Replace strcpy() with strscpy() in the ACPI power resource driver.
strcpy() has been deprecated because it is generally unsafe, so it
is better to eliminate it from the kernel source.
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/88
Signed-off-by: Muhammad Qasim Abdul Majeed <qasim.majeed20@gmail.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240915183822.34588-6-qasim.majeed20@gmail.com
[ rjw: Subject and changelog edits ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The CPR3 power resource on the Toshiba Click Mini toggles a GPIO
which is called SISP (for SIS touchscreen power?) on/off.
This CPR3 power resource is not listed in any _PR? lists, let alone
in a _PR0 list for the SIS0817 touchscreen ACPI device which needs it.
Before commit a1224f34d7 ("ACPI: PM: Check states of power resources
during initialization") this was not an issue because since nothing
referenced the CPR3 power resource its state was always
ACPI_POWER_RESOURCE_STATE_UNKNOWN and power resources with this state
get ignored by acpi_turn_off_unused_power_resources().
This clearly is a bug in the DSDT of this device. Add a DMI quirk
to make acpi_turn_off_unused_power_resources() a no-op on this
model to fix the touchscreen no longer working since kernel 5.16 .
This quirk also causes 2 other power resources to not get turned
off, but the _OFF method on these already was a no-op, so this makes
no difference for the other 2 power resources.
Fixes: a1224f34d7 ("ACPI: PM: Check states of power resources during initialization")
Reported-by: Gé Koerkamp <ge.koerkamp@gmail.com>
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216946
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/regressions/32a14a8a-9795-4c8c-7e00-da9012f548f8@leemhuis.info/
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
While debugging a boot-time issue, it's hard to know what ACPI power
resource the kernel is initializing.
It's very helpful to print the full name path of the power resource
being added so that it is not necessary to guess which one it is,
especially on a system with 2 ore more power resources where the
last name path segment is the same.
Before:
ACPI: PM: Power Resource [RTD3]
ACPI: PM: Power Resource [RTD3]
ACPI: PM: Power Resource [PR00]
ACPI: PM: Power Resource [PR01]
After:
ACPI: \_SB_.PCI0.RP01.RTD3: New power resource
ACPI: \_SB_.PCI0.RP08.RTD3: New power resource
ACPI: \_SB_.PCI0.I2C3.H016.PR00: New power resource
ACPI: \_SB_.PCI0.SPI1.CRFP.PR01: New power resource
Signed-off-by: Kane Chen <kane.chen@intel.com>
[ rjw: Subject and changelog edits ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Instead of having acpi_device_add() defined as a wrapper around
__acpi_device_add(), export acpi_tie_acpi_dev() so it can be called
directly by acpi_add_power_resource(), fold acpi_device_add() into the
latter and rename __acpi_device_add() to acpi_device_add().
No intentional functional impact.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@bytedance.com>
The initialization of ACPI device objects is split between
acpi_init_device_object() and __acpi_device_add() that initializes
the dev field in struct acpi_device. The "release" function pointer
is passed to __acpi_device_add() for this reason.
However, that split is artificial and all of the initialization can
be carried out by acpi_init_device_object(), so rearrange the code
to that end. In particular, make acpi_init_device_object() take the
"release" pointer as an argument, along with the "type" which is
related to it, instead of __acpi_device_add().
No intentional functional impact.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@bytedance.com>
Merge ACPI device enumeration updates, ACPI power management updates
and PCI host bridge ACPI driver updates for 5.17-rc1:
- Introduce acpi_fetch_acpi_dev() as a replacement for
acpi_bus_get_device() and use it in the ACPI subsystem (Rafael
Wysocki).
- Avoid using _CID for device enumaration if _HID is missing or
invalid (Rafael Wysocki).
- Rework quirk handling during ACPI device enumeration and add some
new quirks for known broken platforms (Hans de Goede).
- Avoid unnecessary or redundant CPU cache flushing during system
PM transitions (Kirill A. Shutemov).
- Add PM debug messages related to power resources (Rafael Wysocki).
