There are not users of mutex_trylock_recursive() in tree as of
v5.11-rc7.
Remove it.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210210085248.219210-2-bigeasy@linutronix.de
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: lock_is_held_type()+0x107: call to warn_bogus_irq_restore() leaves .noinstr.text section
As per the general rule that WARNs are allowed to violate noinstr to
get out, annotate it away.
Fixes: 997acaf6b4 ("lockdep: report broken irq restoration")
Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> # build-tested
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YCKyYg53mMp4E7YI@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
Commit f6f48e1804 ("lockdep: Teach lockdep about "USED" <- "IN-NMI"
inversions") overlooked that print_usage_bug() releases the graph_lock
and called it without the graph lock held.
Fixes: f6f48e1804 ("lockdep: Teach lockdep about "USED" <- "IN-NMI" inversions")
Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YBfkuyIfB1+VRxXP@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
This is a leftover from 7f26482a87 ("locking/percpu-rwsem: Remove the embedded rwsem")
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210126101721.976027-1-nborisov@suse.com
To fix the following issues:
kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:1612: warning: Function parameter or member
'lock' not described in '__rt_mutex_futex_unlock'
kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:1612: warning: Function parameter or member
'wake_q' not described in '__rt_mutex_futex_unlock'
kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:1675: warning: Function parameter or member
'name' not described in '__rt_mutex_init'
kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:1675: warning: Function parameter or member
'key' not described in '__rt_mutex_init'
[ tglx: Change rt lock to rt_mutex for consistency sake ]
Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1605257895-5536-2-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com
Nothing uses the argument. Remove it as preparation to use
pi_state_update_owner().
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
We generally expect local_irq_save() and local_irq_restore() to be
paired and sanely nested, and so local_irq_restore() expects to be
called with irqs disabled. Thus, within local_irq_restore() we only
trace irq flag changes when unmasking irqs.
This means that a sequence such as:
| local_irq_disable();
| local_irq_save(flags);
| local_irq_enable();
| local_irq_restore(flags);
... is liable to break things, as the local_irq_restore() would mask
irqs without tracing this change. Similar problems may exist for
architectures whose arch_irq_restore() function depends on being called
with irqs disabled.
We don't consider such sequences to be a good idea, so let's define
those as forbidden, and add tooling to detect such broken cases.
This patch adds debug code to WARN() when raw_local_irq_restore() is
called with irqs enabled. As raw_local_irq_restore() is expected to pair
with raw_local_irq_save(), it should never be called with irqs enabled.
To avoid the possibility of circular header dependencies between
irqflags.h and bug.h, the warning is handled in a separate C file.
The new code is all conditional on a new CONFIG_DEBUG_IRQFLAGS symbol
which is independent of CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS. As noted above such cases
will confuse lockdep, so CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKDEP now selects
CONFIG_DEBUG_IRQFLAGS.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210111153707.10071-1-mark.rutland@arm.com
The purpose of local_lock_t is to abstract: preempt_disable() /
local_bh_disable() / local_irq_disable(). These are the traditional
means of gaining access to per-cpu data, but are fundamentally
non-preemptible.
local_lock_t provides a per-cpu lock, that on !PREEMPT_RT reduces to
no-ops, just like regular spinlocks do on UP.
This gives rise to:
CPU0 CPU1
local_lock(B) spin_lock_irq(A)
<IRQ>
spin_lock(A) local_lock(B)
Where lockdep then figures things will lock up; which would be true if
B were any other kind of lock. However this is a false positive, no
such deadlock actually exists.
For !RT the above local_lock(B) is preempt_disable(), and there's
obviously no deadlock; alternatively, CPU0's B != CPU1's B.
For RT the argument is that since local_lock() nests inside
spin_lock(), it cannot be used in hardirq context, and therefore CPU0
cannot in fact happen. Even though B is a real lock, it is a
preemptible lock and any threaded-irq would simply schedule out and
let the preempted task (which holds B) continue such that the task on
CPU1 can make progress, after which the threaded-irq resumes and can
finish.
This means that we can never form an IRQ inversion on a local_lock
dependency, so terminate the graph walk when looking for IRQ
inversions when we encounter one.
One consequence is that (for LOCKDEP_SMALL) when we look for redundant
dependencies, A -> B is not redundant in the presence of A -> L -> B.
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
[peterz: Changelog]
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
In preparation for adding an TRACE_IRQFLAGS dependent skip function to
check_redundant(), move it below the TRACE_IRQFLAGS #ifdef.
While there, provide a stub function to reduce #ifdef usage.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Some __bfs() walks will have additional iteration constraints (beyond
the path being strong). Provide an additional function to allow
terminating graph walks.
