rb_node returned by __tree_search() can be a valid pointer or NULL,
but won't be some errno.
Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
When we search a dir item with a specific hash code, we can
just return NULL without further checking if btrfs_search_slot()
returns 1.
Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Since commit f2a97a9dbd
("btrfs: remove all unused functions"), there's no extern functions
at all in ref-cache.c, so just remove the remaining dead code.
Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Use wait_event() when possible to avoid code duplication.
Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
If mounting with nodatasum option, we won't csum file data for
general write or direct-io write, and this rule should also be
applied when writing compressed files.
Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Memory areas [ptr, ptr+total_len] and [name, name+total_len]
may overlap, so it's wrong to use memcpy().
Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
In __btrfs_free_extent we will print the leaf if we fail to find the extent we
wanted, but the problem is if we get an error we won't have a leaf so often this
leads to a NULL pointer dereference and we lose the error that actually
occurred. So only print the leaf if ret > 0, which means we didn't find the
item we were looking for but we didn't error either. This way the error is
preserved.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
This is fairly trivial - btrfs_set_root_node() - always returns zero so we
can just make it void. All callers ignore the return code now anyway. I
also made sure to check that none of the functions that
btrfs_set_root_node() calls returns an error that we might have needed to
catch and pass back.
Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Here I have a two SSD-partitions btrfs, and they are defaultly set to
"data=raid0, metadata=raid1", then I try to fill my btrfs partition
till "No space left on device", via "dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/btrfs/tmp".
I get an oops panic from kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:5199!, which
refers to find_free_extent's
BUG_ON(index != get_block_group_index(block_group));
In SSD mode, in order to find enough space to alloc, we may check the
block_group cache which has been checked sometime before, but the index is not
updated, where it hits the BUG_ON.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
The access for ro in btrfs_block_group_cache should be protected
because of the racy lock in relocation.
Signed-off-by: Wu Bo <wu.bo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
The set/clear bit and the extent split/merge hooks only ever return 0.
Changing them to return void simplifies the error handling cases later.
This patch changes the hook prototypes, the single implementation of each,
and the functions that call them to return void instead.
Since all four of these hooks execute under a spinlock, they're necessarily
simple.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
We passed the wrong value to btrfs_force_ra(). Fix this by changing
the argument of btrfs_force_ra() from last_index to nr_page.
Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
When btrfs_unlink_inode() and btrfs_orphan_add() in btrfs_unlink()
are error, the error code is returned to the caller instead of
BUG_ON().
Signed-off-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Don't need to check the return value of __btrfs_add_inode_defrag(),
since it will always return 0.
Signed-off-by: Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
The btrfs transaction code will return any errors that come from
reserve_metadata_bytes. We need to make sure we don't return funny
things like 1 or EAGAIN.
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Now that we are using regular file crcs for the free space cache,
we can deadlock if we try to read the free_space_inode while we are
updating the crc tree.
This commit fixes things by using the commit_root to read the crcs. This is
safe because we the free space cache file would already be loaded if
that block group had been changed in the current transaction.
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
For metadata buffers that don't straddle pages (all of them), btrfs
can safely use the page uptodate bits and extent_buffer uptodate bit
instead of needing to use the extent_state tree.
This greatly reduces contention on the state tree lock.
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Before the reader/writer locks, btrfs_next_leaf needed to keep
the path blocking to avoid making lockdep upset.
Now that btrfs_next_leaf only takes read locks, this isn't required.
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
This patch was originally from Tejun Heo. lockdep complains about the btrfs
locking because we sometimes take btree locks from two different trees at the
same time. The current classes are based only on level in the btree, which
isn't enough information for lockdep to figure out if the lock is safe.
This patch makes a class for each type of tree, and lumps all the FS trees that
actually have files and directories into the same class.
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
The btrfs metadata btree is the source of significant
lock contention, especially in the root node. This
commit changes our locking to use a reader/writer
lock.
The lock is built on top of rw spinlocks, and it
extends the lock tracking to remember if we have a
read lock or a write lock when we go to blocking. Atomics
count the number of blocking readers or writers at any
given time.
It removes all of the adaptive spinning from the old code
and uses only the spinning/blocking hints inside of btrfs
to decide when it should continue spinning.
In read heavy workloads this is dramatically faster. In write
heavy workloads we're still faster because of less contention
on the root node lock.
We suffer slightly in dbench because we schedule more often
during write locks, but all other benchmarks so far are improved.
