mpc85xx_pci_err_probe(struct platform_device *op) need platform_device
declaration for definition. Otherwise, it will cause compile error if any
files including fsl_pci.h without declaration of platform_device.
Signed-off-by: Jia Hongtao <hongtao.jia@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
The T4240 utilizes a new PCIe controller block that has some minor
programming model differences from previous versions.
The major one that impacts initialization is how we determine the link
state. On the 3.x controllers we have a memory mapped SoC register
instead of a PCI config register that reports the link state.
Signed-off-by: Roy Zang <tie-fei.zang@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Andy Fleming <afleming@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
The pci controller structure has a provision to store the device structure
pointer of the corresponding platform device. Currently this information is
not stored during fsl pci controller initialization. This information is
required while dealing with iommu groups for pci devices connected to the
fsl pci controller. For the case where the pci devices can't be paritioned,
they would fall under the same device group as the pci controller.
This patch stores the platform device information in the pci controller
structure during initialization.
Signed-off-by: Varun Sethi <Varun.Sethi@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
We unified the Freescale pci/pcie initialization by changing the fsl_pci
to a platform driver. In previous PCI code architecture the initialization
routine is called at board_setup_arch stage. Now the initialization is done
in probe function which is architectural better. Also It's convenient for
adding PM support for PCI controller in later patch.
Now we registered pci controllers as platform devices. So we combine two
initialization code as one platform driver.
Signed-off-by: Jia Hongtao <B38951@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Li Yang <leoli@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Chunhe Lan <Chunhe.Lan@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
As an alternative incremental starting point to Jia Hongtao's patchset,
get the FSL PCI init out of the board files, but do not yet convert to a
platform driver.
Rather than having each board supply a magic register offset for
determining the "primary" bus, we look for which PCI host bridge
contains an ISA node within its subtree. If there is no ISA node,
normally that would mean there is no primary bus, but until certain
bugs are fixed we arbitrarily designate a primary in this case.
Conversion to a platform driver and related improvements can happen
after this, as the ordering issues are sorted out.
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
FSL PCIe controller v2.1:
- New MSI inbound window
- Same Inbound windows address as PCIe controller v1.x
Added new pit_t member(pmit) to struct ccsr_pci for MSI inbound window
FSL PCIe controller v2.2 and v2.3:
- Different addresses for PCIe inbound window 3,2,1
- Exposed PCIe inbound window 0
- New PCIe interrupt status register
Added new config and interrupt Status register to struct ccsr_pci & updated
pit_t array size to reflect the 4 inbound windows.
Device tree is used to maintain backward compatibility i.e. update inbound
window 1 index depending upon "compatible" field witin PCIE node.
Signed-off-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar@freescale.com>
Acked-by: Roy Zang <tie-fei.zang@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
The following commit broke 83xx because it assumed the 83xx platforms
exposed the "IMMR" address in BAR0 like the 85xx/86xx/QoriQ devices do:
commit 3da34aae03
Author: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: Tue May 12 15:51:56 2009 -0500
powerpc/fsl: Support unique MSI addresses per PCIe Root Complex
However that is not true, so we have to search through the inbound
window settings on 83xx to find which one matches the IMMR address to
determine its PCI address.
Reported-by: Ilya Yanok <yanok@emcraft.com>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Previouslly we just always set the inbound window to 2G. This was
broken for systems with >2G. If a system has >=4G we will need
SWIOTLB support to handle that case.
We now allocate PCICSRBAR/PEXCSRBAR right below the lowest PCI outbound
address for MMIO or the 4G boundary (if the lowest PCI address is above
4G).
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
This allows other platforms with the same pci block like MPC5121 to use it.
Signed-off-by: John Rigby <jrigby@freescale.com>
Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
On the 85xx/86xx PCIe controllers if there is no device connected to the
PHB we will still allocate a pci_bus for downstream bus of the virtual
P2P bridge. However the resources allocated to the downstream bus are not
correct and so we just mimic the resources from the upstream pci_bus.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Rewrite the Freescale PCI code to support PCI on 83xx/85xx/86xx and
PCIe on 85xx/86xx.
Signed-off-by: Roy Zang <tie-fei.zang@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Move
arch/powerpc/platforms/86xx/pci.c -> arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_pci.c
arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_pcie.h -> arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_pci.h
as the base to unify 83xx/85xx/86xx pci and pcie.
Add CONFIG_FSL_PCI to build fsl_pci.c for Freescale pci and pcie option.
The code still works for 86xx platforms.
Signed-off-by: Roy Zang <tie-fei.zang@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>