mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-22 12:11:40 +00:00
NFSv4.2: Rework scratch handling for READ_PLUS
Instead of using a tiny, static scratch buffer, we should use a kmalloc()-ed buffer that is allocated when checking for read plus usage. This lets us use the buffer before decoding any part of the READ_PLUS operation instead of setting it right before segment decoding, meaning it should be a little more robust. Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
e025f0a73f
commit
fbd2a05f29
@ -1122,7 +1122,6 @@ static int decode_read_plus(struct xdr_stream *xdr, struct nfs_pgio_res *res)
|
||||
uint32_t segments;
|
||||
struct read_plus_segment *segs;
|
||||
int status, i;
|
||||
char scratch_buf[16];
|
||||
__be32 *p;
|
||||
|
||||
status = decode_op_hdr(xdr, OP_READ_PLUS);
|
||||
@ -1143,7 +1142,6 @@ static int decode_read_plus(struct xdr_stream *xdr, struct nfs_pgio_res *res)
|
||||
if (!segs)
|
||||
return -ENOMEM;
|
||||
|
||||
xdr_set_scratch_buffer(xdr, &scratch_buf, sizeof(scratch_buf));
|
||||
status = -EIO;
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < segments; i++) {
|
||||
status = decode_read_plus_segment(xdr, &segs[i]);
|
||||
@ -1348,6 +1346,8 @@ static int nfs4_xdr_dec_read_plus(struct rpc_rqst *rqstp,
|
||||
struct compound_hdr hdr;
|
||||
int status;
|
||||
|
||||
xdr_set_scratch_buffer(xdr, res->scratch, sizeof(res->scratch));
|
||||
|
||||
status = decode_compound_hdr(xdr, &hdr);
|
||||
if (status)
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
|
@ -5439,6 +5439,8 @@ static bool nfs4_read_plus_not_supported(struct rpc_task *task,
|
||||
|
||||
static int nfs4_read_done(struct rpc_task *task, struct nfs_pgio_header *hdr)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (hdr->res.scratch)
|
||||
kfree(hdr->res.scratch);
|
||||
if (!nfs4_sequence_done(task, &hdr->res.seq_res))
|
||||
return -EAGAIN;
|
||||
if (nfs4_read_stateid_changed(task, &hdr->args))
|
||||
@ -5452,17 +5454,22 @@ static int nfs4_read_done(struct rpc_task *task, struct nfs_pgio_header *hdr)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#if defined CONFIG_NFS_V4_2 && defined CONFIG_NFS_V4_2_READ_PLUS
|
||||
static void nfs42_read_plus_support(struct nfs_pgio_header *hdr,
|
||||
static bool nfs42_read_plus_support(struct nfs_pgio_header *hdr,
|
||||
struct rpc_message *msg)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* Note: We don't use READ_PLUS with pNFS yet */
|
||||
if (nfs_server_capable(hdr->inode, NFS_CAP_READ_PLUS) && !hdr->ds_clp)
|
||||
if (nfs_server_capable(hdr->inode, NFS_CAP_READ_PLUS) && !hdr->ds_clp) {
|
||||
msg->rpc_proc = &nfs4_procedures[NFSPROC4_CLNT_READ_PLUS];
|
||||
hdr->res.scratch = kmalloc(32, GFP_KERNEL);
|
||||
return hdr->res.scratch != NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
#else
|
||||
static void nfs42_read_plus_support(struct nfs_pgio_header *hdr,
|
||||
static bool nfs42_read_plus_support(struct nfs_pgio_header *hdr,
|
||||
struct rpc_message *msg)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
#endif /* CONFIG_NFS_V4_2 */
|
||||
|
||||
@ -5472,8 +5479,8 @@ static void nfs4_proc_read_setup(struct nfs_pgio_header *hdr,
|
||||
hdr->timestamp = jiffies;
|
||||
if (!hdr->pgio_done_cb)
|
||||
hdr->pgio_done_cb = nfs4_read_done_cb;
|
||||
msg->rpc_proc = &nfs4_procedures[NFSPROC4_CLNT_READ];
|
||||
nfs42_read_plus_support(hdr, msg);
|
||||
if (!nfs42_read_plus_support(hdr, msg))
|
||||
msg->rpc_proc = &nfs4_procedures[NFSPROC4_CLNT_READ];
|
||||
nfs4_init_sequence(&hdr->args.seq_args, &hdr->res.seq_res, 0, 0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -670,6 +670,7 @@ struct nfs_pgio_res {
|
||||
struct {
|
||||
unsigned int replen; /* used by read */
|
||||
int eof; /* used by read */
|
||||
void * scratch; /* used by read */
|
||||
};
|
||||
struct {
|
||||
struct nfs_writeverf * verf; /* used by write */
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user