Commit Graph

26 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Russell King
e01916e3e7 [ARM] wire up rt_tgsigqueueinfo and perf_counter_open
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2009-06-20 22:25:45 +01:00
Mikael Pettersson
eb8f3142fa [ARM] 5456/1: add sys_preadv and sys_pwritev
Kernel 2.6.30-rc1 added sys_preadv and sys_pwritev to most archs
but not ARM, resulting in

<stdin>:1421:2: warning: #warning syscall preadv not implemented
<stdin>:1425:2: warning: #warning syscall pwritev not implemented

This patch adds sys_preadv and sys_pwritev to ARM.

These syscalls simply take five long-sized parameters, so they
should have no calling-convention/ABI issues in the kernel.

Tested on armv5tel eabi using a preadv/pwritev test program posted
on linuxppc-dev earlier this month.

It would be nice to get this into the kernel before 2.6.30 final,
so that glibc's kernel version feature test for these syscalls
doesn't have to special-case ARM.

Signed-off-by: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2009-04-20 14:01:39 +01:00
Heiko Carstens
e55380edf6 [CVE-2009-0029] Rename old_readdir to sys_old_readdir
This way it matches the generic system call name convention.

Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
2009-01-14 14:15:15 +01:00
Stefan Schmidt
751a8ae95d [ARM] 5193/1: Wire up missing syscalls
Setup some missing syscall pointed out by the checksyscalls.sh script. Fix two
small whitespace issues while being there.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Schmidt <stefan@datenfreihafen.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2008-08-12 19:54:07 +01:00
Russell King
adf6d34e46 Merge branch 'omap2-upstream' into devel 2008-04-19 17:17:29 +01:00
Uwe Kleine-König
cbfc0f0406 [ARM] 4852/1: Add timerfd_create, timerfd_settime and timerfd_gettime syscall entries
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <Uwe.Kleine-Koenig@digi.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2008-04-19 11:28:06 +01:00
Riku Voipio
c60afe1014 [ARM] 4878/1: Add oabi shim for fstatat64
Ccoreutils and other have started using fstatat64. Thus, we
need a shim for it if we want to support modern oldabi
userlands (such as Debian/arm/lenny) with EABI kernels.

See http://bugs.debian.org/462677

Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@movial.fi>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2008-03-28 15:00:46 +00:00
Davide Libenzi
4d672e7ac7 timerfd: new timerfd API
This is the new timerfd API as it is implemented by the following patch:

int timerfd_create(int clockid, int flags);
int timerfd_settime(int ufd, int flags,
		    const struct itimerspec *utmr,
		    struct itimerspec *otmr);
int timerfd_gettime(int ufd, struct itimerspec *otmr);

The timerfd_create() API creates an un-programmed timerfd fd.  The "clockid"
parameter can be either CLOCK_MONOTONIC or CLOCK_REALTIME.

The timerfd_settime() API give new settings by the timerfd fd, by optionally
retrieving the previous expiration time (in case the "otmr" parameter is not
NULL).

The time value specified in "utmr" is absolute, if the TFD_TIMER_ABSTIME bit
is set in the "flags" parameter.  Otherwise it's a relative time.

The timerfd_gettime() API returns the next expiration time of the timer, or
{0, 0} if the timerfd has not been set yet.

Like the previous timerfd API implementation, read(2) and poll(2) are
supported (with the same interface).  Here's a simple test program I used to
exercise the new timerfd APIs:

http://www.xmailserver.org/timerfd-test2.c

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style cleanups]
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix ia64 build]
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix m68k build]
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix mips build]
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix alpha, arm, blackfin, cris, m68k, s390, sparc and sparc64 builds]
[heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com: fix s390]
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix powerpc build]
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix sparc64 more]
Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk-manpages@gmx.net>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk-manpages@gmx.net>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-02-05 09:44:07 -08:00
Russell King
883042d6ea [ARM] Add fallocate syscall entry
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2007-10-12 23:43:31 +01:00
David Woodhouse
edd5cd4a94 Introduce fixed sys_sync_file_range2() syscall, implement on PowerPC and ARM
Not all the world is an i386.  Many architectures need 64-bit arguments to be
aligned in suitable pairs of registers, and the original
sys_sync_file_range(int, loff_t, loff_t, int) was therefore wasting an
argument register for padding after the first integer.  Since we don't
normally have more than 6 arguments for system calls, that left no room for
the final argument on some architectures.

