's "populated" fields would be 1 while D's 0.
It tests that after the one process in C is moved to root, A,B and C's
"populated" fields would flip to "0" and file modified events will
be generated on the "cgroup.events" files of both cgroups.
Signed-off-by: Claudio Zumbo <claudioz@fb.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: kernel-team@fb.com
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan (Samsung OSG) <shuah@kernel.org>
The new test verifies that memory.swap.max and memory.swap.current behave
as expected for simple allocation scenarios
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan (Samsung OSG) <shuah@kernel.org>
Cgroups are used for controlling the physical resource distribution
(memory, CPU, io, etc) and often are used as basic building blocks
for large distributed computing systems. Even small differences
in the actual behavior may lead to significant incidents.
The codebase is under the active development, which will unlikely
stop at any time soon. Also it's scattered over different kernel
subsystems, which makes regressions more probable.
Given that, the lack of any tests is crying.
This patch implements some basic tests for the memory controller,
as well as a minimal required framework. It doesn't pretend for a
very good coverage, but pretends to be a starting point.
Hopefully, any following significant changes will include corresponding
tests.
Tests for CPU and io controllers, as well as cgroup core
are next in the todo list.
Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: kernel-team@fb.com
Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan (Samsung OSG) <shuah@kernel.org>