- Fix kernel-doc comment in the PCI host bridge ACPI driver (Yang Li).
* acpi-scan:
serdev: Do not instantiate serdevs on boards with known bogus DSDT entries
i2c: acpi: Do not instantiate I2C-clients on boards with known bogus DSDT entries
ACPI / x86: Add acpi_quirk_skip_[i2c_client|serdev]_enumeration() helpers
ACPI: scan: Create platform device for BCM4752 and LNV4752 ACPI nodes
ACPI: Use acpi_fetch_acpi_dev() instead of acpi_bus_get_device()
ACPI: scan: Introduce acpi_fetch_acpi_dev()
ACPI: scan: Do not add device IDs from _CID if _HID is not valid
* acpi-pm:
ACPI: PM: Remove redundant cache flushing
ACPI: PM: Avoid CPU cache flush when entering S4
* acpi-power:
ACPI: PM: Emit debug messages when enabling/disabling wakeup power
* acpi-pci:
PCI/ACPI: Fix acpi_pci_osc_control_set() kernel-doc comment
Modify the ACPI code to use acpi_fetch_acpi_dev() instead of
acpi_bus_get_device() where applicable.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Print additional debug messages when enabling and disabling wakeup
power for an ACPI device object to facilitate more fine-grained
debugging of problems in that area.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Fix a device wakeup power reference counting error introduced by
commit a2d7b2e004 ("ACPI: PM: Fix sharing of wakeup power
resources") because of a coding mistake.
Fixes: a2d7b2e004 ("ACPI: PM: Fix sharing of wakeup power resources")
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
If acpi_device_sleep_wake() called by acpi_enable_wakeup_device_power()
returns an error which means that the evaluation of either _DWS or
_PSW has failed, turn off all of the device's wakeup power resources
to be consistent with the clearing of dev->wakeup.prepare_count.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
If an ACPI wakeup power resource is shared between multiple devices,
it may not be managed correctly.
Suppose, for example, that two devices, A and B, share a wakeup power
resource P whose wakeup_enabled flag is 0 initially. Next, suppose
that wakeup power is enabled for A and B, in this order, and disabled
for B. When wakeup power is enabled for A, P will be turned on and
its wakeup_enabled flag will be set. Next, when wakeup power is
enabled for B, P will not be touched, because its wakeup_enabled flag
is set. Now, when wakeup power is disabled for B, P will be turned
off which is incorrect, because A will still need P in order to signal
wakeup.
Moreover, if wakeup power is enabled for A and then disabled for B,
the latter will cause P to be turned off incorrectly (it will be still
needed by A), because acpi_disable_wakeup_device_power() is allowed
to manipulate power resources when the wakeup.prepare_count counter
of the given device is 0.
While the first issue could be addressed by changing the
wakeup_enabled power resource flag into a counter, addressing the
second one requires modifying acpi_disable_wakeup_device_power() to
do nothing when the target device's wakeup.prepare_count reference
counter is zero and that would cause the new counter to be redundant.
Namely, if acpi_disable_wakeup_device_power() is modified as per the
above, every change of the new counter following a wakeup.prepare_count
change would be reflected by the analogous change of the main reference
counter of the given power resource.
Accordingly, modify acpi_disable_wakeup_device_power() to do nothing
when the target device's wakeup.prepare_count reference counter is
zero and drop the power resource wakeup_enabled flag altogether.
While at it, ensure that all of the power resources that can be
turned off will be turned off when disabling device wakeup due to
a power resource manipulation error, to prevent energy from being
wasted.
Fixes: b5d667eb39 ("ACPI / PM: Take unusual configurations of power resources into account")
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
If an ACPI power resource is found to be "on" during the
initialization of the list of wakeup power resources of a device,
it is reference counted and its wakeup_enabled flag is set, which is
problematic if the deivce in question is the only user of the given
power resource, it is never runtime-suspended and it is not allowed
to wake up the system from sleep, because in that case the given
power resource will stay "on" until the system reboots and energy
will be wasted.
