[SUBPAGE COMPRESSION LIMITS]
Currently inside writepage_delalloc(), if a delalloc range is going to
be submitted asynchronously (inline or compression, the page
dirty/writeback/unlock are all handled in at different time, not at the
submission time), then we return 1 and extent_writepage() will skip the
submission.
This is fine if every sector matches page size, but if a sector is
smaller than page size (aka, subpage case), then it can be very
problematic, for example for the following 64K page:
0 16K 32K 48K 64K
|/| |///////| |/|
| |
4K 52K
Where |/| is the dirty range we need to submit.
In the above case, we need the following different handling for the 3
ranges:
- [0, 4K) needs to be submitted for regular write
A single sector cannot be compressed.
- [16K, 32K) needs to be submitted for compressed write
- [48K, 52K) needs to be submitted for regular write.
Above, if we try to submit [16K, 32K) for compressed write, we will
return 1 and immediately, and without submitting the remaining
[48K, 52K) range.
Furthermore, since extent_writepage() will exit without unlocking any
sectors, the submitted range [0, 4K) will not have sector unlocked.
That's the reason why for now subpage is only allowed for full page
range.
[ENHANCEMENT]
- Introduce a submission bitmap at btrfs_bio_ctrl::submit_bitmap
This records which sectors will be submitted by extent_writepage_io().
This allows us to track which sectors needs to be submitted thus later
to be properly unlocked.
For asynchronously submitted range (inline/compression), the
corresponding bits will be cleared from that bitmap.
- Only return 1 if no sector needs to be submitted in
writepage_delalloc()
- Only submit sectors marked by submission bitmap inside
extent_writepage_io()
So we won't touch the asynchronously submitted part.
- Introduce btrfs_folio_end_writer_lock_bitmap() helper
This will only unlock the involved sectors specified by @bitmap
parameter, to avoid touching the range asynchronously submitted.
Please note that, since subpage compression is still limited to page
aligned range, this change is only a preparation for future sector
perfect compression support for subpage.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The function btrfs_folio_unlock_writer() is already calling
btrfs_folio_end_writer_lock() to do the heavy lifting work, the only
missing 0 writer check.
Thus there is no need to keep two different functions, move the 0 writer
check into btrfs_folio_end_writer_lock(), and remove
btrfs_folio_unlock_writer().
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The function btrfs_folio_end_all_writers() is only utilized in
extent_writepage() as a way to unlock all subpage range (for both
successful submission and error handling).
Meanwhile we have a similar function, btrfs_folio_end_writer_lock().
The difference is, btrfs_folio_end_writer_lock() expects a range that is
a subset of the already locked range.
This limit on btrfs_folio_end_writer_lock() is a little overkilled,
preventing it from being utilized for error paths.
So here we enhance btrfs_folio_end_writer_lock() to accept a superset of
the locked range, and only end the locked subset.
This means we can replace btrfs_folio_end_all_writers() with
btrfs_folio_end_writer_lock() instead.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The old page API is being gradually replaced and converted to use folio
to improve code readability and avoid repeated conversion between page
and folio. And page_to_inode() can be replaced with folio_to_inode() now.
Signed-off-by: Li Zetao <lizetao1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The old page API is being gradually replaced and converted to use folio
to improve code readability and avoid repeated conversion between page
and folio. Moreover, use folio_pos() instead of page_offset(),
which is more consistent with folio usage.
Signed-off-by: Li Zetao <lizetao1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The old page API is being gradually replaced and converted to use folio
to improve code readability and avoid repeated conversion between page
and folio.
Signed-off-by: Li Zetao <lizetao1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The old page API is being gradually replaced and converted to use folio
to improve code readability and avoid repeated conversion between page
and folio. Moreover, use folio_pos() instead of page_offset(),
which is more consistent with folio usage.
Signed-off-by: Li Zetao <lizetao1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The old page API is being gradually replaced and converted to use folio
to improve code readability and avoid repeated conversion between page
and folio.
