mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-12-05 10:32:35 +00:00
132c93d421
2 Commits
Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Cyril Bur
|
132c93d421 |
drivers/misc: Aspeed LPC control fix compile error and warning
pgprot_dmachoerent() is not defined on every architecture. Having COMPILE_TEST set for the driver causes it to be compiled on architectures which do not have pgprot_dmachoerent(): drivers/misc/aspeed-lpc-ctrl.c: In function 'aspeed_lpc_ctrl_mmap': drivers/misc/aspeed-lpc-ctrl.c:51:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'pgprot_dmacoherent' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] prot = pgprot_dmacoherent(prot); There are two possible solutions: 1. Remove COMPILE_TEST to ensure the driver is only compiled on ARM 2. Use pgprot_noncached() instead of pgprot_dmachoerent() The first option results in less compile testing of the LPC control driver which is undesirable. The second option uses a function that is declared on all architectures and therefore should always build. Currently there is no practical difference between pgprot_noncached() and pgprot_dmachoerent() for the aspeed chips that this driver is compatible with. The reason for pgprot_dmachoerent() was that there may be chips made at some point in the future that could include hardware that pgprot_dmachoerent() could optimise for. As none of this hardware has even been announced there isn't really a need for pgprot_dmachoerent(). Using pgprot_noncached() is completely correct and optimal for all existing hardware on which the LPC control driver will run. This commit also addresses that phys_addr_t should be printed using %pap rather than %x: In file included from include/linux/miscdevice.h:6:0, from drivers/misc/aspeed-lpc-ctrl.c:11: drivers/misc/aspeed-lpc-ctrl.c: In function 'aspeed_lpc_ctrl_probe': drivers/misc/aspeed-lpc-ctrl.c:232:17: warning: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'phys_addr_t {aka long long unsigned int}' [-Wformat=] dev_info(dev, "Loaded at 0x%08x (0x%08x)\n", Signed-off-by: Cyril Bur <cyrilbur@gmail.com> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> |
||
Cyril Bur
|
6c4e976785 |
drivers/misc: Add Aspeed LPC control driver
In order to manage server systems, there is typically another processor known as a BMC (Baseboard Management Controller) which is responsible for powering the server and other various elements, sometimes fans, often the system flash. The Aspeed BMC family which is what is used on OpenPOWER machines and a number of x86 as well is typically connected to the host via an LPC (Low Pin Count) bus (among others). The LPC bus is an ISA bus on steroids. It's generally used by the BMC chip to provide the host with access to the system flash (via MEM/FW cycles) that contains the BIOS or other host firmware along with a number of SuperIO-style IOs (via IO space) such as UARTs, IPMI controllers. On the BMC chip side, this is all configured via a bunch of registers whose content is related to a given policy of what devices are exposed at a per system level, which is system/vendor specific, so we don't want to bolt that into the BMC kernel. This started with a need to provide something nicer than /dev/mem for user space to configure these things. One important aspect of the configuration is how the MEM/FW space is exposed to the host (ie, the x86 or POWER). Some registers in that bridge can define a window remapping all or portion of the LPC MEM/FW space to a portion of the BMC internal bus, with no specific limits imposed in HW. I think it makes sense to ensure that this window is configured by a kernel driver that can apply some serious sanity checks on what it is configured to map. In practice, user space wants to control this by flipping the mapping between essentially two types of portions of the BMC address space: - The flash space. This is a region of the BMC MMIO space that more/less directly maps the system flash (at least for reads, writes are somewhat more complicated). - One (or more) reserved area(s) of the BMC physical memory. The latter is needed for a number of things, such as avoiding letting the host manipulate the innards of the BMC flash controller via some evil backdoor, we want to do flash updates by routing the window to a portion of memory (under control of a mailbox protocol via some separate set of registers) which the host can use to write new data in bulk and then request the BMC to flash it. There are other uses, such as allowing the host to boot from an in-memory flash image rather than the one in flash (very handy for continuous integration and test, the BMC can just download new images). It is important to note that due to the way the Aspeed chip lets the kernel configure the mapping between host LPC addresses and BMC ram addresses the offset within the window must be a multiple of size. Not doing so will fragment the accessible space rather than simply moving 'zero' upwards. This is caused by the nature of HICR8 being a mask and the way host LPC addresses are translated. Signed-off-by: Cyril Bur <cyrilbur@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au> Reviewed-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> |