This reverts commit e620799c41.
The commit introduces unit test failures.
Expected cur == &entries[i], but
cur == 0000037fffadfd80
&entries[i] == 0000037fffadfd60
# list_test_list_cut_position: pass:0 fail:1 skip:0 total:1
not ok 21 list_test_list_cut_position
# list_test_list_cut_before: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/list-test.c:444
Expected cur == &entries[i], but
cur == 0000037fffa9fd70
&entries[i] == 0000037fffa9fd60
# list_test_list_cut_before: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/list-test.c:444
Expected cur == &entries[i], but
cur == 0000037fffa9fd80
&entries[i] == 0000037fffa9fd70
Revert it.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240922150507.553814-1-linux@roeck-us.net
Fixes: e620799c41 ("list: test: fix tests for list_cut_position()")
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: I Hsin Cheng <richard120310@gmail.com>
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Increase the test coverage of list_test_list_replace*() by adding the
checks to compare the pointer of "a_new.next" and "a_new.prev" to make
sure a perfect circular doubly linked list is formed after the
replacement.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240910040818.65723-1-richard120310@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: I Hsin Cheng <richard120310@gmail.com>
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Fix test for list_cut_position*() for the missing check of integer "i"
after the second loop. The variable should be checked for second time to
make sure both lists after the cut operation are formed as expected.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240910043531.71343-1-richard120310@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: I Hsin Cheng <richard120310@gmail.com>
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
make allmodconfig && make W=1 C=1 reports:
WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in lib/list-test.o
Add the missing invocation of the MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macro.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
'klist_test_struct' has been unused since the original
commit 57b4f760f9 ("list: test: Test the klist structure").
Remove it.
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <linux@treblig.org>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Add KUnit tests to the klist linked-list structure.
These perform testing for different variations of node add
and node delete in the klist data structure (<linux/klist.h>).
Limitation: Since we use a static global variable, and if
multiple instances of this test are run concurrently, the test may fail.
Signed-off-by: Sadiya Kazi <sadiyakazi@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Add KUnit tests to the hlist linked-list structure which is used by
hashtables. This should give coverage of every function and macro in
list.h, as well as (combined with the KUnit tests for the hash
functions) get very close to having tests for the hashtable structure.
The tests here mirror the existing list tests, and are found in a new
suite titled 'hlist'.
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
The list_entry_is_head() macro was added[1] after the list KUnit tests,
so wasn't tested. Add a new KUnit test to complete the set.
[1]: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=e130816164e244b692921de49771eeb28205152d
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
list_is_head() was added recently[1], and didn't have a KUnit test. The
implementation is trivial, so it's not a particularly exciting test, but
it'd be nice to get back to full coverage of the list functions.
[1]: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/include/linux/list.h?id=0425473037db40d9e322631f2d4dc6ef51f97e88
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
The list_del_init_careful() function was added[1] after the list KUnit
test. Add a very basic test to cover it.
Note that this test only covers the single-threaded behaviour (which
matches list_del_init()), as is already the case with the test for
list_empty_careful().
[1]: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=c6fe44d96fc1536af5b11cd859686453d1b7bfd1
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
A few of the lists used in the linked-list KUnit tests (the
for_each_entry{,_reverse} tests) are declared 'static', and so are
not-reinitialised if the test runs multiple times. This was not a
problem when KUnit tests were run once on startup, but when tests are
able to be run manually (e.g. from debugfs[1]), this is no longer the
case.
Making these lists no longer 'static' causes the lists to be
reinitialised, and the test passes each time it is run. While there may
be some value in testing that initialising static lists works, the
for_each_entry_* tests are unlikely to be the right place for it.
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
As tests are added to kunit, it will become less feasible to execute
all built tests together. By supporting modular tests we provide
a simple way to do selective execution on a running system; specifying
CONFIG_KUNIT=y
CONFIG_KUNIT_EXAMPLE_TEST=m
...means we can simply "insmod example-test.ko" to run the tests.
To achieve this we need to do the following:
o export the required symbols in kunit
o string-stream tests utilize non-exported symbols so for now we skip
building them when CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST=m.
o drivers/base/power/qos-test.c contains a few unexported interface
references, namely freq_qos_read_value() and freq_constraints_init().
Both of these could be potentially defined as static inline functions
in include/linux/pm_qos.h, but for now we simply avoid supporting
module build for that test suite.
o support a new way of declaring test suites. Because a module cannot
do multiple late_initcall()s, we provide a kunit_test_suites() macro
to declare multiple suites within the same module at once.
o some test module names would have been too general ("test-test"
and "example-test" for kunit tests, "inode-test" for ext4 tests);
rename these as appropriate ("kunit-test", "kunit-example-test"
and "ext4-inode-test" respectively).
Also define kunit_test_suite() via kunit_test_suites()
as callers in other trees may need the old definition.
Co-developed-by: Knut Omang <knut.omang@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Knut Omang <knut.omang@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Acked-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> # for ext4 bits
Acked-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> # For list-test
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Add a KUnit test for the kernel doubly linked list implementation in
include/linux/list.h
Each test case (list_test_x) is focused on testing the behaviour of the
list function/macro 'x'. None of the tests pass invalid lists to these
macros, and so should behave identically with DEBUG_LIST enabled and
disabled.
Note that, at present, it only tests the list_ types (not the
singly-linked hlist_), and does not yet test all of the
list_for_each_entry* macros (and some related things like
list_prepare_entry).
Ignoring checkpatch.pl spurious errors related to its handling of for_each
and other list macros. checkpatch.pl expects anything with for_each in its
name to be a loop and expects that the open brace is placed on the same
line as for a for loop. In this case, test case naming scheme includes
name of the macro it is testing, which results in the spurious errors.
Commit message updated by Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Tested-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