Signed-off-by: Li Zetao <lizetao1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The old page API is being gradually replaced and converted to use folio
to improve code readability and avoid repeated conversion between page
and folio. And use folio_pos instead of page_offset, which is more
consistent with folio usage. At the same time, folio_test_private() can
handle folio directly without converting from page to folio first.
Signed-off-by: Li Zetao <lizetao1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The old page API is being gradually replaced and converted to use folio
to improve code readability and avoid repeated conversion between page
and folio. Use folio_pos instead of page_offset, which is more
consistent with folio usage.
Signed-off-by: Li Zetao <lizetao1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The old page API is being gradually replaced and converted to use folio
to improve code readability and avoid repeated conversion between page
and folio. Now clear_page_extent_mapped() can deal with a folio
directly, so change its name to clear_folio_extent_mapped().
Signed-off-by: Li Zetao <lizetao1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Historically we've held the extent lock throughout the entire read.
There's been a few reasons for this, but it's mostly just caused us
problems. For example, this prevents us from allowing page faults
during direct io reads, because we could deadlock. This has forced us
to only allow 4k reads at a time for io_uring NOWAIT requests because we
have no idea if we'll be forced to page fault and thus have to do a
whole lot of work.
On the buffered side we are protected by the page lock, as long as we're
reading things like buffered writes, punch hole, and even direct IO to a
certain degree will get hung up on the page lock while the page is in
flight.
On the direct side we have the dio extent lock, which acts much like the
way the extent lock worked previously to this patch, however just for
direct reads. This protects direct reads from concurrent direct writes,
while we're protected from buffered writes via the inode lock.
Now that we're protected in all cases, narrow the extent lock to the
part where we're getting the extent map to submit the reads, no longer
holding the extent lock for the entire read operation. Push the extent
lock down into do_readpage() so that we're only grabbing it when looking
up the extent map. This portion was contributed by Goldwyn.
Co-developed-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The function does not follow the pattern where the underscores would be
justified, so rename it.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The function name is a bit misleading as it submits the btrfs_bio
(bbio), rename it so we can use btrfs_submit_bio() when an actual bio is
submitted.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The member btrfs_fs_info::subpage_info stores the cached bitmap start
position inside the merged bitmap.
However in reality there is only one thing depending on the sectorsize,
bitmap_nr_bits, which records the number of sectors that fit inside a
page.
The sequence of sub-bitmaps have fixed order, thus it's just a quick
multiplication to calculate the start position of each sub-bitmaps.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The parameter @nr_ret is used to tell the caller how many sectors have
been submitted for IO.
Then callers check @nr_ret value to determine if we need to manually
clear the PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY, as if we submitted no sector (e.g. all
sectors are beyond i_size) there is no folio_start_writeback() called thus
PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY tag will not be cleared.
Remove this parameter by:
- Moving the btrfs_folio_clear_writeback() call into
__extent_writepage_io()
So that if we didn't submit any IO, then manually call
btrfs_folio_set_writeback() to clear PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY when
the page is no longer dirty.
- Use a bool to record if we have submitted any sector
Instead of an int.
- Use subpage compatible helpers to end folio writeback.
This brings no change to the behavior, just for the sake of consistency.
As for the call site inside __extent_writepage(), we're always called
for the whole page, so the existing full page helper
folio_(start|end)_writeback() is totally fine.
For the call site inside extent_write_locked_range(), although we can
have subpage range, folio_start_writeback() will only clear
PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY if the page is no longer dirty, and the full folio
will still be dirty if there is any subpage dirty range.
Only when the last dirty subpage sector is cleared, the
folio_start_writeback() will clear PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY.
So no matter if we call the full page or subpage helper, the result
is still the same, then just use the subpage helpers for consistency.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Unlike the bitmap usage inside raid56, for __extent_writepage_io() we
handle the subpage submission not sector-by-sector, but for each dirty
range we found.
This is not a big deal normally, as the subpage complex code is already
mostly optimized out by the compiler for x86_64.