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
The local_lock_t's are special, because they cannot form IRQ
inversions, make sure we can tell them apart from the rest of the
locks.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
When the compiler doesn't feel like inlining, it causes a noinstr
fail:
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: lock_is_held_type()+0xb: call to lockdep_enabled() leaves .noinstr.text section
Fixes: 4d004099a6 ("lockdep: Fix lockdep recursion")
Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210106144017.592595176@infradead.org
- A few extensions to the rwsem API and support for opportunistic
spinning and lock stealing
- lockdep selftest improvements
- Documentation updates
- Cleanups and small fixes all over the place
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=uqcN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'locking-core-2020-12-14' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Pull locking updates from Thomas Gleixner:
"A moderate set of locking updates:
- A few extensions to the rwsem API and support for opportunistic
spinning and lock stealing
- lockdep selftest improvements
- Documentation updates
- Cleanups and small fixes all over the place"
* tag 'locking-core-2020-12-14' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (21 commits)
seqlock: kernel-doc: Specify when preemption is automatically altered
seqlock: Prefix internal seqcount_t-only macros with a "do_"
Documentation: seqlock: s/LOCKTYPE/LOCKNAME/g
locking/rwsem: Remove reader optimistic spinning
locking/rwsem: Enable reader optimistic lock stealing
locking/rwsem: Prevent potential lock starvation
locking/rwsem: Pass the current atomic count to rwsem_down_read_slowpath()
locking/rwsem: Fold __down_{read,write}*()
locking/rwsem: Introduce rwsem_write_trylock()
locking/rwsem: Better collate rwsem_read_trylock()
rwsem: Implement down_read_interruptible
rwsem: Implement down_read_killable_nested
refcount: Fix a kernel-doc markup
completion: Drop init_completion define
atomic: Update MAINTAINERS
atomic: Delete obsolete documentation
seqlock: Rename __seqprop() users
lockdep/selftest: Add spin_nest_lock test
lockdep/selftests: Fix PROVE_RAW_LOCK_NESTING
seqlock: avoid -Wshadow warnings
...
RCU:
- Avoid cpuinfo-induced IPI pileups and idle-CPU IPIs.
- Lockdep-RCU updates reducing the need for __maybe_unused.
- Tasks-RCU updates.
- Miscellaneous fixes.
- Documentation updates.
- Torture-test updates.
KCSAN:
- updates for selftests, avoiding setting watchpoints on NULL pointers
- fix to watchpoint encoding
LKMM:
- updates for documentation along with some updates to example-code
litmus tests
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQJHBAABCgAxFiEEQp8+kY+LLUocC4bMphj1TA10mKEFAl/Xon4THHRnbHhAbGlu
dXRyb25peC5kZQAKCRCmGPVMDXSYobXUD/92LJTI/TMgK6Z6EEQBiJZO/2mNKjK8
FEKc6AqTNMlZNsWCfQ5UgqtHpn+MkBZsX1x4u22gehE1qaCB8gnQ5wXgbXon8tQm
exxVk6vvQZjseeqCMqrsUYQlD7dNgHnf1qAmWXJvji4sA/1Opo6n2M74tqfE2ueV
S5hpQwSuK/6Zu2Hrr62HD8+Fx0in6ZuKRZxHGp1392l++DGbniJM3dzntRXB+JbZ
w3PDHFCQuGzTytyeKuQV48ot9IK+2YzmjIp/+4tHL6mvU38xeSu6gcYtqKPcfYWw
D6HXvDa965h5IrFdSA2JWSzjJ+VYgZVElk2HyXDNIae0fM/8GidgoIDQipT1WAur
sxW/Ke4U6Jm5MMqXqV8iMNduktkGD1/h6G/iB1Yis29xFdthorNpbHVAP+8cKXgf
1cR6RorOuBYv6XpyzygHtE7qfLY5ST352pJ4+UqNzboujOcuEnGaygttt0F/F8sA
ZH8NT5dyUfbGeqepdZWkbj116Hjeg3fyV3CZeyBhDeqpjf1Nn3nbJ1xRksPLfa3i
IKvN7HSzEg+vKnsJNnQeFlAmQ/W3n2bedzRqfaCg77pNhKI6jPuavY5f2YGFUj0y
yx0UzOYoI1Cln0keBMmynbyUKgJ7zstLkrt/JenjhtD3B+0df5BmYjkL+nqkP6ax
+XTCu7Xg+B061g==
=N/iO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'core-rcu-2020-12-14' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Pull RCU updates from Thomas Gleixner:
"RCU, LKMM and KCSAN updates collected by Paul McKenney.
