USB: core: Change %pK for __user pointers to %px

Commit 2f964780c0 ("USB: core: replace %p with %pK") used the %pK
format specifier for a bunch of __user pointers.  But as the 'K' in
the specifier indicates, it is meant for kernel pointers.  The reason
for the %pK specifier is to avoid leaks of kernel addresses, but when
the pointer is to an address in userspace the security implications
are minimal.  In particular, no kernel information is leaked.

This patch changes the __user %pK specifiers (used in a bunch of
debugging output lines) to %px, which will always print the actual
address with no mangling.  (Notably, there is no printk format
specifier particularly intended for __user pointers.)

Fixes: 2f964780c0 ("USB: core: replace %p with %pK")
CC: Vamsi Krishna Samavedam <vskrishn@codeaurora.org>
CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201119170228.GB576844@rowland.harvard.edu
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Alan Stern 2020-11-19 12:02:28 -05:00 committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman
parent 184eead057
commit f3bc432aa8

View File

@ -482,11 +482,11 @@ static void snoop_urb(struct usb_device *udev,
if (userurb) { /* Async */
if (when == SUBMIT)
dev_info(&udev->dev, "userurb %pK, ep%d %s-%s, "
dev_info(&udev->dev, "userurb %px, ep%d %s-%s, "
"length %u\n",
userurb, ep, t, d, length);
else
dev_info(&udev->dev, "userurb %pK, ep%d %s-%s, "
dev_info(&udev->dev, "userurb %px, ep%d %s-%s, "
"actual_length %u status %d\n",
userurb, ep, t, d, length,
timeout_or_status);
@ -1997,7 +1997,7 @@ static int proc_reapurb(struct usb_dev_state *ps, void __user *arg)
if (as) {
int retval;
snoop(&ps->dev->dev, "reap %pK\n", as->userurb);
snoop(&ps->dev->dev, "reap %px\n", as->userurb);
retval = processcompl(as, (void __user * __user *)arg);
free_async(as);
return retval;
@ -2014,7 +2014,7 @@ static int proc_reapurbnonblock(struct usb_dev_state *ps, void __user *arg)
as = async_getcompleted(ps);
if (as) {
snoop(&ps->dev->dev, "reap %pK\n", as->userurb);
snoop(&ps->dev->dev, "reap %px\n", as->userurb);
retval = processcompl(as, (void __user * __user *)arg);
free_async(as);
} else {
@ -2142,7 +2142,7 @@ static int proc_reapurb_compat(struct usb_dev_state *ps, void __user *arg)
if (as) {
int retval;
snoop(&ps->dev->dev, "reap %pK\n", as->userurb);
snoop(&ps->dev->dev, "reap %px\n", as->userurb);
retval = processcompl_compat(as, (void __user * __user *)arg);
free_async(as);
return retval;
@ -2159,7 +2159,7 @@ static int proc_reapurbnonblock_compat(struct usb_dev_state *ps, void __user *ar
as = async_getcompleted(ps);
if (as) {
snoop(&ps->dev->dev, "reap %pK\n", as->userurb);
snoop(&ps->dev->dev, "reap %px\n", as->userurb);
retval = processcompl_compat(as, (void __user * __user *)arg);
free_async(as);
} else {
@ -2624,7 +2624,7 @@ static long usbdev_do_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
#endif
case USBDEVFS_DISCARDURB:
snoop(&dev->dev, "%s: DISCARDURB %pK\n", __func__, p);
snoop(&dev->dev, "%s: DISCARDURB %px\n", __func__, p);
ret = proc_unlinkurb(ps, p);
break;