Hans de Goede
211391bf04
ACPI: tables: FPDT: Don't call acpi_os_map_memory() on invalid phys address
...
On a Packard Bell Dot SC (Intel Atom N2600 model) there is a FPDT table
which contains invalid physical addresses, with high bits set which fall
outside the range of the CPU-s supported physical address range.
Calling acpi_os_map_memory() on such an invalid phys address leads to
the below WARN_ON in ioremap triggering resulting in an oops/stacktrace.
Add code to verify the physical address before calling acpi_os_map_memory()
to fix / avoid the oops.
[ 1.226900] ioremap: invalid physical address 3001000000000000
[ 1.226949] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 1.226962] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 1 at arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c:200 __ioremap_caller.cold+0x43/0x5f
[ 1.226996] Modules linked in:
[ 1.227016] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.0.0-rc3+ #490
[ 1.227029] Hardware name: Packard Bell dot s/SJE01_CT, BIOS V1.10 07/23/2013
[ 1.227038] RIP: 0010:__ioremap_caller.cold+0x43/0x5f
[ 1.227054] Code: 96 00 00 e9 f8 af 24 ff 89 c6 48 c7 c7 d8 0c 84 99 e8 6a 96 00 00 e9 76 af 24 ff 48 89 fe 48 c7 c7 a8 0c 84 99 e8 56 96 00 00 <0f> 0b e9 60 af 24 ff 48 8b 34 24 48 c7 c7 40 0d 84 99 e8 3f 96 00
[ 1.227067] RSP: 0000:ffffb18c40033d60 EFLAGS: 00010286
[ 1.227084] RAX: 0000000000000032 RBX: 3001000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000
[ 1.227095] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 00000000ffffdfff RDI: 00000000ffffffff
[ 1.227105] RBP: 3001000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffb18c40033c18
[ 1.227115] R10: 0000000000000003 R11: ffffffff99d62fe8 R12: 0000000000000008
[ 1.227124] R13: 0003001000000000 R14: 0000000000001000 R15: 3001000000000000
[ 1.227135] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff913a3c080000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 1.227146] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 1.227156] CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 0000000018c26000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
[ 1.227167] Call Trace:
[ 1.227176] <TASK>
[ 1.227185] ? acpi_os_map_iomem+0x1c9/0x1e0
[ 1.227215] ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x187/0x370
[ 1.227254] acpi_os_map_iomem+0x1c9/0x1e0
[ 1.227288] acpi_init_fpdt+0xa8/0x253
[ 1.227308] ? acpi_debugfs_init+0x1f/0x1f
[ 1.227339] do_one_initcall+0x5a/0x300
[ 1.227406] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x3f/0x80
[ 1.227442] kernel_init_freeable+0x28b/0x2cc
[ 1.227512] ? rest_init+0x170/0x170
[ 1.227538] kernel_init+0x16/0x140
[ 1.227552] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
[ 1.227639] </TASK>
[ 1.227647] irq event stamp: 186819
[ 1.227656] hardirqs last enabled at (186825): [<ffffffff98184a6e>] __up_console_sem+0x5e/0x70
[ 1.227672] hardirqs last disabled at (186830): [<ffffffff98184a53>] __up_console_sem+0x43/0x70
[ 1.227686] softirqs last enabled at (186576): [<ffffffff980fbc9d>] __irq_exit_rcu+0xed/0x160
[ 1.227701] softirqs last disabled at (186569): [<ffffffff980fbc9d>] __irq_exit_rcu+0xed/0x160
[ 1.227715] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2022-09-10 18:18:34 +02:00
Adrian Huang
97e03410bc
ACPI: tables: FPDT: Do not print FW_BUG message if record types are reserved
...
In ACPI 6.4 spec, record types "0x0002-0xffff" of FPDT Performance Record
Types [1] and record types "0x0003-0xffff" of Runtime Performance Record
Types [2] are reserved.
Users might be confused with the FW_BUG message, and they think this
is the FW issue. Here is the example in a Lenovo box:
ACPI: FPDT 0x00000000A820A000 000044 (v01 LENOVO THINKSYS 00000100 01000013)
ACPI: Reserving FPDT table memory at [mem 0xa820a000-0xa820a043]
ACPI FPDT: [Firmware Bug]: Invalid record 4113 found
So, remove the FW_BUG message to avoid confusion since those types are
reserved in ACPI 6.4 spec.
[1] https://uefi.org/specs/ACPI/6.4/05_ACPI_Software_Programming_Model/ACPI_Software_Programming_Model.html#fpdt-performance-record-types-table
[2] https://uefi.org/specs/ACPI/6.4/05_ACPI_Software_Programming_Model/ACPI_Software_Programming_Model.html#runtime-performance-record-types-table
Signed-off-by: Adrian Huang <ahuang12@lenovo.com>
Acked-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-08-25 20:01:07 +02:00
Jing Xiangfeng
dd9eaa23e7
ACPI: tables: FPDT: Add missing acpi_put_table() in acpi_init_fpdt()
...
acpi_init_fpdt() forgets to call acpi_put_table() in an error path.
Add the missing function call to fix it.
Fixes: d1eb86e59b
("ACPI: tables: introduce support for FPDT table")
Signed-off-by: Jing Xiangfeng <jingxiangfeng@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
[ rjw: Subject and changelog edits ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-06-07 16:00:38 +02:00
Zhang Rui
d1eb86e59b
ACPI: tables: introduce support for FPDT table
...
ACPI Firmware Performance Data Table (FPDT) provides information about
firmware performance during system boot, S3 suspend and S3 resume.
Have the kernel parse the FPDT table, and expose the firmware
performance data to userspace as sysfs attributes under
/sys/firmware/acpi/fpdt/.
Tested-by: Todd Brandt <todd.e.brandt@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-01-29 19:24:13 +01:00