RCU:
- Avoid cpuinfo-induced IPI pileups and idle-CPU IPIs
- Lockdep-RCU updates reducing the need for __maybe_unused
- Tasks-RCU updates
- Miscellaneous fixes
- Documentation updates
- Torture-test updates
KCSAN:
- updates for selftests, avoiding setting watchpoints on NULL pointers
- fix to watchpoint encoding
LKMM:
- updates for documentation along with some updates to example-code
litmus tests"
* tag 'core-rcu-2020-12-14' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (72 commits)
srcu: Take early exit on memory-allocation failure
rcu/tree: Defer kvfree_rcu() allocation to a clean context
rcu: Do not report strict GPs for outgoing CPUs
rcu: Fix a typo in rcu_blocking_is_gp() header comment
rcu: Prevent lockdep-RCU splats on lock acquisition/release
rcu/tree: nocb: Avoid raising softirq for offloaded ready-to-execute CBs
rcu,ftrace: Fix ftrace recursion
rcu/tree: Make struct kernel_param_ops definitions const
rcu/tree: Add a warning if CPU being onlined did not report QS already
rcu: Clarify nocb kthreads naming in RCU_NOCB_CPU config
rcu: Fix single-CPU check in rcu_blocking_is_gp()
rcu: Implement rcu_segcblist_is_offloaded() config dependent
list.h: Update comment to explicitly note circular lists
rcu: Panic after fixed number of stalls
x86/smpboot: Move rcu_cpu_starting() earlier
rcu: Allow rcu_irq_enter_check_tick() from NMI
tools/memory-model: Label MP tests' producers and consumers
tools/memory-model: Use "buf" and "flag" for message-passing tests
tools/memory-model: Add types to litmus tests
tools/memory-model: Add a glossary of LKMM terms
...
Reader optimistic spinning is helpful when the reader critical section
is short and there aren't that many readers around. It also improves
the chance that a reader can get the lock as writer optimistic spinning
disproportionally favors writers much more than readers.
Since commit d3681e269f ("locking/rwsem: Wake up almost all readers
in wait queue"), all the waiting readers are woken up so that they can
all get the read lock and run in parallel. When the number of contending
readers is large, allowing reader optimistic spinning will likely cause
reader fragmentation where multiple smaller groups of readers can get
the read lock in a sequential manner separated by writers. That reduces
reader parallelism.
One possible way to address that drawback is to limit the number of
readers (preferably one) that can do optimistic spinning. These readers
act as representatives of all the waiting readers in the wait queue as
they will wake up all those waiting readers once they get the lock.
Alternatively, as reader optimistic lock stealing has already enhanced
fairness to readers, it may be easier to just remove reader optimistic
spinning and simplifying the optimistic spinning code as a result.
Performance measurements (locking throughput kops/s) using a locking
microbenchmark with 50/50 reader/writer distribution and turbo-boost
disabled was done on a 2-socket Cascade Lake system (48-core 96-thread)
to see the impacts of these changes:
1) Vanilla - 5.10-rc3 kernel
2) Before - 5.10-rc3 kernel with previous patches in this series
2) limit-rspin - 5.10-rc3 kernel with limited reader spinning patch
3) no-rspin - 5.10-rc3 kernel with reader spinning disabled
# of threads CS Load Vanilla Before limit-rspin no-rspin
------------ ------- ------- ------ ----------- --------
2 1 5,185 5,662 5,214 5,077
4 1 5,107 4,983 5,188 4,760
8 1 4,782 4,564 4,720 4,628
16 1 4,680 4,053 4,567 3,402
32 1 4,299 1,115 1,118 1,098
64 1 3,218 983 1,001 957
96 1 1,938 944 957 930
2 20 2,008 2,128 2,264 1,665
4 20 1,390 1,033 1,046 1,101
8 20 1,472 1,155 1,098 1,213
16 20 1,332 1,077 1,089 1,122
32 20 967 914 917 980
64 20 787 874 891 858
96 20 730 836 847 844
2 100 372 356 360 355
4 100 492 425 434 392
8 100 533 537 529 538
16 100 548 572 568 598
32 100 499 520 527 537
64 100 466 517 526 512
96 100 406 497 506 509
The column "CS Load" represents the number of pause instructions issued
in the locking critical section. A CS load of 1 is extremely short and
is not likey in real situations. A load of 20 (moderate) and 100 (long)
are more realistic.
It can be seen that the previous patches in this series have reduced
performance in general except in highly contended cases with moderate
or long critical sections that performance improves a bit. This change
is mostly caused by the "Prevent potential lock starvation" patch that
reduce reader optimistic spinning and hence reduce reader fragmentation.
The patch that further limit reader optimistic spinning doesn't seem to
have too much impact on overall performance as shown in the benchmark
data.
The patch that disables reader optimistic spinning shows reduced
performance at lightly loaded cases, but comparable or slightly better
performance on with heavier contention.
