Commit Graph

6 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Oliver Upton
821d935c87 KVM: arm64: Introduce support for userspace SMCCC filtering
As the SMCCC (and related specifications) march towards an 'everything
and the kitchen sink' interface for interacting with a system it becomes
less likely that KVM will support every related feature. We could do
better by letting userspace have a crack at it instead.

Allow userspace to define an 'SMCCC filter' that applies to both HVCs
and SMCs initiated by the guest. Supporting both conduits with this
interface is important for a couple of reasons. Guest SMC usage is table
stakes for a nested guest, as HVCs are always taken to the virtual EL2.
Additionally, guests may want to interact with a service on the secure
side which can now be proxied by userspace.

Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230404154050.2270077-10-oliver.upton@linux.dev
2023-04-05 12:07:41 +01:00
Oliver Upton
fb88707dd3 KVM: arm64: Use a maple tree to represent the SMCCC filter
Maple tree is an efficient B-tree implementation that is intended for
storing non-overlapping intervals. Such a data structure is a good fit
for the SMCCC filter as it is desirable to sparsely allocate the 32 bit
function ID space.

To that end, add a maple tree to kvm_arch and correctly init/teardown
along with the VM. Wire in a test against the hypercall filter for HVCs
which does nothing until the controls are exposed to userspace.

Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230404154050.2270077-8-oliver.upton@linux.dev
2023-04-05 12:07:41 +01:00
Oliver Upton
aac9496812 KVM: arm64: Rename SMC/HVC call handler to reflect reality
KVM handles SMCCC calls from virtual EL2 that use the SMC instruction
since commit bd36b1a9eb ("KVM: arm64: nv: Handle SMCs taken from
virtual EL2"). Thus, the function name of the handler no longer reflects
reality.

Normalize the name on SMCCC, since that's the only hypercall interface
KVM supports in the first place. No fuctional change intended.

Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230404154050.2270077-5-oliver.upton@linux.dev
2023-04-05 12:07:41 +01:00
Raghavendra Rao Ananta
05714cab7d KVM: arm64: Setup a framework for hypercall bitmap firmware registers
KVM regularly introduces new hypercall services to the guests without
any consent from the userspace. This means, the guests can observe
hypercall services in and out as they migrate across various host
kernel versions. This could be a major problem if the guest
discovered a hypercall, started using it, and after getting migrated
to an older kernel realizes that it's no longer available. Depending
on how the guest handles the change, there's a potential chance that
the guest would just panic.

As a result, there's a need for the userspace to elect the services
that it wishes the guest to discover. It can elect these services
based on the kernels spread across its (migration) fleet. To remedy
this, extend the existing firmware pseudo-registers, such as
KVM_REG_ARM_PSCI_VERSION, but by creating a new COPROC register space
for all the hypercall services available.

These firmware registers are categorized based on the service call
owners, but unlike the existing firmware pseudo-registers, they hold
the features supported in the form of a bitmap.

During the VM initialization, the registers are set to upper-limit of
the features supported by the corresponding registers. It's expected
that the VMMs discover the features provided by each register via
GET_ONE_REG, and write back the desired values using SET_ONE_REG.
KVM allows this modification only until the VM has started.

Some of the standard features are not mapped to any bits of the
registers. But since they can recreate the original problem of
making it available without userspace's consent, they need to
be explicitly added to the case-list in
kvm_hvc_call_default_allowed(). Any function-id that's not enabled
via the bitmap, or not listed in kvm_hvc_call_default_allowed, will
be returned as SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED to the guest.

Older userspace code can simply ignore the feature and the
hypercall services will be exposed unconditionally to the guests,
thus ensuring backward compatibility.

In this patch, the framework adds the register only for ARM's standard
secure services (owner value 4). Currently, this includes support only
for ARM True Random Number Generator (TRNG) service, with bit-0 of the
register representing mandatory features of v1.0. Other services are
momentarily added in the upcoming patches.

Signed-off-by: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
[maz: reduced the scope of some helpers, tidy-up bitmap max values,
 dropped error-only fast path]
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220502233853.1233742-3-rananta@google.com
2022-05-03 21:30:19 +01:00
Raghavendra Rao Ananta
85fbe08e4d KVM: arm64: Factor out firmware register handling from psci.c
Common hypercall firmware register handing is currently employed
by psci.c. Since the upcoming patches add more of these registers,
it's better to move the generic handling to hypercall.c for a
cleaner presentation.

While we are at it, collect all the firmware registers under
fw_reg_ids[] to help implement kvm_arm_get_fw_num_regs() and
kvm_arm_copy_fw_reg_indices() in a generic way. Also, define
KVM_REG_FEATURE_LEVEL_MASK using a GENMASK instead.

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
[maz: fixed KVM_REG_FEATURE_LEVEL_MASK]
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220502233853.1233742-2-rananta@google.com
2022-05-03 14:48:54 +01:00
Christoffer Dall
55009c6ed2 KVM: arm/arm64: Factor out hypercall handling from PSCI code
We currently intertwine the KVM PSCI implementation with the general
dispatch of hypercall handling, which makes perfect sense because PSCI
is the only category of hypercalls we support.

However, as we are about to support additional hypercalls, factor out
this functionality into a separate hypercall handler file.

Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>
[steven.price@arm.com: rebased]
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
2019-10-21 19:20:26 +01:00