It is better to simply turn off wakeup power resources that are "on"
during the initialization unless their reference counters are not
zero, because that may be the only opportunity to prevent them from
staying in the "on" state all the time.
Fixes: b5d667eb39 ("ACPI / PM: Take unusual configurations of power resources into account")
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
To avoid situations in which the actual states of certain ACPI power
resources are not known just because they have never been referenced
by any device configuration objects, check the initial states of all
power resources as soon as they are found in the ACPI namespace (and
fall back to turning them on if the state check fails).
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Andreas K. Huettel <andreas.huettel@ur.de>
Commit 6381195ad7 ("ACPI: power: Rework turning off unused power
resources") caused power resources in unknown state with reference
counters equal to zero to be turned off too, but that caused issues
to appear in the field, so modify the code to only turn off power
resources that are known to be "on".
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/6faf4b92-78d5-47a4-63df-cc2bab7769d0@molgen.mpg.de/
Fixes: 6381195ad7 ("ACPI: power: Rework turning off unused power resources")
Reported-by: Andreas K. Huettel <andreas.huettel@ur.de>
Tested-by: Andreas K. Huettel <andreas.huettel@ur.de>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: 5.14+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.14+
Drop the name field (that only is used in diagnostic messages) from
struct acpi_power_resource and use the name of the power resource
device object instead of it.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Use acpi_handle_debug() to print diagnostic messages regarding ACPI
power resources so as to make it easier to correlate the kernel
messages with the power resource objects in the ACPI namespace that
they are about.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The messages printed by acpi_resume_power_resources() and
acpi_turn_off_unused_power_resources() are not important enough to be
printed with pr_info(), so use dev_dbg() instead of it to get rid of
some noise in the kernel log.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Make turning off unused power resources (after the enumeration of
devices and during system-wide resume from S3) more straightforward
by using the observation that the power resource state stored in
struct acpi_power_resource can be used to determine whether or not
the give power resource has any users.
Namely, when the state of the power resource is unknown, its _STA
method has never been evaluated (or the evaluation of it has failed)
and its _ON and _OFF methods have never been executed (or they have
failed to execute), so for all practical purposes it can be assumed
to have no users (or to be unusable). Therefore, instead of checking
the number of power resource users, it is sufficient to check if its
state is known.
Moreover, if the last known state of a given power resource is "off",
it is not necessary to turn it off, because it has been used to
initialize the power state or the wakeup power resources list of at
least one device and either its _STA method has returned 0 ("off"),
or its _OFF method has been successfully executed already.
Accordingly, modify acpi_turn_off_unused_power_resources() to do the
above checks (which are suitable for both uses of it) instead of
using the number of power resource users or evaluating its _STA
method, drop its argument (which is not useful any more) and update
its callers.
Also drop the users field from struct acpi_power_resource as it is
not useful any more.
Tested-by: Dave Olsthoorn <dave@bewaar.me>
Tested-by: Shujun Wang <wsj20369@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Currently, there are two ways to check the state of an ACPI power
resource and they may not be consistent with each other. The first
one is to evaluate the power resource's _STA object and the other one
is to check its reference counter value. However, on some systems
the value returned by _STA may not be consistent with the value of
the power resource's reference counter (for example, on some systems
it returns the same value every time for certain power resources).
Moreover, evaluating _STA is unnecessary overhead for a power
resource for which it has been evaluated already or whose state is
otherwise known, because either the _ON or the _OFF method has been
executed for it.
For this reason, save the state of each power resource in its
struct acpi_power_resource object and use the saved value whenever
its state needs to be checked, except when its stats is unknown, in
which case the _STA method is evaluated for it and the value
returned by that method is saved as the last known state of
the power resource.
Moreover, drop the power resource _STA method evaluation from
acpi_add_power_resource(), so as to avoid doing that unnecessarily
for power resources that will never be used.
Tested-by: Dave Olsthoorn <dave@bewaar.me>
Tested-by: Shujun Wang <wsj20369@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Use u8 as the data type for representing the state of an ACPI
power resource.
