Commit Graph

6 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Kees Cook
961b33c244 jfs: Fix usercopy whitelist for inline inode data
Bart Massey reported what turned out to be a usercopy whitelist false
positive in JFS when symlink contents exceeded 128 bytes. The inline
inode data (i_inline) is actually designed to overflow into the "extended
area" following it (i_inline_ea) when needed. So the whitelist needed to
be expanded to include both i_inline and i_inline_ea (the whole size
of which is calculated internally using IDATASIZE, 256, instead of
sizeof(i_inline), 128).

$ cd /mnt/jfs
$ touch $(perl -e 'print "B" x 250')
$ ln -s B* b
$ ls -l >/dev/null

[  249.436410] Bad or missing usercopy whitelist? Kernel memory exposure attempt detected from SLUB object 'jfs_ip' (offset 616, size 250)!

Reported-by: Bart Massey <bart.massey@gmail.com>
Fixes: 8d2704d382 ("jfs: Define usercopy region in jfs_ip slab cache")
Cc: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@kernel.org>
Cc: jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
2018-08-04 07:53:46 -07:00
Andi Kleen
ef1fc2f01e BKL-removal: Implement a compat_ioctl handler for JFS
The ioctls were already compatible except for the actual values so this
was fairly easy to do.

Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2008-02-07 13:45:29 -06:00
Dave Kleikamp
f720e3ba55 JFS: Whitespace cleanup and remove some dead code
Signed-off-by: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2007-06-06 15:28:35 -05:00
Dave Kleikamp
63f83c9fcf JFS: White space cleanup
Removed trailing spaces & tabs, and spaces preceding tabs.
Also a couple very minor comment cleanups.

Signed-off-by: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@austin.ibm.com>
(cherry picked from f74156539964d7b3d5164fdf8848e6a682f75b97 commit)
2006-10-02 09:55:27 -05:00
Herbert Poetzl
fa3241d24c JFS: ext2 inode attributes for jfs
ext2 inode attributes with relevance for jfs:

'a' 	EXT2_APPEND_FL       -> append only
'i' 	EXT2_IMMUTABLE_FL    -> immutable file
's' 	EXT2_SECRM_FL	     -> zero file
'u' 	EXT2_UNRM_FL	     -> allow for unrm
'A' 	EXT2_NOATIME_FL      -> no access time
'D' 	EXT2_DIRSYNC_FL      -> dirsync
'S' 	EXT2_SYNC_FL	     -> sync

overview of jfs flags (partially for OS/2)

value	   (OS/2)	Linux	ext2 attrs
------------------------------------------------
0x00010000 IFJOURNAL	-
0x00020000 ISPARSE  	used
0x00040000 INLINEEA 	used
0x00080000 -	    	-	JFS_NOATIME_FL

0x00100000 -	    	-	JFS_DIRSYNC_FL
0x00200000 -	    	-	JFS_SYNC_FL
0x00400000 -	    	-	JFS_SECRM_FL
0x00800000 ISWAPFILE	-	JFS_UNRM_FL

0x01000000 -	    	-	JFS_APPEND_FL
0x02000000 IREADONLY	-	JFS_IMMUTABLE_FL
0x04000000 IHIDDEN  	-	-
0x08000000 ISYSTEM  	-	-

0x10000000 -	    	-
0x20000000 IDIRECTORY	used
0x40000000 IARCHIVE 	-
0x80000000 INEWNAME 	-

the implementation is straight forward, except
for the fact that the attributes have to be mapped
to match with the ext2 ones to avoid a separate
tool for manipulating them (this could be avoided
when using a separate flag field in the on-disk
representation, but the overhead is minimal)

a special jfs_ioctl is added to allow for the new
JFS_IOC_GETFLAGS and JFS_IOC_SETFLAGS calls.

a helper function jfs_set_inode_flags() to transfer
the flags from the on-disk version to the inode

minor changes to allow flag inheritance on inode
creation, as well as a cleanup of the on-disk
flags (including the new ones)

beforementioned helper to map between ext2 and jfs
versions of the new flags ...

the JFS_SECRM_FL and JFS_UNRM_FL are not done yet
and I'm not 100% sure they are worth the effort,
the rest seems to work out of the box ...

Signed-off-by: Herbert Poetzl <herbert@13thfloor.at>
Signed-off-by: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@austin.ibm.com>
2006-02-09 09:09:16 -06:00
Linus Torvalds
1da177e4c3 Linux-2.6.12-rc2
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.

Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00