Since most of the emac platform_data is really SoC specific
and not board specific, move it to the SoC-specific files.
Put a pointer to the platform_data in the soc_info structure
so the board-specific code can set some of the platform_data
if it needs to.
Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
Currently, there is one set of platform_device and platform_data
structures for all DaVinci SoCs. The differences in the data
between the various SoCs is handled by davinci_serial_init()
by checking the SoC type. However, as new SoCs appear, this
routine will become more & more cluttered.
To clean up the routine and make it easier to add support for new
SoCs, move the platform_device and platform_data structures into the
SoC-specific code and use the SoC infrastructure to provide access
to the data.
In the process, fix a bug where the wrong irq is used for uart2
of the dm646x.
Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
The current gpio code needs to know the number of
gpio irqs there are and what the bank irq number is.
To determine those values, it checks the SoC type.
It also assumes that the base address and the number
of irqs the interrupt controller uses is fixed.
To clean up the SoC checks and make it support
different base addresses and interrupt controllers,
have the SoC-specific code set those values in
the soc_info structure and have the gpio code
reference them there.
Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
The watchdog code currently hardcodes the base address
of the timer its using. To support new SoCs, make it
support timers at any address. Use the soc_info structure
to do this.
Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
The davinci timer code currently hardcodes the timer register
base addresses, the timer irq numbers, and the timers to use
for clock events and clocksource. This won't work for some
a new SoC so put those values into the soc_info structure
and set them up in the SoC-specific files.
Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
Use the SoC infrastructure to hold the interrupt controller
information (i.e., base address, default priorities,
interrupt controller type, and the number of IRQs).
The interrupt controller base, although initially put
in the soc_info structure's intc_base field, is eventually
put in the global 'davinci_intc_base' so the low-level
interrupt code can access it without a dereference.
These changes enable the SoC default irq priorities to be
put in the SoC-specific files, and the interrupt controller
to be at any base address.
Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
The pinmux register base and setup can be different for different
SoCs so move the pinmux reg base, pinmux table (and its size) to
the SoC infrastructure.
Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
The current code to support the DaVinci Power and Sleep Controller (PSC)
assumes that there is only one controller. This assumption is no longer
valid so expand the support to allow greater than one PSC.
To accomplish this, put the base addresses for the PSCs in the SoC
infrastructure so it can be referenced by the PSC code. This also
requires adding an extra parameter to davinci_psc_config() to specify
the PSC that is to be enabled/disabled.
Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
All of the davinci SoCs need to call davinci_clk_init() so
put the call in the common init routine.
Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
The Davinci cpu_is_davinci_*() macros use the SoC part number
and variant retrieved from the JTAG ID register to determine the
type of cpu that the kernel is running on. Currently, the code to
read the JTAG ID register assumes that the register is always at
the same base address. This isn't true on some newer SoCs.
To solve this, have the SoC-specific code set the JTAG ID register
base address in soc_info structure and add a 'cpu_id' member to it.
'cpu_id' will be used by the cpu_is_davinci_*() macros to match
the cpu id. Also move the info used to identify the cpu type into
the SoC-specific code to keep all SoC-specific code together.
The common code will read the JTAG ID register, search through
an array of davinci_id structures to identify the cpu type.
Once identified, it will set the 'cpu_id' member of the soc_info
structure to the proper value and the cpu_is_davinci_*() macros
will now work.
Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
Create a structure to encapsulate SoC-specific information.
This will assist in generalizing code so it can be used by
different SoCs that have similar hardware but with minor
differences such as having a different base address.
The idea is that the code for each SoC fills out a structure
with the correct information. The board-specific code then
calls the SoC init routine which in turn will call a common
init routine that makes a copy of the structure, maps in I/O
regions, etc.
After initialization, code can get a pointer to the structure
by calling davinci_get_soc_info(). Eventually, the common
init routine will make a copy of all of the data pointed to
by the structure so the original data can be made __init_data.
That way the data for SoC's that aren't being used won't consume
memory for the entire life of the kernel.
The structure will be extended in subsequent patches but
initially, it holds the map_desc structure for any I/O
regions the SoC/board wants statically mapped.
Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
Rework DM644x code into SoC specific and board specific parts.
This is also to generalize the structure a bit so it's easier to add
support for new SoCs in the DaVinci family.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
