mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-12-20 10:01:56 +00:00
selftests/bpf: change test_verifier expectations
Some of the verifier's error messages have changed, and some constructs that previously couldn't be verified are now accepted. Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
7d1238f210
commit
f65b18493f
@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, 0),
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.errstr_unpriv = "R1 pointer arithmetic",
|
||||
.errstr_unpriv = "R1 subtraction from stack pointer",
|
||||
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
|
||||
.errstr = "R1 invalid mem access",
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
@ -603,8 +603,9 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2, -4),
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.errstr = "misaligned access",
|
||||
.errstr = "misaligned stack access",
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.flags = F_LOAD_WITH_STRICT_ALIGNMENT,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"invalid map_fd for function call",
|
||||
@ -650,8 +651,9 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.fixup_map1 = { 3 },
|
||||
.errstr = "misaligned access",
|
||||
.errstr = "misaligned value access",
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.flags = F_LOAD_WITH_STRICT_ALIGNMENT,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sometimes access memory with incorrect alignment",
|
||||
@ -672,6 +674,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
.errstr = "R0 invalid mem access",
|
||||
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 leaks addr",
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.flags = F_LOAD_WITH_STRICT_ALIGNMENT,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"jump test 1",
|
||||
@ -1215,8 +1218,9 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[0]) + 1),
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.errstr = "misaligned access",
|
||||
.errstr = "misaligned context access",
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.flags = F_LOAD_WITH_STRICT_ALIGNMENT,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"check __sk_buff->hash, offset 0, half store not permitted",
|
||||
@ -1319,8 +1323,9 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[0]) + 2),
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.errstr = "misaligned access",
|
||||
.errstr = "misaligned context access",
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.flags = F_LOAD_WITH_STRICT_ALIGNMENT,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"check cb access: word, unaligned 2",
|
||||
@ -1330,8 +1335,9 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[4]) + 1),
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.errstr = "misaligned access",
|
||||
.errstr = "misaligned context access",
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.flags = F_LOAD_WITH_STRICT_ALIGNMENT,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"check cb access: word, unaligned 3",
|
||||
@ -1341,8 +1347,9 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[4]) + 2),
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.errstr = "misaligned access",
|
||||
.errstr = "misaligned context access",
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.flags = F_LOAD_WITH_STRICT_ALIGNMENT,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"check cb access: word, unaligned 4",
|
||||
@ -1352,8 +1359,9 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[4]) + 3),
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.errstr = "misaligned access",
|
||||
.errstr = "misaligned context access",
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.flags = F_LOAD_WITH_STRICT_ALIGNMENT,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"check cb access: double",
|
||||
@ -1379,8 +1387,9 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[1])),
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.errstr = "misaligned access",
|
||||
.errstr = "misaligned context access",
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.flags = F_LOAD_WITH_STRICT_ALIGNMENT,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"check cb access: double, unaligned 2",
|
||||
@ -1390,8 +1399,9 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[3])),
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.errstr = "misaligned access",
|
||||
.errstr = "misaligned context access",
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.flags = F_LOAD_WITH_STRICT_ALIGNMENT,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"check cb access: double, oob 1",
|
||||
@ -1523,7 +1533,8 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.errstr = "misaligned access off -6 size 8",
|
||||
.errstr = "misaligned stack access off (0x0; 0x0)+-8+2 size 8",
|
||||
.flags = F_LOAD_WITH_STRICT_ALIGNMENT,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"PTR_TO_STACK store/load - bad alignment on reg",
|
||||
@ -1535,7 +1546,8 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.errstr = "misaligned access off -2 size 8",
|
||||
.errstr = "misaligned stack access off (0x0; 0x0)+-10+8 size 8",
|
||||
.flags = F_LOAD_WITH_STRICT_ALIGNMENT,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"PTR_TO_STACK store/load - out of bounds low",
|
||||
@ -1579,8 +1591,6 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.result = ACCEPT,
|
||||
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
|
||||
.errstr_unpriv = "R1 pointer arithmetic",
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"unpriv: add pointer to pointer",
|
||||
@ -1591,7 +1601,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
},
|
||||
.result = ACCEPT,
|
||||
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
|
||||
.errstr_unpriv = "R1 pointer arithmetic",
|
||||
.errstr_unpriv = "R1 pointer += pointer",
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"unpriv: neg pointer",
|
||||
@ -1932,10 +1942,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, -8),
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.errstr_unpriv = "pointer arithmetic prohibited",