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Hit this nice little deadlock. What happens is this
__btrfs_end_transaction with throttle set, --use_count so it equals 0
btrfs_commit_transaction
<somebody else actually manages to start the commit>
btrfs_end_transaction --use_count so now its -1 <== BAD
we just return and wait on the transaction
This is bad because we just return after our use_count is -1 and don't let go
of our num_writer count on the transaction, so the guy committing the
transaction just sits there forever. Fix this by inc'ing our use_count if we're
going to call commit_transaction so that if we call btrfs_end_transaction it's
valid. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
The extent_buffers have a very complex interface where
we use HIGHMEM for metadata and try to cache a kmap mapping
to access the memory.
The next commit adds reader/writer locks, and concurrent use
of this kmap cache would make it even more complex.
This commit drops the ability to use HIGHMEM with extent buffers,
and rips out all of the related code.
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
When we balanced the chunks across the devices, BUG_ON() in
__finish_chunk_alloc() was triggered.
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/volumes.c:2568!
[SNIP]
Call Trace:
[<ffffffffa049525e>] btrfs_alloc_chunk+0x8e/0xa0 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa04546b0>] do_chunk_alloc+0x330/0x3a0 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa045c654>] btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb4/0x1f0 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa045c86b>] btrfs_alloc_free_block+0xdb/0x350 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa048a8d8>] ? read_extent_buffer+0xd8/0x1d0 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa04476fd>] __btrfs_cow_block+0x14d/0x5e0 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa044660d>] ? read_block_for_search+0x14d/0x4d0 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa0447c9b>] btrfs_cow_block+0x10b/0x240 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa044dd5e>] btrfs_search_slot+0x49e/0x7a0 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa044f07d>] btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x8d/0xf0 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa045e973>] insert_with_overflow+0x43/0x110 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa045eb0d>] btrfs_insert_dir_item+0xcd/0x1f0 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa0489bd0>] ? map_extent_buffer+0xb0/0xc0 [btrfs]
[<ffffffff812276ad>] ? rb_insert_color+0x9d/0x160
[<ffffffffa046cc40>] ? inode_tree_add+0xf0/0x150 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa0474801>] btrfs_add_link+0xc1/0x1c0 [btrfs]
[<ffffffff811dacac>] ? security_inode_init_security+0x1c/0x30
[<ffffffffa04a28aa>] ? btrfs_init_acl+0x4a/0x180 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa047492f>] btrfs_add_nondir+0x2f/0x70 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa046af16>] ? btrfs_init_inode_security+0x46/0x60 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa0474ac0>] btrfs_create+0x150/0x1d0 [btrfs]
[<ffffffff81159c63>] ? generic_permission+0x23/0xb0
[<ffffffff8115b415>] vfs_create+0xa5/0xc0
[<ffffffff8115ce6e>] do_last+0x5fe/0x880
[<ffffffff8115dc0d>] path_openat+0xcd/0x3d0
[<ffffffff8115e029>] do_filp_open+0x49/0xa0
[<ffffffff8116a965>] ? alloc_fd+0x95/0x160
[<ffffffff8114f0c7>] do_sys_open+0x107/0x1e0
[<ffffffff810bcc3f>] ? audit_syscall_entry+0x1bf/0x1f0
[<ffffffff8114f1e0>] sys_open+0x20/0x30
[<ffffffff81484ec2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[SNIP]
RIP [<ffffffffa049444a>] __finish_chunk_alloc+0x20a/0x220 [btrfs]
The reason is:
Task1 Space balance task
do_chunk_alloc()
__finish_chunk_alloc()
update device info
in the chunk tree
alloc system metadata block
relocate system metadata block group
set system metadata block group
readonly, This block group is the
only one that can allocate space. So
there is no free space that can be
allocated now.
find no space and don't try
to alloc new chunk, and then
return ENOSPC
BUG_ON() in __finish_chunk_alloc()
was triggered.
Fix this bug by allocating a new system metadata chunk before relocating the
old one if we find there is no free space which can be allocated after setting
the old block group to be read-only.
Reported-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Everybody else does this, we need to do it too. If we're syncing, we need to
tag the pages we're going to write for writeback so we don't end up writing the
same stuff over and over again if somebody is constantly redirtying our file.