It is s not necessary to use int for that and because subsequent
changes are going to use ACPI_POWER_RESOURCE_STATE_UNKNOWN, it is
better to adjust the data type so that the "unknown" state is
represented by the "all ones" value.
While at it, clean up acpi_power_get_state() somewhat.
No intentional functional impact.
Tested-by: Dave Olsthoorn <dave@bewaar.me>
Tested-by: Shujun Wang <wsj20369@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Commit 7e4fdeafa6 ("ACPI: power: Turn off unused power resources
unconditionally") dropped the power resource state check from
acpi_turn_off_unused_power_resources(), because according to the
ACPI specification (e.g. ACPI 6.4, Section 7.2.2) the OS "may run
the _OFF method repeatedly, even if the resource is already off".
However, it turns out that some systems do not follow the
specification in this particular respect and that commit introduced
boot issues on them, so refine acpi_turn_off_unused_power_resources()
to only turn off power resources without any users after device
enumeration and restore its previous behavior in the system-wide
resume path.
Fixes: 7e4fdeafa6 ("ACPI: power: Turn off unused power resources unconditionally")
Link: https://uefi.org/specs/ACPI/6.4/07_Power_and_Performance_Mgmt/declaring-a-power-resource-object.html#off
BugLink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213019
Reported-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Reported-by: Dave Olsthoorn <dave@bewaar.me>
Tested-by: Dave Olsthoorn <dave@bewaar.me>
Reported-by: Shujun Wang <wsj20369@163.com>
Tested-by: Shujun Wang <wsj20369@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Revert commit 5db91e9cb5 ("Revert "ACPI: scan: Turn off unused
power resources during initialization") which was not necessary.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* acpi-pm:
Revert "ACPI: scan: Turn off unused power resources during initialization"
* acpi-docs:
Documentation: firmware-guide: gpio-properties: Add note to SPI CS case
Revert commit 4b9ee772ea ("ACPI: scan: Turn off unused power
resources during initialization") that is reported to cause
initialization issues to occur.
Reported-by: Shujun Wang <wsj20369@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* acpi-misc:
ACPI: dock: fix some coding style issues
ACPI: sysfs: fix some coding style issues
ACPI: PM: add a missed blank line after declarations
ACPI: custom_method: fix a coding style issue
ACPI: CPPC: fix some coding style issues
ACPI: button: fix some coding style issues
ACPI: battery: fix some coding style issues
ACPI: acpi_pad: add a missed blank line after declarations
ACPI: LPSS: add a missed blank line after declarations
ACPI: ipmi: remove useless return statement for void function
ACPI: processor: fix some coding style issues
ACPI: APD: fix a block comment align issue
ACPI: AC: fix some coding style issues
ACPI: fix various typos in comments
* acpi-scan:
ACPI: bus: Introduce acpi_dev_get() and reuse it in ACPI code
ACPI: scan: Utilize match_string() API
ACPI: scan: Call acpi_get_object_info() from acpi_set_pnp_ids()
ACPI: scan: Drop sta argument from acpi_init_device_object()
ACPI: scan: Drop sta argument from acpi_add_single_object()
ACPI: scan: Rearrange checks in acpi_bus_check_add()
ACPI: scan: Fold acpi_bus_type_and_status() into its caller
* acpi-drivers:
ACPI: HED: Drop unused ACPI_MODULE_NAME() definition
* acpi-pm:
ACPI: power: Turn off unused power resources unconditionally
ACPI: scan: Turn off unused power resources during initialization
* acpi-resources:
resource: Prevent irqresource_disabled() from erasing flags
Notice that it is not necessary to call acpi_get_object_info() from
acpi_add_single_object() in order to pass the pointer returned by it
to acpi_init_device_object() and from there to acpi_set_pnp_ids().
It is more straightforward to call acpi_get_object_info() from
acpi_set_pnp_ids() and avoid unnecessary pointer passing, so change
the code accordingly.