|
||||
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
|
||||
.errstr = "R1 invalid mem access",
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.result = ACCEPT,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"unpriv: cmp of stack pointer",
|
||||
@ -1999,7 +2006,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.errstr = "invalid stack type R3",
|
||||
.errstr = "R4 min value is negative",
|
||||
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
@ -2016,7 +2023,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.errstr = "invalid stack type R3",
|
||||
.errstr = "R4 min value is negative",
|
||||
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
@ -2218,7 +2225,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.errstr = "invalid stack type R3 off=-1 access_size=-1",
|
||||
.errstr = "R4 min value is negative",
|
||||
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
@ -2235,7 +2242,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.errstr = "invalid stack type R3 off=-1 access_size=2147483647",
|
||||
.errstr = "R4 unbounded memory access, use 'var &= const' or 'if (var < const)'",
|
||||
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
@ -2252,7 +2259,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.errstr = "invalid stack type R3 off=-512 access_size=2147483647",
|
||||
.errstr = "R4 unbounded memory access, use 'var &= const' or 'if (var < const)'",
|
||||
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
@ -2652,7 +2659,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 1),
|
||||
BPF_JMP_A(-6),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.errstr = "misaligned packet access off 2+15+-4 size 4",
|
||||
.errstr = "misaligned packet access off 2+(0x0; 0x0)+15+-4 size 4",
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
|
||||
.flags = F_LOAD_WITH_STRICT_ALIGNMENT,
|
||||
@ -2795,7 +2802,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
},
|
||||
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.errstr = "cannot add integer value with 47 upper zero bits to ptr_to_packet",
|
||||
.errstr = "invalid access to packet, off=0 size=8, R5(id=1,off=0,r=0)",
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"direct packet access: test24 (x += pkt_ptr, 5)",
|
||||
@ -3112,7 +3119,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"helper access to packet: test14, cls helper fail sub",
|
||||
"helper access to packet: test14, cls helper ok sub",
|
||||
.insns = {
|
||||
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1,
|
||||
offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
|
||||
@ -3132,12 +3139,36 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.errstr = "type=inv expected=fp",
|
||||
.result = ACCEPT,
|
||||
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"helper access to packet: test15, cls helper fail range 1",
|
||||
"helper access to packet: test15, cls helper fail sub",
|
||||
.insns = {
|
||||
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1,
|
||||
offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
|
||||
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_1,
|
||||
offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end)),
|
||||
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_6, 1),
|
||||
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6),
|
||||
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 7),
|
||||
BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_7, 6),
|
||||
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_1, 12),
|
||||
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 4),
|
||||
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0),
|
||||
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_4, 0),
|
||||
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_5, 0),
|
||||
BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
|
||||
BPF_FUNC_csum_diff),
|
||||
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.errstr = "invalid access to packet",
|
||||
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"helper access to packet: test16, cls helper fail range 1",
|
||||
.insns = {
|
||||
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1,
|
||||
offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
|
||||
@ -3162,7 +3193,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"helper access to packet: test16, cls helper fail range 2",
|
||||
"helper access to packet: test17, cls helper fail range 2",
|
||||
.insns = {
|
||||
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1,
|
||||
offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
|
||||
@ -3183,11 +3214,11 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.errstr = "invalid access to packet",
|
||||
.errstr = "R2 min value is negative",
|
||||
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"helper access to packet: test17, cls helper fail range 3",
|
||||
"helper access to packet: test18, cls helper fail range 3",
|
||||
.insns = {
|
||||
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1,
|
||||
offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
|
||||
@ -3208,11 +3239,11 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.errstr = "invalid access to packet",
|
||||
.errstr = "R2 min value is negative",
|
||||
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"helper access to packet: test18, cls helper fail range zero",
|
||||
"helper access to packet: test19, cls helper fail range zero",
|
||||
.insns = {
|
||||
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1,
|
||||
offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
|
||||
@ -3237,7 +3268,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"helper access to packet: test19, pkt end as input",
|
||||
"helper access to packet: test20, pkt end as input",
|
||||
.insns = {
|
||||
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1,
|
||||
offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
|
||||
@ -3262,7 +3293,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"helper access to packet: test20, wrong reg",
|
||||
"helper access to packet: test21, wrong reg",