This will keep us from having latencies with heavy sync workloads. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
So I had this brilliant idea to use atomic counters for outstanding and reserved
extents, but this turned out to be a bad idea. Consider this where we have 1
outstanding extent and 1 reserved extent
Reserver Releaser
atomic_dec(outstanding) now 0
atomic_read(outstanding)+1 get 1
atomic_read(reserved) get 1
don't actually reserve anything because
they are the same
atomic_cmpxchg(reserved, 1, 0)
atomic_inc(outstanding)
atomic_add(0, reserved)
free reserved space for 1 extent
Then the reserver now has no actual space reserved for it, and when it goes to
finish the ordered IO it won't have enough space to do it's allocation and you
get those lovely warnings.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Kill the check to see if we have 512mb of reserved space in delalloc and
shrink_delalloc if we do. This causes unexpected latencies and we have other
logic to see if we need to throttle. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
grab_cache_page will use mapping_gfp_mask(), which for all inodes is set to
GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE. So instead use find_or_create_page in all cases where we
need GFP_NOFS so we don't deadlock. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
A user reported a deadlock when copying a bunch of files. This is because they
were low on memory and kthreadd got hung up trying to migrate pages for an
allocation when starting the caching kthread. The page was locked by the person
starting the caching kthread. To fix this we just need to use the async thread
stuff so that the threads are already created and we don't have to worry about
deadlocks. Thanks,
Reported-by: Roman Mamedov <rm@romanrm.ru>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
In addition to properly handling allocation failure from btrfs_alloc_path, I
also fixed up the kzalloc error handling code immediately below it.
Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
I also removed the BUG_ON from error return of find_next_chunk in
init_first_rw_device(). It turns out that the only caller of
init_first_rw_device() also BUGS on any nonzero return so no actual behavior
change has occurred here.
do_chunk_alloc() also needed an update since it calls btrfs_alloc_chunk()
which can now return -ENOMEM. Instead of setting space_info->full on any
error from btrfs_alloc_chunk() I catch and return every error value _except_
-ENOSPC. Thanks goes to Tsutomu Itoh for pointing that issue out.
Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
It seems to hurt performance in real life. Yes, the inode will be used
later, but the conditional doesn't seem to predict all that well
(negative dentries are not uncommon) and it looks like the cost of
prefetching is simply higher than depending on the cache doing the right
thing.
As usual.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
The compiler, at least for ix86 and m68k, validly warns that the
comparison:
next <= (loff_t)-1
is always true (and it's always true also for x86-64 and probably all
other arches - as long as pgoff_t isn't wider than loff_t). The
intention appears to be to avoid wrapping of "next", so rather than
eliminating the pointless comparison, fix the loop to indeed get exited
when "next" would otherwise wrap.
On m68k the following warning is observed:
fs/fscache/page.c: In function '__fscache_uncache_all_inode_pages':
fs/fscache/page.c:979: warning: comparison is always false due to limited range of data type
Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Reported-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@suse.de>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Assume that /sys/kernel/debug/dummy64 is debugfs file created by
debugfs_create_x64().
# cd /sys/kernel/debug
# echo 0x1234567812345678 > dummy64
# cat dummy64
0x0000000012345678
# echo 0x80000000 > dummy64
# cat dummy64
0xffffffff80000000
A value larger than INT_MAX cannot be written to the debugfs file created
by debugfs_create_u64 or debugfs_create_x64 on 32bit machine. Because
simple_attr_write() uses simple_strtol() for the conversion.
To fix this, use simple_strtoll() instead.
Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs-2.6:
vfs: fix race in rcu lookup of pruned dentry
Fix cifs_get_root()
[ Edited the last commit to get rid of a 'unused variable "seq"'
warning due to Al editing the patch. - Linus ]
Don't update *inode in __follow_mount_rcu() until we'd verified that
there is mountpoint there. Kudos to Hugh Dickins for catching that
one in the first place and eventually figuring out the solution (and
catching a braino in the earlier version of patch).
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Add missing ->i_mutex, convert to lookup_one_len() instead of
(broken) open-coded analog, cope with getting something like
a//b as relative pathname. Simplify the hell out of it, while
we are there...
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
... and it's getting it wrong, too - missing ->d_revalidate() calls when
it's dealing with filesystem (procfs) that has non-trivial ->d_revalidate()...
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
* git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sfrench/cifs-2.6:
[CIFS] update cifs to version 1.74
[CIFS] update limit for snprintf in cifs_construct_tcon
cifs: Fix signing failure when server mandates signing for NTLMSSP