This patch just removes reader optimistic spinning for now. As readers
are not going to do optimistic spinning anymore, we don't need to
consider if the OSQ is empty or not when doing lock stealing.
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201121041416.12285-6-longman@redhat.com
If the optimistic spinning queue is empty and the rwsem does not have
the handoff or write-lock bits set, it is actually not necessary to
call rwsem_optimistic_spin() to spin on it. Instead, it can steal the
lock directly as its reader bias is in the count already. If it is
the first reader in this state, it will try to wake up other readers
in the wait queue.
With this patch applied, the following were the lock event counts
after rebooting a 2-socket system and a "make -j96" kernel rebuild.
rwsem_opt_rlock=4437
rwsem_rlock=29
rwsem_rlock_steal=19
So lock stealing represents about 0.4% of all the read locks acquired
in the slow path.
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201121041416.12285-4-longman@redhat.com
The lock handoff bit is added in commit 4f23dbc1e6 ("locking/rwsem:
Implement lock handoff to prevent lock starvation") to avoid lock
starvation. However, allowing readers to do optimistic spinning does
introduce an unlikely scenario where lock starvation can happen.
The lock handoff bit may only be set when a waiter is being woken up.
In the case of reader unlock, wakeup happens only when the reader count
reaches 0. If there is a continuous stream of incoming readers acquiring
read lock via optimistic spinning, it is possible that the reader count
may never reach 0 and so the handoff bit will never be asserted.
One way to prevent this scenario from happening is to disallow optimistic
spinning if the rwsem is currently owned by readers. If the previous
or current owner is a writer, optimistic spinning will be allowed.
If the previous owner is a reader but the reader count has reached 0
before, a wakeup should have been issued. So the handoff mechanism
will be kicked in to prevent lock starvation. As a result, it should
be OK to do optimistic spinning in this case.
This patch may have some impact on reader performance as it reduces
reader optimistic spinning especially if the lock critical sections
are short the number of contending readers are small.
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201121041416.12285-3-longman@redhat.com
The atomic count value right after reader count increment can be useful
to determine the rwsem state at trylock time. So the count value is
passed down to rwsem_down_read_slowpath() to be used when appropriate.
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201121041416.12285-2-longman@redhat.com
In preparation for converting exec_update_mutex to a rwsem so that
multiple readers can execute in parallel and not deadlock, add
down_read_interruptible. This is needed for perf_event_open to be
converted (with no semantic changes) from working on a mutex to
wroking on a rwsem.
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/87k0tybqfy.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org
In preparation for converting exec_update_mutex to a rwsem so that
multiple readers can execute in parallel and not deadlock, add
down_read_killable_nested. This is needed so that kcmp_lock
can be converted from working on a mutexes to working on rw_semaphores.
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/87o8jabqh3.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org
A warning was hit when running xfstests/generic/068 in a Hyper-V guest:
[...] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[...] DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(lockdep_hardirqs_enabled())
[...] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 1350 at kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5280 check_flags.part.0+0x165/0x170
[...] ...
[...] Workqueue: events pwq_unbound_release_workfn
[...] RIP: 0010:check_flags.part.0+0x165/0x170
[...] ...
[...] Call Trace:
[...] lock_is_held_type+0x72/0x150
[...] ? lock_acquire+0x16e/0x4a0
[...] rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x3f/0x80
[...] __send_ipi_one+0x14d/0x1b0
[...] hv_send_ipi+0x12/0x30
[...] __pv_queued_spin_unlock_slowpath+0xd1/0x110
[...] __raw_callee_save___pv_queued_spin_unlock_slowpath+0x11/0x20
[...] .slowpath+0x9/0xe
[...] lockdep_unregister_key+0x128/0x180
[...] pwq_unbound_release_workfn+0xbb/0xf0
[...] process_one_work+0x227/0x5c0
[...] worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0
[...] ? process_one_work+0x5c0/0x5c0
[...] kthread+0x153/0x170
[...] ? __kthread_bind_mask+0x60/0x60
[...] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
The cause of the problem is we have call chain lockdep_unregister_key()
-> <irq disabled by raw_local_irq_save()> lockdep_unlock() ->
arch_spin_unlock() -> __pv_queued_spin_unlock_slowpath() -> pv_kick() ->
__send_ipi_one() -> trace_hyperv_send_ipi_one().
Although this particular warning is triggered because Hyper-V has a
trace point in ipi sending, but in general arch_spin_unlock() may call
another function having a trace point in it, so put the arch_spin_lock()
and arch_spin_unlock() after lock_recursion protection to fix this
problem and avoid similiar problems.
