The new SMC Calling Convention (v1.1) allows for a reduced overhead
when calling into the firmware, and provides a new feature discovery
mechanism.
Make it visible to KVM guests.
Tested-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
As we're about to update the PSCI support, and because I'm lazy,
let's move the PSCI include file to include/kvm so that both
ARM architectures can find it.
Acked-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
KVM doesn't follow the SMCCC when it comes to unimplemented calls,
and inject an UNDEF instead of returning an error. Since firmware
calls are now used for security mitigation, they are becoming more
common, and the undef is counter productive.
Instead, let's follow the SMCCC which states that -1 must be returned
to the caller when getting an unknown function number.
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Tested-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
This implements the kvm_arch_vcpu_in_kernel() for ARM, and adjusts
the calls to kvm_vcpu_on_spin().
Signed-off-by: Longpeng(Mike) <longpeng2@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
If a vcpu exits due to request a user mode spinlock, then
the spinlock-holder may be preempted in user mode or kernel mode.
(Note that not all architectures trap spin loops in user mode,
only AMD x86 and ARM/ARM64 currently do).
But if a vcpu exits in kernel mode, then the holder must be
preempted in kernel mode, so we should choose a vcpu in kernel mode
as a more likely candidate for the lock holder.
This introduces kvm_arch_vcpu_in_kernel() to decide whether the
vcpu is in kernel-mode when it's preempted. kvm_vcpu_on_spin's
new argument says the same of the spinning VCPU.
Signed-off-by: Longpeng(Mike) <longpeng2@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
arm/arm64 already has one VCPU request used when setting pause,
but it doesn't properly check requests in VCPU RUN. Check it
and also make sure we set vcpu->mode at the appropriate time
(before the check) and with the appropriate barriers. See
Documentation/virtual/kvm/vcpu-requests.rst. Also make sure we
don't leave any vcpu requests we don't intend to handle later
set in the request bitmap. If we don't clear them, then
kvm_request_pending() may return true when it shouldn't.
Using VCPU requests properly fixes a small race where pause
could get set just as a VCPU was entering guest mode.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
Hardware debugging in guests is not intercepted currently, it means
that a malicious guest can bring down the entire machine by writing
to the debug registers.
This patch enable trapping of all debug registers, preventing the
guests to access the debug registers. This includes access to the
debug mode(DBGDSCR) in the guest world all the time which could
otherwise mess with the host state. Reads return 0 and writes are
ignored (RAZ_WI).
The result is the guest cannot detect any working hardware based debug
support. As debug exceptions are still routed to the guest normal
debug using software based breakpoints still works.
To support debugging using hardware registers we need to implement a
debug register aware world switch as well as special trapping for
registers that may affect the host state.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Zhichao Huang <zhichao.huang@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
Should kvm_reboot() be invoked while guest is running, an IPI
wil be issued, forcing the guest to exit and HYP being reset to
the stubs. We will then try to reenter the guest, only to get
an error (HVC_STUB_ERR).
This patch allows this case to be gracefully handled by exiting
the run loop.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
Currently we BUG() if we see a HSR.EC value we don't recognise. As
configurable disables/enables are added to the architecture (controlled
by RES1/RES0 bits respectively), with associated synchronous exceptions,
it may be possible for a guest to trigger exceptions with classes that
we don't recognise.
While we can't service these exceptions in a manner useful to the guest,
we can avoid bringing down the host. Per ARM DDI 0406C.c, all currently
unallocated HSR EC encodings are reserved, and per ARM DDI
0487A.k_iss10775, page G6-4395, EC values within the range 0x00 - 0x2c
are reserved for future use with synchronous exceptions, and EC values
within the range 0x2d - 0x3f may be used for either synchronous or
asynchronous exceptions.
The patch makes KVM handle any unknown EC by injecting an UNDEFINED
exception into the guest, with a corresponding (ratelimited) warning in
the host dmesg. We could later improve on this with with a new (opt-in)
exit to the host userspace.
Cc: Dave Martin <dave.martin@arm.com>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Both data and prefetch aborts occuring in HYP lead to a well
deserved panic. Let's get rid of these silly handlers.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
If we have caught an Abort whilst exiting, we've tagged the
exit code with the pending information. In that case, let's
re-inject the error into the guest, after having adjusted
the PC if required.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
If we've exited the guest because it has triggered an asynchronous
abort, a possible course of action is to let it know it screwed up
by giving it a Virtual Abort to chew on.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
These are now handled as a panic, so there is little point in
keeping them around.
Acked-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
This field was never populated, and the panic code already
does something similar. Delete the related code.
Acked-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
It would add guest exit statistics to debugfs, this can be helpful
while measuring KVM performance.
[ Renamed some of the field names - Christoffer ]
Signed-off-by: Amit Singh Tomar <amittomer25@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Currently the trace printk talks about "wfi" only, though the trace
point triggers both on wfi and wfe traps.
Add a parameter to differentiate between the two.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Wei Huang <wei@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
The architecture specifies that when the processor wakes up from a WFE
or WFI instruction, the instruction is considered complete, however we
currrently return to EL1 (or EL0) at the WFI/WFE instruction itself.
