This enum is already perfectly aliased to enum nl80211_band, and
the only reason for it is that we get IEEE80211_NUM_BANDS out of
it. There's no really good reason to not declare the number of
bands in nl80211 though, so do that and remove the cfg80211 one.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
In some of the non-success return paths, the memory allocated by
iwl4965_sta_alloc_lq() in iwl4965_alloc_bcast_station() is not freed.
In particular:
- if the card isn't ready after il4965_prepare_card_hw()
- if the card is hardware-rfkilled
In the hardware rfkilled path, the driver enables the rfkill
interrupt. When the card is unrfkilled and this interrupt is raised
we end up calling il4965_bg_restart() which calls __il4965_up() which
calls iwl4965_alloc_bcast_station() again.
Suggested-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
When il4965_hw_nic_init in __il4965_up fails, the memory allocated by
iwl4965_sta_alloc_lq in iwl4965_alloc_bcast_station is not freed.
This patches adds il_dealloc_bcast_stations in the error handling code of
__il4965_up to fix this problem.
This patch has been tested in real device, and it actually fixes the bug.
Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@163.com>
Acked-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
If "txq->cmd = kzalloc(...)" in il_tx_queue_init fails,
"kfree(txq->cmd[i])" in il_tx_queue_free and il_cmd_queue_free
in iwl4965_hw_txq_ctx_free will causes a null pointer dereference,
because txq->cmd is NULL at that time.
This patch fixes this problem by adding a if-check before kfree.
To avoid double free in il_tx_queue_free and il_cmd_queue_free
caused by the fixing, txq->meta and txq->cmd in error handling code
of il_tx_queue_init are assigned null values.
Otherwise, a double free will occur.
This patch has been tested in real device, and it actually fixes the bug.
Thanks Stanislaw for his suggestion.
Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@163.com>
Acked-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Also remove an unused label.
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
[Rewrote commit message]
Signed-off-by: Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Currently mac80211 does not inform the driver of the session
block ack timeout when starting a rx aggregation session.
Drivers that manage the reorder buffer need to know this
parameter.
Seeing that there are now too many arguments for the
drv_ampdu_action() function, wrap them inside a structure.
Signed-off-by: Sara Sharon <sara.sharon@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
The il_sensitivity_ranges is never modified, so declare it as const.
Done with the help of Coccinelle.
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
Acked-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
With the new optimized do_div() code, some versions of gcc
produce obviously incorrect code that leads to a link error
in iwlegacy/common.o:
drivers/built-in.o: In function `il_send_rxon_timing':
:(.text+0xa6b4d4): undefined reference to `____ilog2_NaN'
:(.text+0xa6b4f0): undefined reference to `__aeabi_uldivmod'
In a few thousand randconfig builds, I have seen this problem
a couple of times in this file, but never anywhere else in the
kernel, so we can try to work around this in the only file
that shows the behavior, by marking the il_adjust_beacon_interval
function as noinline, which convinces gcc to use the unoptimized
do_div() all the time.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
This code causes a static checker warning because we check for
"if (ret == 0)" but we have already had verified that was true. Clean
it up a little.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