No intentional functional impact.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Use the observation that the initial status check for
ACPI_BUS_TYPE_PROCESSOR objects can be carried out in the same way
as for ACPI_BUS_TYPE_DEVICE objects and it is not necessary to fail
acpi_add_single_object() if acpi_bus_get_status_handle() returns an
error for a processor (its status can be set to 0 instead) to
simplify acpi_add_single_object().
Accordingly, drop the "sta" argument from acpi_init_device_object()
as it can always set the initial status to ACPI_STA_DEFAULT and let
its caller correct that later on.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
According to the ACPI specification (section 7.2.2 in ACPI 6.4), the
OS may evaluate the _OFF method of a power resource that is "off"
already [1], and in particular that can be done in the case of unused
power resources.
Accordingly, modify acpi_turn_off_unused_power_resources() to
evaluate the _OFF method for each of the unused power resources
unconditionally which may help to work around BIOS issues where the
return value of _STA for a power resource does not reflect the
actual state of the power resource [2].
Link: https://uefi.org/specs/ACPI/6.4/07_Power_and_Performance_Mgmt/declaring-a-power-resource-object.html#off # [1]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210314000439.3138941-1-luzmaximilian@gmail.com/ # [2]
Tested-by: Wendy Wang <wendy.wang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
It is reported that on certain platforms there are power resources
that are not associated with any devices physically present in the
platform. Those power resources are expected to be turned off by
the OS in accordance with the ACPI specification (section 7.3 of
ACPI 6.4) which currently is not done by Linux and that may lead
to obscure issues.
For instance, leaving those power resources in the "on" state may
prevent the platform from reaching the lowest power state in
suspend-to-idle which leads to excessive power draw.
For this reason, turn all of the unused ACPI power resources off
at the end of the initial namespace scan for devices in analogy with
resume from suspend-to-RAM.
Link: https://uefi.org/specs/ACPI/6.4/07_Power_and_Performance_Mgmt/device-power-management-objects.html
Reported-by: David Box <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Wendy Wang <wendy.wang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* acpi-messages:
ACPI: OSL: Clean up printing messages
ACPI: OSL: Rework acpi_check_resource_conflict()
ACPI: thermal: Clean up printing messages
ACPI: video: Clean up printing messages
ACPI: button: Clean up printing messages
ACPI: battery: Clean up printing messages
ACPI: AC: Clean up printing messages
ACPI: bus: Drop ACPI_BUS_COMPONENT which is not used any more
ACPI: utils: Clean up printing messages
ACPI: scan: Clean up printing messages
ACPI: bus: Clean up printing messages
ACPI: PM: Clean up printing messages
ACPI: power: Clean up printing messages
Replace all of the ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT() instances in power.c with
acpi_handle_debug() or pr_debug(), depending on the context,
drop the _COMPONENT and ACPI_MODULE_NAME() definitions that
are not used any more, and replace the direct invocations of
printk() in there with acpi_handle_info() or pr_info(), depending
on the context.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Instead of open coding DEVICE_ATTR(), use the
DEVICE_ATTR_RW(), DEVICE_ATTR_RO() and DEVICE_ATTR_WO()
macros wherever possible.
This required a few functions to be renamed but the
functionality itself is unchanged.
Signed-off-by: Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* acpica:
ACPICA: Update version to 20201113
ACPICA: Interpreter: fix memory leak by using existing buffer
ACPICA: Add function trace macros to improve debugging
ACPICA: Also handle "orphan" _REG methods for GPIO OpRegions
ACPICA: Remove extreaneous "the" in comments
ACPICA: Add 5 new UUIDs to the known UUID table
* acpi-scan:
ACPI: scan: Fix up _DEP-related terminology with supplier/consumer
ACPI: scan: Drop INT3396 from acpi_ignore_dep_ids[]
ACPI: scan: Add PNP0D80 to the _DEP exceptions list
ACPI: scan: Call acpi_get_object_info() from acpi_add_single_object()
ACPI: scan: Add acpi_info_matches_hids() helper
Call acpi_get_object_info() from acpi_add_single_object() instead of
calling it from acpi_set_pnp_ids() and pass the result down to the
latter so as to allow acpi_add_single_object() to use that data for
other purposes.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
[ rjw: Changelog rewrite ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Replaces spaces with tabs where spaces have been (inconsistently) used
for indentation and removes trailing whitespaces.
