This patch also checks if the sensor is well detected at connection time.
Signed-off-by: Jean-François Moine <moinejf@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
Generate a release button event when the button is still pressed when the
stream stops.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
The errors were found by checkpatch.pl. Most fixes are:
- remove spaces followed by TAB(s),
- split lines greater than 80 characters,
- move most '{'s from start of line to end of previous line.
(Some '{'s at start of line remain when the '}'s are on the same line)
Signed-off-by: Jean-François Moine <moinejf@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
The image pointer and its length are now in the main structure instead
of in the frame buffer. They are updated on application vidioc_qbuf and
in the URB interrupt function when ending an image.
Signed-off-by: Jean-François Moine <moinejf@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
The JPEG header is now included in the subdriver structure instead
of being allocated and freed at capture start and stop.
Signed-off-by: Jean-François Moine <moinejf@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
setcolors(0 is a no-op for 7670 sensors, so we should not report a
saturation control for 7670 sensors.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
With the ovfx2 bridge sometimes the first few frames in a stream
would be no good, as the bridge and sensor are not in complete hsync /
vsync yet. This can easily be detected by checking the framesize. So if the
framesize is short and it is one of the 1ste 3 frames after an sd_start,
drop it.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
Due to hardware limitations this only works while the camera is
streaming.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
Due to hardware limitations this only works while the camera is
streaming.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
Note due to hardware limitiations (no interrupt endpoint), this only works
when the camera is streaming.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
ov764x remove setting of AEC limits, as the custom values cause AEC
oscilation in 320x240.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
gspca_ov519: remove non functioning contrast control for ov764x sensor
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
Differentiate between ov7640 and ov7648 and handle the ov7648 320x240
on the ov519 bridge specially to fix r and b being swapped.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
Michael Deegan <michael@ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au>, has reported issues with
using 640x480 mode on his ov518+ webcam. The fix for this breaks things
on my ov518+ cam (Trust 320 Sp@cecam), this patch thus adds differentiation
in the driver between the OV7620 sensor his cam has and the OV7620AE sensor
my cam has, and then only changes the init sequence for the ov518+ +
OV7620 combo which was not working for Michael.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
Mark led on eyetoy II as inverted, I have the feeling the led needs to
be inverted for all 519 based cams (iow we got the set led code wrong), but
lets just deal with this one cam at a time to avoid breaking currently
working cams.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
In particular, several occurances of funny versions of 'success',
'unknown', 'therefore', 'acknowledge', 'argument', 'achieve', 'address',
'beginning', 'desirable', 'separate' and 'necessary' are fixed.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack <daniel@caiaq.de>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
- gl860.c:332:15: warning: cast to restricted __le16
- gl860.c:333:15: warning: cast to restricted __le16
- gl860-mi1320.c:348:5: warning: symbol 'mi1320_camera_settings' was not declared. Should it be static?
- gl860-mi2020.c:772:5: warning: symbol 'mi2020_camera_settings' was not declared. Should it be static?
- m5602_ov9650.c:444:7: warning: symbol 'data' shadows an earlier one
- m5602_core.c:84:5: warning: symbol 'm5602_wait_for_i2c' was not declared. Should it be static?
- m5602_core.c:391:6: warning: symbol 'm5602_disconnect' was not declared. Should it be static?
- m5602_s5k4aa.c:530:23: warning: dubious: x | !y
- m5602_s5k4aa.c:575:23: warning: dubious: x | !y
- gspca.c:1196:13: warning: potentially expensive pointer subtraction
- mr97310a.c:70:5: warning: symbol 'force_sensor_type' was not declared. Should it be static?
- ov519.c:2025:4: warning: do-while statement is not a compound statement
- ov519.c:2063:4: warning: do-while statement is not a compound statement
- ov519.c:2089:4: warning: do-while statement is not a compound statement
- ov519.c:1985:34: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
- sn9c20x.c:1164:5: warning: symbol 'i2c_r1' was not declared. Should it be static?
- sn9c20x.c:1189:5: warning: symbol 'i2c_r2' was not declared. Should it be static?
- sn9c20x.c:2237:27: warning: right shift by bigger than source value
- sn9c20x.c:2237:27: warning: right shift by bigger than source value
Signed-off-by: Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
gspca w9968cf: Add support for JPEG compression, this enables much higher
framerates at 320x240 / 352x288 and also allows for 640x480 mode for
cams which can do this. The w9968cf uses planar JPEG, which libv4l until
now did not support, so this requires atleast version 0.6.3 of libv4l.
And something important I forgot to mention in my earlier w9968cf commits:
Many thanks to Hans Verkuil for giving me a w9968cf based cam, which has
allowed me to develop the gspca w9968cf support.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
gspca-w9968cf: Don't add an extra packet to the buffer after the EOF,
this makes the frame data size bigger then it should be which makes
gstreamer discard it.
This patch also fixes an unrelated compiler warning.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
Cache sensor regs to avoid unnecessary slow i2c reads / writes, this speeds
up sd_start a bit with most bridges and a lot (from 5 seconds down to 0.3
seconds) with W996xCF cams, as this avoids very slow bit bang IO over
USB i2c reads.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
This patch adds support to gspca for the Winbond W9967CF and W9968CF
camera's. This is mostly a port of the existing v4l1 driver to gspca
(making it v4l2). But this also features fixes to the bitbanging i2c code
(send a nack not an ack after reading the last byte of a transfer), which
gets rid of the weird errors which were being seen there, and of
the smbus_refresh() hack to get around these errors.
Also the vstart settings have been tweaked to work with different
frequency filter settings.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
There were various "if (sensor == foo)" pieces of code inside ov519.c,
move these bits to the sensor specific init functions, where they
belong.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
gscpa_ov519: add support for the ovfx2 bridge
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
This patch adds support for the OV2610 and OV3610 sensors to the gspca
ov519 subdriver. This is a preparation patch for adding ovfx2 bridge
support.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
When we call gspca_frame_add, it returns a pointer to the frame passed in,
unless we call it with LAST_PACKET, when it will return a pointer to a
new frame in which to store the frame data for the next frame.
The frame pointer was not updated in stv06xx and ov518.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
gspca_ov519: Cleanup some sensor special cases
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
gspca_ov519: add support for the ov511 bridge
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
Hmm, another one with an extra if (life sucks) the
default contrast really is no good for the ov6630, it
isn't even high enough in full daylight, this gives
the ov6630 a different initial value for a better out
of the box experience.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
As reported on the ov51x-jpeg list, and as I can confirm with my own cam
the ov7670 in 320x240 has a number of broken columns of pixels
at the left of the picture. This was not present in the old
driver as it always used 640x480 and did software
downscaling (took me a while to figure that one out).
The fix adds a sensor specific if in so far sensor
neutral code :( But this is the only way to fix this,
this cannot be fixed by only changing sensor registers.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
My ov519 cam has it led inverted, the same has been
reported on the ov51x-jpeg list for another
creative cam. This patch fixes this without changing
the behaviour for other cams.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
gspca_ov519: Add 320x240 and 160x120 support for cif sensor cams
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
The fix for the UV swapping in qcif mode with the ov6630, which I did
to fix this issue on a ov518 cam with an ov66308AF, causes UV swapping in
qcif with another cam of mine with the ov518 and an ov66308AE, so this
patch changes the code to differentiate between the ov66308AF and other
ov6630 versions, and restricts the UV swap fix to the ov66308AF.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