|
||||
.insns = {
|
||||
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1,
|
||||
offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
|
||||
@ -3322,7 +3353,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.fixup_map2 = { 3 },
|
||||
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited",
|
||||
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 leaks addr",
|
||||
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
|
||||
.result = ACCEPT,
|
||||
.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
|
||||
@ -3346,7 +3377,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.fixup_map2 = { 3 },
|
||||
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited",
|
||||
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 leaks addr",
|
||||
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
|
||||
.result = ACCEPT,
|
||||
.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
|
||||
@ -3374,7 +3405,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.fixup_map2 = { 3 },
|
||||
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited",
|
||||
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 leaks addr",
|
||||
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
|
||||
.result = ACCEPT,
|
||||
.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
|
||||
@ -3415,9 +3446,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.fixup_map2 = { 3 },
|
||||
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited",
|
||||
.errstr = "R0 min value is outside of the array range",
|
||||
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
|
||||
},
|
||||
@ -3439,9 +3468,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.fixup_map2 = { 3 },
|
||||
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited",
|
||||
.errstr = "R0 min value is negative, either use unsigned index or do a if (index >=0) check.",
|
||||
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
|
||||
.errstr = "R0 unbounded memory access, make sure to bounds check any array access into a map",
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
|
||||
},
|
||||
@ -3455,7 +3482,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
|
||||
BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
|
||||
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 7),
|
||||
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, 0),
|
||||
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, 0),
|
||||
BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_2, MAX_ENTRIES),
|
||||
BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, 1),
|
||||
BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0),
|
||||
@ -3466,8 +3493,8 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.fixup_map2 = { 3 },
|
||||
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited",
|
||||
.errstr = "R0 min value is negative, either use unsigned index or do a if (index >=0) check.",
|
||||
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 leaks addr",
|
||||
.errstr = "R0 unbounded memory access",
|
||||
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
|
||||
@ -3493,7 +3520,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.fixup_map2 = { 3 },
|
||||
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited",
|
||||
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 leaks addr",
|
||||
.errstr = "invalid access to map value, value_size=48 off=44 size=8",
|
||||
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
@ -3523,8 +3550,8 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.fixup_map2 = { 3, 11 },
|
||||
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited",
|
||||
.errstr = "R0 min value is negative, either use unsigned index or do a if (index >=0) check.",
|
||||
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer += pointer",
|
||||
.errstr = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'",
|
||||
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
|
||||
@ -3665,34 +3692,6 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
.result = ACCEPT,
|
||||
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"multiple registers share map_lookup_elem bad reg type",
|
||||
.insns = {
|
||||
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 10),
|
||||
BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_1, -8),
|
||||
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
|
||||
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
|
||||
BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
|
||||
BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
|
||||
BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
|
||||
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_0),
|
||||
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_0),
|
||||
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_0),
|
||||
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_5, BPF_REG_0),
|
||||
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
|
||||
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 1),
|
||||
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
|
||||
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 2),
|
||||
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_3, 0, 1),
|
||||
BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_3, 0, 0),
|
||||
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 3),
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.fixup_map1 = { 4 },
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.errstr = "R3 invalid mem access 'inv'",
|
||||
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"invalid map access from else condition",
|
||||
.insns = {
|
||||
@ -3711,9 +3710,9 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.fixup_map2 = { 3 },
|
||||
.errstr = "R0 unbounded memory access, make sure to bounds check any array access into a map",
|
||||
.errstr = "R0 unbounded memory access",
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited",
|
||||
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 leaks addr",
|
||||
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
|
||||