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Those were used to create files in /proc/acpi long ago
and were missed when that code was deleted.
Signed-off-by: Pascal Terjan <pterjan@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
If there are shared power resources between otherwise unrelated devices
turning them on causes the other devices sharing them to be powered up
as well. In case of PCI devices go into D0uninitialized state meaning
that if they were configured to trigger wake that configuration is lost
at this point.
For this reason introduce a concept of "_PR0 dependent device" that can
be added to any ACPI device that has power resources. The dependent
device will be included in a list of dependent devices for all power
resources returned by the ACPI device's _PR0 (assuming it has one).
Whenever a power resource having dependent devices is turned physically
on (its _ON method is called) we runtime resume all of them to allow
their driver or in case of PCI the PCI core to re-initialize the device
and its wake configuration.
This adds two functions that can be used to add and remove these
dependent devices. Note the dependent device does not necessary need
share power resources so this functionality can be used to add "software
dependencies" as well if needed.
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Based on 3 normalized pattern(s):
this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify
it under the terms of the gnu general public license as published by
the free software foundation either version 2 of the license or at
your option any later version this program is distributed in the
hope that it will be useful but without any warranty without even
the implied warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular
purpose see the gnu general public license for more details
this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify
it under the terms of the gnu general public license as published by
the free software foundation either version 2 of the license or at
your option any later version [author] [kishon] [vijay] [abraham]
[i] [kishon]@[ti] [com] this program is distributed in the hope that
it will be useful but without any warranty without even the implied
warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose see
the gnu general public license for more details
this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify
it under the terms of the gnu general public license as published by
the free software foundation either version 2 of the license or at
your option any later version [author] [graeme] [gregory]
[gg]@[slimlogic] [co] [uk] [author] [kishon] [vijay] [abraham] [i]
[kishon]@[ti] [com] [based] [on] [twl6030]_[usb] [c] [author] [hema]
[hk] [hemahk]@[ti] [com] this program is distributed in the hope
that it will be useful but without any warranty without even the
implied warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular
purpose see the gnu general public license for more details
extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier
GPL-2.0-or-later
has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 1105 file(s).
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net>
Reviewed-by: Richard Fontana <rfontana@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190527070033.202006027@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Fix some misspellings in comments. No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Some ACPI tables contain duplicate power resource references like this:
Name (_PR0, Package (0x04) // _PR0: Power Resources for D0
{
P28P,
P18P,
P18P,
CLK4
})
This causes a WARN_ON in sysfs_add_link_to_group() because we end up
adding a link to the same acpi_device twice:
sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/PNP0A08:00/808622C1:00/OVTI2680:00/power_resources_D0/LNXPOWER:0a'
CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.19.12-301.fc29.x86_64 #1
Hardware name: Insyde CherryTrail/Type2 - Board Product Name, BIOS jumperx.T87.KFBNEEA02 04/13/2016
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x5c/0x80
sysfs_warn_dup.cold.3+0x17/0x2a
sysfs_do_create_link_sd.isra.2+0xa9/0xb0
sysfs_add_link_to_group+0x30/0x50
acpi_power_expose_list+0x74/0xa0
acpi_power_add_remove_device+0x50/0xa0
acpi_add_single_object+0x26b/0x5f0
acpi_bus_check_add+0xc4/0x250
...
To address this issue, make acpi_extract_power_resources() check for
duplicates and simply skip them when found.
Cc: All applicable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
[ rjw: Subject & changelog, comments ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
attribute_groups are not supposed to change at runtime. All functions
working with attribute_groups provided by <linux/sysfs.h> work with const
attribute_group. So mark the non-const structs as const.