However for the sake of consistency and for the future of subpage
sector-perfect compression support, this patch does:
- Extract the sector submission code into submit_one_sector()
- Add the needed code to extract the dirty bitmap for subpage case
There is a small pitfall for non-subpage case, as we cleared page
dirty before starting writeback, so we have to manually set
the default dirty_bitmap to 1 for such case.
- Use bitmap_and() to calculate the target sectors we need to submit
This is done for both subpage and non-subpage cases, and will later
be expanded to skip inline/compression ranges.
For x86_64, the dirty bitmap will be fixed to 1, with the length of 1,
so we're still doing the same workload per sector.
For larger page sizes, the overhead will be a little larger, as previous
we only need to do one extent_map lookup per-dirty-range, but now it
will be one extent_map lookup per-sector.
But that is the same frequency as x86_64, so we're just aligning the
behavior to x86_64.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We already use a folio some in this function, replace all page usage
with the folio and update the function to take the folio as an argument.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Now that btrfs_get_extent takes a folio, update __get_extent_map to
take a folio as well.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We only pass this into read_inline_extent, change it to take a folio and
update the callers.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Instead of a page, use a folio for btrfs_writepage_cow_fixup. We
already have a folio at the only caller, and the fixup worker uses
folios.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Now that every function that btrfs_run_delalloc_range calls takes a
folio, update it to take a folio and update the callers.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This mostly uses folios, convert it to take a folio instead and update
the callers to pass in the folio.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Instead of taking the locked page, take the locked folio so we can pass
that into __process_folios_contig.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Now that this mostly uses folios, update it to take folios, use the
folios that are passed in, and rename from process_one_page =>
process_one_folio.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This operates mostly on folios, update it to take a folio for the locked
folio instead of the page, rename from __process_pages_contig =>
__process_folios_contig.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
All of the callers have a folio at this point, update
__unlock_for_delalloc to take a folio so that it's consistent with its
callers.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Also rename lock_delalloc_pages => lock_delalloc_folios in the process,
now that it exclusively works on folios.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Instead of passing in a page for locked_page, pass in the folio instead.
We only use the folio itself to validate some range assumptions, and
then pass it into other functions.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We already use a folio heavily in this function, pass the folio in
directly and use it everywhere, only passing the page down to functions
that do not take a folio yet.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We only need a folio now, make it take a folio as an argument and update
all of the callers.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The callers and callee's of this now all use folios, update it to take a
folio as well.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Now that we've gotten most of the helpers updated to only take a folio,
update __extent_writepage to only deal in folios.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Instead of using pages for everything, find a folio and use that. This
makes things a bit cleaner as a lot of the functions calls here all take
folios.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
__extent_writepage_io uses page everywhere, but a lot of these functions
take a folio. Convert it to use the folio based helpers, and then
change it to take a folio as an argument and update its callers.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Willy is wanting to get rid of page->index, convert the writepage
tracepoint to take a folio so we can do folio->index instead of
page->index.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Now that the callers and helpers mostly use folio, convert
btrfs_do_readpage to take a folio, and rename it to btrfs_do_read_folio.
Update all of the page stuff to use the folio based helpers instead.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The callers of this helper are going to be converted to using a folio,
so adjust submit_extent_page to become submit_extent_folio and update it
to use all the relevant folio helpers.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This already uses a folio internally, change it to take a folio as an
argument instead.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We have this helper function to set the page range uptodate once we're
done reading it, as well as run fsverity against it. Half of these
functions already take a folio, just rename this to end_folio_read and
then rework it to take a folio instead, and update everything
accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Currently we're using the page for everything here. Convert this to use
the folio helpers instead.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We're the only user of readahead_page_batch(). Convert
btrfs_readahead() to use the folio based helpers to do readahead.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The function is only used inside inode.c by compress_file_range(),
so move it to inode.c and unexport it.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
There is only one caller utilizing the @extra_gfp parameter,
alloc_eb_folio_array(). And in that case the extra_gfp is only assigned
to __GFP_NOFAIL.
Rename the @extra_gfp parameter to @nofail to indicate that.
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The function btrfs_alloc_folio_array() is only utilized in
btrfs_submit_compressed_read() and no other location, and the only
caller is not utilizing the @extra_gfp parameter.
