mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-24 21:21:41 +00:00
bcachefs: Assert that we don't lock nodes when !trans->locked
We rely on the trans->locked to know if a trans has nodes locked for assertions about deadlocks; there can't be more than one trans in the same process that is locked. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
This commit is contained in:
parent
a8cdf0ff46
commit
f1625637b8
@ -218,14 +218,12 @@ static inline int __btree_node_lock_nopath(struct btree_trans *trans,
|
||||
bool lock_may_not_fail,
|
||||
unsigned long ip)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
|
||||
trans->lock_may_not_fail = lock_may_not_fail;
|
||||
trans->lock_must_abort = false;
|
||||
trans->locking = b;
|
||||
|
||||
ret = six_lock_ip_waiter(&b->lock, type, &trans->locking_wait,
|
||||
bch2_six_check_for_deadlock, trans, ip);
|
||||
int ret = six_lock_ip_waiter(&b->lock, type, &trans->locking_wait,
|
||||
bch2_six_check_for_deadlock, trans, ip);
|
||||
WRITE_ONCE(trans->locking, NULL);
|
||||
WRITE_ONCE(trans->locking_wait.start_time, 0);
|
||||
|
||||
@ -284,6 +282,7 @@ static inline int btree_node_lock(struct btree_trans *trans,
|
||||
int ret = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
EBUG_ON(level >= BTREE_MAX_DEPTH);
|
||||
bch2_trans_verify_not_unlocked(trans);
|
||||
|
||||
if (likely(six_trylock_type(&b->lock, type)) ||
|
||||
btree_node_lock_increment(trans, b, level, (enum btree_node_locked_type) type) ||
|
||||
|
@ -731,6 +731,18 @@ static void btree_update_nodes_written(struct btree_update *as)
|
||||
bch2_fs_fatal_err_on(ret && !bch2_journal_error(&c->journal), c,
|
||||
"%s", bch2_err_str(ret));
|
||||
err:
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Ensure transaction is unlocked before using btree_node_lock_nopath()
|
||||
* (the use of which is always suspect, we need to work on removing this
|
||||
* in the future)
|
||||
*
|
||||
* It should be, but bch2_path_get_unlocked_mut() -> bch2_path_get()
|
||||
* calls bch2_path_upgrade(), before we call path_make_mut(), so we may
|
||||
* rarely end up with a locked path besides the one we have here:
|
||||
*/
|
||||
bch2_trans_unlock(trans);
|
||||
bch2_trans_begin(trans);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We have to be careful because another thread might be getting ready
|
||||
* to free as->b and calling btree_update_reparent() on us - we'll
|
||||
@ -750,18 +762,6 @@ err:
|
||||
* we're in journal error state:
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Ensure transaction is unlocked before using
|
||||
* btree_node_lock_nopath() (the use of which is always suspect,
|
||||
* we need to work on removing this in the future)
|
||||
*
|
||||
* It should be, but bch2_path_get_unlocked_mut() -> bch2_path_get()
|
||||
* calls bch2_path_upgrade(), before we call path_make_mut(), so
|
||||
* we may rarely end up with a locked path besides the one we
|
||||
* have here:
|
||||
*/
|
||||
bch2_trans_unlock(trans);
|
||||
bch2_trans_begin(trans);
|
||||
btree_path_idx_t path_idx = bch2_path_get_unlocked_mut(trans,
|
||||
as->btree_id, b->c.level, b->key.k.p);
|
||||
struct btree_path *path = trans->paths + path_idx;
|
||||
|
@ -159,6 +159,8 @@ static inline int bch2_foreground_maybe_merge(struct btree_trans *trans,
|
||||
unsigned level,
|
||||
unsigned flags)
|
||||
{
|
||||
bch2_trans_verify_not_unlocked(trans);
|
||||
|
||||
return bch2_foreground_maybe_merge_sibling(trans, path, level, flags,
|
||||
btree_prev_sib) ?:
|
||||
bch2_foreground_maybe_merge_sibling(trans, path, level, flags,
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user