File size before:
text data bss dec hex filename
4622 304 8 4934 1346 drivers/acpi/power.o
File size After adding 'const':
text data bss dec hex filename
4846 80 8 4934 1346 drivers/acpi/power.o
Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Commit 660b1113e0 (ACPI / PM: Fix consistency check for power resources
during resume) introduced a check for ACPI power resources which have
been turned on by the BIOS during suspend and turns these back off again.
This is causing problems on a Dell Venue Pro 11 7130 (i5-4300Y) it causes
the following messages to show up in dmesg:
[ 131.014605] ACPI: Waking up from system sleep state S3
[ 131.150271] acpi LNXPOWER:07: Turning OFF
[ 131.150323] acpi LNXPOWER:06: Turning OFF
[ 131.150911] acpi LNXPOWER:00: Turning OFF
[ 131.169014] ACPI : EC: interrupt unblocked
[ 131.181811] xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: System wakeup disabled by ACPI
[ 133.535728] pci_raw_set_power_state: 76 callbacks suppressed
[ 133.535735] iwlwifi 0000:01:00.0: Refused to change power state,
currently in D3
[ 133.597672] PM: noirq resume of devices complete after 2428.891 msecs
Followed by a bunch of iwlwifi errors later on and the pcie device
dropping from the bus (acpiphp thinks it has been unplugged).
Disabling the turning off of unused power resources fixes this. Instead
of adding a quirk for this system, this commit fixes this by moving the
disabling of unused power resources to later in the resume sequence
when the iwlwifi card has been moved out of D3 so the ref_count for
its power resource no longer is 0.
This new behavior seems to match the intend of the original commit which
commit-msg says: "(... which means that no devices are going to need them
any time soon) and we should turn them off".
This also avoids power resources which we need when bringing devices out
of D3 from getting bounced off and then back on again.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
gcc -O2 cannot always prove that the loop in acpi_power_get_inferred_state()
is enterered at least once, so it assumes that cur_state might not get
initialized:
drivers/acpi/power.c: In function 'acpi_power_get_inferred_state':
drivers/acpi/power.c:222:9: error: 'cur_state' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
This sets the variable to zero at the start of the loop, to ensure that
there is well-defined behavior even for an empty list. This gets rid of
the warning.
The warning first showed up when the -Os flag got removed in a bug fix
patch in linux-4.11-rc5.
I would suggest merging this addon patch on top of that bug fix to avoid
introducing a new warning in the stable kernels.
Fixes: 61b79e16c6 (ACPI: Fix incompatibility with mcount-based function graph tracing)
Cc: All applicable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* acpi-pm:
ACPI / bus: Move duplicate code to a separate new function
mfd: Add support for Intel Sunrisepoint LPSS devices
dmaengine: add a driver for Intel integrated DMA 64-bit
mfd: make mfd_remove_devices() iterate in reverse order
driver core: implement device_for_each_child_reverse()
klist: implement klist_prev()
Driver core: wakeup the parent device before trying probe
ACPI / PM: Attach ACPI power domain only once
PM / QoS: Make it possible to expose device latency tolerance to userspace
ACPI / PM: Update the copyright notice and description of power.c
The description and copyright notice of drivers/acpi/power.c is out
of date, so update it as appropriate.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
There is no need to carry potentially outdated Free Software Foundation
mailing address in file headers since the COPYING file includes it.
Signed-off-by: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
According to Section 7.2 of ACPI 6.0, power resources should
always be enabled and disabled in order given by the "resourceorder"
field of the corresponding Power Resource objects: "Power Resource
levels are enabled from low values to high values and are disabled
from high values to low values."
However, this is not what happens during system resume, because
in that case the enabling/disabling is carried out in the power
resource registration order which may not reflect the ordering
required by the platform.
For this reason, make the ordering of the global list of all
power resources in the system (used by the system resume code)
reflect the one given by the "resourceorder" attributes of the
Power Resource objects in the ACPI namespace and modify
acpi_resume_power_resources() to walk the list in the reverse
order when turning off the power resources that had been off
before the system was suspended.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
