mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-26 22:21:42 +00:00
signal/pid_namespace: Fix reboot_pid_ns to use send_sig not force_sig
The locking in force_sig_info is not prepared to deal with a task that
exits or execs (as sighand may change). The is not a locking problem
in force_sig as force_sig is only built to handle synchronous
exceptions.
Further the function force_sig_info changes the signal state if the
signal is ignored, or blocked or if SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE will prevent the
delivery of the signal. The signal SIGKILL can not be ignored and can
not be blocked and SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE won't prevent it from being
delivered.
So using force_sig rather than send_sig for SIGKILL is confusing
and pointless.
Because it won't impact the sending of the signal and and because
using force_sig is wrong, replace force_sig with send_sig.
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@free.fr>
Cc: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Fixes: cf3f89214e
("pidns: add reboot_pid_ns() to handle the reboot syscall")
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
1dfd1711de
commit
f9070dc945
@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ int reboot_pid_ns(struct pid_namespace *pid_ns, int cmd)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
|
||||
force_sig(SIGKILL, pid_ns->child_reaper);
|
||||
send_sig(SIGKILL, pid_ns->child_reaper, 1);
|
||||
read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
do_exit(0);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user