mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-23 04:31:50 +00:00
pwm: lpc18xx-sct: Don't reconfigure PWM in .request and .free
Regarding the .request case: The consumer might be interested in taking over the configured state from the boot loader. So the initially configured state should be retained. For the free case the PWM consumer is responsible for disabling the PWM before calling pwm_put() and there are three subcases to consider: a) The PWM is already off. Then there is no gain in disabling the PWM once more. b) The PWM is still running and there is a good reason for that. (Not sure this is a valid case, I cannot imagine such a good reason.) Then it is counterproductive to disable the PWM. c) The PWM is still running because the consumer failed to disable the PWM. Then the consumer needs fixing and there is little incentive to paper over the problem in the backend driver. This aligns the lpc18xx-sct driver to the other PWM drivers that also don't reconfigure the hardware in .request and .free. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
651022382c
commit
f82d15e223
@ -296,7 +296,6 @@ static int lpc18xx_pwm_request(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
|
||||
|
||||
set_bit(event, &lpc18xx_pwm->event_map);
|
||||
lpc18xx_data->duty_event = event;
|
||||
lpc18xx_pwm_config_duty(chip, pwm, pwm_get_duty_cycle(pwm));
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -306,8 +305,6 @@ static void lpc18xx_pwm_free(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
|
||||
struct lpc18xx_pwm_chip *lpc18xx_pwm = to_lpc18xx_pwm_chip(chip);
|
||||
struct lpc18xx_pwm_data *lpc18xx_data = pwm_get_chip_data(pwm);
|
||||
|
||||
pwm_disable(pwm);
|
||||
pwm_set_duty_cycle(pwm, 0);
|
||||
clear_bit(lpc18xx_data->duty_event, &lpc18xx_pwm->event_map);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user