While most guests may not be affected by this because their local
exception handler performs an exception returning setting the event bit
or with an interrupt pending, some guests like UEFI will get wedged due
this little mishap.
Simply skip the instruction when we have completed the emulation.
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Currently, the kvm_psci_call() returns 'true' or 'false' based on whether
the PSCI function call was handled successfully or not. This does not help
us emulate system-level PSCI functions where the actual emulation work will
be done by user space (QEMU or KVMTOOL). Examples of such system-level PSCI
functions are: PSCI v0.2 SYSTEM_OFF and SYSTEM_RESET.
This patch updates kvm_psci_call() to return three types of values:
1) > 0 (success)
2) = 0 (success but exit to user space)
3) < 0 (errors)
Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup.patel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar <pranavkumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
trace.h was included twice. Remove duplicate inclusion.
Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Update comments to reflect what is really going on and add the TWE bit
to the comments in kvm_arm.h.
Also renames the function to kvm_handle_wfx like is done on arm64 for
consistency and uber-correctness.
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
On an (even slightly) oversubscribed system, spinlocks are quickly
becoming a bottleneck, as some vcpus are spinning, waiting for a
lock to be released, while the vcpu holding the lock may not be
running at all.
This creates contention, and the observed slowdown is 40x for
hackbench. No, this isn't a typo.
The solution is to trap blocking WFEs and tell KVM that we're
now spinning. This ensures that other vpus will get a scheduling
boost, allowing the lock to be released more quickly. Also, using
CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_CPU_RELAX_INTERCEPT slightly improves the performance
when the VM is severely overcommited.
Quick test to estimate the performance: hackbench 1 process 1000
2xA15 host (baseline): 1.843s
2xA15 guest w/o patch: 2.083s
4xA15 guest w/o patch: 80.212s
8xA15 guest w/o patch: Could not be bothered to find out
2xA15 guest w/ patch: 2.102s
4xA15 guest w/ patch: 3.205s
8xA15 guest w/ patch: 6.887s
So we go from a 40x degradation to 1.5x in the 2x overcommit case,
which is vaguely more acceptable.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Currently, kvmtool unconditionally declares that HVC should be used
to call PSCI, so the function numbers in the DT tell the guest
nothing about the function ID namespace or calling convention for
SMC.
We already assume that the guest will examine and honour the DT,
since there is no way it could possibly guess the KVM-specific PSCI
function IDs otherwise. So let's not encourage guests to violate
what's specified in the DT by using SMC to make the call.
[ Modified to apply to top of kvm/arm tree - Christoffer ]
Signed-off-by: Dave P Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@cs.columbia.edu>
Pull ARM updates from Russell King:
"The major items included in here are:
- MCPM, multi-cluster power management, part of the infrastructure
required for ARMs big.LITTLE support.
- A rework of the ARM KVM code to allow re-use by ARM64.
- Error handling cleanups of the IS_ERR_OR_NULL() madness and fixes
of that stuff for arch/arm
- Preparatory patches for Cortex-M3 support from Uwe Kleine-König.
There is also a set of three patches in here from Hugh/Catalin to
address freeing of inappropriate page tables on LPAE. You already
have these from akpm, but they were already part of my tree at the
time he sent them, so unfortunately they'll end up with duplicate
commits"
* 'for-linus' of git://git.linaro.org/people/rmk/linux-arm: (77 commits)
ARM: EXYNOS: remove unnecessary use of IS_ERR_VALUE()
ARM: IMX: remove unnecessary use of IS_ERR_VALUE()
ARM: OMAP: use consistent error checking
ARM: cleanup: OMAP hwmod error checking
ARM: 7709/1: mcpm: Add explicit AFLAGS to support v6/v7 multiplatform kernels
ARM: 7700/2: Make cpu_init() notrace
ARM: 7702/1: Set the page table freeing ceiling to TASK_SIZE
ARM: 7701/1: mm: Allow arch code to control the user page table ceiling
ARM: 7703/1: Disable preemption in broadcast_tlb*_a15_erratum()
ARM: mcpm: provide an interface to set the SMP ops at run time
ARM: mcpm: generic SMP secondary bringup and hotplug support
ARM: mcpm_head.S: vlock-based first man election
ARM: mcpm: Add baremetal voting mutexes
ARM: mcpm: introduce helpers for platform coherency exit/setup
ARM: mcpm: introduce the CPU/cluster power API
ARM: multi-cluster PM: secondary kernel entry code
ARM: cacheflush: add synchronization helpers for mixed cache state accesses
ARM: cpu hotplug: remove majority of cache flushing from platforms
ARM: smp: flush L1 cache in cpu_die()
ARM: tegra: remove tegra specific cpu_disable()
...
This one got lost in the move to handle_exit, so let's reintroduce it
using an accessor to the immediate value field like the other ones.
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@cs.columbia.edu>
The exit handler selection code cannot be shared with arm64
(two different modes, more exception classes...).
Move it to a separate file (handle_exit.c).
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@cs.columbia.edu>