.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
|
||||
},
|
||||
@ -4091,7 +4090,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.fixup_map2 = { 3 },
|
||||
.errstr = "invalid access to map value, value_size=48 off=0 size=-8",
|
||||
.errstr = "R2 min value is negative",
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
|
||||
},
|
||||
@ -4157,7 +4156,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.fixup_map2 = { 3 },
|
||||
.errstr = "R1 min value is outside of the array range",
|
||||
.errstr = "invalid access to map value, value_size=48 off=4 size=0",
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
|
||||
},
|
||||
@ -4203,7 +4202,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.fixup_map2 = { 3 },
|
||||
.errstr = "invalid access to map value, value_size=48 off=4 size=-8",
|
||||
.errstr = "R2 min value is negative",
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
|
||||
},
|
||||
@ -4225,7 +4224,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.fixup_map2 = { 3 },
|
||||
.errstr = "R1 min value is outside of the array range",
|
||||
.errstr = "R2 min value is negative",
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
|
||||
},
|
||||
@ -4341,7 +4340,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.fixup_map2 = { 3 },
|
||||
.errstr = "invalid access to map value, value_size=48 off=4 size=-8",
|
||||
.errstr = "R2 min value is negative",
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
|
||||
},
|
||||
@ -4364,7 +4363,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.fixup_map2 = { 3 },
|
||||
.errstr = "R1 min value is outside of the array range",
|
||||
.errstr = "R2 min value is negative",
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
|
||||
},
|
||||
@ -4452,13 +4451,13 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0),
|
||||
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_0, 0),
|
||||
BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_3),
|
||||
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 0),
|
||||
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 1),
|
||||
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0),
|
||||
BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_probe_read),
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.fixup_map2 = { 3 },
|
||||
.errstr = "R1 min value is negative, either use unsigned index or do a if (index >=0) check",
|
||||
.errstr = "R1 unbounded memory access",
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
|
||||
},
|
||||
@ -4578,7 +4577,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.fixup_map2 = { 3 },
|
||||
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited",
|
||||
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 leaks addr",
|
||||
.result = ACCEPT,
|
||||
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
|
||||
.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
|
||||
@ -4606,7 +4605,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.fixup_map2 = { 3 },
|
||||
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited",
|
||||
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 leaks addr",
|
||||
.result = ACCEPT,
|
||||
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
|
||||
.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
|
||||
@ -4625,7 +4624,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.fixup_map2 = { 3 },
|
||||
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited",
|
||||
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 bitwise operator &= on pointer",
|
||||
.errstr = "invalid mem access 'inv'",
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
|
||||
@ -4644,7 +4643,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.fixup_map2 = { 3 },
|
||||
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited",
|
||||
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 32-bit pointer arithmetic prohibited",
|
||||
.errstr = "invalid mem access 'inv'",
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
|
||||
@ -4663,7 +4662,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.fixup_map2 = { 3 },
|
||||
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited",
|
||||
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic with /= operator",
|
||||
.errstr = "invalid mem access 'inv'",
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
|
||||
@ -4706,10 +4705,8 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.fixup_map2 = { 3 },
|
||||
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'",
|
||||
.errstr = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'",
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"map element value is preserved across register spilling",
|
||||
@ -4731,7 +4728,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.fixup_map2 = { 3 },
|
||||
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited",
|
||||
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 leaks addr",
|
||||
.result = ACCEPT,
|
||||
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
|
||||
.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
|
||||
@ -4913,7 +4910,8 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.errstr = "R2 unbounded memory access",
|
||||
/* because max wasn't checked, signed min is negative */
|
||||
.errstr = "R2 min value is negative, either use unsigned or 'var &= const'",
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
|
||||
},
|
||||
@ -5061,6 +5059,20 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"helper access to variable memory: size = 0 allowed on NULL",
|
||||
.insns = {
|
||||
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0),
|
||||
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 0),
|
||||
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0),
|
||||
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_4, 0),
|
||||
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_5, 0),
|
||||
BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_csum_diff),
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.result = ACCEPT,
|
||||
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"helper access to variable memory: size > 0 not allowed on NULL",
