Currently, struct arm_pmu and related functions are only visible to
{,arch/arm/}/kernel/perf_event.c. This prevents new drivers from using
the framework.
This patch moves declarations to asm/pmu.h, allowing new PMU drivers
to use the framework.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jamie Iles <jamie@jamieiles.com>
Reviewed-by: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwinc@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Once upon a time, OProfile and Perf fought hard over who could play with
the PMU. To stop all hell from breaking loose, pmu.c offered an internal
reserve/release API and took care of parsing PMU platform data passed in
from board support code.
Now that Perf has ingested OProfile, let's move the platform device
handling into the Perf driver and out of the PMU locking code.
Unfortunately, the lock has to remain to prevent Perf being bitten by
out-of-tree modules such as LTTng, which still claim a right to the PMU
when Perf isn't looking.
Acked-by: Jamie Iles <jamie@jamieiles.com>
Reviewed-by: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Commit f12482c9 ("ARM: 6974/1: pmu: refactor reservation") changed
{release,reserve}_pmu to take an enum arm_pmu_type as a parameter, but
inconsistently named the parameter `type' or `device'. It would be nice
if these were consistent.
This patch makes use of enum arm_pmu_type consistent, always using
`type'. Related printks are updated, explicitly mentioning `type' also.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Commit f12482c9 ("ARM: 6974/1: pmu: refactor reservation") changed the
prototype of release_pmu, but missed the stub for when
CONFIG_CPU_HAS_PMU is not selected by the platform.
This patch changes the prototype of the stub, preventing possible build
failures when CONFIG_CPU_HAS_PMU is not selected.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Currently, PMU platform_device reservation relies on some minor abuse
of the platform_device::id field for determining the type of PMU. This
is problematic for device tree based probing, where the ID cannot be
controlled.
This patch removes reliance on the id field, and depends on each PMU's
platform driver to figure out which type it is. As all PMUs handled by
the current platform_driver name "arm-pmu" are CPU PMUs, this
convention is hardcoded. New PMU types can be supported through the use
of {of,platform}_device_id tables
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Acked-by: Jamie Iles <jamie@jamieiles.com>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Allow a platform-specific IRQ handler to be specified via platform data.
This will be used to implement the single-irq workaround for the DB8500.
Signed-off-by: Rabin Vincent <rabin.vincent@stericsson.com>
Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
The current PMU infrastructure for ARM requires that the IRQs for the PMU
device are fixed at compile time and are selected based on the ARCH_ or MACH_ flags. This has the disadvantage of tying the Kernel down to a
particular board as far as profiling is concerned.
This patch replaces the compile-time IRQ registration with a runtime mechanism which allows the IRQs to be registered with the framework as
a platform_device.
A further advantage of this change is that there is scope for registering
different types of performance counters in the future by changing the id
of the platform_device and attaching different resources to it.
Acked-by: Jamie Iles <jamie.iles@picochip.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
This patch adds an enum describing the potential PMU device types in
preparation for PMU device registration via platform devices.
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
To add support for perf events and to allow the hardware counters to be
shared with oprofile, we need a way to reserve access to the pmu
(performance monitor unit). Platforms with PMU interrupts should
register the interrupts in arch/arm/kernel/pmu.c
Signed-off-by: Jamie Iles <jamie.iles@picochip.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
