div64: Correct inline documentation for `do_div'

Correct inline documentation for `do_div', which is a function-like
macro the `n' parameter of which has the semantics of a C++ reference:
it is both read and written in the context of the caller without an
explicit dereference such as with a pointer.

In the C programming language it has no equivalent for proper functions,
in terms of which the documentation expresses the semantics of `do_div',
but substituting a pointer in documentation is misleading, and using the
C++ notation should at least raise the reader's attention and encourage
to seek explanation even if the C++ semantics is not readily understood.

While at it observe that "semantics" is an uncountable noun, so refer to
it with a singular rather than plural verb.

Signed-off-by: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@orcam.me.uk>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
This commit is contained in:
Maciej W. Rozycki 2021-04-20 04:50:33 +02:00 committed by Thomas Bogendoerfer
parent 5086ea4b0f
commit f287583238

View File

@ -8,12 +8,14 @@
* Optimization for constant divisors on 32-bit machines:
* Copyright (C) 2006-2015 Nicolas Pitre
*
* The semantics of do_div() are:
* The semantics of do_div() is, in C++ notation, observing that the name
* is a function-like macro and the n parameter has the semantics of a C++
* reference:
*
* uint32_t do_div(uint64_t *n, uint32_t base)
* uint32_t do_div(uint64_t &n, uint32_t base)
* {
* uint32_t remainder = *n % base;
* *n = *n / base;
* uint32_t remainder = n % base;
* n = n / base;
* return remainder;
* }
*