|
||||
.insns = {
|
||||
@ -5075,7 +5087,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_csum_diff),
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.errstr = "R1 type=imm expected=fp",
|
||||
.errstr = "R1 type=inv expected=fp",
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
|
||||
},
|
||||
@ -5160,7 +5172,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
|
||||
BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
|
||||
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 4),
|
||||
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 6),
|
||||
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, 0),
|
||||
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_1, -4),
|
||||
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_LSH, BPF_REG_1, 2),
|
||||
BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
|
||||
@ -5169,10 +5181,8 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.fixup_map2 = { 3 },
|
||||
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited",
|
||||
.errstr = "R0 min value is negative, either use unsigned index or do a if (index >=0) check.",
|
||||
.errstr = "R0 max value is outside of the array range",
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
|
||||
.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
@ -5201,10 +5211,8 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.fixup_map2 = { 3 },
|
||||
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited",
|
||||
.errstr = "R0 min value is negative, either use unsigned index or do a if (index >=0) check.",
|
||||
.errstr = "R0 max value is outside of the array range",
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
|
||||
.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
@ -5251,7 +5259,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
},
|
||||
.fixup_map_in_map = { 3 },
|
||||
.errstr = "R1 type=inv expected=map_ptr",
|
||||
.errstr_unpriv = "R1 pointer arithmetic prohibited",
|
||||
.errstr_unpriv = "R1 pointer arithmetic on CONST_PTR_TO_MAP prohibited",
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
@ -5531,10 +5539,8 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.fixup_map1 = { 3 },
|
||||
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited",
|
||||
.errstr = "R0 min value is negative",
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"bounds checks mixing signed and unsigned",
|
||||
@ -5557,10 +5563,8 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.fixup_map1 = { 3 },
|
||||
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited",
|
||||
.errstr = "R0 min value is negative",
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"bounds checks mixing signed and unsigned, variant 2",
|
||||
@ -5585,10 +5589,8 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.fixup_map1 = { 3 },
|
||||
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited",
|
||||
.errstr = "R8 invalid mem access 'inv'",
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"bounds checks mixing signed and unsigned, variant 3",
|
||||
@ -5612,10 +5614,8 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.fixup_map1 = { 3 },
|
||||
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited",
|
||||
.errstr = "R8 invalid mem access 'inv'",
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"bounds checks mixing signed and unsigned, variant 4",
|
||||
@ -5638,10 +5638,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.fixup_map1 = { 3 },
|
||||
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited",
|
||||
.errstr = "R0 min value is negative",
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
|
||||
.result = ACCEPT,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"bounds checks mixing signed and unsigned, variant 5",
|
||||
@ -5665,10 +5662,8 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.fixup_map1 = { 3 },
|
||||
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited",
|
||||
.errstr = "R0 invalid mem access",
|
||||
.errstr = "R0 min value is negative",
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"bounds checks mixing signed and unsigned, variant 6",
|
||||
@ -5689,10 +5684,8 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.errstr_unpriv = "R4 min value is negative, either use unsigned",
|
||||
.errstr = "R4 min value is negative, either use unsigned",
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"bounds checks mixing signed and unsigned, variant 7",
|
||||
@ -5715,39 +5708,10 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.fixup_map1 = { 3 },
|
||||
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited",
|
||||
.errstr = "R0 min value is negative",
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
|
||||
.result = ACCEPT,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"bounds checks mixing signed and unsigned, variant 8",
|
||||
.insns = {
|
||||
BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
|
||||
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
|
||||
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
|
||||
BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
|
||||
BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
|
||||
BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
|
||||
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 7),
|
||||
BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -16, -8),
|
||||
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10, -16),
|
||||
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 1024 * 1024 * 1024 + 1),
|
||||
BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2, 3),
|
||||
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_1, 1, 2),
|
||||
BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
|
||||
BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, 0, 0),
|
||||
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.fixup_map1 = { 3 },
|
||||
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited",
|
||||
.errstr = "R0 min value is negative",
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"bounds checks mixing signed and unsigned, variant 9",
