mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-12-02 00:51:44 +00:00
tracing: Use in_serving_softirq() to deduct softirq status.
PREEMPT_RT does not report "serving softirq" because the tracing core looks at the preemption counter while PREEMPT_RT does not update it while processing softirqs in order to remain preemptible. The information is stored somewhere else. The in_serving_softirq() macro and the SOFTIRQ_OFFSET define are still working but not on the preempt-counter. Use in_serving_softirq() macro which works on PREEMPT_RT. On !PREEMPT_RT the compiler (gcc-10 / clang-11) is smart enough to optimize the in_serving_softirq() related read of the preemption counter away. The only difference I noticed by using in_serving_softirq() on !PREEMPT_RT is that gcc-10 implemented tracing_gen_ctx_flags() as reading FLAG, jmp _tracing_gen_ctx_flags(). Without in_serving_softirq() it inlined _tracing_gen_ctx_flags() into tracing_gen_ctx_flags(). Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210125194511.3924915-4-bigeasy@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
0c02006e6f
commit
fe427886bf
@ -2590,8 +2590,7 @@ unsigned int tracing_gen_ctx_irq_test(unsigned int irqs_status)
|
||||
trace_flags |= TRACE_FLAG_NMI;
|
||||
if (pc & HARDIRQ_MASK)
|
||||
trace_flags |= TRACE_FLAG_HARDIRQ;
|
||||
|
||||
if (pc & SOFTIRQ_OFFSET)
|
||||
if (in_serving_softirq())
|
||||
trace_flags |= TRACE_FLAG_SOFTIRQ;
|
||||
|
||||
if (tif_need_resched())
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user