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201113110512.1056501-1-boqun.feng@gmail.com
Chris Wilson reported a problem spotted by check_chain_key(): a chain
key got changed in validate_chain() because we modify the ->read in
validate_chain() to skip checks for dependency adding, and ->read is
taken into calculation for chain key since commit f611e8cf98
("lockdep: Take read/write status in consideration when generate
chainkey").
Fix this by avoiding to modify ->read in validate_chain() based on two
facts: a) since we now support recursive read lock detection, there is
no need to skip checks for dependency adding for recursive readers, b)
since we have a), there is only one case left (nest_lock) where we want
to skip checks in validate_chain(), we simply remove the modification
for ->read and rely on the return value of check_deadlock() to skip the
dependency adding.
Reported-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201102053743.450459-1-boqun.feng@gmail.com
When executing the LOCK06 locktorture scenario featuring percpu-rwsem,
the RCU callback rcu_sync_func() may still be pending after locktorture
module is removed. This can in turn lead to the following Oops:
BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffffffc00eb920
#PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
#PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
PGD 6500a067 P4D 6500a067 PUD 6500c067 PMD 13a36c067 PTE 800000013691c163
Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Not tainted 5.9.0-rc5+ #4
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)
RIP: 0010:rcu_cblist_dequeue+0x12/0x30
Call Trace:
<IRQ>
rcu_core+0x1b1/0x860
__do_softirq+0xfe/0x326
asm_call_on_stack+0x12/0x20
</IRQ>
do_softirq_own_stack+0x5f/0x80
irq_exit_rcu+0xaf/0xc0
sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x2e/0xb0
asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x12/0x20
This commit avoids tis problem by adding an exit hook in lock_torture_ops
and using it to call percpu_free_rwsem() for percpu rwsem torture during
the module-cleanup function, thus ensuring that rcu_sync_func() completes
before module exits.
It is also necessary to call the exit hook if lock_torture_init()
fails half-way, so this commit also adds an ->init_called field in
lock_torture_cxt to indicate that exit hook, if present, must be called.
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
If an locktorture torture-test run is given a bad kvm.sh argument, the
test will complain to the console, which is good. What is bad is that
from the user's perspective, it will just hang for the time specified
by the --duration argument. This commit therefore forces an immediate
kernel shutdown if a lock_torture_init()-time error occurs, thus avoiding
the appearance of a hang. It also forces a console splat in this case
to clearly indicate the presence of an error.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Exclusive locks do not have readlock support, which means that a
locktorture run with the following module parameters will do nothing:
torture_type=mutex_lock nwriters_stress=0 nreaders_stress=1
This commit therefore rejects this combination for exclusive locks by
returning -EINVAL during module init.
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
This commit adds a last_lock_release variable that tracks the time of
the last ->writeunlock() call, which allows easier diagnosing of lock
hangs when using a kernel debugger.
Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
- Fix incorrect failure injection handling on the fuxtex code
- Prevent a preemption warning in lockdep when tracking local_irq_enable()
and interrupts are already enabled
- Remove more raw_cpu_read() usage from lockdep which causes state
corruption on !X86 architectures.
- Make the nr_unused_locks accounting in lockdep correct again.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=S01o
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'locking-urgent-2020-11-01' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Pull locking fixes from Thomas Gleixner:
"A couple of locking fixes:
- Fix incorrect failure injection handling in the fuxtex code
- Prevent a preemption warning in lockdep when tracking
local_irq_enable() and interrupts are already enabled
- Remove more raw_cpu_read() usage from lockdep which causes state
corruption on !X86 architectures.
- Make the nr_unused_locks accounting in lockdep correct again"
* tag 'locking-urgent-2020-11-01' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
lockdep: Fix nr_unused_locks accounting
locking/lockdep: Remove more raw_cpu_read() usage
futex: Fix incorrect should_fail_futex() handling
lockdep: Fix preemption WARN for spurious IRQ-enable
Chris reported that commit 24d5a3bffef1 ("lockdep: Fix
usage_traceoverflow") breaks the nr_unused_locks validation code
triggered by /proc/lockdep_stats.
By fully splitting LOCK_USED and LOCK_USED_READ it becomes a bad
indicator for accounting nr_unused_locks; simplyfy by using any first
bit.
Fixes: 24d5a3bffef1 ("lockdep: Fix usage_traceoverflow")
Reported-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201027124834.GL2628@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
I initially thought raw_cpu_read() was OK, since if it is !0 we have
IRQs disabled and can't get migrated, so if we get migrated both CPUs
must have 0 and it doesn't matter which 0 we read.
And while that is true; it isn't the whole store, on pretty much all
architectures (except x86) this can result in computing the address for
one CPU, getting migrated, the old CPU continuing execution with another
task (possibly setting recursion) and then the new CPU reading the value
of the old CPU, which is no longer 0.