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Pass a struct btrfs_inode to is_data_inode() as it's an
internal interface, allowing to remove some use of BTRFS_I.
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We can add const to many parameters, this is for clarity and minor
addition to safety. There are some minor effects, in the assembly
code and .ko measured on release config. This patch does not cover all
possible conversions.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
When extent_write_locked_range() generated an inline extent, it would
set and finish the writeback for the whole page.
Although currently it's safe since subpage disables inline creation,
for the sake of consistency, let it go with subpage helpers to set and
clear the writeback flags.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[BUG]
For subpage + zoned case, the following workload can lead to rsv data
leak at unmount time:
# mkfs.btrfs -f -s 4k $dev
# mount $dev $mnt
# fsstress -w -n 8 -d $mnt -s 1709539240
0/0: fiemap - no filename
0/1: copyrange read - no filename
0/2: write - no filename
0/3: rename - no source filename
0/4: creat f0 x:0 0 0
0/4: creat add id=0,parent=-1
0/5: writev f0[259 1 0 0 0 0] [778052,113,965] 0
0/6: ioctl(FIEMAP) f0[259 1 0 0 224 887097] [1294220,2291618343991484791,0x10000] -1
0/7: dwrite - xfsctl(XFS_IOC_DIOINFO) f0[259 1 0 0 224 887097] return 25, fallback to stat()
0/7: dwrite f0[259 1 0 0 224 887097] [696320,102400] 0
# umount $mnt
The dmesg includes the following rsv leak detection warning (all call
trace skipped):
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 4528 at fs/btrfs/inode.c:8653 btrfs_destroy_inode+0x1e0/0x200 [btrfs]
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 4528 at fs/btrfs/inode.c:8654 btrfs_destroy_inode+0x1a8/0x200 [btrfs]
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 4528 at fs/btrfs/inode.c:8660 btrfs_destroy_inode+0x1a0/0x200 [btrfs]
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
BTRFS info (device sda): last unmount of filesystem 1b4abba9-de34-4f07-9e7f-157cf12a18d6
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 4528 at fs/btrfs/block-group.c:4434 btrfs_free_block_groups+0x338/0x500 [btrfs]
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
BTRFS info (device sda): space_info DATA has 268218368 free, is not full
BTRFS info (device sda): space_info total=268435456, used=204800, pinned=0, reserved=0, may_use=12288, readonly=0 zone_unusable=0
BTRFS info (device sda): global_block_rsv: size 0 reserved 0
BTRFS info (device sda): trans_block_rsv: size 0 reserved 0
BTRFS info (device sda): chunk_block_rsv: size 0 reserved 0
BTRFS info (device sda): delayed_block_rsv: size 0 reserved 0
BTRFS info (device sda): delayed_refs_rsv: size 0 reserved 0
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 4528 at fs/btrfs/block-group.c:4434 btrfs_free_block_groups+0x338/0x500 [btrfs]
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
BTRFS info (device sda): space_info METADATA has 267796480 free, is not full
BTRFS info (device sda): space_info total=268435456, used=131072, pinned=0, reserved=0, may_use=262144, readonly=0 zone_unusable=245760
BTRFS info (device sda): global_block_rsv: size 0 reserved 0
BTRFS info (device sda): trans_block_rsv: size 0 reserved 0
BTRFS info (device sda): chunk_block_rsv: size 0 reserved 0
BTRFS info (device sda): delayed_block_rsv: size 0 reserved 0
BTRFS info (device sda): delayed_refs_rsv: size 0 reserved 0
Above $dev is a tcmu-runner emulated zoned HDD, which has a max zone
append size of 64K, and the system has 64K page size.
