drm/msm: Remove call to reservation_object_test_signaled_rcu before wait

Since fence_wait_timeout_reservation_object_wait_timeout_rcu() with a
timeout of 0 becomes reservation_object_test_signaled_rcu(), we do not
need to handle such conversion in the caller. The only challenge are
those callers that wish to differentiate the error code between the
nonblocking busy check and potentially blocking wait.

v2: 9 is only 0 in German.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
Chris Wilson 2016-08-29 08:08:26 +01:00 committed by Rob Clark
parent 5f6f5e08b1
commit f755e227dc

View File

@ -584,18 +584,16 @@ int msm_gem_cpu_prep(struct drm_gem_object *obj, uint32_t op, ktime_t *timeout)
{
struct msm_gem_object *msm_obj = to_msm_bo(obj);
bool write = !!(op & MSM_PREP_WRITE);
unsigned long remain =
op & MSM_PREP_NOSYNC ? 0 : timeout_to_jiffies(timeout);
long ret;
if (op & MSM_PREP_NOSYNC) {
if (!reservation_object_test_signaled_rcu(msm_obj->resv, write))
return -EBUSY;
} else {
int ret;
ret = reservation_object_wait_timeout_rcu(msm_obj->resv, write,
true, timeout_to_jiffies(timeout));
if (ret <= 0)
return ret == 0 ? -ETIMEDOUT : ret;
}
ret = reservation_object_wait_timeout_rcu(msm_obj->resv, write,
true, remain);
if (ret == 0)
return remain == 0 ? -EBUSY : -ETIMEDOUT;
else if (ret < 0)
return ret;
/* TODO cache maintenance */