Similer to:
baffd723e4 ("lockdep: Revert "lockdep: Use raw_cpu_*() for per-cpu variables"")
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201026152256.GB2651@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
It is valid (albeit uncommon) to call local_irq_enable() without first
having called local_irq_disable(). In this case we enter
lockdep_hardirqs_on*() with IRQs enabled and trip a preemption warning
for using __this_cpu_read().
Use this_cpu_read() instead to avoid the warning.
Fixes: 4d004099a6 ("lockdep: Fix lockdep recursion")
Reported-by: syzbot+53f8ce8bbc07924b6417@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Pull RCU changes from Ingo Molnar:
- Debugging for smp_call_function()
- RT raw/non-raw lock ordering fixes
- Strict grace periods for KASAN
- New smp_call_function() torture test
- Torture-test updates
- Documentation updates
- Miscellaneous fixes
[ This doesn't actually pull the tag - I've dropped the last merge from
the RCU branch due to questions about the series. - Linus ]
* tag 'core-rcu-2020-10-12' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (77 commits)
smp: Make symbol 'csd_bug_count' static
kernel/smp: Provide CSD lock timeout diagnostics
smp: Add source and destination CPUs to __call_single_data
rcu: Shrink each possible cpu krcp
rcu/segcblist: Prevent useless GP start if no CBs to accelerate
torture: Add gdb support
rcutorture: Allow pointer leaks to test diagnostic code
rcutorture: Hoist OOM registry up one level
refperf: Avoid null pointer dereference when buf fails to allocate
rcutorture: Properly synchronize with OOM notifier
rcutorture: Properly set rcu_fwds for OOM handling
torture: Add kvm.sh --help and update help message
rcutorture: Add CONFIG_PROVE_RCU_LIST to TREE05
torture: Update initrd documentation
rcutorture: Replace HTTP links with HTTPS ones
locktorture: Make function torture_percpu_rwsem_init() static
torture: document --allcpus argument added to the kvm.sh script
rcutorture: Output number of elapsed grace periods
rcutorture: Remove KCSAN stubs
rcu: Remove unused "cpu" parameter from rcu_report_qs_rdp()
...
Steve reported that lockdep_assert*irq*(), when nested inside lockdep
itself, will trigger a false-positive.
One example is the stack-trace code, as called from inside lockdep,
triggering tracing, which in turn calls RCU, which then uses
lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled().
Fixes: a21ee6055c ("lockdep: Change hardirq{s_enabled,_context} to per-cpu variables")
Reported-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Basically print_lock_class_header()'s for loop is out of sync with the
the size of of ->usage_traces[].
Also clean things up a bit while at it, to avoid such mishaps in the future.
Fixes: 23870f1227 ("locking/lockdep: Fix "USED" <- "IN-NMI" inversions")
Reported-by: Qian Cai <cai@redhat.com>
Debugged-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Qian Cai <cai@redhat.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200930094937.GE2651@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
Pull v5.10 RCU changes from Paul E. McKenney:
- Debugging for smp_call_function().
- Strict grace periods for KASAN. The point of this series is to find
RCU-usage bugs, so the corresponding new RCU_STRICT_GRACE_PERIOD
Kconfig option depends on both DEBUG_KERNEL and RCU_EXPERT, and is
further disabled by dfefault. Finally, the help text includes
a goodly list of scary caveats.
- New smp_call_function() torture test.
- Torture-test updates.
- Documentation updates.
- Miscellaneous fixes.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Qian Cai reported a BFS_EQUEUEFULL warning [1] after read recursive
deadlock detection merged into tip tree recently. Unlike the previous
lockep graph searching, which iterate every lock class (every node in
the graph) exactly once, the graph searching for read recurisve deadlock
detection needs to iterate every lock dependency (every edge in the
graph) once, as a result, the maximum memory cost of the circular queue
changes from O(V), where V is the number of lock classes (nodes or
vertices) in the graph, to O(E), where E is the number of lock
dependencies (edges), because every lock class or dependency gets
enqueued once in the BFS. Therefore we hit the BFS_EQUEUEFULL case.
However, actually we don't need to enqueue all dependencies for the BFS,
because every time we enqueue a dependency, we almostly enqueue all
other dependencies in the same dependency list ("almostly" is because
we currently check before enqueue, so if a dependency doesn't pass the
check stage we won't enqueue it, however, we can always do in reverse
ordering), based on this, we can only enqueue the first dependency from
a dependency list and every time we want to fetch a new dependency to
work, we can either:
1) fetch the dependency next to the current dependency in the
dependency list
or
2) if the dependency in 1) doesn't exist, fetch the dependency from
the queue.
