mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-28 07:01:32 +00:00
tcp/dccp: warn user for preferred ip_local_port_range
After commit 07f4c90062
("tcp/dccp: try to not exhaust
ip_local_port_range in connect()") it is advised to have an even number
of ports described in /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_local_port_range
This means start/end values should have a different parity.
Let's warn sysadmins of this, so that they can update their settings
if they want to.
Suggested-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
e2baad9e4b
commit
ed2dfd9009
@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ struct sock;
|
|||||||
struct local_ports {
|
struct local_ports {
|
||||||
seqlock_t lock;
|
seqlock_t lock;
|
||||||
int range[2];
|
int range[2];
|
||||||
|
bool warned;
|
||||||
};
|
};
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
struct ping_group_range {
|
struct ping_group_range {
|
||||||
|
@ -45,7 +45,13 @@ static int ip_ping_group_range_max[] = { GID_T_MAX, GID_T_MAX };
|
|||||||
/* Update system visible IP port range */
|
/* Update system visible IP port range */
|
||||||
static void set_local_port_range(struct net *net, int range[2])
|
static void set_local_port_range(struct net *net, int range[2])
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
|
bool same_parity = !((range[0] ^ range[1]) & 1);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
write_seqlock(&net->ipv4.ip_local_ports.lock);
|
write_seqlock(&net->ipv4.ip_local_ports.lock);
|
||||||
|
if (same_parity && !net->ipv4.ip_local_ports.warned) {
|
||||||
|
net->ipv4.ip_local_ports.warned = true;
|
||||||
|
pr_err_ratelimited("ip_local_port_range: prefer different parity for start/end values.\n");
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
net->ipv4.ip_local_ports.range[0] = range[0];
|
net->ipv4.ip_local_ports.range[0] = range[0];
|
||||||
net->ipv4.ip_local_ports.range[1] = range[1];
|
net->ipv4.ip_local_ports.range[1] = range[1];
|
||||||
write_sequnlock(&net->ipv4.ip_local_ports.lock);
|
write_sequnlock(&net->ipv4.ip_local_ports.lock);
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user