Fix this by introducing sys_sync_file_range2(int, int, loff_t, loff_t) which
all fits nicely.  In fact, ARM already had that, but called it
sys_arm_sync_file_range.  Move it to fs/sync.c and rename it, then implement
the needed compatibility routine.  And stop the missing syscall check from
bitching about the absence of sys_sync_file_range() if we've implemented
sys_sync_file_range2() instead.

Tested on PPC32 and with 32-bit and 64-bit userspace on PPC64.

Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-06-28 11:38:30 -07:00
Russell King
c05107911a [ARM] Update ARM syscalls
Add utimensat, signalfd, timerfd, eventfd syscalls.  Add ignore
defines for sync_file_range and fadvise64_64 which we implement
differently.

Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2007-05-16 15:37:48 +01:00
Richard Purdie
c587e4a6a4 [ARM] 4137/1: Add kexec support
Add kexec support to ARM.

Improvements like commandline handling could be made but this patch gives
basic functional support. It uses the next available syscall number, 347.

Once the syscall number is known, userspace support will be
finalised/submitted to kexec-tools, various patches already exist.

Originally based on a patch by Maxim Syrchin but updated and forward
ported by various people.

Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@rpsys.net>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2007-02-16 14:37:06 +00:00
Russell King
5a059f1ac0 [ARM] Add more syscalls
Add:
  sys_unshare
  sys_set_robust_list
  sys_get_robust_list
  sys_splice
  sys_arm_sync_file_range
  sys_tee
  sys_vmsplice
  sys_move_pages
  sys_getcpu

Special note about sys_arm_sync_file_range(), which is implemented as:

asmlinkage long sys_arm_sync_file_range(int fd, unsigned int flags,
                                        loff_t offset, loff_t nbytes)
{
        return sys_sync_file_range(fd, offset, nbytes, flags);
}

We can't export sys_sync_file_range() directly on ARM because the
argument list someone picked does not fit in the available registers.
Would be nice if... there was an arch maintainer review mechanism for
new syscalls before they hit the kernel.

Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2006-12-17 18:23:31 +00:00
Russell King
bca0b8e75f [ARM] Add sys_*at syscalls
Later glibc requires the *at syscalls.  Add them.

Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2006-12-09 16:41:55 +00:00
Nicolas Pitre
6c0fa49b18 [ARM] 3338/1: old ABI compat: sys_socketcall
Patch from Nicolas Pitre

Commit 99595d0237 forgot to intercept
sys_socketcall as well.

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2006-02-16 22:36:13 +00:00
Nicolas Pitre
99595d0237 [ARM] 3308/1: old ABI compat: struct sockaddr_un
Patch from Nicolas Pitre

struct sockaddr_un loses its padding with EABI.  Since the size of the
structure is used as a validation test in unix_mkname(), we need to
change the length argument to 110 whenever it is 112.

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2006-02-08 21:19:36 +00:00
Al Viro
fa1b4f91d6 [ARM] safer handling of syscall table padding
ARM entry-common.S needs to know syscall table size; in itself that would
not be a problem, but there's an additional constraint - some of the
instructions using it want a constant that would be a multiple of 4.
So we have to pad syscall table with sys_ni_syscall and that's where
the trouble begins.  .rept pseudo-op wants a constant expression for
number of repetitions and subtraction of two labels (before and after
syscall table) doesn't always get simplified to constant early enough
for .rept.  If labels end up in different frags, we lose.  And while
the frag size is large enough (slightly below 4Kb), the syscall table
is about 1/3 of that.  We used to get away with that, but the recent
changes had been enough to trigger the breakage.

Proper fix is simple: have a macro (CALL(x)) to populate the table
instead of using explicit .long x and the first time we include calls.S
have it defined to .equ NR_syscalls,NR_syscalls+1.  Then we can find
the proper amount of padding on the first inclusion simply by looking
at NR_syscalls at that time.  And that will be constant, no matter what.

Moreover, the same trick kills the need of having an estimate of padded
NR_syscalls - it will be calculated for free at the same time.