With this approach, the "max bfs queue depth" for a x86_64_defconfig +
lockdep and selftest config kernel can get descreased from:
max bfs queue depth: 201
to (after apply this patch)
max bfs queue depth: 61
While I'm at it, clean up the code logic a little (e.g. directly return
other than set a "ret" value and goto the "exit" label).
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/17343f6f7f2438fc376125384133c5ba70c2a681.camel@redhat.com/
Reported-by: Qian Cai <cai@redhat.com>
Reported-by: syzbot+62ebe501c1ce9a91f68c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200917080210.108095-1-boqun.feng@gmail.com
The __this_cpu*() accessors are (in general) IRQ-unsafe which, given
that percpu-rwsem is a blocking primitive, should be just fine.
However, file_end_write() is used from IRQ context and will cause
load-store issues on architectures where the per-cpu accessors are not
natively irq-safe.
Fix it by using the IRQ-safe this_cpu_*() for operations on
read_count. This will generate more expensive code on a number of
platforms, which might cause a performance regression for some of the
other percpu-rwsem users.
If any such is reported, we can consider alternative solutions.
Fixes: 70fe2f4815 ("aio: fix freeze protection of aio writes")
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200915140750.137881-1-houtao1@huawei.com
During the LPC RCU BoF Paul asked how come the "USED" <- "IN-NMI"
detector doesn't trip over rcu_read_lock()'s lockdep annotation.
Looking into this I found a very embarrasing typo in
verify_lock_unused():
- if (!(class->usage_mask & LOCK_USED))
+ if (!(class->usage_mask & LOCKF_USED))
fixing that will indeed cause rcu_read_lock() to insta-splat :/
The above typo means that instead of testing for: 0x100 (1 <<
LOCK_USED), we test for 8 (LOCK_USED), which corresponds to (1 <<
LOCK_ENABLED_HARDIRQ).
So instead of testing for _any_ used lock, it will only match any lock
used with interrupts enabled.
The rcu_read_lock() annotation uses .check=0, which means it will not
set any of the interrupt bits and will thus never match.
In order to properly fix the situation and allow rcu_read_lock() to
correctly work, split LOCK_USED into LOCK_USED and LOCK_USED_READ and by
having .read users set USED_READ and test USED, pure read-recursive
locks are permitted.
Fixes: f6f48e1804 ("lockdep: Teach lockdep about "USED" <- "IN-NMI" inversions")
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200902160323.GK1362448@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
Currently, the chainkey of a lock chain is a hash sum of the class_idx
of all the held locks, the read/write status are not taken in to
consideration while generating the chainkey. This could result into a
problem, if we have:
P1()
{
read_lock(B);
lock(A);
}
P2()
{
lock(A);
read_lock(B);
}
P3()
{
lock(A);
write_lock(B);
}
, and P1(), P2(), P3() run one by one. And when running P2(), lockdep
detects such a lock chain A -> B is not a deadlock, then it's added in
the chain cache, and then when running P3(), even if it's a deadlock, we
could miss it because of the hit of chain cache. This could be confirmed
by self testcase "chain cached mixed R-L/L-W ".
To resolve this, we use concept "hlock_id" to generate the chainkey, the
hlock_id is a tuple (hlock->class_idx, hlock->read), which fits in a u16
type. With this, the chainkeys are different is the lock sequences have
the same locks but different read/write status.
Besides, since we use "hlock_id" to generate chainkeys, the chain_hlocks
array now store the "hlock_id"s rather than lock_class indexes.
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200807074238.1632519-15-boqun.feng@gmail.com
Since we have all the fundamental to handle recursive read locks, we now
add them into the dependency graph.
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200807074238.1632519-13-boqun.feng@gmail.com
Currently, in safe->unsafe detection, lockdep misses the fact that a
LOCK_ENABLED_IRQ_*_READ usage and a LOCK_USED_IN_IRQ_*_READ usage may
cause deadlock too, for example:
P1 P2
<irq disabled>
write_lock(l1); <irq enabled>
read_lock(l2);
write_lock(l2);
<in irq>
read_lock(l1);
Actually, all of the following cases may cause deadlocks:
LOCK_USED_IN_IRQ_* -> LOCK_ENABLED_IRQ_*
LOCK_USED_IN_IRQ_*_READ -> LOCK_ENABLED_IRQ_*
LOCK_USED_IN_IRQ_* -> LOCK_ENABLED_IRQ_*_READ
LOCK_USED_IN_IRQ_*_READ -> LOCK_ENABLED_IRQ_*_READ
To fix this, we need to 1) change the calculation of exclusive_mask() so
that READ bits are not dropped and 2) always call usage() in
mark_lock_irq() to check usage deadlocks, even when the new usage of the
lock is READ.