[CAUSE]
I have added several trace_printk() to show the events (header skipped):
> btrfs_dirty_pages: r/i=5/259 dirty start=774144 len=114688
> btrfs_dirty_pages: r/i=5/259 dirty part of page=720896 off_in_page=53248 len_in_page=12288
> btrfs_dirty_pages: r/i=5/259 dirty part of page=786432 off_in_page=0 len_in_page=65536
> btrfs_dirty_pages: r/i=5/259 dirty part of page=851968 off_in_page=0 len_in_page=36864
The above lines show our buffered write has dirtied 3 pages of inode
259 of root 5:
704K 768K 832K 896K
I |////I/////////////////I///////////| I
756K 868K
|///| is the dirtied range using subpage bitmaps. and 'I' is the page
boundary.
Meanwhile all three pages (704K, 768K, 832K) have their PageDirty
flag set.
> btrfs_direct_write: r/i=5/259 start dio filepos=696320 len=102400
Then direct IO write starts, since the range [680K, 780K) covers the
beginning part of the above dirty range, we need to writeback the
two pages at 704K and 768K.
> cow_file_range: r/i=5/259 add ordered extent filepos=774144 len=65536
> extent_write_locked_range: r/i=5/259 locked page=720896 start=774144 len=65536
Now the above 2 lines show that we're writing back for dirty range
[756K, 756K + 64K).
We only writeback 64K because the zoned device has max zone append size
as 64K.
> extent_write_locked_range: r/i=5/259 clear dirty for page=786432
!!! The above line shows the root cause. !!!
We're calling clear_page_dirty_for_io() inside extent_write_locked_range(),
for the page 768K.
This is because extent_write_locked_range() can go beyond the current
locked page, here we hit the page at 768K and clear its page dirt.
In fact this would lead to the desync between subpage dirty and page
dirty flags. We have the page dirty flag cleared, but the subpage range
[820K, 832K) is still dirty.
After the writeback of range [756K, 820K), the dirty flags look like
this, as page 768K no longer has dirty flag set.
704K 768K 832K 896K
I I | I/////////////| I
820K 868K
This means we will no longer writeback range [820K, 832K), thus the
reserved data/metadata space would never be properly released.
> extent_write_cache_pages: r/i=5/259 skip non-dirty folio=786432
Now even though we try to start writeback for page 768K, since the
page is not dirty, we completely skip it at extent_write_cache_pages()
time.
> btrfs_direct_write: r/i=5/259 dio done filepos=696320 len=0
Now the direct IO finished.
> cow_file_range: r/i=5/259 add ordered extent filepos=851968 len=36864
> extent_write_locked_range: r/i=5/259 locked page=851968 start=851968 len=36864
Now we writeback the remaining dirty range, which is [832K, 868K).
Causing the range [820K, 832K) never to be submitted, thus leaking the
reserved space.
This bug only affects subpage and zoned case. For non-subpage and zoned
case, we have exactly one sector for each page, thus no such partial dirty
cases.
For subpage and non-zoned case, we never go into run_delalloc_cow(), and
normally all the dirty subpage ranges would be properly submitted inside
__extent_writepage_io().
[FIX]
Just do not clear the page dirty at all inside extent_write_locked_range().
As __extent_writepage_io() would do a more accurate, subpage compatible
clear for page and subpage dirty flags anyway.
Now the correct trace would look like this:
> btrfs_dirty_pages: r/i=5/259 dirty start=774144 len=114688
> btrfs_dirty_pages: r/i=5/259 dirty part of page=720896 off_in_page=53248 len_in_page=12288
> btrfs_dirty_pages: r/i=5/259 dirty part of page=786432 off_in_page=0 len_in_page=65536
> btrfs_dirty_pages: r/i=5/259 dirty part of page=851968 off_in_page=0 len_in_page=36864
The page dirty part is still the same 3 pages.
> btrfs_direct_write: r/i=5/259 start dio filepos=696320 len=102400
> cow_file_range: r/i=5/259 add ordered extent filepos=774144 len=65536
> extent_write_locked_range: r/i=5/259 locked page=720896 start=774144 len=65536
And the writeback for the first 64K is still correct.
> cow_file_range: r/i=5/259 add ordered extent filepos=839680 len=49152
> extent_write_locked_range: r/i=5/259 locked page=786432 start=839680 len=49152
Now with the fix, we can properly writeback the range [820K, 832K), and
properly release the reserved data/metadata space.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