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2006-01-19 12:57:01 +00:00
Nicolas Pitre
dd35afc22b [ARM] 3110/5: old ABI compat: multi-ABI syscall entry support
Patch from Nicolas Pitre

This patch adds the required code to support both user space ABIs at
the same time. A second syscall table is created to include legacy ABI
syscalls that need an ABI compat wrapper.

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2006-01-14 16:36:12 +00:00
Nicolas Pitre
713c481519 [ARM] 3108/2: old ABI compat: statfs64 and fstatfs64
Patch from Nicolas Pitre

struct statfs64 has extra padding with EABI growing its size from 84 to
88. This struct is now __attribute__((packed,aligned(4))) with a small
assembly wrapper to force the sz argument to 84 if it is 88 to avoid
copying the extra padding over user space memory unexpecting it.

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2006-01-14 16:35:03 +00:00
Russell King
567bd98017 [ARM] Fix sys_sendto and sys_recvfrom 6-arg syscalls
Rather than providing more wrappers for 6-arg syscalls, arrange for
them to be supported as standard.  This just means that we always
store the 6th argument on the stack, rather than in the wrappers.

This means we eliminate the wrappers for:
* sys_futex
* sys_arm_fadvise64_64
* sys_mbind
* sys_ipc

Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2005-12-17 15:25:42 +00:00
George G. Davis
34f521fd55 [ARM] 2896/1: Add sys_ipc_wrapper to pass 'fifth' argument on stack
Patch from George G. Davis

As pointed out be Matthew Klahn <MKLAHN@motorola.com>, some sys_ipc()
call options require six args, e.g. SEMTIMEDOP. This patch adds an ARM sys_ipc_wrapper to save the sys_ipc() 'fifth' arg on the stack.

Signed-off-by: George G. Davis <gdavis@mvista.com>
 arch/arm/kernel/calls.S        |    2 +-
 arch/arm/kernel/entry-common.S |    5 +++++
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2005-09-13 22:55:00 +01:00
Russell King
9b9eb8c061 [ARM] sys_mbind needs wrapping
sys_mbind is a 6-arg syscall, hence needs wrapping to save the
sixth argument.

Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2005-09-09 18:35:12 +01:00
Russell King
9c2c389307 [ARM] Add memory type based allocation syscalls
Add syscall numbers and syscall table entries for mbind,
set_mempolicy and get_mempolicy.

Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2005-09-09 11:12:51 +01:00
Nicolas Pitre
68d9102f76 [ARM] 2865/2: fix fadvise64_64 syscall argument passing
Patch from Nicolas Pitre

The prototype for sys_fadvise64_64() is:
    long sys_fadvise64_64(int fd, loff_t offset, loff_t len, int advice)
The argument list is therefore as follows on legacy ABI:
	fd: type int (r0)
	offset: type long long (r1-r2)
	len: type long long (r3-sp[0])
	advice: type int (sp[4])
With EABI this becomes:
	fd: type int (r0)
	offset: type long long (r2-r3)
	len: type long long (sp[0]-sp[4])
	advice: type int (sp[8])
Not only do we have ABI differences here, but the EABI version requires
one additional word on the syscall stack.
To avoid the ABI mismatch and the extra stack space required with EABI
this syscall is now defined with a different argument ordering
on ARM as follows:
    long sys_arm_fadvise64_64(int fd, int advice, loff_t offset, loff_t len)
This gives us the following ABI independent argument distribution:
	fd: type int (r0)
	advice: type int (r1)
	offset: type long long (r2-r3)
	len: type long long (sp[0]-sp[4])
Now, since the syscall entry code takes care of 5 registers only by
default including the store of r4 to the stack, we need a wrapper to
store r5 to the stack as well.  Because that wrapper was missing and was
always required this means that sys_fadvise64_64 never worked on ARM and
therefore we can safely reuse its syscall number for our new
sys_arm_fadvise64_64 interface.

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2005-09-01 12:37:13 +01:00
Robert Love
498de0cc5e [ARM] Add syscall stubs for inotify and ioprio system calls
Signed-off-by: Robert Love <rml@novell.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2005-08-15 10:57:08 +01:00
Linus Torvalds
1da177e4c3 Linux-2.6.12-rc2
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.

Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00