Besides, adjust usage_match() and usage_acculumate() to recursive read
lock changes.
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200807074238.1632519-12-boqun.feng@gmail.com
check_redundant() will report redundancy if it finds a path could
replace the about-to-add dependency in the BFS search. With recursive
read lock changes, we certainly need to change the match function for
the check_redundant(), because the path needs to match not only the lock
class but also the dependency kinds. For example, if the about-to-add
dependency @prev -> @next is A -(SN)-> B, and we find a path A -(S*)->
.. -(*R)->B in the dependency graph with __bfs() (for simplicity, we can
also say we find an -(SR)-> path from A to B), we can not replace the
dependency with that path in the BFS search. Because the -(SN)->
dependency can make a strong path with a following -(S*)-> dependency,
however an -(SR)-> path cannot.
Further, we can replace an -(SN)-> dependency with a -(EN)-> path, that
means if we find a path which is stronger than or equal to the
about-to-add dependency, we can report the redundancy. By "stronger", it
means both the start and the end of the path are not weaker than the
start and the end of the dependency (E is "stronger" than S and N is
"stronger" than R), so that we can replace the dependency with that
path.
To make sure we find a path whose start point is not weaker than the
about-to-add dependency, we use a trick: the ->only_xr of the root
(start point) of __bfs() is initialized as @prev-> == 0, therefore if
@prev is E, __bfs() will pick only -(E*)-> for the first dependency,
otherwise, __bfs() can pick -(E*)-> or -(S*)-> for the first dependency.
To make sure we find a path whose end point is not weaker than the
about-to-add dependency, we replace the match function for __bfs()
check_redundant(), we check for the case that either @next is R
(anything is not weaker than it) or the end point of the path is N
(which is not weaker than anything).
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200807074238.1632519-11-boqun.feng@gmail.com
Currently, lockdep only has limit support for deadlock detection for
recursive read locks.
This patch support deadlock detection for recursive read locks. The
basic idea is:
We are about to add dependency B -> A in to the dependency graph, we use
check_noncircular() to find whether we have a strong dependency path
A -> .. -> B so that we have a strong dependency circle (a closed strong
dependency path):
A -> .. -> B -> A
, which doesn't have two adjacent dependencies as -(*R)-> L -(S*)->.
Since A -> .. -> B is already a strong dependency path, so if either
B -> A is -(E*)-> or A -> .. -> B is -(*N)->, the circle A -> .. -> B ->
A is strong, otherwise not. So we introduce a new match function
hlock_conflict() to replace the class_equal() for the deadlock check in
check_noncircular().
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200807074238.1632519-10-boqun.feng@gmail.com
The "match" parameter of __bfs() is used for checking whether we hit a
match in the search, therefore it should return a boolean value rather
than an integer for better readability.
This patch then changes the return type of the function parameter and the
match functions to bool.
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200807074238.1632519-9-boqun.feng@gmail.com
Now we have four types of dependencies in the dependency graph, and not
all the pathes carry real dependencies (the dependencies that may cause
a deadlock), for example:
Given lock A and B, if we have:
CPU1 CPU2
============= ==============
write_lock(A); read_lock(B);
read_lock(B); write_lock(A);
(assuming read_lock(B) is a recursive reader)
then we have dependencies A -(ER)-> B, and B -(SN)-> A, and a
dependency path A -(ER)-> B -(SN)-> A.
In lockdep w/o recursive locks, a dependency path from A to A
means a deadlock. However, the above case is obviously not a
deadlock, because no one holds B exclusively, therefore no one
waits for the other to release B, so who get A first in CPU1 and
CPU2 will run non-blockingly.
As a result, dependency path A -(ER)-> B -(SN)-> A is not a
real/strong dependency that could cause a deadlock.
From the observation above, we know that for a dependency path to be
real/strong, no two adjacent dependencies can be as -(*R)-> -(S*)->.
Now our mission is to make __bfs() traverse only the strong dependency
paths, which is simple: we record whether we only have -(*R)-> for the
previous lock_list of the path in lock_list::only_xr, and when we pick a
dependency in the traverse, we 1) filter out -(S*)-> dependency if the
previous lock_list only has -(*R)-> dependency (i.e. ->only_xr is true)
and 2) set the next lock_list::only_xr to true if we only have -(*R)->
left after we filter out dependencies based on 1), otherwise, set it to
false.
With this extension for __bfs(), we now need to initialize the root of
__bfs() properly (with a correct ->only_xr), to do so, we introduce some
helper functions, which also cleans up a little bit for the __bfs() root
initialization code.
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200807074238.1632519-8-boqun.feng@gmail.com