|
||||
.insns = {
|
||||
BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
|
||||
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
|
||||
@ -5769,13 +5733,11 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.fixup_map1 = { 3 },
|
||||
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited",
|
||||
.errstr = "R0 min value is negative",
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"bounds checks mixing signed and unsigned, variant 10",
|
||||
"bounds checks mixing signed and unsigned, variant 9",
|
||||
.insns = {
|
||||
BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
|
||||
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
|
||||
@ -5797,13 +5759,10 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.fixup_map1 = { 3 },
|
||||
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited",
|
||||
.errstr = "R0 min value is negative",
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
|
||||
.result = ACCEPT,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"bounds checks mixing signed and unsigned, variant 11",
|
||||
"bounds checks mixing signed and unsigned, variant 10",
|
||||
.insns = {
|
||||
BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
|
||||
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
|
||||
@ -5825,13 +5784,11 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.fixup_map1 = { 3 },
|
||||
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited",
|
||||
.errstr = "R0 min value is negative",
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"bounds checks mixing signed and unsigned, variant 12",
|
||||
"bounds checks mixing signed and unsigned, variant 11",
|
||||
.insns = {
|
||||
BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
|
||||
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
|
||||
@ -5854,13 +5811,11 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.fixup_map1 = { 3 },
|
||||
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited",
|
||||
.errstr = "R0 min value is negative",
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"bounds checks mixing signed and unsigned, variant 13",
|
||||
"bounds checks mixing signed and unsigned, variant 12",
|
||||
.insns = {
|
||||
BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
|
||||
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
|
||||
@ -5882,13 +5837,11 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.fixup_map1 = { 3 },
|
||||
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited",
|
||||
.errstr = "R0 min value is negative",
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"bounds checks mixing signed and unsigned, variant 14",
|
||||
"bounds checks mixing signed and unsigned, variant 13",
|
||||
.insns = {
|
||||
BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
|
||||
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
|
||||
@ -5913,13 +5866,11 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.fixup_map1 = { 3 },
|
||||
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited",
|
||||
.errstr = "R0 min value is negative",
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"bounds checks mixing signed and unsigned, variant 15",
|
||||
"bounds checks mixing signed and unsigned, variant 14",
|
||||
.insns = {
|
||||
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_9, BPF_REG_1,
|
||||
offsetof(struct __sk_buff, mark)),
|
||||
@ -5945,13 +5896,11 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, -7),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.fixup_map1 = { 4 },
|
||||
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited",
|
||||
.errstr = "R0 min value is negative",
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"bounds checks mixing signed and unsigned, variant 16",
|
||||
"bounds checks mixing signed and unsigned, variant 15",
|
||||
.insns = {
|
||||
BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
|
||||
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
|
||||
@ -5975,13 +5924,13 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.fixup_map1 = { 3 },
|
||||
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited",
|
||||
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer comparison prohibited",
|
||||
.errstr = "R0 min value is negative",
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"subtraction bounds (map value)",
|
||||
"subtraction bounds (map value) variant 1",
|
||||
.insns = {
|
||||
BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
|
||||
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
|
||||
@ -6003,10 +5952,33 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.fixup_map1 = { 3 },
|
||||
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited",
|
||||
.errstr = "R0 max value is outside of the array range",
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"subtraction bounds (map value) variant 2",
|
||||
.insns = {
|
||||
BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
|
||||
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
|
||||
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
|
||||
BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
|
||||
BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
|
||||
BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
|
||||
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 8),
|
||||
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, 0),
|
||||
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_1, 0xff, 6),
|
||||
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_0, 1),
|
||||
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_3, 0xff, 4),
|
||||
BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_3),
|
||||
BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
|
||||
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0),
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.fixup_map1 = { 3 },
|
||||
.errstr = "R0 min value is negative, either use unsigned index or do a if (index >=0) check.",
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
|
||||
},
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user