mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-22 20:22:09 +00:00
remoteproc: sysmon: Send sysmon state only for running rprocs
When a new remoteproc boots up, send the sysmon state notification of only running remoteprocs. Sending state of remoteprocs booting up in parallel can cause a race between SSR clients of the remoteproc that is booting up and the sysmon notification for the same remoteproc, resulting in an inconsistency between which state the remoteproc that is booting up in parallel. For example - if remoteproc A and B crash one after the other, after remoteproc A boots up, if the remoteproc A tries to get the state of remoteproc B before the sysmon subdevice for B is invoked but after the ssr subdevice of B has been invoked, clients on remoteproc A might get confused when the sysmon notification indicates a different state. Signed-off-by: Siddharth Gupta <sidgup@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@quicinc.com> Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1657022900-2049-8-git-send-email-quic_sibis@quicinc.com
This commit is contained in:
parent
47c04e00ef
commit
fd75c2d01a
@ -512,10 +512,12 @@ static int sysmon_start(struct rproc_subdev *subdev)
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_lock(&sysmon_lock);
|
||||
list_for_each_entry(target, &sysmon_list, node) {
|
||||
if (target == sysmon)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_lock(&target->state_lock);
|
||||
if (target == sysmon || target->state != SSCTL_SSR_EVENT_AFTER_POWERUP) {
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&target->state_lock);
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
event.subsys_name = target->name;
|
||||
event.ssr_event = target->state;
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user